Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruchoma Shain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ruchoma Shain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable in any particular field or categorization. Strongly suspect COI. Quis separabit? 03:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The editor's suspected COI, which I also suspect, is not a reason to delete the article. Especially in a case where the article is written neutrally, without peacock terms or fluff, like in this case. Debresser (talk) 11:32, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There is some coverage in independent, reliable sources. She has published some books. Neither are too notable, but IMHO do establish a minimum of notability. Debresser (talk) 11:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see no reason for considering deletion, let alone doing it. I fail to see where the COI would be. Her notability as a rebetzin and as a scholar is quite clear, as is her importance within Orthodox Jewry. Just to quell any suspicions, I am not a Jew myself, but a firm believer in freedom of worship, which relies on knowledge of each other's belief systems.Bmcln1 (talk) 14:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. She is best known for the biography of her father, and there is very little notable about her personally. Merge any relevant content into the YY Herman article. JFW | T@lk 21:16, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have added more sources showing her influence on other writers, as well as verification of her first book being an all-time bestseller for Feldheim Publishers. Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Bmcln1 and Yoninah above. -- -- -- 04:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not extremely notable, but notable enough. I don't think that deleting it would improve the encyclopedia. Zero^talk 03:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the ample reliable and verifiable sources about the subject establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 01:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.