Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/01/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![43 File:LOS ANGELES - JUL 17- Jillian Rose Reed arrives at the "Step Up Revolution" Premiere at Graumans Chinese Theater on July 17, 2012 in Los Angeles, CA 2014-01-09 03-14.jpg](#File:LOS_ANGELES_-_JUL_17-_Jillian_Rose_Reed_arrives_at_the_"Step_Up_Revolution"_Premiere_at_Graumans_Chinese_Theater_on_July_17,_2012_in_Los_Angeles,_CA_2014-01-09_03-14.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused and superseded by better-quality File:Flag of the Australian Antarctic Territory (unofficial).svg. Alkari (?), 9 January 2014, 00:19 UTC 00:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
We have this icon in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 00:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Better version available here SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Donbas Arena, no FoP in Ukraine LGA talkedits 07:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. That's a correct RFD because it is about a photo that focuses on an architecture and not on the event. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in the UK LGA talkedits 10:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of hockey team (see site); picture appears to be of television program ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 06:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Accidentally nominated, meant to tag for immediate deletion as obvious copyright violation. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 07:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violation (non-admin closure). ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 13:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
No FOP in Ukraine, copyright in Ukraine includes "dramatic, musical drama works, pantomimes, choreographic" as well as architecture. LGA talkedits 07:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: not because of stadium's architecture which is a DM and not original anyway, but for the setting of the dancers on the pitch which can be considered original artwork SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
From a TV show, certainly not "own work". El Grafo (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and
Comment This image is the same, but with different size and without being cropped. --> http://cdnvideo.dolimg.com/cdn_assets/8d5b7fd13f8fb2727e9cef74121efea731ee2f21.jpg --Mega-buses (talk) 14:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Yep, there are several versions of this around – looks like a DVD cover or something like that. BTW: This was supposed to be a speedy DR, must have clicked the wrong button in the navbox … --El Grafo (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, speedy is indeed possible for this. Jcb (talk) 17:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
상황에맞지않은사진이기에 Dispolt (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: User requested deletion of own photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
No details of what page this shot was used on at Luke Ford provided. Luke Ford had a lot of shots located on his site, not just his own. The permission statement we have only covers the shots he himself took, and to my knowledge all the valid shots which were covered by the permission statement have already been scrapped and uploaded to Commons (either by myself or by Gohe007). Tabercil (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I did some further digging into the archives and found the page which details who took the shot here. You scroll down and it says the shot was taken by Mike South, so we can't use it. Tabercil (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Image not covered by permissin statement Tabercil (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oops... turns out I'd gotten permission from Mike South and it's archived in the OTRS system as Ticket:2008071010008259... undeleting. Tabercil (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
File already available here. Hazmat2 (talk) 02:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: processed as duplicate Denniss (talk) 10:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Defense.gov photo essay 110226-A-9393S-016.jpg Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as a duplicate of File:Defense.gov photo essay 110226-A-9393S-016.jpg by User:Matanya Bidgee (talk) 07:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
ошибка загрузки Al 2 Yol (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Lymantria as a copyright violation. Bidgee (talk) 07:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France - undelete 2041 Traumrune (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:PierreSelim. Bidgee (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France - undelete 2036 Traumrune (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France PierreSelim (talk) 06:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France - undelete 2036 Traumrune (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in France PierreSelim (talk) 06:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation of personal live. Promotional LEITOXX 21:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- I apologize to say I have no clue on what you mean by 'Personal live'. Can you please ellaborate? TwinTurbo (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Keep: In use. Senseless nomination. (Leitoxx, at least pretend you’re serious about this DR business: If it is self promotion it cannot be copyvio, at most it is missing permission and unclear copyright. And of course personality rights issues is not grounds for deletion.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 06:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright violation. Going by the EXIF/Meta data (Lavc52.32.0) shows that is a screenshot. Bidgee (talk) 07:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Contesting it's being the uploader's own work. Please see the identical photo on IMDB. All the uploader has done is crop the 'Life' magazine watermark off the bottom. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:44, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Upgraded to speedy delete as copyvio. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Jcb as a copyright violation. Bidgee (talk) 07:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Ungenutzte Weiterleitung. Entstand aus einem Typo Gunnar.offel (talk) 02:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted by Getty Images http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/5wmRew9WvyR/Barcelona+FC+Training+Session/nYfLg9otRW9/Gerardo+Martino Dudek1337 (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted Cambalachero (talk) 03:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
unknown person, promotional information, not used Motopark (talk) 05:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Looks like advertising, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Looks like advertising, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Looks like advertising, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Looks like advertising, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Want new page Suleman12 (talk) 07:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. JurgenNL (talk) 07:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - personal picture uploaded from FlickR — Yerpo Eh? 07:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope. Personal photo Alan (talk) 08:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP#United Arab Emirates. 84.61.157.189 08:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personality rights? Dubious "own work" (14 kb) 91.66.63.89 10:11, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
"Own work" ???? 91.66.63.89 10:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.157.189 11:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Userpic from user with 1 edit, not in use. Out of SCOPE Shakko (talk) 13:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Photo of an image with copyright Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's ok, please delete, I overlooked the lack of correct license. -- Biberbaer (talk) 11:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted for missing license JurgenNL (talk) 09:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
I dont want to share this under Creative commons Manojkg.me (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: The creative commons licenses aren't revocable JurgenNL (talk) 07:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
I dont want to share this under Creative commons Manojkg.me (talk) 13:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: The creative commons licenses aren't revocable JurgenNL (talk) 07:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
