Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/01/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 15th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/YangEnTi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxzata123 (talk • contribs) 16:12, January 14, 2014‎ (UTC)

G10 Shane Fang1982 (talk) 04:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader Shane Fang1982 requested deletion of unused file. Quality is quite bad. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright as per DND/MDN. T's and C's say - you may reproduce the materials in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes - is this allowed on commons? Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: speedy deleted as out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional, out of scope imo Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy closed, author also seemed to agree. Trijnsteltalk 14:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No licence and derivative of non-free content Leitoxx 19:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Geni (talk) 19:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image contains advertising/self-promotion (an invitation to email the user if the viewer "likes what they see"). Schaea (talk) 23:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Per COM:PENIS, and image contains advertising/self-promotion ("e-mail me if you like this cock"), –Krinkletalk 23:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful in terms of understanding concepts Tekksavvy (talk) 22:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - no source for the three images given, unlikely that all were made by the authour as they are radically different in composition. Also requested deletion by author on my enwp talkpage. Acather96 (talk) 12:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very weak reason. It should be pointed the copied source of some of the images or their parts.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Actually it is both a new and a very good reason. While the first image -- the underwater baby, appears on Commons, the second, the weightlifter, I could find only on copyrighted clip-art sites. Since the first image makes it clear that the uploader is not the author, as claimed, we need to known where all three came from. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted' .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! FOR ADMIN: you may keep it and upload it under your name! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! FOR ADMIN: you may keep it and upload it under your name! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dont need it for my online notes! Tekksavvy (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! FOR ADMIN: you may keep it and upload it under your name! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment What is this about "the blog it was hosted for"?? This was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, and seems to be within project scope. You have twice listed it for deletion. Could you please explain why this was uploaded and why you formerly thought this belonged here and now you do not? Wondering, -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept No valid reason given for deletion. The CC-BY-SA license is irrevocable and we rarely delete a good image just because the uploader doesn't it want it on Commons anymore. Please do not nominate this image for deletion again. Once is OK, the second time is a waste of Commons time, a third time would be vandalism. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dont need it for my notes Tekksavvy (talk) 03:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: / .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! FOR ADMIN: you may keep it and upload it under your name! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep This is still not a valid reason for deletion. Commons is not your private web host and this image is here for anyone who might need it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:01, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You released it under a free licence, it doesn't require a non-free use rationale, and if it did we wouldn't host it anyway. However, as this is an easily replaceable file where the uploader has requested deletion, I say  Delete. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep This is one of twenty plus of his own files that the user has nominated for a second time. Some are in use, all are useful. There is no reason to put up with repeated requests that don't have any reason. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:01, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dont need it for my notes Tekksavvy (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: / .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concepts and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:05, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep This is still not a valid reason for deletion. Commons is not your private web host and this image is here for anyone who might need it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 22:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! Tekksavvy (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Don't need this for the blog and there are already lots of images for this plant on the web! Tekksavvy (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is thymus citriodorus (see the label). And there are only 25 photos of this species. It is not so many. --Tangopaso (talk) 22:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for! FOR ADMIN: you may keep it and upload it under your name! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep This is still not a valid reason for deletion. Commons is not your private web host and this image is here for anyone who might need it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for understanding concept and no longer useful for the blog it was hosted for. Also, image box is blank! Tekksavvy (talk) 23:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: improper deletion reason Denniss (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 08:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep no new reason given. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be an author, however on his Polish page stated, that he was born in 1988 (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedysta:Przemys%C5%82aw_Berli%C5%84ski ). Highly questionable origins of the photo. Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 00:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-authorized cap from a TV show. Own work? How could pt:Henrique Baldassare photographed himself? Yanguas (talk) 01:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of notability, not part of General Dynamics, and a duplicate of File:GurbinderS.JPG (which also should be deleted). Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by PNG Hazmat2 (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, not used anywhere TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 04:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown person in picture, private picture, some homepage picture Motopark (talk) 05:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Warfieldian (talk) 01:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Jameslwoodward deleted the file with reason "Recreation of content deleted per community consensus". Taivo (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in italy FunkMonk (talk) 06:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uses copyrighted images. FunkMonk (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in us FunkMonk (talk) 06:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fopin us FunkMonk (talk) 06:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in us FunkMonk (talk) 06:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hate to do it, but the presumably copyrighted sculpture is the focal point and main interest of this picture, so we can't call it de minimis. Unless we have the sculptors permission, I believe we have to delete this. Jmabel ! talk 06:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't be own work - see url in image - think this is a copyvio Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No actual source, author, license Hazmat2 (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not educationally useful; random group photo with no subject Tortie tude (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not educationally useful; people standing around with no description of who they are or what they are doing Tortie tude (talk) 08:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 24.134.91.178 08:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not educationally useful; totally random snapshot of people milling around. Tortie tude (talk) 08:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not educationally useful; group shot of some people Tortie tude (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not educationally useful; group shot of some people. Commons isn't Facebook. Tortie tude (talk) 08:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user logo 24.134.91.178 09:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 24.134.91.178 09:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work 24.134.91.178 10:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality selfie, unused.out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unused. Out of scope - not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work, no permission 24.134.91.178 10:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soviet architecture (built in 1955), no FoP in Russia A.Savin 10:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality Out of COM:SCOPE, unused A.Savin 10:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not a memorial site Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality - hard to determine subject Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE A.Savin 10:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE A.Savin 10:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of contemporary sculpture, no FoP in Russia A.Savin 10:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense . 24.134.91.178 11:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of possibly copyrighted poster A.Savin 11:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry pic from a schoolbook, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, unused and so out of scope A.Savin 11:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of Soviet sculpture created after 1945, no FoP in Russia A.Savin 11:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 24.134.91.178 11:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per Penis, there are better examples of this Flickrworker (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright non expiré, photo recente et signée Classiccardinal (talk) 11:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 24.134.91.178 11:48, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2070 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2079 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2077 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2074 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2073 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 12:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image under copyright Ajuntament de Mataró (talk) 13:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the church shed is work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 13:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: this part of the church is work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 13:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the lamp is work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 13:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the depicted architecture is work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 13:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque no lo puedo compartir dice JorgeGarcia1990 (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no la puedo compartir dice JorgeGarcia1990 (talk) 13:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 14:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of website, promotional purposes. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a town called "Duni". This is a collection of three photos of New York City taken from internet and put together without any license information. This image is used for a hoax Wikipedia article about a made-up town called "Duni" (see: w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duni, Assam). Vanjagenije (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: looks like a photoshopped personal image. Probably not own work. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 16:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This album cover appears unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Since it has been published broadly before, we would need a permission via COM:OTRS. El Grafo (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical web resolution of this image - likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 16:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Typical web resolution of this image - likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 16:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown persons, some homepage picture, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 17:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown persons, some homepage picture, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload hiccuped Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted design of poster. It is likely that the source of the photo on the poster is copyrighted. Wylve (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of modern art; per COM:FOP, Spanish FoP does not apply to interiors. Эlcobbola talk 18:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I followed the instructions for getting a photo uploaded to put on my Wikipedia user page. I am a campus ambassador for Colgate University and having a picture is appropriate.


