Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Portillo (Javi)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Javier Portillo (Javi)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of previously speedied article. Besides the concerns over COI that I have (I think this is an autobiography), a quick google search shows that the article is about a high school athlete who isn't notable. There aren't any references included. I have Afd's this to prompt discussion so that I don't go on a CSD crusade. Deadly∀ssassin 03:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find any significant coverage to establish notability of this High School student. ~~ GB fan ~~ 06:58, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 12:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above - should probably have been "speedied". Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Article clearly fails all relevant notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, he fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 20:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails all relevant notability guidelines. Argyle 4 Life^talk 15:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.