I dont want to share this under Creative commons Manojkg.me (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: The creative commons licenses aren't revocable JurgenNL (talk) 07:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This is very unlikely to be CC-BY-SA as claimed. Also it appears to be too complex to be in the public domain for simplicity. El Grafo (talk) 13:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, see description, not used Motopark (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, see description, not used Motopark (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: While this is certainly not the uploader's own work, it could be old enough to be in the public domain. I found another version here – surrounding text might contain some information about it's provenance. El Grafo (talk) 13:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: While this is unlikely to be licenses as CC-BY-SA, it might be old enough to be in the public domain. This website might contain additional information. El Grafo (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
File:LOS ANGELES - JUL 17- Jillian Rose Reed arrives at the "Step Up Revolution" Premiere at Graumans Chinese Theater on July 17, 2012 in Los Angeles, CA 2014-01-09 03-14.jpg
[edit]
Clear copyright violation. Image is registered to Getty Images. See http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/8tA5fMsbVjh/Premiere+Summit+Entertainment+Step+Up+Revolution/fEYA6OkIEOa/Jillian+Rose+Reed Voceditenore (talk) 14:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Not used. All linked to File:Army Reserve Overseas Training Ribbon.svg Gunnar.offel (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Not an image of a notable subject; appears to be an over-eager football fan. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 02:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2084 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Carlos Menem became President elect of Argentina following on from the May 14, 1989 election therefore this is copyright in the US as there were no requirements regards notices for images taken/or first published after March 1 1989. LGA talkedits 20:57, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Post-Feb., 1989. Not free. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Most likely to have been taken after the election but before Menem assumed office (8 July 1989). Green Giant (talk) 23:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2067 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2066 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2066 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2068 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
The person in question is only partly visible. There are better photos in category:Piyanut Pannoy. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Konjščica 06 COPY1.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 09:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This is a modern sculpture, not permanently fixed (I saw this first in the UK during a temporary exhibition) and would not be covered by FOP in Denmark which is limited to buildings.
Please consider File:Ronmueck boy.jpg in addition to this file. Fæ (talk) 13:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- The sculpture was shown 2000 at Millennium Dome London, Biennale 2001 and was purchased by Arhus museum 2002, http://en.aros.dk/the-collection/boy/--Oursana (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's a great artefact, I have some of my own photos taken of it at the Dome but I doubt Mueck will give us a free release for his work. I note that File:Ron_Mueck_head.jpg uses Fair Use to retain an illustrative image of his work on en.wp. I see there are other Mueck works we have photos of, if you are spotting these, can you add them as a list on this DR? --Fæ (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Fæ is correct. These are clearly works of art, thereby copyrighted and not covered by freedom-of-panorama exemption of Danish copyright law. Without a permission from the original artist, Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Suspect copyright violation: [1]. El Grafo (talk) 13:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Uploader is not copyright holder. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Uploader is not copyright holder. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:51, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE Rezonansowy (talk) 16:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Correct. Delete it.Chrisarnesen (talk) 16:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.157.189 18:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
If this user does not have any other contributions on other projects, this appears to fall outside COM:SCOPE (cf. w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dedhiyaparas) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. The image is likely not own work. Jespinos (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2075 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2070 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2081 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2067 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS. Jespinos (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution, unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 19:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2069 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC) 'Restored URAA isn't reason for delete pictures Ezarateesteban 12:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before June 1, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 01:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 19:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2071 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2078 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2079 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 19:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
out of scope. Unused photo LEITOXX 19:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic image, out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 20:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Architect is Harbeson, Hough, Livingston & Larson. John Frederick Harbeson (30 July 1888 – 21 December 1986). French FOP. Labattblueboy (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP Alfred-Alphonse Bottiau (1889–1951) & Paul Philippe Cret (October 24, 1876 – September 8, 1945) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Not built until at leat 1944 Labattblueboy (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Felix Weihs de Weldon (April 12, 1907–June 3, 2003) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Felix Weihs de Weldon (April 12, 1907–June 3, 2003) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Herbert Baker (9 June 1862 – 4 February 1946) and Charles Thomas Wheeler KCVO, PRA (14 March 1892 – 22 August 1974) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Blurry and dark Briarfallen (talk) 21:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. I am sorry, for my inadvertence, no objection to the deletion, respectfully submitted.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Low resolution and missing EXIF. The image is likely not own work. Jespinos (talk) 22:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Jespinos (talk) 23:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве, персона скончалась в 2004 году Dogad75 (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Uploader is not copyright holder. Permission is asserted but there is no evidence to support the assertion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Russian FOP is de minimis or non-commercial only. ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP and it is definatly a sculpture with some nice paintwork on it. Natuur12 (talk) 12:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful ArtsMontmartreParisFrance (talk) 21:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright violation Bidgee (talk) 07:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
User:The Photographer/Selfish information The Photographer (talk) 20:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: The subject is notable. Seems to be well known in Spain for showing up on TV behind all kinds of celebrities — a kind of troll iRL, so it is adequate that The Photographer branded this photo to his obnoxious, smarmy DR boilerplate. -- Tuválkin ✉ 08:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Low quality, motion blur. Unrecognizable main subject. without permission The Photographer (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- What, no cats? No smarmy lines? No passive agressive intimidation of occasional contributers? All dried up, your creamy center, is it? But still making pointy DRs, though, I see. -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep:
- «Low quality, motion blur.» Yes, but we don’t have a better pic of this notable person.
