Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pablo Khali

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G11. (non-admin closure) —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Khali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Avoids WP:A7 due to the claims of significant awards and charting in a notable chart. I don't think this passes WP:NMUSICIAN or WP:GNG; the Billboard and 2015 Nigeria Entertainment Awards claims look like hoaxes. I could not find a source to verify them. Most of the sources don't mention Khali at all. Nothing of note coming up for "Ojako Peter Godfrey" or "Ojako Sunday Peter". Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
9 out of the 14 refs are not even about Khali. They are about Lil Kesh, Wiz Khalifa, Boy Pablo and Pablo Escobar! We also need to pay diligence to the fact that this is an autobiography and the creator's activity strongly suggests that they are here for the sole purpose of promoting themselves and are bordering on WP:NOTHERE. I do believe that we need to do what we can to encourage newbies to stay and feel welcome but I do not believe that we should be encouraging them to write autobiographies or to promote themselves in any other way. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.