Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yallwire (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yallwire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the second go-around for deletion of this article. The previous time, the AFD closed as no consensus with a rather severe lack of participation. The original reasons for deletion still stand.

The article is about a web site with no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. The article provides no independent sources. All references in the article are to their own web site. I've searched again and still find only press releases. Whpq (talk) 13:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing but press releases found in Gnews, nothing of reliability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 15:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not established using third party reputable sources. Press releases and other self-generated sources not good enough to keep. --Quartermaster (talk) 19:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.