Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jürgen Schrodër
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as per consensus. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jürgen Schrodër (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability. Google, etc. reveal nothing substantive. (Though you should be careful to not confuse this person with "Jürgen Schröder." --MZMcBride (talk) 18:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Theleftorium 18:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried to check the source „who is who“ from 1981/82 in Google books and couldn't find the name in any spelling (schröder, schroder, schroeder, Schrodër). In connection with „stevedoring“ (excluding Wikipedia) there is absolutely nothing. It's not even clear how the person is spelled correctly. I'm not a very active contributor here, so I won't vote, but I don't think he is notable enough for Wikipedia. --elya (talk) 19:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unable to find anything that asserts notability for this individual. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, perhaps a hoax — German doesn't use "ë". Nyttend (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the references provided are a "personal interview" (OR?), and Who's Who, a work whose entries are generally written by their subjects. That's assuming that the claim is true in the first place, which it may not be. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 02:31, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.