Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 4

[edit]

Files uploaded by Moodlook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are copyrighted album covers that need to be uploaded locally in less than 100k pixel resolution: Special:ListFiles/Moodlook

68.199.122.141 06:26, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see rationale above

Rosenzweig τ 08:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional track that does not serve any purpose and could mislead users when the appropriate season arrives. Zzzs (talk) 00:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional track that does not serve any purpose and could mislead users into thinking this existed. Zzzs (talk) 00:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ARABCREATOR7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: As a general rule, national flags should not be used to represent languages, as they unavoidably fail to represent minority languages, and are prone to invoking nationalist disputes. Using a single national flag (like that of Saudi Arabia, in this case) to represent the Arabic language is especially problematic, as the language doesn't have a well-defined country of origin.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


deleting my files saying "Using a single national flag (like that of Saudi Arabia, in this case) to represent the Arabic language is especially problematic" is strange, What about combined flags like this one? . It's out there in WIKIMEDIA COMMONS and no one deleted it! Is it okay if I combine two flags and ignore all the other countries' flags that speak English like Canada just because I combined two of them? so 1 flag is bad. 2 is good. and 3 is not necessary? what logic is this?


My reasons for choosing the Saudi flag to represent the Arabic language:

  • Saudi Arabia is the largest country in the Arabian Peninsula, which is the recognized homeland of Arabs.
  • The Saudi flag is already used as a symbol for Arabic in countless games, websites, movies, apps, books, etc., so everybody is familiar with it.
  • The other Arab countries have similar colors in their flags (red, white, black), which can be confusing, and it can be difficult to identify which country is which, and is it Arabian or not?. In contrast, Saudi Arabia has a simple and distinctive green flag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARABCREATOR7 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


my point is: if you gonna delete the files you need to delete this Combined flags too, or give a good explanation. ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per the nominator. The Arabic language didn't originate in Saudi Arabia and it's not even in the top five countries where the language is spoken. That would go to Egypt, where there's like 4 times as many people who speak Arabic then there are in Saudi Arabia. I think Saudi Arabia is like six or seventh by population who speak the language. So you could just as easily argue it should be the flag of Morocco, Sudan, Algeria, Iraq, or again Egypt. There's nothing particularly special about Saudi Arabia here. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • I'm not trying to be racist or offend anyone, but among Arabs, you can call someone 'Arab' if they come from Arab tribes and have Arab lineage. Most Arab tribes are found in the Arabian Peninsula, such as the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia, as well as in small parts of Iraq, Syria, and Jordan. The people in Egypt are Copts and do not have Arab lineage. We love them, but that's the reality; even they know it and agree with me.
    If a Chinese man speaks Arabic, that doesn't make him Arab. And if entire China (1.412 billion people) speaks Arabic, that makes them Arabic speakers, but it doesn't make them Arabs.
    Arabs are tribes, and you find them mostly in the Arabian Peninsula, What's is the biggest country in it? Saudi.
    Otherwise, you wouldn't see famous websites and major companies using the Saudi flag as a symbol for the language without reason, or you will be saying to the world "You all wrong, and i'm right".
    I swear to you that I am neither biased nor racist; I am simply trying to explain why the flags of Egypt or Iraq or Morocco are not used as symbols for the Arabic language. ARABCREATOR7 (talk) 05:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am simply trying to explain why the flags of Egypt or Iraq or Morocco are not used as symbols for the Arabic language. That's because there isn't a flag for the Arabic language in the first place. The only reason there's one in this case is because you created it. There's a reason why if I do a Google search for "flag of Arabic language" most of the results are for Commons or another website for user created flags though. Otherwise you get results like this one to Reddit where there's comments like "I've seen many people use different flags to represent the Arabic language" or "in Israel I saw Arabic represented by the Jordanian flag." This discussion on Quora about which flag represents the Arabic language. To quote from it "there is no flag for the Arabic language." Etc. Etc. The fact is that there is no "flag of the Arabic language" except ones created by users of Commons or similar websites for reason's that are pretty obvious. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted poster. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image of a common subject taken in a manner that suggests the people depicted were unaware they were being photographed and could not reasonably expect to be photographed Dronebogus (talk) 01:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unremarkable image that doesn’t illustrate alleged topic Dronebogus (talk) 01:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image that doesn’t illustrate subject Dronebogus (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PORN LevandeMänniska (talk), 01:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete dubious educational usefulness. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 05:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PENIS Dronebogus (talk) 01:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This file is suspected of copyright infringement and needs to be deleted immediately. YeBoy371 (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is suspected of copyright infringement and needs to be deleted immediately. YeBoy371 (talk) 01:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake, definitely misleading. Not created by the author and definitely not Sanba and Jelawat since it was taken "in the future". Pretty much a hoax. Zzzs (talk) 02:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake, definitely misleading. Not created by the author and definitely not Letlama since it was taken "in the future". Pretty much a hoax. Zzzs (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files by user Boulivet

