Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquin Domagoso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 04:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquin Domagoso

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a son of a mayor doesn't make him automatically notable. He just started his career and has no significant roles in any films or TV series. Htanaungg (talk) 03:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Htanaungg (talk) 03:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The subject is notable enough, he hast been cast in many television shows, there are a number of independent sources, and that makes him notable enough. —It'sCtrlwiki • talk • 01:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is not because he is the mayor's son that it deserves to be deleted. He is better known because he is the son of a former actor and is now the mayor. many show and series are included and all sources included in the article are popular reliable and well -known online news websites and licensed from the Philippines. — 7starunited (talk • page) 03:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: In depth reliable secondary sources exists independent of the subject. Definitely pass WP:GNG WP:SIGCOV - Wakowako (talk) 06:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article has reference/s from GMA Network, Philippine Entertainment Portal, Philippine Daily Inquirer and The Manila Times which are all reliable sources. The article needs expanding though.TheHotwiki (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:ENT per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 00:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject is notable not only because of his father. Also, several reliable sources exist. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 02:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ctrlwiki and SBKSPP. Drags4U (talk) 09:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Based on what I can see he meets notability. Chelokabob (talk) 09:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.