Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/01/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 19th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User is no longer active. Permission states "All Rights Reserved" but the image is tagged {{PD-Self}}... Which one is it? AdmrBoltz 06:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read more carefully. It says "All Rights Released," not reserved. IFCAR (talk) 06:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. Editing too late at night. Sorry! Request withdrawn. --AdmrBoltz 06:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: fine then JuTa 10:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently moved to Category:Adolf Wagner (Economist) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2014-01-12T09:27:01‎ (UTC)


Deleted: by Fastily JuTa 11:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

création par erreur d'une page au lieu d'une catégorie Pinetfriend (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please use ::t|speedy}} for routine housekeeping. It uses less human and computer resources. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Edited image, out of scope. Likely derivate of a copyrighted image, per watermark. Savhñ 16:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an upgraded version of copyrighted picture: http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTcwNTk5OTgyN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMTY5MDI5MDE@._V1__SX640_SY720_.jpg Mbch331 (talk) 21:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. My fault. File should be removed.


Deleted: cpvio JuTa 22:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by YLSS as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Deprecated redirect. All usage has been replaced (except on user pages and project galleries). Stefan4 (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by YLSS as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Deprecated redirect. All usage has been replaced (except on user pages). Stefan4 (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there have been a lot of such deletion requests. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unused photo Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, we have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 21:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken by André Kertész, who died in 1985; not PD. Piisamson (talk) 13:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a bit of a hard time understanding why this was not deleted as a copyvio, as the photo is certainly not own work as was marked by the uploader. -- Piisamson (talk) 09:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand correctly, I have been asked for a source that this photograph is indeed taken by Kertész. The photo can be found on page 99 in the book "André Kertész: A Lifetime of Perception", edited by Jane Corkin. (ISBN: 90-6012-968-7) -- Piisamson (talk) 13:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ОК. Delete. В русском журнале "Огонёк" автор не указан. --Vizu (talk) 22:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available here: http://www.2-71adataiwan.com/. Unclear if this drawing is public domain or not. If it was drawn by someone not in their official duties in the US Army, it is non-free. See Commons:Coats of arms for details. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a previously loaded image that is identical to this image and agree it should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wkthomson (talk • contribs) 21:42, January 24, 2014‎ (UTC)


Deleted: uploader request Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:15, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope The Yeti 18:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user photo from a now blocked enWP user. AdmrBoltz 21:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope image The Yeti 23:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary; we have this logo in a lossless format: File:Logoneoxamarillo.gif Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (COM:PS) - no educational value High Contrast (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By Uploader: When I transferred to commons, I missed that there is no source, and may in fact still be under copyright in Malaysia. Hazmat2 (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Used only in self-promoting user page deleted at en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BlackTwista. JohnCD (talk) 15:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, not valid as de minimis Alan (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality selfie, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Appears to be a self-image which is promotional and unused on any wikis. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to the duplicate File:Alenbo Fire .png, which is in use meanwhile in es:Alenbou. --JuTa 22:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Kept the other one which is still in use. (Lets wait for the article on es.wiki to get deleted.) McZusatz (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Indeedous (talk) 22:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contains 2 nonsense licences 91.64.241.40 13:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Indeedous (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie-out of scope Indeedous (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At the request of the user Margedon (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, blurred: most likely cropped from X Gunnex (talk) 23:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Gunnex (talk) 22:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:56, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No foreseeable use - see en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mental CreepersRHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 16.05.2011 but previsously published (even with lower res) via (example) http://elcomercio.pe/lima/sucesos/buses-alimentadores-metropolitano-comenzaron-operar-cono-norte-noticia-685142 (2010, © Empresa Editora El Comercio) = http://cde.elcomercio.pe/66/ima/0/0/2/6/3/263450.jpg (last modified: 2010) or Google. Gunnex (talk) 23:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 16.05.2011 but previsously published (even with lower res) via (example) http://peru21.pe/noticia/467986/piden-que-maquinas-metropolitano-den-vuelto (2010, © Prensa Popular) = http://e.peru21.pe/102/ima/0/0/1/3/6/136182.jpg (last modified: 2010) or Google Gunnex (talk) 23:52, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. derivative work based on a non-free image Dsprc (talk) 01:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Jcb (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No foreseeable use - see en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mental CreepersRHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:09, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Content found elsewhere online;[1] unlikely to be own work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image out of scope The Yeti 15:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considered unlikely to be user's own work. Stifle (talk) 17:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:otrs McZusatz (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست کاربر Mohsen0asgari (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 21:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Gunnex (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: found on the web McZusatz (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded on 04.08.2011. Unclear copyright status: Previously published via http://building-pc.cocolog-nifty.com/helicopter/2011/02/post-b467-1.html (26.02.2011) = http://building-pc.cocolog-nifty.com/photos/uncategorized/2011/02/26/tokyoskytree110222.jpg (last modified: 26.02.2011) Gunnex (talk) 23:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Superwiki1001/Omega Heroes Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of "Edutice" software. The wikipedia page and the company website http://edutice.fr don't really make it clear what this actually is. Is it a linux-based operating system? Is it linux bundled with some security/school stuff? And the most important question: Is this software freely licensed? Since the website only offers to buy it and does not mention a license or a place where you could get the source code I don't think that we can just assume that the software is freely licensed. Also the screenshots are tagged as GFDL which is probably wrong if this is really GPL software.

