Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerro Panizos/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by FrB.TG via FACBot (talk) 24 October 2024 [1].

Cerro Panizos

Nominator(s): Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second time's hopefully the charm. This volcano is in a remote area of northwestern Argentina and southeastern Bolivia, it bears no traces of recent activity but it is an important member of a regional volcano group. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Beards

I am happy to support with regard to the prose, and the article seems comprehensive. I think the actions suggested in the previous nomination and a recent copyedit have contrinuted much in bringing this contribution to FA level. Graham Beards (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also support per my review in the previous FAC. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I did what was essentially a pre-FAC review on the article talk page and have nothing to add to those comments. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SC

Comments to come. - SchroCat (talk) 03:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up that I will be away for a few days. JoJo Eumerus mobile (main talk) 05:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JoJo, Very little from me, just a few of very minor points:

"two calderas (a depression...": As 'calderas' is plural, it may be a bit smoother to say '(depressions...'
"includes Cerro Panizo:[36] it consists of two parts: a volcanic arc" I'm never a fan of two colons in one sentence – maybe swap the first for a full stop?
"northeast~southwest": did you mean to have a tilde there?
"antimony, copper, and uranium": you don't use serial commas elsewhere

I hope these help. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SchroCat: Done. In case you are interested in any pre-nomination review, Socompa is the next article on my FAC block. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to now Support on prose. I'll add Socompa to the list and try and pop along there shortly. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 07:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image review - pass

Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, happy to do the image review. The article contains the following images:

Two are public domain, the other is CC BY-SA 3.0. The image "LandsatLook_Viewer_Cerro_Panizos_ignimbrite_shield.png" has an alt text and a caption, the other two images are part of the map preview of the infobox mountain template. All images are relevant to the article and placed appropriately. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support from Tim riley

I'm completely ignorant on this subject, but after a careful and enjoyable perusal of the article I'm confident enough to sign up to support. The substantive content is well and widely sourced, and my only quibble on the prose is that we have a rash of "numerous"es: some more precise numbers or at least a few synonyms for "numerous" would be nice. Tim riley talk 22:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Synonymized several. @SchroCat: now I am back and available. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

I'll do the source review soon. Hog Farm _Talk 20:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources all appear to be high-quality RS. Various searching for unused sources gives me confidence that this article is based on a representative survey of the underlying literature. Reference formatting looks fine. I'm not particularly capable of assessing the non-English sources but the usage appears to be appropriate. Spot-checked the following items:

The sole citation to Breitkreuz et al looks fine
Deroin et al. p. S42 for "The last eruptions took place 271,000 and 85,000 years ago at Uturuncu and the Cerro Chascon-Runtu Jarita complex, respectively" is okay
Deroin et al. p. S41 for "The only vegetation consists of cushion plants, grasses and shrubs. Wetter areas feature wetlands (such as bofedales), and there are salt flats." is okay provided that there's a source somewhere establishing that the general Puna conditions are representative at Cerro Panizos

Deroin is discussing the Sur Lípez region of Bolivia, and (the Bolivian portion of) Cerro Panizos is in Sur Lípez. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is fine based on the prior reputation of the nominator; this can be considered a pass of the source review. Hog Farm _Talk 02:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. FrB.TG (talk) 10:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.