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Blocked in enwiki/ Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: self-promotion. ([1]) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company INeverCry 18:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a Commons:URAA problem. In the US its still copyrighted until end of 2072 (95 years after publication). - Fma12 (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture of me was a wrong picture with a bad quality Toilet (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Profile image of user with almost no edits. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:09, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not-in-use user page image. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely bad quality, useless Indeedous (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims the copyright owner granted PD for this image. He links to http://www.marlinfirearms.com/Firearms/xt/XT22.asp But there I only read: © 2013 Marlin Firearms Avron (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

سرشناس نیست Msanta20 (talk) 20:36, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture, not educational value, not used Avron (talk) 20:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture obviously taken from random websites on the internet [2]. First downloaded to the Albanian Wikipedia, then transferred to Commons. There's no reasonable evidence that the Wikipedia user is the author of this photograph. Dantadd 21:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, no educational value, not used Avron (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: personal picture. Nixón (wop!) 21:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this coat of arms in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to come from here: http://www.proza.ru/avtor/jeanneaster. Needs OTRS permission if it was uploaded here by someone representing the copyright holder. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; see ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/The bonds of TUPLS (BOT) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

laurent.peters 87.158.197.140 08:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason stated PierreSelim (talk) 07:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie 4ing (talk) 08:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Commons:Nudity official guidelines: "Categories such as male reproductive system, penis and vaginas show that Commons has a large quantity of images relating to human genitalia. New images of low resolution or poor quality, which provide little descriptive information, of a subject we already have images of, may be nominated for deletion, citing appropriate rationale(s). Such images are of limited value as media for categories related to human anatomy and stages of development." This photo is blurry, has inadequate lighting, is taken from a bad angle, and has no artistic merit; it simply doesn't illustrate the *subject* adequately enough to be of use, especially compared to the other hundreds of human penis photos we have already. Nor does the *subject* have any unique, unusual, or particularly interesting features that might increase our knowledge or understanding of the human penis. Thank you. Tortie tude (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality of COM:Nudity PierreSelim (talk) 07:40, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May or may not be a copyright violation, but appears to be out of scope anyway. El Grafo (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Both out of scope and copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 07:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Argentine work, published/created (or sourced with - as indicated) 1972, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US till the end of 2067 (+95 years). Gunnex (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 02:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixelated and unused, have File:Benzocyclobutadiene.svg DMacks (talk) 05:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 23:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no fop in us FunkMonk (talk) 06:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of panorama. FunkMonk (talk) 06:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Pictures of sculptures in the US are not allowed on commons unless the sculpture is in the public domain. Natuur12 (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is one of a series of DRs filed by this user on his own files without any valid reason. Almost all of them are for the second time or third time, without any good reason. Most are in use. This one is not in use, but it is perfectly useable and well within scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is one of a series of DRs filed by this user on his own files without any valid reason. Almost all of them are for the second time or third time, without any good reason. Most are in use. This one is not in use, but it is perfectly useable and well within scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  KeepThis is one of a series of DRs filed by this user on his own files. Almost all of them are for the second time -- this one obviously not -- without any good reason. Most are in use. This one is not in use, but it is perfectly useable and well within scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is one of a series of DRs filed by this user on his own files. Almost all of them are for the second time -- this one obviously not -- without any good reason. Most are in use. This one is not in use, but it is perfectly useable and well within scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In use. This is one of a series of DRs filed by this user on his own files. Almost all of them are for the second time -- this one obviously not -- without any good reason. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F6. Missing non-free use rationale Tekksavvy (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this messeage at the source page:© 2013 KpopStarz. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission. Puramyun31 (talk) 08:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A different crop of this image is credited to © Nancy G. Brown [4], who appears to be the subject's wife. To keep this file, we would need evidence that the person uploading the file is in fact Mrs. Brown. El Grafo (talk) 11:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete that one? It is a CC license, but I clicked the wrong box when uploading it.TMDrew (talk) 14:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TMDrew: Thanks for updating the description. If the file has heally been released under a Creative Commons License compatible with COM:Licensing (note that there are different kinds of CC licenses and not all of them are allowed here), we might be able to keep it – but we need proof of that. Unfortunately, all I can find at http://askdrbrown.org/ is a note saying © 2013 | All Rights Reserved, so why do you think it has been released under a CC license? In case you asked Mrs. Brown for a release: Please refer to COM:OTRS – there you'll find instructions on how to proceed. If you have any questions about the process, contact our support team using the e-mail-address provided there, giving them as much details on this case as possible. Or just ask here and I'll try to help as good as I can. --El Grafo (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just messaged Nancy Brown asking her to email Wikimedia declaring that the photo is Creative Commons.TMDrew (talk) 19:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This picture is no longer needed. Please deleteTMDrew (talk) 19:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Fastility Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description 24.134.91.178 11:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not having a description is not a reason to delete. Flickrworker (talk) 11:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyrightviolation, non free printscreen Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Collages: image sources and their authors are missing. At least this one was not created by the uploader. El Grafo (talk) 12:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind: found the list at es.wp and added the missing information myself.  Keep now, but for the future: @DjAvrilPerry90: please always remember to list your sources and credit the original authors. --El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Español: Los autores fueron agregados. Lo siento pues se me olvidó. No volvera a ocurrir.
True blue ...baby, i love you 23:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
¡Gracias! --El Grafo (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Seems fixed Natuur12 (talk) 18:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty Category (all the images were deleted due to URAA copyright). - Fma12 (talk) 12:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category. - Fma12 (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free rendering, no evidence of permission. Eleassar (t/p) 13:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Žepni park B&B bar (4588840688).jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:23, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the column at the left side (a street light) is work by Jože Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 13:24, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped out. --Sporti (talk) 14:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Fixed Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given reason for this file to be in the public domain appears to dubious: "This was a photo uploaded by the author of a public domain who is a wildlife photographer." I simply don't understand what the uploader is trying to tell us here. El Grafo (talk) 14:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This author has been adding copyvio content to enwp using made up sources. Has also uploaded a blatant copyvio image here a few days ago (and nommed it for FA image). Persists despite warnings. This image caption is copyvio. This image appears at many sources on tineye. This image author says "Gobinda Sinha" and "Sinha" appears as his name at his enwp userpage. His previous copyvio image he claimed to be the photographer. In other words, "strong delete" and I'm watching his contribs here and at enwp. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a town in India. These are three photos of Berlin, Copenhagen and Guwahati taken from Commons and combined. Original authors are not attributed, so it's a copyrights violation. Original files are: File:Dom Berlin abends (jha).jpg, File:Colourful façades along Nyhavn.jpg and File:GS Road Guwahhat by Vikramjit Kakati.png. This file is made to be used for a hoax page w:Namkhola in English Wikipedia about a made-up town. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by Schloss Rosenstein#Löwentor Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely small, better version in svg Indeedous (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE INeverCry 22:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original black and white image is in the public domain, but this colorized version is not in the public domain. 173.87.189.81 22:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work" - found at multiple Web sites using Google Image Search, including last.fm, lastfm.as and lastfm.es Dwpaul (talk) 23:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Kleffmann Group.gif Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Miss upload わいはま (talk) 04:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss upload わいはま (talk) 04:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploaders request shortly after upload and image is not in use. PierreSelim (talk) 07:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BJ Dilbar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christine emmelda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bunch of soccer photos, mostly low-resolution files more or less obviously grabbed from the web, some of them even containing watermarks. I didn't bother to run them all through the google image search, because I think it's pretty much obvious that they are copyright violations.