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Calvin6022 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hawkblack 89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Hawkblack 89. Uploader is quite active at skyscrapercity.com. Some files mysteriously watermarked (File:Morales de Noche.jpg) or black bordered (File:Tarapoto vista aerea años 90.jpg). File:Escudo Tarapoto.jpg - certainly - not "own work". Usually cropping files as File:Tarapoto 22.jpg (12.2013) = grabbed from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=108473386&postcount=65 (01.2013, by "fayo") = https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/580564_10151941279865067_631313977_n.jpg

Gunnex (talk) 22:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:08, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sofinice1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Besides, it's not like self-portraits.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: Once again, I vote for deletion but not per nom, rather against nom: These images are pretty much and scope and should otherwise be added to several established or possible categories about the depicted celebrities — if only they were not copyright violations (made obvious by the hoax filenames).
Please work harder, User:Yuriy75. -- Tuválkin 22:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sourabhsharma000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tharindu Samaradiwakara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

..........................

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted McZusatz (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toreyumo2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mostly all in 612x612 res (2 images in 640x640) and all most likely grabbed from different Instagram-accounts and/or derivated from already circulating images elsewhere. Examples:


Gunnex (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yoyomiami (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE. Commons allows for a limited number of user page images for regular users, but it is not a photo album.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was supposed to start a category, but forgot put 'Category:' before the title. I added some categories via (+/-) before I found out my mistake, thus creating this gallery, which I don't need. So please delete this page. Thanks. Briarfallen (talk) 18:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. screenshot of non-free software and text Dsprc (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Also out of scope JurgenNL (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality screenshot of an image macro. probably copyright violation Dsprc (talk) 02:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image (of creases in furniture?) Dsprc (talk) 02:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality photograph taken of an image on a LCD Dsprc (talk) 02:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strange pseudoscience image used to vandalize categories (Universe, Sun, Asteroids, ...) today. Nanite (talk) 12:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution (id:Pengguna:Azwardy Firmansyah). Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

car le blason central n'est pas correct la constellation ne sera insérée dans le blason qu'en 1844 par son fils oscar et en plus elle se trouvera au dessus de l'aigle. Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


voir le blason de gauche
 Keep. factual inaccuracy is not a criterion for deletion.Kathisma (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File annotation recommends that it be deleted. Mahir256 (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also a duplicate. JurgenNL (talk) 14:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 13:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Savhñ 20:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect geometry of the nitrile group. In addition {{BadJPG}}. Leyo 22:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep still in use: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electrosynthesis&action=history --McZusatz (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Could be but still in use Natuur12 (talk) 12:34, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect geometry of the nitrile group (original concern is still valid). Talkpage comment from editor is apparently confusing the C-N of the nitrile, which obviously must be linear (2 points determine a line) with that C itself (the bond to the other C must be co-linear with the C-N, as noted with ref to en:Nitrile and Category:Nitriles. Also there is a factual mistake in the formula for ammonium sulfate. Unused, replaced by File:Benzyl cyanide electrolytic reduction.png DMacks (talk) 12:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. --McZusatz (talk) 18:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Another file in the same article is affected: File:AdiponitrileSynthesis.png. --Leyo 19:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I just redid that one and removed the dispute-tag. Feel free to re-tag if there are still unresolved issues there. DMacks (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably personal image, person not found on Google. Image looks like users sandbox, see history. JurgenNL (talk) 19:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its not own work of User 'Gorska vila'. Possible copyright infringement: see http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/06/060103.reiner.shtml HHE99 (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.64.241.40 11:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

