SPHERICAL-SURFACE

The reference polnt is not essential for the geometric definition of axis spherical surface but it is essential for the unique parameterisation. [Pg.81]

The reference point should lie approximately on the plane through the centre normal to axis. [Pg.81]

For a sphere, the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation yields the polymer-sphere interaction energy (per polymer length) (see Sect. 6.2.1) [Pg.10]

Because the Hulthen potential is spherically symmetric, the Green function can be expanded in terms of radial eigenfunctions and the spherical [Pg.11]

In the limit of a small curvature, i.e., a oo, the curvamre term 1/r can be neglected and the potentials (15) and (16) assume the form of the potential (8). Hence, the equation of a polyelectrolyte in front of a planar surface (9) is recovered. [Pg.11]

To solve the differential equation with the Hulthen potential, we introduce the new variable x(.r) via [Pg.11]

The numerical solution of (21) is presented in Fig. 4. Polyelectrolyte adsorption takes place for p p. The p curve monotonically decrease with increasing ku. For small Ka, it is well approximated by p k 2 4Ka. This dependence is consistent with the necessary condition for the existence of zeros for F, namely, [Pg.12]

The radiation and temperature dependent mechanical properties of viscoelastic materials (modulus and loss) are of great interest throughout the plastics, polymer, and rubber from initial design to routine production. There are a number of laboratory research instruments are available to determine these properties. All these hardness tests conducted on polymeric materials involve the penetration of the sample under consideration by loaded spheres or other geometric shapes [1]. Most of these tests are to some extent arbitrary because the penetration of an indenter into viscoelastic material increases with time. For example, standard durometer test (the "Shore A") is widely used to measure the static "hardness" or resistance to indentation. However, it does not measure basic material properties, and its results depend on the specimen geometry (it is difficult to make available the identity of the initial position of the devices on cylinder or spherical surfaces while measuring) and test conditions, and some arbitrary time must be selected to compare different materials. [Pg.239]

For the case where the curvature is small compared to the thickness of the surface region, d(c - C2) = 0 (this will be exactly true for a plane or for a spherical surface), and Eq. III-28 reduces to... [Pg.59]

As the attenuation of the incident beam per unit path through the solution, the turbidity is larger than the Rayleigh ratio by the factor Ibrr/S, since T is obtained by integrating Rg over a spherical surface. Thus, if Eq. (10.54) is written in terms of Rg rather than r, the proportionality constant H must also be decreased by l6n/3, in which case the constant is represented by the symbol K ... [Pg.687]

The principle of the Brinell hardness test is that the spherical surface area of a recovered indentation made with a standard hardened steel ball under specific load is direcdy related to the property called hardness. In the following, HBN = Brinell hardness number, P = load in kgf,... [Pg.464]

Dome-roof tanks are similar to umbrella-roof tanks except that the dome more neatly approximates a spherical surface than the segmented sections of an umbrella roof... [Pg.313]

Figure 5 shows conduction heat transfer as a function of the projected radius of a 6-mm diameter sphere. Assuming an accommodation coefficient of 0.8, h 0) = 3370 W/(m -K) the average coefficient for the entire sphere is 72 W/(m -K). This variation in heat transfer over the spherical surface causes extreme non-uniformities in local vaporization rates and if contact time is too long, wet spherical surface near the contact point dries. The temperature profile penetrates the sphere and it becomes a continuum to which Fourier s law of nonsteady-state conduction appfies. [Pg.242]

Close examination of these areas under a low-power microscope revealed smoothly rippled, spherical surfaces in the weld region and a chevron pattern that pointed back to the weld in the plate. Cross sections cut through the weld revealed substantial subsurface porosity and regions where oxidized surfaces prevented metallurgical bonding of the weld (Fig. [Pg.350]

The resistance between fluids separated by two coaxial spherical surfaces is... [Pg.108]

The rigidity of the y axis prevents the development of spherical surfaces for all but very small displacements. Morton suggests that the limit is reached when the displacement is equal to the metal thickness. This condition was satisfied in the high-temperature studies of Appleby and Tylecote and spherical doming of the disc specimen occurred. When the oxide is not very thin compared with the metal both the moduli for oxide and metal must be considered. Stringer" , in his excellent review of stress generation and relief in oxide layers, quotes a corrected formula, originally due to Brenner and Senderoff ... [Pg.289]

Brickstock, A., and Pople, J. A., Phil. Mag. 44, 705, The spatial correlation of electrons in atoms and molecules. IV. The correlation of electrons on a spherical surface." Two examples—four electrons of the same spin and eight paired electrons—have been studied to compare the effects of the exclusion principle and the interelectronic repulsion. [Pg.334]

The first set of screening constants was obtained from the discussion of the motion of an electron in the field of the nucleus and its surrounding electron shells, idealized as electrical charges uniformly distributed over spherical surfaces of suitably chosen radii. This idealization of electron shells was first used by Schrodinger3), and later by Heisenberg4) and Unsold5), who pointed out that it is justified to a considerable extent by the quantum mechanics. The radius of a shell of electrons with principal quantum number nt is taken as... [Pg.712]

The idea to produce a converging objective from a reflecting, concave surface, instead of a refractive lens, was recognised by Galileo himself, and tried by Zucchi in 1616 (Fig. 4). Such arrangement, however, does not deliver acceptable image quality as a spherical surface used off-axis produces strong aberrations, and Zucchi s attempt was doomed for reasons he could not know. [Pg.23]

