Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masashi Tsuboyama
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Masashi Tsuboyama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Golden Sugarplum (talk) 00:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Added Japanese name above; searching for that doesn't seem to reveal any non-trivial WP:RS coverage. There seems to have been an interview with him in Dengeki Playstation magazine, unfortunately it's not available online. cab (call) 06:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Fails general notability criteria: no independent reliable sources with significant coverage. Article is a verbose version of the MobyGames credits, and impossible to expand without biographical information. There was an interview in Dengeki, but it was centered on the cancelled Silent Hill 5 rather than on Tsuboyama himself. Prime Blue (talk) 11:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.