[edit]

All the files by Boulivet look like copyvios at first glance - small sizes, often thumbnails themselves, no EXIF information (except for one set of pics). I found one having been published online years before it was uploaded here (first one listed above) and the second file has a Leboncoin watermark, and I now feel justified in nominating all of these for deletion. The YouTube videos are from Club Renault 25 Français 🇫🇷, which I just realized is ran by a man with the same name as this user.

I hope some are their own work (it is possible, since they are clearly involved with Renault 25s) and will notify them at fr.wikipedia, where they are most active, to give them a chance to respond and possibly clear some of these. --mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Iam PraveenBhatt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   02:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused poor quality photo of nondescript widnow, no educational use, little distinguishable and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of non-notable group, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At least, the photo shows the sign of the "Home of Faith Charitable Trust". Please keep. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely not own work: credit in watermark not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9   02:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused random image of nondescript wall, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused presentation slide, COM:WEBHOST, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infographic, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:HowToPriceLTnew.svg P 1 9 9   02:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-res diagram without context or clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Brennivin87 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos and notes, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   03:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 77juanes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with watermark and FB code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   03:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Topeomokungbe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text tables (should be in wiki-table format if needed) and logo, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   03:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: small crop from an unknown source. P 1 9 9   03:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text table (should be in wiki-table format if needed), out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused random image of nondescript place/building, no location, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused super tiny flag icon, indistinguishable and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SysFreak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   03:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Adamant1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly COPYVIO since there's no FOP in Ukraine and the artist hasn't been dead for more then 70 years since it was created after World War 2. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ 03:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by MHernandezp05 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=https://tiempo.hn/gobierno-entregara-premios-martires-resistencia-8-periodistas/palacio_jose_cecilio_del_valle-3/. Upload is from 2021, link is undated, should be discussed. King of ♥ 03:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by MHernandezp05 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=https://xn--hondurasradiotvturstica-jfc.com/lago-de-yojoa/. Old upload from 2012, would otherwise decline per COM:AGF but uploader has other uploads which are confirmed copyvio, should be discussed. King of ♥ 03:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Adamant1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There's no FOP in Ukraine and this was created in 1975. So it's clearly COPYVIO. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ 03:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Adamant1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There's no FOP in Ukraine and this statue was created in 2000. So the image is clearly COPYVIO. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ 03:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of the background image is not clear. Quick1984 (talk) 04:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Background from the program bgchanger, Here is the developer's website https://vyro.ai/

--DenisMironov1 (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TimedText: Sit-in Against Racial Injustice, Downtown Indianapolis (2020-06-06).webm.*.srt

[edit]

Koavf created 201 subtitles all containing identical content, the name Breonna Taylor thrice. No actual translation to other languages or transcription to non‑Latin scripts has been performed. (Well, the Spanish version uses ¡!, which is negligible.)

To preserve the revision history I have moved the “English” subtitles, the first language version from the entire set, to the multiple languages code now; presumably Koavf was not aware of this option. Since the {{closed captions}} template assigns bogus categories, creating the false impression any real translation was performed, I propose their deletion without redirect.

The pages nominated for deletion are, except the .mul. version, that cannot be omitted from the list (unless you really want to waste 19195 bytes to have it spelled out):