For a spherical surface such as a lens or mirror, we are able to determine the angle of refraction, or reflection from the ray height at that surface. The angle the surface normal makes relative to the ray as a function of height h above the optical axis is given by... [Pg.39]

This system consists of a symmetrical pair of lens elements connected by a small volume of liquid. Each lens consists of a single spherical interface between the liquid and a lens rod. The lens element is formed by polishing a small concave spherical surface in the end of a sapphire rod. At the opposite end of the rod, a thin film piezoelectric transducer is centered on the axis of the lens surface. [Pg.28]

It is worth noticing that the "turbulent burning rates" reported in Figure 7.1.2 have been defined similarly but not exactly as the "turbulent flame speed" mentioned in Section 7.1.2. The mixture has been ignited at the center of the bomb and the dependence of the pressure on time has been recorded. This has enabled to determine the derivative of the burned mixture volume. This derivative is ascribed to a spherical surface whose volume is simply equal to the volume of fully burned products, thus leading to an estimate of the turbulent combustion rate. [Pg.142]

These two elements are treated as two capacitors in parallel. The capacity of a sphere relative to the sample can be calculated exactly by the method of images. Even then, however, a complicated expression is obtained that must be calculated numerically. Fortunately, when the tip-surface distance is sufficiently smaller than the tip radius, an approximate expression for the capacitance can be found by integrating the contributions of flat infinitesimal rings of spherical surface centered at the apex [36], The result is ... [Pg.249]

In recent years, much attention has been paid to the use of controlled/ living polymerizations from flat and spherical surfaces [121,122],because this allows better control over the MW and MWD of the target polymer. By using these techniques, a high grafting density and a controlled film thickness can be obtained, as such brushes consist of end-grafted, strictly linear chains of the same length and the chains are forced to stretch away from the flat surface. Several research... [Pg.27]

This prompted us [111 to try to represent CeoMu by clusters of carbon atoms, CisHuMu and C30H12MU, the external atoms being constrained to lie on a part of a spherical surface with the same radius as Ceo- The results were very similar to the CeoMu calculations with partial geometry optimisation to suggest that this adduct did not depend on the full structure but corresponded to a locdised defect , both structurally and electronically. [Pg.451]

Here Lqp is the distance between points q and p. Note that G q, p) is called a Green s function. There are an infinite number of such functions and all of them have a singularity at the observation point p. Inasmuch as the second Green s formula has been derived assuming that singularities of the functions U and G are absent within volume V, we cannot directly use this function G in Equation (1.99). To avoid this obstacle, let us surround the point by a small spherical surface S and apply Equation (1.99) to the volume enclosed by surfaces S and S, as is shown in Fig. 1.9. Further we will be mainly interested by only cases, when masses are absent inside the volume V, that is. [Pg.35]

Our task is to derive an explicit expression for the potential U proceeding from this equation. This means that we have to take the function U out of this integral. With this purpose in mind consider the limiting value of the second integral, when the radius of the spherical surface r tends to zero. Since both the potential and its derivatives are continuous functions inside the volume, we have... [Pg.35]

Now we will establish a relationship between the potential U(p) at any point p of the volume V and its values on the spherical surface, surrounding all masses. Fig. 1.11. The reason why we consider this problem is very simple it plays the fundamental role in Stokes s theorem, which allows one to determine the elevation of the geoid with respect to the reference ellipsoid. [Pg.40]

Here the unit vector n and radius vector R have opposite directions. The volume V is surrounded by the surface S as well as a spherical surface with infinitely large radius. In deriving this equation we assume that the potential U p) is a harmonic function, and the Green s function is chosen in such a way that allows us to neglect the second integral over the surface when its radius tends to an infinity. The integrand in Equation (1.117) contains both the potential and its derivative on the spherical surface S. In order to carry out our task we have to find a Green s function in the volume V that is equal to zero at each point of the boundary surface ... [Pg.40]

By definition, any plane 0 — constant is a plane of symmetry. In other words, there are always two elementary masses, which are equal to each other, and located at opposite sides of this plane but at the same distance. As is seen from Fig. 1.5d, the sum of 0-components, caused by both masses is equal to zero. Representing the total mass as a sum of such pairs we conclude that the 0-component, gg, due to the spherical mass is absent at every point outside and inside the body. In the same manner we can prove that — 0. Of course, volume integration, Equation (1.6), can prove this fact, but this procedure is much more complicated. Thus, the attraction field has only a radial component, g, and the field is directed toward the origin, 0. In order to determine this component we will proceed from Equation (1.26) and consider a spherical surface with radius R, as is shown in Fig. 1.5c. Inasmuch as dS — dSiR and the scalar component g is constant at points of the spherical surface, we have for the flux ... [Pg.43]

Thus, the potential reaches a maximum at the sphere s center and then decreases as a parabolic function. A completely different behavior is observed outside the sphere. This simple problem allows one to demonstrate again that the potential obeys Poisson s equation. Consider the potential at the point p of an arbitrary body, Fig. 1.12a, assuming that the density may change from point to point. Let us mentally draw a spherical surface around the point p. If its radius is sufficiently small, we can suppose that this sphere is homogeneous. The potential at the point p can be written as... [Pg.45]

We see that a summation of fields of elementary masses outside of the shell produces the same result as a point source, placed at the center of the shell. This is the second example of such equivalence, and again it is an exception. Consider a spherical surface S with radius R — a + r[Pg.46]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...