- «Unrecognizable main subject.» Oh, it’s all there, don’t worry. (We rely on metadata to enhance images’ identification all the time.)
- «without permission». Not needed, this is a public event. (All this guys does, shows up in public events and waves to cameras behind celebs.)
- -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:11, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Renominated with the same reasoning after being closed as keep. Tuvalkin has a point, regarding the low quality. Bidgee (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Very curious. I did personally this photo with my camera
- Delete Comment to uploader, more pixel, please upload with original size and metadata Motopark (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
No source given for the borders, perhaps derived from a copyrighted work. And for the coats of arms and flags, I'm not sure they're all own work or even in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 19:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Greetings. I just added the source for the border, emblems and flags.--MirkoS18 (talk) 14:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for having done so. Unfortunately, I don't find any information stating that [2] is a free work. It seems that a copyrighted map was used, which makes this work a derivative of a copyrighted work and therefore ineligible for Commons. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
- I didnt take map from there, I just use their map as a source for borders on my map.--MirkoS18 (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ok.
I withdraw my nomination --Eleassar (t/p) 18:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
The International Sava River Basin Commission does not stand behind this photo and therefore requests its removal. VaKol (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep This project is not property of the commission; the map is educational and well-sourced. --Eleassar (t/p) 21:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Nowhere is it claimed that Commission stand behind this photo. Frankly, I also think it is not the best map but I make it as useful tool (in accordance with my ability) and should be keep unless someone from Commission or some more experienced user with better equipment make a better map.--MirkoS18 (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: I'm not going to delete a file which is widely used because someone doesn't like it and per Eleassar. Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
The picture is not geographically correct, including both country names and borders. Description of the picture in summary is also not correct since not all the countries are the "members" of the Sava Commission. The .pdf file in the description does not contain this picture and yet it says it is the "map source". The Sava Comission would upload a proper map showing the basin overview but would still request deletion of this picture. Unfortunately, being easily available, this picture had been used in projects causing complaints to the Sava Commission. VaKol (talk) 12:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC) (original edit)
- Keep until we get a better map (preferably in the svg format). Though it may be incorrect at some places it is still better than no map at all. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:13, 4 February 2014 (UTC) (original edit)
- Comment Nomination and initial comment by Eleassar moved here from malformed nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sava River Basin.png. Links to original diffs are provided. Эlcobbola talk 20:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept. This map is widely used. It is Commons policy that maps that are in use may not be deleted for any reason other than copyright violation. The creator does not say that the image came from the cited PDF -- he says that the map was his own work (except for the COAs) and that he used the PDF as a source of information. The Sava Commission does not own the information in its PDF -- the copyright covers only the words used to express that information, not the information itself -- so the the Commission has no right to complain.
This is the second DR posted by User:VaKol on this file with no different reason from the first. Please do not post a third DR or take any other action with respect to this file. Once is OK, twice is a nuisance, and three times would be vandalism. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)No freedom of panorama in France, Architecte: Jean Montariol (1892-1966)
- File:BibliothequeMunicipaleToulouse.jpg
- File:Bibliothèque du Périgord - Toulouse.jpg
- File:Facade bibliothèque de Toulouse rue de Périgort.JPG
- File:Perigord1bis 01.JPG
- File:Perigord1bis 02.JPG
Traumrune (talk) 21:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in France. Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:41, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images. Uploader has history of copyvios.
Jespinos (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted: File:Nuevos colores Empresas del Transantiago.jpg as a copyright violation. Bidgee (talk) 07:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dannyratana
[edit]- File:Muangthong.jpg
- File:Dannymtutd.jpg
- File:DannyMuangthong.jpg
- File:MTUTD.jpg
- File:JakeBrimmer.jpg
- File:Security scuffle.jpg
Especially evident by the first picture, photos all seem to be of copyrighted TV footage of football games. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 15:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Collection of art, book cover, promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:In Flight Poetry.jpg
- File:Purple Crane Painting.jpg
- File:Jan Veile, 2011.jpg
- File:Purple Crane Tribute.jpg
- File:Jan Marie Kearney Veile.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Guillenbernardo.jpg
- File:Demonbernardosanto.jpg
- File:Doscarasguillendelrio.jpg
- File:3acaidaparkas.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- I work for Tercera Caída and the pictures were taken from José Manuel Guillén and Bernardo Guzmán facebook accounts, with their proper authorization.
- Tercera Caída is a TV show produced by TVC Deportes, a PCTV tv channel in Mexico City, where Im the Internet Manager. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gersomgm (talk • contribs) 16:09, January 9, 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send a permission e-mail to OTRS. JurgenNL (talk) 08:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itsbilluid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:2ranchi dec.jpg
- File:Ranchi dec.jpg
- File:Zombie viv.jpg
- File:Standin.jpg
- File:Bdp.jpg
- File:Collage bill.jpg
- File:Dual d.jpg
- File:Billem.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jkimxpolygons (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kari heimonen (talk · contribs)
[edit]I don't see how any of these images are in scope.
- File:Kohti auringonlaskua.jpg
- File:Halonen ja heimonenI.jpg
- File:1991 perhospuutarhaI.jpg
- File:Titaanit3II.jpg
- File:Iskun otsikko.jpg
- File:Lääkärintodistus kopio I.jpg
- File:Lääkärintodistus kopio.jpg
- File:KH 1978.jpg
- File:Rockin Queen 1973.jpg
- File:Kari H SM Trwe 1969 a.jpg
- File:Kari Heimonen 10-2008.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope and copyrightviolations (newspapers etc.) JurgenNL (talk) 07:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khalilkhan k khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files meant for self-promotion alone. Commons is not a private album. Out of project scope in my opinion.