Also, is there a bot flagging the files? The mass deletion request guide does not mention any, but I’ll go insane manually adding {{delete}} to all 201 of them. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 04:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kai Burghardt: Couldn't you just redirect them all to TimedText:Sit-in_Against_Racial_Injustice,_Downtown_Indianapolis_(2020-06-06).webm.mul.srt instead? Duckmather (talk) 23:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Duckmather: No,
  • as I wrote, a redirect will still categorize the file as having closed captions “in German” (etc.), which is kind of misleading,
  • with redirects installed you can still choose from 201 subtitle tracks in the media player, which by the way causes a fetch/list-delay that might last as long as the video clip itself, and
  • redirects create n ∶ 1 relationships en → mul, de → mul, etc., but in fact the actual semantics of the mul code are 1 ∶ n mul → en, mul → de, and so on as far as applicable – the other way round.
‑‑ Kays (T | C) 05:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Test page or page with no valid content UmirovaDilshoda (talk) 04:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Ok, my bad; it's been many years since I lived in U.K. I was not aware of FoP. Gillfoto (talk) 17:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no FOP in Abu Dhabi 109.45.60.10 19:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the original photographer of this image, I support the deletion request. I apologise for any inadvertent violation of the law and request that this matter is not escalated to the UAE authorities for prosecution. Sm105 (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no "Freedom of Panorama" in the United Arab Emirates. The building is modern and still under copyright. This photo can be transferred to local wikis that allow FOP-encumbered photos, but cannot be hosted on Commons. Storkk (talk) 18:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no "Freedom of Panorama" in the United Arab Emirates. The building is modern and still under copyright. This photo can be transferred to local wikis that allow FOP-encumbered photos, but cannot be hosted on Commons. Additionally, the file lacks metadata (despite the description's date field referencing non-existent Exif), and thus its authorship should be confirmed via OTRS if it is indeed transferred to a sister project. Storkk (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no "Freedom of Panorama" in the United Arab Emirates. The building is modern and still under copyright. Additionally, the file appears unlikely to be the uploader's own work, and thus its authorship and license should be confirmed via OTRS before any transfer to a sister project that allows FOP-encumbered photos is considered. Storkk (talk) 09:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in UAE. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 05:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


out of scope: unused fictional election apportionment diagram, wrong numbers, maybe based on early projections or preliminary results; correct version at File:Autriche2019.svg. 2003:E5:3717:E00:F10B:21EF:2DB7:AD86 05:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source is random internet search, not uploader's work Poliocretes (talk) 06:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no permission from photographer no selfie. Copyvio from https://www.facebook.com/VooruitHaaltert/ used for election promotion on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 06:26, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 06:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F5 and Create article in description Ariandi Lie (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E5%AE%BF%E8%BF%81%E9%A1%B9%E7%8E%8B%E6%95%85%E9%87%8C%E8%8B%B1%E9%A3%8E%E9%98%81(2).png CHEN HEBING (talk) 07:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E5%AE%BF%E8%BF%81%E9%A1%B9%E7%8E%8B%E6%95%85%E9%87%8C%E8%8B%B1%E9%A3%8E%E9%98%81(2).png CHEN HEBING (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from a copyrighted video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpJVnQMk1RQ CarterSterling (talk) 07:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of 2006 mural; no Freedom of Panorama in the US -- see COM:MURALS Rlandmann (talk) 08:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image comes from https://www.crystalinks.com/toye.html, and the footer of the front page at https://www.crystalinks.com says

Disclaimer: All images were originally found in either public domain, were created by readers of Crystalinks, or were created by the author and are protected under US copyright. If you own rights to any of the images, and do not wish them to appear here, please contact us and they will be promptly removed.

Given that this front page also links to offsite news stories using images taken without credit from those news sites, I suspect the site owner's concept of "found in the public domain" means "found on a website", so this map (a redrawn version of Lori Toye's 1983 poster) probably isn't public domain. It has certainly appeared on other websites over the past twenty years. Belbury (talk) 08:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Itz Guddu Chauhan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with bad history. Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 08:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence of CC0 license for this work Albinfo (talk) 08:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It contains a prominent ad of the uploader's website throughout the video. Victoria (talk) 08:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep Remove the text. Also it doesn't make the video useless, it's a real problem though. One could use the upper part of the video. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. It's not at all clear that we can remove the text without violating the license; Wikimedia guidance on the subject is equivocal on the matter. But that's really a moot point unless someone's actually going to do the work to edit this video to remove the watermark (and, ideally, to do so without making an ugly mess of it). Omphalographer (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

en:Fernando Leal (artist) died in 1964, not public domain yet. Yann (talk) 08:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Everything published in the early 20th century is public domain in Mexico The New Foxy (talk) 22:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about in the U.S., since Commons' servers are in the U.S.? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also public domain in US The New Foxy (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great, but how come? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it may be in the public domain in USA, but not in the country of origin if it is Mexico. Unless you have some evidence of first publication in USA. Yann (talk) 08:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PD US no notice The New Foxy (talk) 23:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The New Foxy: Commons requires all content to be in the public domain in the country of origin. If this was first published in Mexico, it is still not in the public domain there, and it never was in the public domain in USA. Please see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico. Yann (talk) 09:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


en:Fernando Leal (artist) died in 1964, not public domain yet. Yann (talk) 08:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dubious license EdrianJustine (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ponieważ zawiera błędny opis pliku Krokmilowy (talk) 09:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo with meaningless description. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Very unclear what's even depicted here. Omphalographer (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Quick1984 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free photo of 1970s.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Source-website claims "При перепечатке текстовой информации и фотографий ссылка на сайт обязательна". Not sure whether that might be interpreted as some CC-BY. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this file. --- SVR-Box (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in a blatantly promotional draft being G11'ed AlphaBetaGamma (talk) 09:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Copyright holder @SetDitJenPDM". MKFI (talk) 10:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CtrlFreak578 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos, some of the people depicted died in 1970, 2001, etc - not 2024 own work. May be PD but need sourcing etc

Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the need for relevant sources. They have been added for the following images:
File:Srimati Dakshayani Velayudhan - Constitution of India — Ze (zen) 2bf.png
File:Srimati Kamala Chaudhri - Constitution of India.png
File:Srimati Purnima Banerjee- Digital District Repository Detail Digital Distri (zen) 2b9.png
File:Vithalrao Gadgil.png
The following image can be deleted as per deletion nomination:
File:Vithalrao Gadgil - 1st Works, Mines and Power Minister.png CtrlFreak578 (talk) 10:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Malta1798 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos, some of the people depicted died in the 1970's - not 2024 own work

Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an architects design - not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest Netherzone (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I took this picture myself. I told I have asked to Menotti Lerro the permission to use some of his pictures and him gave me it. But in this case I have made the picture myself.Gingeksace (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Netherzone as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The uploader of this photograph has said that they are not in fact the owner of the copyright. They falsely claimed it's their own work then retracted that, they are also not the artist whose work is depicted. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gingeksace#Managing_a_conflict_of_interest
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. In some countries this photo would be ok per freedom-of-panorama, as the mosaic seems to be located ourdoors. Unfortunately, Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception. Therefore, a permission by the artist is required or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work 2022, a scan from an unknown source and author. MKFI (talk) 11:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While the composition is in the Public Domain, this recording is of a modern performance, which must be presumed copyrighted. Paul_012 (talk) 11:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Merhaba k (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:Derivative works: scanned photographs from unknown source and author.

MKFI (talk) 11:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC) (Changed one file in nomination, error in batch tool selection). MKFI (talk) 11:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While the composition is in the Public Domain, this recording is of a modern performance, which must be presumed copyrighted as there is no evidence noting of it being licensed. Paul_012 (talk) 11:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two modern book covers visible, no permission. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Max Odoy, who died in 1976. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2047.

Rosenzweig τ 11:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


no info, small image, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 11:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work, this image can be found through Google Lens in its original color (or other colors for that matter), eg https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/ahura-mazda-zoroastrian-benevolent-god-600nw-2296511257.jpg. This is not even the Qarmatian flag, but a symbol of the Zoroastrian religion. Possibly copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo in description asd GioviPen GP msg 11:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: out of scope GioviPen GP msg 11:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
as Commons:Deletion requests/File:MIAMI TWINS.jpg GioviPen GP msg 11:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Asikzengin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works. Please read COM:DW, and provide proper dates, sources, authors, and licenses if these files are in the public domain.

Yann (talk) 12:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical AI-misgenerated image whose main focus is an unlabelled graph going from 2023 to 2020 to 2030. Belbury (talk) 12:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Typical meaningless AI sludge. Omphalographer (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Graph doesn't even make sense and is meaningless Wiiformii (talk) 22:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by YellowOracle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused and unreliable tables of what ChatGPT said about something, prompt unspecified. File:Ai chart projections.jpg seems fully nonsensical for percentages jumping up by 5/10% with different sentence fragments.

Belbury (talk) 12:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Plain text, no context. Omphalographer (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI generated diagram of electrical objects being connected to each other at random, with everything mislabeled and/or misspelled and some of the connections fading out. Out of COM:SCOPE, no educational use. Belbury (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a product of a photo studio, the person indicated by the author is not the author of this image. Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Metalcoating (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional files uploaded only for use in a now-deleted promotional user page on Italian Wikipedia, w:it:Utente:Metalcoating, for which the uploader is blocked there. Outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 12:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Published before 1929 but the British author only died in 1955, should be undeleted in 2026 Wiiformii (talk) 13:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

หม่อม. ปนวืกอาฝืกแนวทาง หน่วยงานราชการ ดิา. เ. แ. ปราง 58.10.58.127 13:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

blurry photo RomanM82 (talk) 13:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

doublon d'un blason déjà existant : File:Blason ville fr Bernaville 80.svg FL00 80 (talk) 13:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was made for a page that was rejected by the wiki. The image can be misused in an inappropriate environment. I want to prevent this, to delete it now instead of any later legal disputes. Mindentezzel (talk) 13:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was made for a page that was rejected by the wiki. The image can be misused in an inappropriate environment. I want to prevent this, to delete it now instead of any later legal disputes. Mindentezzel (talk) 13:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was made for a page that was rejected by the wiki. The image can be misused in an inappropriate environment. I want to prevent this, to delete it now instead of any later legal disputes. Mindentezzel (talk) 13:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was made for a page that was rejected by the wiki. The image can be misused in an inappropriate environment. I want to prevent this, to delete it now instead of any later legal disputes. Mindentezzel (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image was made for a page that was rejected by the wiki. The image can be misused in an inappropriate environment. I want to prevent this, to delete it now instead of any later legal disputes. Mindentezzel (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two of its older versions were containing my personal data. If possible leave the latest version and delete previous ones. If not, please delete this page, I will upload the latest version again. Wertuose (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unviewable content, blurry; out of scope GioviPen GP msg 13:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Morshedulgharana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album.

