Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilson Combat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn - Keep. Evil saltine (talk) 21:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wilson Combat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources. Evil saltine (talk) 20:29, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete promotional, created with COI, doesn't pass GNG Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:52, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, the references recently added by User:AliveFreeHappy may make it notable now. The article has been around for significantly longer than the recent COI edits. Evil saltine (talk) 20:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I was a bit careless. Six gun justice, and all that. I saw the username, googled it, and got a wall of trade mags, and made a snap judgement. Refs look reasonable. I'm all fer lettin'er stand, cowboys. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the COI user was making life miserable but they're blocked and we'll get the article in good shape. Numerous sources exist, as you can see. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 21:12, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.