problems with COM:SCOPE (educational usefulness is unclear) and COM:DW (Monster shirt is probably copyrighted art) Closeapple (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of scope. T-shirt is de minimis. BrightRaven (talk) 12:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image Torsch (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File needs an OTRS ticket 91.64.241.40 09:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Gunnex (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's modern building (1999). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's modern building (1999). No FoP in Russia. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image with no educational value JurgenNL (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:25, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small size, I doubt this is the work of the uploader Avron (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, the "title" and the "permission" in the summary both say "Do not share" in Chinese. Also, if this is the author's own work, why is it a picture from Facebook (as noted in the source)? Facebook pictures are still copyrighted by the original photographer. Considering the user's other copyright offenses, this image is questionable. Hazmat2 (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and com:SCOPE Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. It looks like this is the photo that the uploader is talking about in this unsigned help desk question, which, despite what the uploader claimed 14 minutes later (at the same time the question was answered), makes it sound like it's not actually the uploader's own work. LX (talk, contribs) 16:19, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata lists the copyright holder as http://www.sre.gob.mx and http://www.flickr.com/photos/sremexico so may have been taken from one of these sites. The website has a copyright notice and the Flickr stream is all rights reserved. January (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 02:17, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that file has been released under this license - this is almost certainly not the user's own work. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons license at source website MPF (talk) 13:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of the advert. Out of scope McZusatz (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I went around the Heritage Restaurant where we ate since 1960's when I visited weekly Luneta and the Roxas Boulevard. No objection to the deletion, respectfully submitted.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 01:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer: presumably Maria Radnoti-Alfoldi. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Natuur12 (talk) 12:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (en:User:Haryhanne/sandbox). Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

far too bad quality for reuse, most of image only blurry mass of twigs Andy king50 (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

noncommercial — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martynabe18 (talk • contribs) 2014-01-19T16:11:55‎ (UTC)