MdsShakil (talk) 14:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mesin Antrian Vorsea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A large collection of small, blurred, and unused images. All watermarked and will never be used for education IMO. Insignificant office interiors, office equipment, random people. So, out of project scope

George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

homemade advertisement for a book? No educational use -- Deadstar (msg) 14:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation: shows work by living artist, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mehrnazzhian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of emoji icon https://tineye.com/search/6dbc71adaedc82fde03b5cf8b5caa4185386aefe?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original uploader nomination. This is already {{Superseded}} by the better quality File:Administrative divisions of Poso Regency (blank).svg Argo Carpathians (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file. Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 15:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not useful (and confusing) to save this redirect Cultureel Gelderland (talk) 15:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete junk redirect. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Хочу свою работу старую удалить,я надеюсь номинирован не единственный способ. Sazhik99 (talk) 17:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Хочу свою работу старую удалить,я надеюсь номинирован не единственный способ. Sazhik99 (talk) 15:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


promo description, promo wikidata item, no use, no cat; out of scope GioviPen GP msg 15:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Work dated 1980, so not in public domain. No permission given Zen 38 (talk) 15:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ScarletViolet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are marked as being under CC BY 3.0, but I can't see a CC licence on any of the source YouTube videos [1][2][3]. Am I missing something?

bjh21 (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No appropriate copyright status PamD (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 16:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no educational value Veliensis (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as no source (No source since) Krd 16:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 16:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 16:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 16:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 16:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Krd 16:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smart Bajrangi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal photos. File:Csk.jpg looks like a photoshopped picture making it a DW and probable Copyvio.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Smart Bajrangi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope: unused personal images of non-wikipedian

George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete reuploaded Taylor 49 (talk) 20:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 16:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Syrus257 as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 16:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kattya alexandra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope: unused low quality math sketches

George Chernilevsky talk 16:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake license 777mxmxmxmxmx (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake license 777mxmxmxmxmx (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unwatermarked and unapproved for public publishing nudity 158.222.69.218 16:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Amin 12409 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused renderings of "unofficial flags", with no source or context given for what the designs are based on.

Belbury (talk) 16:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and adding File:JarwanidDynastyUnofficialFlag.jpg by the same user.Jonteemil (talk) 00:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old, not needed. No need to keep this anymore on wikimedia commons. J-Man11 (talk) 16:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old page no longer needed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, per above; inappropriate renomination. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arthur Discretion, remove please. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 'French Infantry Command' is not a thing Coldstreamer20 (talk) 17:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep INUSE and no valid reason for deletion. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused video. Doubtful copyright info. Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 17:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is the old version of the logo. The new one was launched in august, as you can see it at their website: https://www.ultra.com.br/group-ultra-launches-new-brand-in-celebration-of-25-years-since-initial-public-offering/?lang=en Komuh Ultra (talk) 17:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

low resolution from same source as File:Zille, Heinrich - Rummel, vor dem Hunde-Theater (Zeno Fotografie).jpg Carl Ha (talk) 18:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

low resolution blow-up from same source as better quality version: File:Zille, Heinrich - Rummel, vor dem Hunde-Theater (Zeno Fotografie).jpg Carl Ha (talk) 18:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Credited to "BBC's Podcast Rex", but Podcast Rex just seems to be a YouTube channel that publishes clips of many different podcast sources, with no particular connection to the BBC. Unclear whether they actually have permission to CC-Attribution licence all this content, it seems unlikely and https://podcastrex.com/submit-a-show doesn't mention the licensing. This is the only Podcast Rex sourced image I can see on Commons right now. Belbury (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image represents copyrighted LEGO® product by LEGO Group: https://www.lego.com/en-us/product/tower-bridge-10214 Appsoft4 (talk) 19:04, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The L3Harris orb in the "O" is not simple geometric shapes or text, and likely exceeds the threshold of originality, so this does not qualify as {{PD-Textlogo}} Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 19:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Those simple red lines are definitely below COM:TOO US, see examples there. ~TheImaCow (talk) 19:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. And clearly notable per w:Aerojet Rocketdyne. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freely licensed Photograph with a large modern artwork in the background that would not be covered by Spanish FoP since it's indoors. File is also uncategorized. Abzeronow (talk) 19:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Firudin Həmidli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:Derivative work, see COM:FOP Azerbaijan.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Firudin Həmidli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Posters and portraits (often low-resolution) uploaded without attribution; clearly not own work in the former case, unlikely so in the latter (COM:PCP).

