Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Martell (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kayla Martell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At first glance it looks like we have a lot of sources on Martell. However these all add up to just saying "look, a women who is bald was a contestant in Miss America". This can be covered in the entry on her in the Miss Delaware page in the notes, and actually is. There is no justification for having a stand alone article. If the coverage had extended beyond when she was a Miss America contestant and showed sustained notability as an advocate for these causes, we could justify this article, but it does not, so we cannot. The previously deletion discussion focused on the fact that the coverage existed without really considering if it was sustained or not. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, and chastise nominator for re-nomming this: JPL nominated this article in August. The discussion was closed in September as kept-kept (not no-consensus-kept, kept-kept). Nearly everybody there agreed Martell passed GNG. She still passes GNG; and articles shouldn't be renominated this quickly unless either a) the close was no-consensus, or b) new information came to light. p b p 16:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous AfDs DarjeelingTea (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Purplebackpack89 and the result of the previous AfD, which closed as "Keep" just three months ago. Ejgreen77 (talk) 20:27, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the previous AFD --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per PurpleBackPack. †dismas†|^(talk) 01:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous AfD. Passes WP:GNG. CBS527^Talk 02:26, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:BASIC and not a WP:BLP1E situation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:GNG, WP:BLP1E - Meets WP:GNG, and is not a single event subject, as shown by the sources provided by user GRuban in the last nomination. Johnpacklambert please do not nominate again unless there is new information. -- Taketa (talk) 09:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.