Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:SPACEFLIGHT)


Main page   Discussion   Members   Assessment   Open tasks
Popular pages   Recognized content     Awards   Portal


GSST

[edit]

I have created the article Galileo Solar Space Telescope, and I'd like to invite everyone to contribute to it! I believe that the next step would be to include the technical material from the scientific articles (if someone here has deep knowledge to write it in layman terms), until the team behind the project receives the green lit to build the orbiter. Erick Soares3 (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ladakh Human Analogue Mission

[edit]

I created article Ladakh Human Analogue Mission I request everyone to review and contribute to it.Thanks. Edasf (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content seems to be almost directly copied from the sources.
For example:
From the "Times of India": "The proposed research station would serve multiple purposes: Testing platform for space technologies, advancing Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), engineering integration, human studies, and crew training for geological and astrobiological research"
From the article: "The projected research station would be used for geological and astrobiological research, human studies, crew training, advancing Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), testing space technologies, and engineering integration"
"Testing platform for space technologies" becomes "testing space technologies"
"advancing Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)" remains the same, as does "engineering integration" and "human studies"
"crew training for geological and astrobiological research" is only divided into different sections. Redacted II (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And, to be frank, it at times seems to be written without any regard for basic grammar rules: "Mission aims to make suitable interplanetary conditions for astronaut training." It also is promotional: "With an emphasis on sustainability (buzzword), resource efficiency (buzzword), and adaptability (buzzword) to challenging space conditions, AAKA Space Studio will explore innovative (in my opinion, nearly every article that uses this word without providing further details on what makes it innovative is promotional) habitat designs."
It's a good start, but it needs lots of copyedits. Titan(moon)003 (talk) 16:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Move Discussion

[edit]

The Redirect List of Super Heavies is being discussed here.

(The redirect is currently slated to eventually become a full article) Redacted II (talk) 15:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UAP studies timeline

[edit]

If you think modern day UAP studies that went as far back as the middle of the 20th century (was then called ufology) is worth an independent timeline article, please go and support the Timeline of Ufology from being deleted and help extend and enrich its content. VaudevillianScientist (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attitude determination and control

[edit]

Please see Talk:Spacecraft_attitude_control#Split_Attitude_determination. fgnievinski (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge request - Timeline of STS-121

[edit]

I've added a merger suggestion for Timeline of STS-121 into the main article (STS-121) since it seems redundant to me, especially given that there doesn't seem to be a separate page for the timeline for any other Space Shuttle mission. However since the timeline is quite long I haven't gone ahead with the merger myself & wanted to raise a discussion first. Slovborg (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Attitude (psychology)#Requested move 23 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on date format

[edit]

Hi! I have recently opened up a discussion on the date format of the article for Kalpana Chawla. You can find it on the Talk page. Would like to see people's perspectives on it. Thank you! Spookyaki (talk) 22:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]