Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Mehta (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Neeraj Mehta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another vanity article with no encyclopedic value. Fails WP:ENT, WP:SPORTSPERSON RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete lots of promotionalism but not substance.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete same content, seems like branding PangolinPedia 07:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; the WP:REFBOMBing fails to hide the lack of notability Spiderone 23:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.