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-41.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-40.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-39.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-38.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-22.jpg
Rahul Bott (talk) 09:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete Commons is not facebook --High Contrast (talk) 11:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khalilkhan k khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mostly unused, personal images, some of them incorporating probably copyrighted material (e.g. File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-38.jpg or File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-36.jpg). Nothing has changed since the last DR: Commons is still not Facebook (see Commons:Scope).
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-36.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-27.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-25.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-19.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-18.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-16.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-15.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-14.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-13.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-12.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-11.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-10.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-05.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-04.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-01.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-00.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 04-55.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-55.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-53.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-52.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-50.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-49.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-48.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan-DR ghani gharwal 2014-01-09 01-46.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan -DR ghani gharwal 2014-01-09 01-45.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan-DR ghani gharwal 2014-01-09 01-44.jpg
- File:Rakhman 2014-01-09 01-42.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-40.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-38.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-37.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-36.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-33.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-32.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-31.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-30.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-29.jpg
- File:Banuchai khan 2014-01-09 01-19.jpg
- File:Nyamatullha 2014-01-09 01-18.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-13.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-11.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-10.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-09.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-08.jpg
- File:Khlilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-08.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-03.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 01-02.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-58.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-56.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-55.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-51.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-50.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-49.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-47.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-42.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-40.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-39.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-38.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 00-37.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-49.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-47.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-46.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-45.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan- 2014-01-08 23-44.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-43.jpg
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-08 23-42.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-23.JPG
- File:Khalilkhan k khan 2013-12-31 01-21.jpg
El Grafo (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
DeleteThe files should be speedied and the uploader should be issued a strict warning. Some even have plausible privacy issues (e.g. File:Khalilkhan k khan 2014-01-09 05-19.jpg). Rahul Bott (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: All files are speedy deleted by Denniss. JurgenNL (talk) 07:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leisure communications (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Office Linie café+co.png
- File:Die Goldene Kaffeebohne.jpg
- File:Café+co Café.png
- File:Café+co Office Linie.png
- File:Café+co-Automatendesign.png
- File:Café+co SB Café im Einkaufszentrum Q19 (Wien).png
- File:Café+co SB Café im „Mozarthaus Vienna“.png
- File:Café+co Samurai "Ippon Girls".png
- File:Café+co Office-Linie.png
- File:Café+co Mobil.png
- File:Café+co Gastro Linie Maschine.png
- File:Café+co Gastro Linie Kaffee.png
- File:Aquapush.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria Auxiliadora Castro Reinoso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text only images which should be replace with wiki and math markup.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images. The backgrounds images are likely copyvios.
Jespinos (talk) 02:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright violations [3], [4] Bidgee (talk) 07:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naimaforer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fails COM:EDUSE, and copyright violation
LEITOXX 21:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Scenes and posters from a movie/short film, so most probably copyrighted. To keep these, we need a written permission from the copyright holder via Commons:OTRS.
- File:Riccardo Sollecito aka Valerio Morigi in "Halina" (2013)..jpg
- File:Giovanna Di Rauso in "Halina" (2013).png
- File:Valerio Morigi in "Halina" (2013).jpg
- File:Saverio Prosdogemi in "Halina" (2013).jpg
- File:Lorenzo De Angelis in "Halina" (2013).png
- File:Giorgia Sinicorni in "Halina".png
- File:Halina-poster.jpg
..jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
El Grafo (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: All files deleted by User:Jcb as copyright violations. Bidgee (talk) 07:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, similar images (b&w, similar res, all related to the Spanish architect es:César Ortiz-Echagüe Rubio) were configured with an external source (needing permission).
- File:Biblioteca de la Universidad de Navarra.jpg
- File:Exposición y torre de oficinas, Filial de la SEAT.jpg
- File:Sucursal del Banco Popular Español.jpg
- File:Laboratorios de la SEAT.jpg
- File:Comedores de la SEAT, Barcelona.jpg
- File:Interior de los comedores de la SEAT.jpg
- File:CésarOrtiz-Echagüe.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tripl3rdmc454 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:TOYS.
Jespinos (talk) 02:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:38, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Logos and drawing, unlikely to be own works, no permission.
