Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Fisher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Fisher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable model. I am having a difficult time in looking for anything to support this BLP's notability, aside WP:COI edits and all its sources are all personal sites.

Also as she only had one decent role, every other appearances are minor one-episode roles, therefore she fails to meet WP: ENT. Donnie Park (talk) 09:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Impressed by the number of people that have edited that article, including one purporting to be the subject. Covered by imdb including photos (why, Google Images?) - maybe that's a better place for it. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 11:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there are the WP:SPA WP:COI edits that makes it appear that it was edited by more than one person. Examples (check the user contribution and you will realise that its they have everything in common) ... User:98.149.133.227, User:71.177.119.15, User:Kimberlyfisher, ~~User:76.29.216.150~~, User:75.84.249.118, User:70.228.160.203, ~~User:76.226.114.83~~, User:Kimberlyfisher1, User:98.18.34.179, User:70.59.28.50, User:166.214.108.23, User:65.130.70.108. You can tell easily, other than the SPA edit the removal of her DoB (some people like to think they re younger then they are). Donnie Park (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't account for nearly all of the edits. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 00:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not appear to satisfy WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 03:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unclear why she is notable, all roads of sourcing return to Rome VASterling (talk) 14:32, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable. I'm sorry, Kimberly. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 08:22, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.