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template:Pixabay, only images on Pixabay before January 9, 2019 can be used. https://pixabay.com/photos/mosque-temple-building-najaf-8400613/ says the image was uploaded in 2023. Therefore, it can't be used. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Als alleingestellte Datei nicht sinnvoll, da fehlerhaft und deswegen auch nicht klassifizierbar. Das einzige was hier Sinn macht, ist die Abbildung im Kontext, also in der Ursprungsdatei (Lexikonseite mit Fehler)) GerritR (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo GerritR, die Datei gehört zum Wikisource-Projekt Meyers Konversations-Lexikon und wird benötigt, um im transkribierten Text eingebunden zu werden, siehe z.B. im Artikel s:de:MKL1888:Haag. Eine andere als die gescannte Version ist im Rahmen des Projekts nicht vorgesehen. Eine modernisierte Fassung ist auf keinen Fall erwünscht. Das gilt im übrigen für sämtliche freigestellte Grafiken aus diesem Werk. Die Datei kann gerne aus der COA-Systematik ausgeschlossen werden.
Bitte nicht löschen! Gruß --Mapmarks (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gerne auch mal hier nachlesen: Das Hagener Wappen : von der Lilie zur Eiche --Mapmarks (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Offenbar war die Lilie das historische Wappen, bevor ein paar Besserwisser es durch die Eiche ersetzt haben? Dann ist die Datei natürlich historisch bedeutsam und darf nicht gelöscht werden. LAZ.--GerritR (talk) 20:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe 2 versions are needed, but that's no reason to delete this, and neither is having trouble finding categories for it. The only relevant question is whether it's plausibly usable. Is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the filer agreed at the end that the image should not be deleted. ("Dann ist die Datei natürlich historisch bedeutsam und darf nicht gelöscht werden.")  Keep Nakonana (talk) 01:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 07:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 19:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope, unused GioviPen GP msg 19:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by LuisAyalaBeefeater (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per context provided at w:User talk:LuisAyalaBeefeater#Ship images, these AI-generated images are often historically inaccurate and therefore misleading instead of being educationally useful. I suggest deletion in line with Commons:AI-generated media#Are AI-generated media within the Commons project scope?.

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all -- AS (Artificial Stupididy). Taylor 49 (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Not just AI but confusing, nonsensical, and incorrect AI. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 20:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template:Pixabay, only images before January 9, 2019 can be used. This photo was uploaded onto Pixabay in October 2019 per https://pixabay.com/es/illustrations/baillie-william-wilson-de-escocia-4586013/ MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement and therefore incorrect file license MacQtosh (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreement between Elcobbola and Bastique as to whether "Creative Commons - free for reuse" is an acceptable license. Sending to DR for further discussion. King of ♥ 20:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

