Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Task Force Arrowhead

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Task Force Arrowhead

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources. The unit is also not acknowledged by the command and nothing substantial has been written on it besides the initial announcement and some 'fancruft' on forums and the like. CharlieEchoTango (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not verifiable, and notability should not be predicted per WP:CRYSTAL. The reference on the website is a deadlink, but I recovered it here. It makes no mention of the above task force. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 00:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It made news a while back (see my message on the talk page in 2010), but it appears to have gone completely under the radar now. Your link is one of the very few mentions of it. I agree with you, it's simply not verifiable. CharlieEchoTango (talk) 05:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per IJethroBot. This task force may become operational within a year, and at that time there are bound to be more sources on it, and an article can be created at that time. --Noleander (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per I, Jethrobot. I also tried to find sources but all I got was people wondering what this taskforce was. --DeVerm (talk) 18:18, 24 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.