- File:Caricatura Creel.jpg
- File:Quiero Amarte logo.jpg
- File:Quiero Amarte.jpg.jpg
- File:Quiero Amarte.png.jpg
- File:María la del Barrio.jpg
Yann (talk) 19:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:38, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This image is clearly of the sculptural and architectural elements of the memorial (this is the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial, with the surrounding elements part of the Arras Memorial), so if French lack of freedom of panorama is enforced strictly, then this is a good example of an image that needs to go. I am still of the opinion that enforcing lack of FoP for long-dead architects and sculptors is needlessly cautious. In cases where the existing owners of any remaining copyright protection (be they the heirs of the original artists or the current owners of the site) are actively enforcing said copyright, then that should be respected, but I see no evidence that this is being done for Commonwealth War Graves Commission memorials in France. Would it help to directly ask the CWGC what the copyright situation is, and if there are any restrictions on photographing their memorial sites in France, or would the questions need to be more explicit? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
-2014-01-15T23:49:00.000Z-File:Arras_Memorial_and_Fauberg-D'Amiens_Cemetery_10.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This is a close-up of the carved globe at the top of the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial, so if French lack of freedom of panorama is enforced strictly, then this is a good example of an image that needs to go. I am still of the opinion that enforcing lack of FoP for long-dead architects and sculptors is needlessly cautious. In cases where the existing owners of any remaining copyright protection (be they the heirs of the original artists or the current owners of the site) are actively enforcing said copyright, then that should be respected, but I see no evidence that this is being done for Commonwealth War Graves Commission memorials in France. Would it help to directly ask the CWGC what the copyright situation is, and if there are any restrictions on photographing their memorial sites in France, or would the questions need to be more explicit? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
-2014-01-16T00:00:00.000Z-File:Arras_Memorial_and_Fauberg-D'Amiens_Cemetery_11.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pilgrimsong (talk · contribs)
[edit]photomontages, probably derivative works, unclear how to use them
- File:Waiting.......jpg
- File:The Eyes of My Apple.jpg
- File:Stool Softener.jpg
- File:Shine On.jpg
- File:Reach out for me..jpg
- File:PS Rocks.jpg
- File:Gorilla Crush.jpg
- File:On Watch.jpg
- File:Old Plum Island House.jpg
- File:Kitten Prey.jpg
- File:Johnnie Wayne.jpg
- File:Beautiful Mourning.jpg
91.66.63.89 08:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 07:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pilgrimsong (talk · contribs)
[edit]photomontages, mostly derivative works, unclear how to use them
- File:Because It's There.jpg
- File:To Be or Not To Be.jpg
- File:Monster Business.jpg
- File:Night Tower.jpg
- File:Light and Shadow.jpg
- File:Jonas sighs.....jpg
- File:Hands-Face.jpg
- File:Go Home Forest.jpg
- File:Dawn Rising.jpg
- File:At the gate......jpg
- File:Bad Bride.jpg
- File:And She Waits Still.......jpg
91.64.241.40 14:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Delted: com:SCOPE. Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work: photograph of contemporary (2002) medal Эlcobbola talk 22:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- What's the problem please? This is a scan of a medal that is in my personal collection. If you found it somewhere else, check the name of the person who uploaded it in the OMSA database or in the GMIC personal galeries, you will see it was also me as I own the copyright and can upload it where I like. Fdutil (talk) 23:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- See COM:DW. There are two copyrights: 1) the medal and 2) the photo of the medal. You may have taken the photo, and you may own the medal (mere physical property rights), but the medal's creator retains the intellectual property rights and thus his/her permission would be required to license this image freely. Эlcobbola talk 23:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK... I'll take it you're new at this. Been down this road before, unfortunately. Are you saying that every single photo of a contemporary medal on Wiki that isn't accompanied by a letter of permission from it's original creator/designer is to be deleted? If that is the case, you're looking at thousands of deletions from thousands of articles, just in phaleristics. If this is to be the case, please let me know, so many friends think me completely daft for spending so many countless hours contributing to Wiki in hundreds of articles vice publishing my own books... I'm simply tired of these arbitrary actions... Think I'll just stop coming here. Cheers! Fdutil (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- See COM:DW. There are two copyrights: 1) the medal and 2) the photo of the medal. You may have taken the photo, and you may own the medal (mere physical property rights), but the medal's creator retains the intellectual property rights and thus his/her permission would be required to license this image freely. Эlcobbola talk 23:28, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Well?
[edit]
So what is it going to be? Are you going to keep sporadically and completely arbitrarily doing this? If your argument is valid, then hundreds of thousands of photos on Wikipedia MUST be deleted post haste. In Phaleristics alone (look it up), on English Wiki alone, you're easily looking at 20,000+ photos to be deleted. Once you've done that, what's next? Toasters? Blenders? Tractors? Toilet plungers? Do you have any idea of how tiring and frustrating it is for people who donate thousands of hours of their time to Wiki and material from their personal property to have to go through this a few times a year... Fdutil (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- The latter is false; copyright law does not protect utilitarian or functional designs like that (they save those for patents). Medals are considered to be three-dimensional artwork, please read COM:DW. ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Just because we have not deleted every unlicenced image does not mean we cannot delete any. We must start somewhere. Stifle (talk) 17:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Not solely a text logo 4ing (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Not text logo Stifle (talk) 17:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
It seems that this image does not really show a color blindness test. Torsch (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unopposed request Stifle (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
je ne souhaite plus le partager cette taille de fichier Mairieaucamville (talk) 13:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Kept. Image is in use on frwiki and free licence is not revocable. Stifle (talk) 17:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Diverse gleichartige. Alles verweist auf File:DEU Kleve COA.svg Gunnar.offel (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused/duplicate Stifle (talk) 17:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
unused personal image - out of scope Santosga (talk) 13:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS. Disney's version of Winnie-the-Pooh. Jespinos (talk) 20:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Deleted Stifle (talk) 17:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Werk eines zeitgenössischen Künstlers, in CH keine Panoramafreiheit innen Martin Sg. (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 02:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The image is fictitious, self-made. The emblem itself was taken from Wikipedia, which was an incorrect version (as of 26 August 2010): power tower terminal on the left was missing. 101.229.178.1 13:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 02:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
There is only 3 images on this flickr account. The image may be a scan. Is this own work by the flickr account owner? Leoboudv (talk) 06:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
These are pictures of my grandpa and we have the pictures at home but they are on the internet as well so I don't really know who took the picture. And I don't know how copyrights work either. I tried to understand but I find it really complicated. Bboypanda (User talk:Bboypanda)