El Grafo (talk) 12:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolutions and mostly missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC) --- Deleted Ezarateesteban 21:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmln93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After recently identifying several uploads as copyvio it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP, considering also upload behaviour per User talk:Fmln93) can't be believed either. Uploader grabbed images mostly from several official Facebook-accounts or sites of Uruguayan association football clubs or related sites (blogs/e-commerce sites as mercadolibre.cl etc.), including cropping/hiding out watermarks etc. Nominating only files without exif-info (there are only 2 images with exif available). All files uploaded in 2013.

Gunnex (talk) 10:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios PierreSelim (talk) 07:43, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmln93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own work. These are logos. Furthermore, several other logo images uploaded by this user can be found elsewhere on the Internet.

Stefan4 (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JorgeGarcia1990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - policy allows a few userpage images, but not a large collection like this - the user has them in a gallery on es:Usuario:JorgeGarcia1990, which looks like a promotional autobiography anyways

INeverCry 21:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not anymore. Savh deleted his userpage so those are not in use anymore and out of scope. Natuur12 (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jose Luis Sanchez D. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juan Miguel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying around 10 uploads (from 2007 to 2011) as copyvio (grabbed from different Flickr-accounts, blogs, news sites, skyscrapercity.com etc., see User talk:Juan Miguel for details.) and clearing 4 files with false claim of authorship (example: File:Metrocentro Santa Ana.jpg) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Additional info: File:Extension estimada Cihuatan.jpg is a map licensed with {{Copyrighted free use}} sourced with an actual unavailable .pdf-file. vmvdu.mop.gob.sv (archive from 2011) is configured with "Derechos Reservados ©2010".