Deleted: No license given, out of scope. JurgenNL (talk) 14:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted app Alan (talk) 01:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, bad quality Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no own work, copivio from resident evil Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no own work, copivio from resident evil Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On request by the person in the photo. Renaming the file didn't solve that the photo is still easy to find. Ter-burg (talk) 10:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is an unused userportret with no educational value. When Ter-burg says that the subject wishes it to be removed I believe him. The person is most likely not mentionable. So per com:SCOPE Natuur12 (talk) 13:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of file:Schloss Rosenstein, 096a.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 18:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Kann nicht sein eigenes Duplikat sein. --McZusatz (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Link is the same. --McZusatz (talk) 22:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How are we assuming this is public domain in India? The state didn't even exist until 1966. It won't be free in India until 2027, and much later in the US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per the nomination.Perumalism Chat 11:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nomination + lacking several base informations.Kathisma (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: no evidence that the uploader created the poster and is copyrigth owner Andy king50 (talk) 20:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely case of Flickerwashing, single purpose flicker account, LGA talkedits 20:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. @LGA: - I have confirmed the image's copyfree status from the photographer Ms. Sehaj Maini, who took the shot with the permission of the subject of the image Mr. Shivam Patil (an actor), for the main purpose of using it at Shivam Patil. Since the image has been made available under CC2.0 by its author, there seems to be no reason to delete it. I have kept the record of the emailed permission from the image's author, which I can present, whenever desired. Cheers! Anir1uph (talk) 20:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily the case, she may well not have the authority to release the images. LGA talkedits 07:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep. LGA there was a lot here had you looked more carefully, EXIF data matches nicely with Flickr and there is other real-life info were you to check more generally, such as the uploader's record of contributions on en.wp. Please avoid accusations of License laundering unless you have something stronger and have made the effort to do some homework, for example by asking the uploader some questions about their uploads on their talk page. -- (talk) 23:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I feel I do :
  1. Images of this person have been uploaded both here and at enwp REPEATEDLY and been deleted for copvio/licencing issues.
  2. The ease at which EXIF data can be edited and the fact that the images on the flicker account exist else where on the internet.
  3. This image appears in various on line sources (facebook etc).
  4. The enwp article has repeatedly been the subject of promotional editing.
I am more than happy to withdraw this, however before I do can you please confirm who the OTRS release came ? Was it the photographer or the the agent who commissioned the works, if it is the former did they confirm that it was not covered under work for hire rules ? LGA talkedits 07:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will take a second look later today, run some other verification steps and add some results here so long as they are not unnecessarily revealing personal information. OTRS volunteers can be expected to do reasonable checks and so far the background checks out, but if the EXIF data has been faked this would make it a rare example, in fact in 3 years I have only been involved in one other case where credible EXIF data was being added to images to give a false provenance. -- (talk) 08:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am not saying the EXIF data has been faked, just that it should not be used to to positively support authorship. There were a number of other factors here that gave reason to question that this has been correctly released and given it was uploaded by the flicker-bot I felt a DR was the best way to go. Just to be clear, I am not after any personal information, just confirmation that it has indeed been correctly released by the person who controls the file.LGA talkedits 08:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have run further checks, this included:
  • Emailing the uploader to get the original photographer's email release on record on OTRS, with its header information intact (rather than a copy).
  • Verifying that the images on the Flickr account are better resolution/quality than derivatives found elsewhere. This demonstrated that versions found on the actor's Facebook account are apparent derivatives.
  • Checking the detailed history of changes in the EXIF data, reviewing EXIF information for credibility, any inconsistencies and checking for matches to the camera data across Commons.
  • Checking the history of the uploader.
  • Checking for alternative contact information for the photographer and the actor/model; this was inconclusive so I was unable to follow-up (the actor's Facebook account actually links back to Wikipedia).
  • Reviewing some of the contention around the en.wp article, which led me to no particular conclusion.
At this time I find good evidence that this photograph is original, apart from some cropping after being taken, and not available elsewhere on the internet at the quality. I would be happy to review this again should any more evidence be presented or emailed to me. Should anyone have doubt, I see no issue with requesting that another OTRS volunteer review this ticket, I have annotated it with the background checks done to date. -- (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So I am clear on this, the OTRS is not from the person who owns the Flickr account directly but relayed via the up-loader and you have not been in contact with owner of the Flickr account directly and therefore you have not been able to confirm if the owner of the account has the authority to release the files in this way. In which case, and again please correct me if I am wrong here, the OTRS ticket does not confirm the licence status of this file at all. LGA talkedits 07:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The email from the photographer/Flickrstream owner is on OTRS with its original header/routing data. I emailed the photographer yesterday for confirmation, but it is perfectly normal practice to accept a forwarded email as evidence, particularly from a long term active Wikimedian in good standing, who uses their verifiable legal identity in support of the correspondence. I have investigated your assertion of Flickrwashing, to date I have found no evidence for it apart from the Flickr account appearing specifically created to publish 6 related photographs; on the contrary reasonable evidence that these (the other photographs on the Flickrstream remain All Rights Reserved by the photographer) are originals at high resolution with credible EXIF data, not available anywhere else on the internet at this quality. Should you find an example, please do alert me to it.
I am aware that you have been engaging with problems of possible COI/advocate editing on en.wp, but see no reason to carry those presumptions of doubtful behaviour and motivation over to this project without specific evidence. -- (talk) 09:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The issue now is that does this person have the authority to release this image, it is not about the uploader who I don't for one moment think has been party to anything untoward . Happy to close this and re-open it, but that seems pointless. LGA talkedits 10:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Has it ? see above. LGA talkedits 07:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This OTRS-ticket seems fine with me and Fae really did his homework and checked everything properly. Natuur12 (talk) 12:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, we have this logo in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons license at source website, must be presumed copyrighted art MPF (talk) 13:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work + montage El Funcionario (talk) 03:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this is own work. Images with higher resolution can be found. See https://www.google.com/search?q=assassin%27s+creed+hidden+blade&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSYxphCxCo1NgEGgAMCxCwjKcIGjwKOggBEhTFAsMCsgXEAsECsQWmBaUFtQa2Bhog9SSfpWaWZJTyTBizcJKLq-U5QNZZx-V250lZnZNgIoQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgRvikwfDA,isz:l&sa=X&ei=sZTbUo-EG8XWswb59ICYBA&ved=0CCkQ2A4oAw Wouter (talk) 09:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raoul Thomen is dead in 1950. Copyright violation. 82.120.162.14 20:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

