Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liliana Gil
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jclemens (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Liliana Gil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. There are some Google News results but they appear to be promotional press release or mentions of Gil which do not demonstrate sufficiently against Wikipedia:Notability (people). In particular the awards mentioned are corporate promotional and not recognized by the general public apart from a National Latino Award 2008 (on my count there were 18 recipients of these awards) but I do not believe that that award alone can demonstrate notability here. The article itself is a CV and requires major rewrite but as there is no reason to think independent sources (i.e. not based on J&J press releases) will demonstrate notability, deletion is the better action. The article has been marked for notability and clean-up for over 18 months with no sign of improvement. Ash (talk) 22:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 22:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 22:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete : Did anyone find sources? It looks like creators are some kind of promotors ( guessing from alias and article style) and no one has bothered to find sources of substance. But, if she helps get Tysabri away from Biogen I will recuse myself again :) Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.