Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Noir Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Noir Movement

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails to meet notability guidelines, particularly WP:BAND "1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable." Both the sources given are self published. A further search on google book produces no useful works and a google search just indicates a presence on myspace, facebook and blogs: all considered not to be non-trivial reliable sources. The article looks like self-promotion. Although tagged for notability since June, no further sources to indicate notability have been forthcoming.--SabreBD (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
After Ron's re-listing, there have been no comments. Hence relisting for the second time. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 10:48, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks notability shown through significant coverage in reliable sources, independent of the subject. Lack of notability at this time. Cindamuse (talk) 11:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.