??? Are you the owner of the Annuaire Almanach publisehd in 1910 ? Please, prove it. --Spiessens (talk) 23:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Drawings by an artist died in 1950 are not acceptable before 2021, unless we have the explicit consent of the artist or his heir. BrightRaven (talk) 11:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Yes you are right. No more comment and sorry for the trouble, --Spiessens (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 12:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of unfree movie Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fritz Røed died 2002 and FOP in Norway does not apply to sculptures. Vesihiisi (talk) 10:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scan of unfree book cover Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scan of unfree book cover Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

оставить Обоснование добросовестного использования для статьи:Протопопов, Дмитрий Захарович

цель изображение деятельности Протопопова Дмитрия Захаровича—советского государственного и партийного деятеля.

Это несвободная фотография умершего человека. Новую фотографию невозможно сделать, что при отсутствии альтернативных фотографий со свободной лицензией может служить обоснованием добросовестного использования фотографии для иллюстрации статьи об этом человеке.

оставить Обоснование добросовестного использования для статьи: Протопопов, Дмитрий Захарович Permanent73 (talk) 09:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fastility Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahsan203 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andy konar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arezarni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:09, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avlesselvaraj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edu23Rmelen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused user portraits

91.64.241.40 10:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ganesan.natarajan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (en:User:Ganesan.natarajan).

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcswift1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion(en:User:Marcswift1).

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgl skate (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (es:Usuario:Mgl skate).

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moshikovaknin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Njsmith365 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SantiagoJulianMollo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion and advertisement (en:User:Siegfried Jalink).

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theycallmehydro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (en:User:Theycallmehydro).

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: And nominated the userpage for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tipuboyyzz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unissonorecords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

useless without a description

91.64.241.40 13:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Городенцев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (ru:Участник:Городенцев). In addition, fake authorship.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical images of Tsarskoe Selo 1944-45

[edit]

They can not be PD, at the earliest in 2015, if the photographer died in the year of creation. But we don't know, when this happened. --Ras67 (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no such license at ko:파일:Joosangwook.jpg, I also see no indication this user is connected to this website stated as source or has usage rights on the media uploaded to ko wiki Denniss (talk) 10:20, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons license at source website MPF (talk) 13:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons license at source website MPF (talk) 13:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for Creative Commons license at source website MPF (talk) 13:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless, blurry quasi duplicate from this one. The licence is copyfraud. Ras67 (talk) 20:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{Duplicate}} is probably more useful for these cases than a deletion request. As for copyfraud, if you are convinced that a PD template is more appropriate then it is reasonable to go ahead and change it. -- (talk) 21:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is not an exact duplicate, and i've got contra in a careless use of it, therefore a full DR. Should the file be deleted, the licence changing is not needed. --Ras67 (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, though I normally interpret lower resolution to include more blurry. I agree that sometimes this is more complex, and I would challenge the deletion of scans of different physical lithograph prints as they may separately add value in terms of image information. -- (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate and bad quality. Yann (talk) 14:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader posted this message here but did not have the issue resolved. Can Commons keep this image or should it be deleted on the precautionary principle? Leoboudv (talk) 21:10, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author and date unknown. Krd 11:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright status of the presentation slide and the image on it is not clear from the description page. It looks likely that it is under some free license, but that license may not be PD, and in any case there's no evidence for it on the description page. darkweasel94 20:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Assume good faith, there isn,t a reason for doubt about copyright status Ezarateesteban 00:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jean11 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: accidentally uploaded by me. --Jean11 (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC) JuTa 21:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete And 'speedy|accidentally uploaded by me' was correct, see Commons:Löschrichtlinien#Allgemeines_Vorgehen ->"Schnelllöschverfahren: Wenn du absolut sicher bist, dass die Datei unter die Schnelllöschkriterien, wie versehentliches Hochladen deinerseits, " --Jean11 (talk) 22:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, its a bit weird to find an own accidental upload after 7 months. --JuTa 22:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Uploading and describing a file properly does not seem accidental. Also com:revoke. --McZusatz (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Unused file and the subject did not consent. --McZusatz (talk) 12:34, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

