Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xelzeta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW deletion ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xelzeta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, no real sources, potentially just advertising and COI Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 15:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:VG/S custom Google search returns 0 sources. Delete. --Izno (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Purely promotional. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 19:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedily delete per WP:SOAPBOX and WP:Notability. ~~Gamingforfun~~³⁶⁵ (talk) 21:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - would be eligible for A7 speedy deletion as there is no sign of significance, much less notability per WP:CORP. --bonadea contributions talk 19:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.