conditional Keep for a limited time until the user can get the origin license straightened out either by VRT or by getting the license fixed in the source. It's apparent that they didn't know our process by their response on their user talk page. For me, "Creative commons - free for use" is enough to provide intent until they get it fixed. By their behavior, it seems that MysticMagpie is somehow connected to the subject in the photo and is trying to navigate how to properly get the picture onto the Wikipedia article about the subject. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 20:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to add that my interpretation of "Creative Commons - free for use" is an unconditional statement, so it's not NC or ND or SA or even BY. It's free without conditions, meaning it would rightfully be considered CC-0. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 21:14, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the idea that intent is enough, and our reusers need a proper license for this that spells out what can and cannot be done. It could easily be CC-BY-NC 4.0, and I'm not comfortable trying to guess what the source actually means. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral @Abzeronow @Bastique @King of Hearts Yo voto por neutral,te explico es lo mismo que pasó con el logo de Aeropostal de Venezuela (File:Logo Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela (Aerolínea).jpg) en el sitio web sale "Licencia Creative Commons" pero como el logo de Aeropostal esta en el Dominio Público porque son obras de una administración pública de Venezuela eso está en último párrafo de la licencia en Venezuela {{PD-VenezuelaGov}} AbchyZa22 (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • """Creative Commons - free for reuse""" free for reuse.. under what conditions?? there is some CC licenses that NOT allow gaining money from that image but free to use. in wikimedia projects, the indicated file's CC license must allow to gaining money and reuse. we dont actually know what CC license is this image.  Delete.
+ and i find it unfortunate for bastique's actions about this. he should be more careful. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 12:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Modern primat, did you read my explanation above? Free for use, in the English language, is an unconditional statement. The implications of "free for use" without conditions means:
  • Commercial use is acceptable--because no commercial use is a condition.
  • Derivative use is acceptable--because no derivatives is a condition.
  • Even CC-BY is a condition--because demanding that attribution is given is a condition.
"Free for use" without a restriction attached is free for use without restriction. You all can wikilawyer all you want about "MY GOD THEY DIDN'T SPECIFY THE LICENSE IT COULD BE ANY ONE OF THESE", but the English language is fairly specific about intent and language and there is no court that would side with someone complaining about a non-free use when they publish it with this statement. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
👍 modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 22:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i believe, if we are not sure about actual license, then we should remove. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 22:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote "conditional keep" because while we have every right to upload this as {{CC-0}}, it's clear by the uploader's decision to upload it as CC-by-4.0 probably says they want at least attribution. But they don't state that--give them an opportunity to change their website or send a VRT. I've harassed them on their User talk page ''again''. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 23:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clear intent is an open CC license, with or without attribution CC0 is for want of something more specific, though the uploader has chosen cc-by 4.0 to give attribution but the attribution isnt requirement. though an email and request for clarity via vrt would be best action as it currently stands no need to delete Gnangarra 02:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 20:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 20:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope GioviPen GP msg 20:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image at Pixabay with this author and numerical ID does not match. https://pixabay.com/vectors/palm-hand-human-fingers-five-303412/ shows a different image. I didn't find this image at https://pixabay.com/images/search/user_id%3a3736%20hands/ or https://web.archive.org/web/20190403115255/https://pixabay.com/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=303412 MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This appears to be a composite of "Hand Back Part" and "Palm Hand Human", both by that user. Omphalographer (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template:Pixabay, images before January 9, 2019 from Pixabay can be used. This image was published in April 2019 per https://pixabay.com/photos/nile-goose-water-bird-animal-chick-4116166/ . MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

self uploaded unrelevant blurred photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-quality crop. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The picture at the given URL of https://pixabay.com/photos/summer-tropical-tequila-drink-3106910/ does not match the upload. I searched through the Pixabay's photos at https://pixabay.com/users/5275305/?tab=photos&order=latest&pagi=1 but this image is not there. I also did not find this photo at https://pixabay.com/photos/search/tequila/ . MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:12, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo endless description, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. In use at en:Underground Sound of Lisbon. Omphalographer (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the page HAS to be fixed @Omphalographer
it's unacceptable, full of promo info and automatic translation, copied in every version of the (all) images GioviPen GP msg 22:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So fix it! The file doesn't need to be deleted just because it's got a bad description. Omphalographer (talk) 23:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo endless description, out of scope; as for File:Portuguese electronic music pioneers Underground Sound Of Lisbon (or U.S.L.) in Portugal 1994 - photo by Ithaka Darin Pappas 01.jpg GioviPen GP msg 21:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo endless description, out of scope; as for File:Portuguese electronic music pioneers Underground Sound Of Lisbon (or U.S.L.) in Portugal 1994 - photo by Ithaka Darin Pappas 01.jpg and second img GioviPen GP msg 21:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:23, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:26, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:26, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo (from the title), out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Photographic Art Gallery 2007 Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:41, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fotografia com direitos de autor; quase de certeza não foi pedido autorização para publicar GualdimG (talk) 21:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo descr, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of File:Kirk 2024 path.png Sria-72 (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Visually they are not duplicates. --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No encyclopedic value - this is just Soviet/Russian child urban legend. Alex Spade (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But if it's an urban legend, it might be in scope?
I case someone is wondering, the text reads Гитлер (Hitler), Гимлер (Himmler), Гебельс (Goebbels), Геринг (Göring). The Russian language does not have the letter "H", therefore all four names start with the letter "G" in Cyrillic (Г). The Cyrillic Г looks like one "arm" of the Swastika, so four Гs form a Swastika, and Г happens to be the initial letter of the names of four important Nazi figures. Nakonana (talk) 01:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For encyclopedic value an urban legend must be described in reliable sources, there are not such sources for this legend. Alex Spade (talk) 04:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo descr, out of scope; as per File:Ramiro Pedemonte DJ.jpg GioviPen GP msg 21:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research (not to be confused with File:Soviet Swastika 2.svg). The swastika for kalmyk units was introduced in 1918-1919, the USSR was formed later. Alex Spade (talk) 22:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ce n'est pas le bon, pour y travailler, je confirme Ttgv4445 (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Dans ce cas il convient en effet de procéder à sa suppression.
Je suis toutefois preneur de toute photographie de l'écusson officiel afin de le reproduire et l'intégrer dans Wikipedia.
Cordialement Loick7695 (talk) 13:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be user's own work; I just reverted this addition on enwiki. Suriname0 (talk) 23:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although, "[n]early all Govt.nz content is licensed under Creative Commons", per the Terms and Conditions of the Canterbury Maps website: "This website and the information provided in it are the copyright of the following District and Regional Council(s); Kaikoura District, Hurunui District, Waimakariri District, Christchurch District, Environment Canterbury Regional Council, Selwyn District, Ashburton District, Waimate District, Mackenzie District, Timaru District and Waitaki District. This website is a public service and may be used for personal and business purposes. However, you are not permitted to copy or republish any substantial amount of the information from this website without the prior written consent of the aforementioned Councils." (Emphasis added.) I think a map is a "substantial amount of ... information" and meets COM:TOO New Zealand. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not from New Zealand and this argument seems to hold water, so I won't stand in the way of deletion. Anyone have any other ideas how I can make a map to supplement the article? Riverhugger (talk) 23:40, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dark, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 23:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file Ilzhabimantara (talk) 23:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terima kasih , untuk nama file membuat singkat dari jenis biota laut dan untuk memudahkan editor dalam pemberian nama lainnya Selam Scuba Prodi Perikanan (talk) 11:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it looks like this file is not used Ilzhabimantara (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photos from NWS Galveston with unverifiable creator

