Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scalpel (Transformers)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Scalpel (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional character sourced only to primary sources and thus fails WP:GNG. A merge to a minor characters list is usually appropriate here but none appears to exist. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Black Kite (t) (c) 23:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Major character in a recent notable film. Mathewignash (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- the only decent source cited doesn't actually contain the information it's claimed to. J Milburn (talk) 09:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - For the lack of sources, and that this is not really that important a character. I also oppose redirecting, since this is a minor character. NotARealWord (talk) 12:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of SIGNIFCANT third person info. Dwanyewest (talk) 20:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No third party sources address this topic directly and in detail so that we can WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:14, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. Not enough content for a stand-alone article. —Farix (t | c) 22:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete too obscure to have received the requisite substantial coverage in reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:54, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.