- Comment: The uploader is new. If there is No evidence of copyright violation, perhaps one could assume good faith and keep them. As long as the images are not out COM:SCOPE. (ie. it is an image of a notable person or a useful educational image) Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
My brother and I made a flickr account to upload the pictures of my grand father because we thought it would be easier to deal with copyrights that way. I really hope that we can keep this picture for my grandfather's wikipedia page Bboypanda (User talk:Bboypanda)
- If the image is not a copyvio and its in use on wikipedia, it may be kept. Goodbye, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Scanned photo with no indication of who the author is, no permission, etc. Doesn't look like a family photo, but possibly a scan from a magazine or newspaper. INeverCry 22:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- On second thoughts Delete. The uploader says "These are pictures of my grandpa and we have the pictures at home but they are on the internet as well so I don't really know who took the picture." Since they are on the internet, this means could mean that someone else took this picture originally and the uploader has a paper copy of it at home. Since they don't know who took the picture, the real photographer could surface and claim a copyright violation too. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
My mistake; I thought this was from Bundesarchiv, but it was actually taken by a British government photographer, so I doubt it's in public domain. Surtsicna (talk) 04:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, this photograph was also taken by a Ministry of Food photographer and is supposedly in public domain. Wouldn't this one also be in public domain then? Surtsicna (talk) 21:51, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept, I added license for England and some categories. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Diverse gleichartige. Alles verweist auf File:DEU Kleve COA.svg Gunnar.offel (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file, superseded with .svg. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Diverse gleichartige. Alles verweist auf File:DEU Kleve COA.svg Gunnar.offel (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file, superseded with .svg. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Diverse gleichartige. Alles verweist auf File:DEU Kleve COA.svg Gunnar.offel (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file, superseded with .svg. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work; photograph of stuffed animals (see COM:TOYS, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 22:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep For me, Wikipedia logo is de minimis and is not the main subject of the photo. Plus, these plushes has to be considered as convenience goods as they are not a derivative work of famous work of art like Star Wars or Astérix as mentionned in COM:TOYS. Happily, everything is not a work of art that shouldn't be freely shared. Obviously, these RfD is an abusive one. Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- "Copyright protection subsists [...] in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression" (17 USC § 102). Stuffed animals/dolls/etc. are original works, have authors, and are fixed in fabric. Indeed, they are considered "soft sculptures" and are unambiguously copyrighted. Certain relevant court cases are:
- Superior Form Builders, Inc. v. Dan Chase Taxidermy Supply Co., 74 F.3d 488 (1995)
- Gay Toys, Inc. v. Buddy L Corp., 703 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1983)
- Eden Toys Inc v. Marshall Field & Company, 675 F. 2d 498 (2nd. Cir. 1982)
- Ty Inc v. Gma Accessories Inc Harris, 132 F. 3d 1167 (7th Cir. 1997)
- American Greetings Corporation Cpg v. Dan-Dee Imports Inc Dan-Dee Imports, 807 F. 2d 1136 (3rd Cir. 1986)
- Dollcraft Industries, Ltd. v. Well-Made Toy Mfg., 479 F.Supp. 1105 (E.D.N.Y.1978)
- Kamar International Inc v. Russ Berrie and Co, 657 F. 2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1981)
- R. Dakin & Co. v. A & L Novelty Co., Inc. 444 F.Supp. 1080 (E.D.N.Y 1978)
- The notion, further, that copyright only applies to "famous work [sic] of art like Star Wars or Astérix" is ridiculous and unintelligent. If true, it would deny copyright protection to all but large international corporations. Being "famous" is not a criterion in any copyright law and is contrary to common sense. Эlcobbola talk 15:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- "Copyright protection subsists [...] in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression" (17 USC § 102). Stuffed animals/dolls/etc. are original works, have authors, and are fixed in fabric. Indeed, they are considered "soft sculptures" and are unambiguously copyrighted. Certain relevant court cases are:
Deleted, copyrighted toys. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
much too blurry for use Andy king50 (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Keep Not a valid reason. As long as we haven't a better version, this tag is the right one. --Ras67 (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Keep Bluriness is not a reason for deletion. No better version exists on Commons, apparently. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 02:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept, blurry image and I hope, that Commons will get one day sharper version about that painting. Then I am glad to delete present image. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Blue plaques in Monmouth
[edit]According to Commons:FOP#United_Kingdom, there is no freedom of panorama for 2D works in the UK. I don't know when these can be undeleted because it is unclear if they are published or not. Their website says they sell a booklet of some plaques set up in December 2009. It doesn't say anything about these so the safe date to undelete these would be 2129. (120 years after creation)
- File:Drybridge House 2012 plaque.jpg
- File:Information about Great Castle House - geograph.org.uk - 867899.jpg
- File:Informative plaque on Monnow Bridge - geograph.org.uk - 1241357.jpg
- File:Monmouth bridge plaque.jpg
- File:MonmouthpediA 2011 plaque.jpg
- File:St Thomass Church Monmouth Oct 2011 4.jpg
- File:St Thomass Church Monmouth Oct 2011 plaque 2.jpg
Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This debate has been had before with ref to plaques in Coventry. Do look back through the archives as this is a precedent. I imagine it might stem from their being no image to attract a copyright.... and I suspect that putting text in the street is an act of publication. Victuallers (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Could you please point to this specific discussion? Just saying that it is in "the archives" is not specific enough for me to find it. Text is copyrightable, not just images, and these are considered not published. See Commons:Publication. Also, even if they were published, they would still be copyrighted. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, there is no freedom of panorama in UK for 2D objects. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Diverse gleichartige. Alles verweist auf File:DEU Kleve COA.svg (bessere Version) sowie siehe Diskussion (heraldisches Rot ist kein Karminrot) Gunnar.offel (talk) 02:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Nein, File:DEU Kleve COA.svg ist später entworfen worden und nicht die bessere, sondern die schlechtere Version. Wer hat den deletion request gestellt? Ich werde das Wappen auf den entsprechenden Artikeln wieder einstellen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.156.163.15 (talk • contribs)
Kept, I agree with anonymous person. Although unused, I consider this image better than the other. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chelseaangelo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of promo images. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Chelsea Angelo Formula Ford Test Winton.png
- File:Chelsea Angelo First V8 Test.jpg
- File:Chelsea Angelo First National Round Formula Ford.jpg
- File:Chelsea Angelo Motorbike.jpeg
- File:Chelsea Angelo V8 Test 2013.jpg
- File:Chelsea Angelo F3 Testing 2013.jpg
- File:Chelsea angelo formula ford winton test.png
- File:Chelsea Angelo CAMS Manual 2014.jpg
- File:Chelsea Angelo First Kart.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
These are not promotional photos. They are photos of a racing car driver with her racing car. This is common with many (1000s) of racing car driver promotional pages.