Gunnex (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I really hate myself for deleting all those files but low ref, no exif data etc. I kept the COA since I belive this one needs an individidual Dr and I kept a map since the orriginal was uploaded by someone else. Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matias Emanuel Silva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-quality personal photos of unidentified subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matu Silva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-quality personal photos of unidentified subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Megumissima (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I'm not sure that these images are in COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:OTRS validation is required and they look like promotional images if you ask me. Not in use. Natuur12 (talk) 17:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebastian Aroca Carpio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonupandit37 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by أيمن الليلة (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own works, see also http://www.iraqiparty.com/news_item/5965/

24.134.91.178 09:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by أيمن الليلة (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own works"

24.134.91.178 09:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be his own work Natuur12 (talk) 18:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hiccup during multi page upload Wiki-ny-2007 (talk) 17:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free material, I guess. The picture is said to be both "own work" and "taken from the Turkish government-run TV". The description also claims that we can use it because "it's low resolution", "there are not commercial symbols in the frame" and its use on Wikipedia would be "educational". Damiens.rf 15:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • So Damiens.rf, please teach me how I can convert the picture into the appropriate level regarding "the wikimedia commons image rules". Which policy should I follow in the description box of the picture? What type of "Copyright tag/license" should I place such as "CC-BY-SA", "GNU Free Documentation License" and etc.?
I am waiting for your direction --Toksoz (talk) 20:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Borovnica-model od viaduct as fence on private land.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 12:13, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Ljubljana 063.JPG. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, probably surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Formally incorrect version of this CoA (form of the escutcheon). For the correct version see File:Wolfsberg wappen vektor.svg. Sakra (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MuyDaniel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The images most likely aren't own work of the uploader and likely aren't in the public domain in the United States per URAA.

Jespinos (talk) 14:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All the images are press releases of an argentinean sports club available online whitout copyright restrictions in http://www.argentinosjuniors.com.ar so they shouldn't be deleted--MuyDaniel (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MuyDaniel continues uploading images of uncertain copyright status without having clarified the copyright issues of the images listed here. Jespinos (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, if the photos are publicly in web, then this does not mean, that you can upload these photos into Commons. At first is possible, that Argentinosjuniors has special permission for publishing the photos in its site. Commons needs also OTRS-permission. At second is possible, that Argentinosjuniors violates photographer's copyright, Commons must not repeat that mistake. I'll look MuyDaniel's other uploads and delete them, if needed. Taivo (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MuyDaniel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:MuyDaniel / previous DR / logs. All files uploaded 02.2014 mostly (if not all) for es:Asociación Atlética Argentinos Juniors, an Argentina footbal club.

Gunnex (talk) 01:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Per nomination. Basvb (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait photos uploaded by Raguilarcubillos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A bunch of portrait photos from different sources. Most are just plain copyright violations. Some (like File:HernanLagosO.JPG) are from elrancahuaso.cl - they are marked CC-BY-SA 3.0 here but are actually CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 [6]. Others from elmostrador.cl turn out to be actually CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 [7]. There are others which seem to be OK, coming from the Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile ({{CC-Historia Política BCN}}) – I've left them out. There are also some Logos and figures uploaded by this user, which I've not included in this DR. Might be worth checking them as well, though.

El Grafo (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info I've checked every single one of these images, but since most of the source pages are in French (which I'm not too familiar with) or Spanish (which I don't speak at all), I might have missed "hidden" notes about free licenses. Please double-check before you delete anything. Thanks, --El Grafo (talk) 14:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The user don't understand about the Wikimedia Commons licenses, and literally upload pictures implicitly. I suggest also a block. --Taichi (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Taichi and COM:PRP Alan (talk) 20:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

REASON (A Scanned copy of a Photograph. Not for GFDL) Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copy of the photo from my father (all rights with him). It was worked and scanned to use for wiki. I fail to understand the reason for deletion. Clarify. How can i avoid it been getting deleted. it is been there in wiki for past several years (~10) Sreekanthv (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think for GFDL or CC-BY-SA licenses the owner or creater of the photograph must upload himself/herself. Also OTRS system is available in Wikipedia. "This is a copy of the photo from my father" means all rights to your father. He must upload the photo or OTRS from him needed to publish in wiki. Also scanned unmodified copy needed. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: AGF. Yann (talk) 14:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]