Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangeban

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Verifiable inhabited localities at any level are generally considered notable.  Sandstein  12:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Rangeban

Rangeban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability questionable and not established. No sources. Eeekster (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

• Please follow WP:BEFORE before marking an article as a candidate for deletion. The request for deletion was put in only a few hours after the article was created. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 00:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. Evidence of notability in contemporary accounts of detention and torture of refugees returning to the area associated with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.