[edit]

All four of these files are sourced to a National Weather Service website (Galveston regional office).

Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where photos originated. In particular, storm damage photos such as these often come from County Emergency Management Agencies, County Sheriffs, other state- or county-level agencies, and even from private citizens. Even more particularly, aerial damage photos are very often (even usually) not the work of the NWS but of those other agencies or the Civil Air Patrol.

Unfortunately, all these images are no longer hosted on the NWS website where they originated, and the citation we have for each of them points directly to the image itself instead of the page it was found on. Therefore, although we can verify that the file exists in the Internet Archive, we no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.

Because such photos routinely originate outside the NWS, I reached out the to NWS office that published them to ask about their origin. They told me that they do not know who took these:

"There is probably no way we can identify each image you have mentioned. We did lose a lot of pictures/photos off our web page many years ago that we were not able to retrieve or recover.

I have forwarded this advice to the VRT (ticket:2024100410012611)

Because we cannot verify that any of these images are (or were ever) ever available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If they are truly orphan images, they will enter the public domain 120 years after they were taken: 2122 for the Tropical Storm Allison photo; 2124 for the Hurricane Claudette images.


--Rlandmann (talk) 23:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 02:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Copyright data missing. Tolga Theo Yalur (talk) 23:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This artwork appears to contain elements taken directly from the game Minecraft. Beleg Tâl (talk) 23:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This artwork appears to contain elements taken directly from the game Minecraft. Beleg Tâl (talk) 23:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not educationally useful, very low-quality, blurry, low resolution, pixelated image. There are hundreds of higher quality photos of BTS performing on Commons. RachelTensions (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not educationally useful, very low-quality, blurry, low resolution, pixelated image. There are hundreds of higher quality photos of BTS performing on Commons. RachelTensions (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not educationally useful, very low-quality, blurry, low resolution, pixelated image. There are hundreds of higher quality photos of BTS performing on Commons. RachelTensions (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image claimed as own work when it is actually sourced from here: https://twitter.com/VLikeAngel/status/915834625301319680. Copyright holder has not given any statement about their image being free to use Nyantatata (talk) 01:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 05:59, 26 Dezember 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 19:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. RachelTensions (talk) 23:51, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solicito la eliminación de esta imagen que muestra el frontis de un negocio aleatorio porque 1) La imagen no tiene un valor enciclopédico significativo, ya que representa un negocio que no es notable ni tiene relevancia histórica. No contribuye al conocimiento general ni proporciona información valiosa para los usuarios de Wikimedia Commons y 2) La imagen parece haber sido subida sin el consentimiento del propietario del negocio. Esto podría violar los derechos de autor, ya que no se ha proporcionado una licencia adecuada que permita su uso. Por estas razones, solicito que se considere la eliminación de esta imagen de Wikimedia Commons. Gracias por su atención. Nosoymidori (talk) 00:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PaulPeter456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your private photo bucket / no educational value / COM:NUDE

LevandeMänniska (talk), 01:45, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]