I hope she hasn't been singled out because she is a female racing car driver.
I took all of these photos with the exception of:
These two photos were taken by Chelsea Angelo's family and therefore we have permission for use of all of the images.
Kept: AGF. Yann (talk) 06:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Raúl Alfonsín -Presidente - escoltado por soldados con sus caras pintadas -presidenciagovar.jpg
[edit]
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2084 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose According to this diff, you have modified the license of the image to the one you are complaining about now. If you think that the image should be deleted, point what was wrong with the original license Cambalachero (talk) 16:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, indeed I changed the license because this file is not hosted at Presidency website (Here are all the photos related to Raúl Alfonsín on Presidency website). This photo was previously published in other media (magazines) in 1987, so I changed the tag to {{PD-AR-Photo}}. Moreover, you can find this image at other websites like this - Fma12 (talk) 22:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2084 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose According to this diff, you have modified the license of the image to the one you are complaining about now. If you think that the image should be deleted, point what was wrong with the original license
- Delete Yes, indeed, I modified the license because this image is not hosted at Presidency of Argentina website (as the uploader stated). The only Menem's photo (as president) found at the website is this so I support my request.
- In fact, some users upload photos previously published on other media tagging them with {{CC-AR-Presidency}} (which is obviously wrong), as I commented on other DR. - Fma12 (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Carlos Menem became President of Argentina on July 8, 1989, therfore this is copyright in the US as there were no requirements regards notices after March 1 1989. LGA talkedits 09:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 10:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in the UK LGA talkedits 10:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Also :
- File:2010-10-13-london-by-RalfR-036.jpg
- File:Baker Street stn Bakerloo line platform motif close-up.JPG
- File:Holmes in tube.jpg
- File:London 01 2013 Baker Street station 5359.JPG
- File:Sherlock Holmes, No Smoking.jpg
- File:Situational irony.jpg
LGA talkedits 10:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep because this is no artwork --Ralf Roleček 12:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No artwork. It's derived from a PD image (File:Mistery stub.png) SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Reopen because of this
- File:2010-10-13-london-by-RalfR-036.jpg
- File:Baker Street stn Bakerloo line platform motif close-up.JPG
- File:Holmes in tube.jpg
- File:London 01 2013 Baker Street station 5359.JPG
- File:Sherlock Holmes, No Smoking.jpg
- File:Situational irony.jpg
adding also:
because it appears to be still under copyright. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Adding DW :
LGA talkedits 13:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - it's definitely artwork. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 22:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 09:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This image shows a wreath at the base of the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial, with some of the name panels visible. The background shows some of the archways of the Arras Memorial, with the memorial/cemetery's Cross of Sacrifice visible at the far end. Some architectural elements are visible, but is this enough to trigger French lack of freedom of panorama here? The Crosses of Sacrifice were designed by another architect, Reginald Blomfield (1856-1942), so I believe images focusing on the Crosses of Sacrifice are OK. As I've stated on other nominations, I am still of the opinion that enforcing lack of FoP for long-dead architects and sculptors is needlessly cautious. In cases where the existing owners of any remaining copyright protection (be they the heirs of the original artists or the current owners of the site) are actively enforcing said copyright, then that should be respected, but I see no evidence that this is being done for Commonwealth War Graves Commission memorials in France. Would it help to directly ask the CWGC what the copyright situation is, and if there are any restrictions on photographing their memorial sites in France, or would the questions need to be more explicit? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 00:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
-2014-01-16T00:10:00.000Z-File:Arras_Memorial_and_Fauberg-D'Amiens_Cemetery_12.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep - the architectural elements here, such as they are, are now public domain, both by Lutyens and Blomfield. No sculptural elements by Dick are visible here. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Probably okay, DM applies FASTILY 23:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
The composition of this image was intended to show the full extent and size of the Arras Memorial and the war graves in the Fauberg-D'Amiens Cemetery (not all the graves are shown and the memorial itself extends some more off to the right). Clearly, the architectural elements of the memorial are enough to trigger French lack of freedom of panorama, but it is still galling that this is being enforced so strictly. These images were taken in September 2010, over three years ago. Has Commons always been this strict about things like this? I still find it very hard to believe that the original sculptors and architects, and their heirs, would be raising any objections to photographs being taken of war memorials such as these. The cemetery contains over 2,650 CWGC burials, the memorial inscriptions list 34,785 names of the missing, and the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial has nearly 1000 names. As I've stated on other nominations, I am still of the opinion that enforcing lack of FoP for long-dead architects and sculptors is needlessly cautious. In cases where the existing owners of any remaining copyright protection (be they the heirs of the original artists or the current owners of the site) are actively enforcing said copyright, then that should be respected, but I see no evidence that this is being done for Commonwealth War Graves Commission memorials in France. Would it help to directly ask the CWGC what the copyright situation is, and if there are any restrictions on photographing their memorial sites in France, or would the questions need to be more explicit? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
-2014-01-16T00:29:00.000Z-File:Arras_Memorial_and_Fauberg-D'Amiens_Cemetery_14.JPG){kind=link}
