Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston E. Willis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Winston E. Willis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article was originally to be speedy A7, though it was declined and it considered as non-notable person. It doesn't meet WP:N and WP:BIO. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 10:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- keep - there are claims of notability, supported* by refs. Laudak (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- preliminary comment the two refs I have checked so far don't say anything about Willis. Rich Farmbrough, 19:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Ok looks like the section that was called "Press coverage" had some worthwhile references, though sadly not on-line links. However there are major problems with the article as she is wrote, mostly POV, tone and lack of cites, but also BLP against Willis' opponents. Nonetheless I !vote keep. Rich Farmbrough, 19:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.