Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relato K (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. POV, UNDUE, and OR are all valid reasons to rewrite an article from scratch, but not to delete it, assuming the topic meets our notability guidelines. The Delete !votes did not successfully refute the claim that sources established notability for the topic. As for SYNTH, there was some support to the view that the various elements of the article were arbitrarily slapped together without sourcing suggesting such a connection. However, no claim was made that none of the elements of Relato K is supported by the sources, leaving the door open to a rewrite. Editors are encouraged to stubify the page and work on an NPOV, non-OR, non-SYNTH version, or discuss a potential merge target on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 14:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Relato K (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
POV forking and WP:UNDUE; the article is based on the opinions of far-right politicians such as Axel Kaiser. Also WP:OR?? JPerez90 (talk) 01:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Argentina. JPerez90 (talk) 01:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Please define what do you mean when you say "far-right". Do you mean that he's right-wing, but more enthusiastic than others? How would that make him an unreliable source? Or do you mean that he's racist, white-supremacist, or something similar? That would be something else, right, but I would like to see a specific reference of that, not just a generic label that seems to be applied at random. Cambalachero (talk) 03:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)- Far right, the opposite of far left. Oaktree b (talk) 13:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Which, of course, means nothing. The article of Kaiser now has a reference of a book that calls him far-right, but again, only that, a label, without any specific racism, supremacism, or wrongdoing attributed to him. Calling someone "Far-right" seems to be becoming like Fascist (insult) nowadays. In fact, if we check that source, it says that Kaiser is far-right... in the middle of a grand conspiracy theory about how the far-right (the only kind of right-wing politics there seem to be) is out there to conquer the word, destroy the left, abolish democracy, and enslave the helpless working class. I have my doubts that can be considered a reliable source to begin with. Cambalachero (talk) 19:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- It really doesn't matter how you define it, the article isn't notable regardless. Sourcing is a mess and is mostly SYNTH. Oaktree b (talk) 20:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Which, of course, means nothing. The article of Kaiser now has a reference of a book that calls him far-right, but again, only that, a label, without any specific racism, supremacism, or wrongdoing attributed to him. Calling someone "Far-right" seems to be becoming like Fascist (insult) nowadays. In fact, if we check that source, it says that Kaiser is far-right... in the middle of a grand conspiracy theory about how the far-right (the only kind of right-wing politics there seem to be) is out there to conquer the word, destroy the left, abolish democracy, and enslave the helpless working class. I have my doubts that can be considered a reliable source to begin with. Cambalachero (talk) 19:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This appears to be SYNTH, I don't see the sources saying these various bullet points are related. Article draws conclusions that don't seem to be there. Oaktree b (talk) 13:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The article should make more clear that the "relato K" concept has been used in several books and hundreds of articles in the press. I'm working on it. It has been used even in the context of the Spanish-language Wikipedia by an Argentine historian (in relation to hundreds of articles on Argentine history). I quote this Argentine historian and provide the citation:
"En 2014 dirigí una Enciclopedia Histórica Argentina que editó Clarín. Revisé varios cientos de entradas de Wikipedia referidas a la historia argentina, desde los casi ignotos guerreros de la independencia hasta conocidos personajes de la historia más reciente. Son contados los casos en que no me topara con una intrusión o manipulación con el clásico sabor del relato K."[1]
AwerDiWeGo (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- I tried a translation: "In 2014 I was in charge of an Argentine History Encyclopedia, published by Clarín. I reviewed hundreds of articles in Wikipedia related to Argentine history, from little-known fighters for independence to well-known personalities of more recent history. There were few cases in which I did not find an intrusion or manipulation with the classic taste of the K narrative (relato K)." AwerDiWeGo (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural keep per WP:WRONGFORUM. The article doesn't meet any of the criteria listed at WP:DEL-REASON as notability is not an issue here. This is a WP:CONTENTDISPUTE/WP:POV issue that should be solved through normal editing and through discussion on the article's talk page using the WP:CONSENSUS process. Any WP:SYNTH issues can also be addressed there.4meter4 (talk) 00:51, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- ^ Romero, Luis Alberto (2021-03-25). "Wikipedia: el toque del Rey Midas". Clarín (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-09-21.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete WP:SYNTH; WP:OR. The procedural keep argument is hard to understand. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:28, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per arguments of 4meter4. Note that so-called "far-right" sources and opinions are not forbidden in Wikipedia if they presented in an appropiate and balanced manner. Lulicoxi (talk) 15:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep – Per above. Svartner (talk) 13:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.