- Keep - was missing the obvious here. The architectural elements of the memorial are public domain since it is more than 70 years since the architect (Lutyens) died. The sculptural elements by Dick were for the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial (which is de minimis here). Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France FASTILY 23:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/2015. An UnDR agreed with me that the Dick memorial is de minimis -- in fact, almost invisible. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
The composition of this image focuses on the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial (with sculpture by William Reid Dick). The surrounding architectural elements of the Arras Memorial were to a design by Edwin Lutyens, so as far as I'm aware the elements of that are OK under the rule of the 70-year term. But as the sculptor Dick died later, images focusing on the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial may be a problem. The Stone of Remembrance (in the foreground) was to a design by Lutyens, so that is OK I think. Clearly, the architectural elements of this image and the dates of the sculptor are enough to trigger French lack of freedom of panorama. It does seem a touch ironic that the Stone of Remembrance states "Their Name Liveth For Evemore", but later developments in French copyright laws means that rights to distribution and use of photography of the site are restricted until 70 years after the death of the artists - I'm still not convinced that those drafting such French laws intended them to apply in situations such as this. And as I've stated on other nominations, I am still of the opinion that enforcing lack of FoP for long-dead architects and sculptors is needlessly cautious. In cases where the existing owners of any remaining copyright protection (be they the heirs of the original artists or the current owners of the site) are actively enforcing said copyright, then that should be respected, but I see no evidence that this is being done for Commonwealth War Graves Commission memorials in France. Would it help to directly ask the CWGC what the copyright situation is, and if there are any restrictions on photographing their memorial sites in France, or would the questions need to be more explicit? Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
-2014-01-16T00:44:00.000Z-File:Arras_Memorial_and_Fauberg-D'Amiens_Cemetery_9.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: There is no FOP in France FASTILY 23:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - the architectural elements of this memorial (by Lutyens) are public domain under the 70-year term. No sculptural elements by Dick are present (he did the sculpture for the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial, a separate structure). Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France FASTILY 23:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/15. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. This is the English-language version of the inscription panel for the Arras Memorial and the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial. As far as I am aware, there are no restrictions on the memorial or its inscriptions. The architectural elements (minimal in any case) are by Lutyens and are now public domain. There are no sculptural elements by Dick in this image (he worked on the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial, a separate structure). The text of the inscription would have been provided by the IWGC (as it then was) and its literary advisor Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936). The memorial itself was unveiled in 1932, so that may count as a publication date for this text. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:32, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France. Is this text copyrighted? Unclear copyright status FASTILY 23:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/2015 I doubt very much that this text ever had a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. This is the French-language version of the inscription panel for the Arras Memorial and the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial. As far as I am aware, there are no restrictions on the memorial or its inscriptions. The architectural elements (minimal in any case) are by Lutyens and are now public domain. There are no sculptural elements by Dick in this image (he worked on the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial, a separate structure). The text of the inscription would have been provided by the IWGC (as it then was) and its literary advisor Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936). The memorial itself was unveiled in 1932, so that may count as a publication date for this text. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France. Is this text copyrighted? Unclear copyright status FASTILY 23:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/2015 I doubt very much that this text ever had a copyright and the architect is now dead 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - this image shows only architectural elements of the Arras Memorial, designed by Edwin Lutyens (1869-1944). Those elements are in the public domain. No sculptural work by Dick is present in this image. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France. FASTILY 23:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/2015 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - this image shows only architectural elements of the Arras Memorial, designed by Edwin Lutyens (1869-1944). Those elements are in the public domain. No sculptural work by Dick is present in this image. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France. FASTILY 23:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/2015 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - this image shows only architectural elements of the Arras Memorial, designed by Edwin Lutyens (1869-1944). Those elements are in the public domain. No sculptural work by Dick is present in this image. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France. FASTILY 23:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/2015 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
French FOP. Sir Edwin Landseer Lutyens (1869–1944) Labattblueboy (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- William Reid Dick (1879–1961) also.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - this image shows only architectural elements of the Arras Memorial, designed by Edwin Lutyens (1869-1944). Those elements are in the public domain. No sculptural work by Dick is present in this image (he carved the globe on top of the Arras Royal Flying Corps Memorial, a separate structure). The sculptural work present here is by an unknown sculptor and is de minimis. The Cross of Sacrifice seen through the archway is to a design by Reginald Blomfield (1856-1942), so the design elements there are public domain. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 01:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France. FASTILY 23:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Restored as of 1/1/2015 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