that's hogwash, I upload multiple files at once with commonist. And it's enough for me also, inderect to insinuate that I am not telling the truth. And the above mentioned reason is part of the policy. What you write has nothing to do with the case and is not part of the policy. --Jean11 (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This picture should have been long since deleted as speedy. The reason above is specify in the policy. Who does not comply with as an administrator of the policy and the laws, is not suitable as administrator. In addition, Christoph Bratmann hasn´t consented to the publication of this image, see law´s Info: en:Personality rights, de:Recht am eigenen Bild, law.

 Info I have over 1000 photos to upload yet, if the picture due to the policy and laws will not be deleted, I will not upload more photos.--Jean11 (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I will courtesy-delete this file per wish by the uploader, as it is unused (also no external uses identified) and as we have enough portraits of the depicted person (Category:Christoph Bratmann). However, I also have to ask User:Jean11 to refrain from such kind of coercing communication as above. If you don't wish to contribute any longer to Commons, that is your own decision to which you are fully entitled. It is not a personal attack, but legitimate to question whether a user, who was quite active over the last months, needs 7 months to realize an "unintended accidental" upload. (For example, a complaint by the depicted, if happened, might be a legitimate reason.) In addition, as you mentioned "missing consent" as an additional deletion-rationale, what does that mean for all your other portrait uploads? None of your recents uploads has {{Consent}}. --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy-deletion, per request by uploader, as image is unused, easily replaceable and not of best portrait quality. Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on the Flickr user's profile picture, she is the person appearing on the left in this photo. The only person who can issue a valid copyright license to a photo is the copyright holder, which is normally the photographer, rather than the subject of a photograph. As this is a US photograph and copyright transfers require a written agreement according to US law, the Flickr user probably cannot issue a valid license. This also affects File:Gary Cohen, April 2009 cropped.jpg. LX (talk, contribs) 15:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Ezarateesteban 00:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We already have this in lossless format: File:La Sexta.svg. This file should be deleted and redirected to the SVG. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Ezarateesteban 00:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No stereo, plenty of alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the user holds the copyright? Theroadislong (talk) 10:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality, unusuable, no stereo information given. Yikrazuul (talk) 10:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also missing the reagents used to cause each of the last three steps (could maybe suffice without stereo in certain contexts, but instead would need these types of reaction details consistently). DMacks (talk) 15:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The song seems to be {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} and the composer hasn't been dead for 70 years as required per COM:CRT#Sri Lanka making it unfree in Sri Lanka too. See w:Sri Lanka Matha. Stefan4 (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Einverständnis zur Veröffentlichung wurde zurückgezogen. Besseres Foto in Aussicht gestellt. Maseltov (talk) 15:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muss hier einfach mal "blöd" (weil: OT) fragen: Man kann sein Einverständnis wieder zurückziehen, _nachdem_ das Bild unter CC-BY veröffentlicht ist? --Flo Sorg (talk) 13:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The edit history of the image suggests that the alleged initial permission has never been documented. So, this image should have been deleted long ago due to missing permission. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Same problem with retouched version: File:Feodor Lynen by maseltov - 2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: @user:Maseltov: Kannst du die neue Version des Bildes ueber die alte laden oder das neue Bild hochladen, bevor das alte geloescht wird? Damit spart man sich viel Arbeit beim ersetzen der globalen Benutzungen. --McZusatz (talk) 22:36, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in contact with a member of the family but I've got no new photo with acceptable quality until now.--Maseltov (talk) 23:40, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamed ijazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is dubious that the uploader performed these himself considering the other uploads of performances. Also, the national anthem of Sri Lanka seems to be {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. I can't find out how old the national anthem of Samoa is.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have the Pakistani coat of arms in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 07:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Seoul World Cup Stadium : FOP in South Korea is limited only to non-commercial use and is not compatible with COM:L LGA talkedits 20:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 07:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Bengali letters

[edit]

These all have near-identical versions in SVG, as for example . --Mahir256 (talk) 17:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. INeverCry 07:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Maps of Oakland County, Michigan

[edit]

All of these display the exact same, if not less or more, information as their counterparts without the capitalized 'H' in 'highlighted' (with a few exceptions). --Mahir256 (talk) 18:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Many of these are in use. Also, the rationale is a bit strange: if not less or more - what does that mean exactly? INeverCry 07:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want to type this again, so see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maps of Wayne County, Michigan. The exceptions I found still apply as per my previous nomination.

