Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thurtene Carnival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Synergy 00:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thurtene Carnival

No reliable sources found. {{Db-bio}} removed as carnivals are not people. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The one secondary source seemed reliable enough. It was a local alternative newspaper. The carnival's own website was also cited. Northwestgnome (talk) 03:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So one secondary source and a primary source. Do you really think that's enough? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have written an article with just two sources. However, the information in the article seems to be true. I don't see any reason to delete the article. Someone might want to look up information on the carnival. Northwestgnome (talk) 03:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which is exactly what I did. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters •

^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 04:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More information can be found here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Kpa3pSOOUc

Keep I have added more secondary sources about the carnival —Preceding unsigned comment added by DMYK (talk • contribs) 23:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it is a sui genersis, since it is the largest student run carnival.CdC—Chuleta de Chancho (talk) 03:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Thurtene Honorary, which isn't exactly overflowing. Stifle (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles are needed as they are somewhat separate entities. Although nothing has been written on the topic yet, The Honorary has many aspects which are not the carnival, and vise versa

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: plenty of significant coverage referenced in the current article, plenty more on Google News. Oppose merge as there is more than enough in the reference for a decent-length non-stub article. the skomorokh 14:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's stubby but that's not a reason to delete. Notability is asserted and references seem to support what is written so far. -- Banjeboi 19:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.