Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Grapes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nate Grapes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NM, non-notable person that asserts no notability and has no substantial third-party coverage DiverseMentality(Boo!) 21:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What do you not like about the article. He is a relevant person, he is known around the Bay Area. There is plenty of sources to back up all the statements in the article. I have put links on there that back up these statements. I do not understand why it is proposed for deletion.
Sources: http://www.nbc11.com/newsarchive/16279733/detail.html http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=236320115
Nate Grapes and Nathaniel Curtis Freeman are the same person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnmhorn (talk • contribs) 21:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.
--Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Please read WP:RS. MySpace and YouTube are not reliable sources, as well as the other sources you've listed. DiverseMentality(Boo!) 03:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. Even if reliable sources were found for the claims, local notability does not equate with wikipedia-notability.Yobmod (talk) 10:46, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i think NBC is. He is very well known.Why would you delete the whole article when there are news articles to prove the statements in the article. I have many many articles that would back the fact that he is a murderer but only CD covers and others for his rapping. I have his music and things along those lines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.150.195.42 (talk) 06:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 19:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 20:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - falls short of the WP:MUSIC notability bar. His being charged with a murder that has received only local mention doesn't make up the difference. The article itself makes only a weak assertion of notability - this must be changed if the article is to survive. B.Wind (talk) 03:09, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
can you guys help me find more sources then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.150.195.156 (talk) 19:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- question Where is the article link? How are people checking the sources without it? I'm ocnfused!Yobmod (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.