Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liu-lig Gong Fang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 05:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liu-lig Gong Fang

Notability is lacked here. Ohmpandya (Talk) 21:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - non-notable advertisement of sorts, or so it seems. -FrankTobia (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - with cab's recent edits, notability has been established and the article is much more neutral and useful. Kudos to cab for being particularly awesome. -FrankTobia (talk) 18:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep moved to correct name "Liuli Gongfang" (it can also be spaced as "Liu Li Gong Fang" or "Liuligongfang") and rewritten with sources. Notable company; its founders are described as the originators of contemporary Chinese glass art. cab (talk) 02:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meets WP:N. Noroton (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, I meant to explicitly say Keep because it meets WP:N. Noroton (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in light of recent edits, this now meets WP:N standards. RFerreira (talk) 21:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.