Mahir256 (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 12:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These have near-identical counterparts with near-identical names save for the capitalized 'H' in 'Highlighted', allowing for redundancy and possible misdirection.

Mahir256 (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Many of these are in use. DR rationale unclear. INeverCry 08:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am renominating because I have replaced all of these files (mostly in the Swahili Wikipedia), such as File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Allen Park Highlighted.svg, with their equivalents which are used in other wikis, such as File:Wayne County Michigan Incorporated and Unincorporated areas Allen Park highlighted.svg. Notice that the two filenames are not identical, differing only by a single capitalization--this is the case for all the files which I am nominating. When one looks in the category (and in Category:Maps of Oakland County, Michigan), one notices that about half of the locator maps are completely unnecessary and hence should be deleted. The differences, while significant to an automatic diff of the files, are negligible for the purposes of transmission of information. Before one decides to press that 'Kept' button, one should consider whether the redundancy matters in the context of COM:SCOPE: there is no difference in what is being emphasized between the two sets of images which I wish to distinguish. I hope I have made my rationale clearer than before.

Mahir256 (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 23:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama for statues in USA. It's necessary to find out sculptor information to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have to admit to a lack of understanding on my part of the rules for various photo subjects here. In this case, I gather that it's because the photo includes a statue of St. Vincent Ferrer. I know I've seen plenty of photos of statues out here. What are the criteria? Your note indicates that I need to come up with information about the sculptor. What specifically? --Sanfranman59 (talk) 01:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Name and date of death. Or at least date of statue installation if name and dates are impossible to find out. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've poked around a bit on the internet and can't find any specific information about the sculptor or the date it was erected. I've also tried calling the church today, but haven't reached anyone (perhaps the office is closed for the holiday). The dedication on the pedestal, which can be seen in the photo, says, "In memory of Philip B. Lynch 1921". But I don't know if that means it was erected in 1921 or not. I did find a biography of Peter Lynch that mentions the statue and says that Lynch died in February 1921. If that's not enough, then I guess the photo needs to go. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FYI ... I managed to reach the church office the other day and was told that the only person who could answer questions about the statue is a priest who's out of the country for a while. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 20:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It is in the public domain if erected prior to 1977, and there is no copyright mention on the statue itself. See Commons:Hirtle chart for details. Yann (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have to believe that it was erected well before 1977 since it was dedicated to someone who died in 1921. I'm not sure when I'm going to get a chance to take a more careful look at the statue to see if there's anything on it about a copyright. I didn't have plans to visit there again soon, but since there were two new Vallejo listings announced in 2013 after I made my last photo-taking trip, maybe I'll make another road trip. However, I don't really know what to look for on the statue. Are you saying that all I need to do is add the {{PD-US-no notice}} tag to the file here and everything will be hunky-dory? Eugene ... any additional thought on this matter? --Sanfranman59 (talk) 20:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 09:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvios - scans and photos of old professional photos and portraits - not own work - book covers - newspaper articles, etc

INeverCry 19:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Sorry I guess I don't understand how to describe my image posts. The images are all of unique items I own and scanned and so I described them as own Many of the photos scanned are 1. dated on their backside, or front, as being from 1923 or earlier, or 2. can be dated as pre-1923 by the appearance of the person in the photo or 3. Are of private anonymous snap shots

I am busy trying to correct the descriptions Thanks


Deleted: FASTILY 09:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvios - all of these were uploaded under {{PD-US}} but with no details or evidence that they qualify for that license - many of them, like File:Charles m jones breaking into the movies.jpg (Unicorn Press, 1927) are obviously not PD-US - this user has had mass copyvios deleted previously

INeverCry 01:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The user responded to this notice on his/her talk page, so am linking it to this discussion.
 Comment Many of the photos the user claims to have scanned from his/her personal collection have turned up on eBay auctions. There's certainly no harm in using eBay, but one has to be able to do outside research when necessary to prove the image is really in the public domain and be able to determine which public domain license applies. We hope (talk) 21:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 10:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]