Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Is… Cliff Clavin?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was What is withdrawn? Clearly I pulled a Clavin here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What Is… Cliff Clavin?

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only sources are the user-submitted J-Archive.com and TV.com and an unreliable trivia site. The fact that Jeopardy! has made countless references to this is immaterial if said references can't be reliably sourced. A thorough search on Gnews and Gbooks turned up no reliable secondary sources whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Ignore All Rules for the fanboys. People come to Wikipedia for this stuff, true fact. Carrite (talk) 03:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
tentative keep the intro suggests it is a distinctive enough episode to warrant a separate page. There are other sources not available on the web, but I am not a Cheers! fan. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wikipedia:Inherent notability. Where else can we find stupid stuff like this except Wikipedia. Long live trivial yet notable television episodes. EnabledDanger (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Simple searches on GNews and Gbooks turns up numerous reliable secondary sources including:

The nomination is therefore blatantly counterfactual. Colonel Warden (talk) 21:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where the flying hell was all that when I googled? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.