Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/01/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 9th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That's a Goat Simulator logo (compare) and is likely copyrighted. This file has fake creation date (it's 2014 at most, not 2022), no source link, and, most likely, fake license as well. Facenapalm (talk) 02:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UPD: according to metadata, that's literally the low-resolution copy of https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Goat_Simulator_logo.png . Facenapalm (talk) 02:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedily as obvious. --rubin16 (talk) 06:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subido como prueba en mi área de taller de wikipedia, es una prueba, no es un archivo para poder compartir Pelly59 (talk) 10:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 10:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no use to Wikipedia KJP1 (talk) 08:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exact duplicates of photos already uploaded and properly categorized at Category:Ivana Čermáková.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accepting that these files are freely licensed it does appear that these are actually advertising to me. The description being

Become our Patreon member to access full sized photo and Behind-The-Scene footage of all our shoots www.patreon.com/captain_crunch

makes this rather obvious to me. I have deleted a batch and then realised there are rather a lot of them. If I am wrong the others should be undeleted. Thanks

Herby talk thyme 15:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can remove the advertising description if necessary. Sorry for not doing that while uploading the images. Let me take you down, (be)cause… (talk) 15:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a still copyrighted video A09 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete, uploaded by mistake and not my original creation. Thanks! Avant576 (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted I requested {{Db-author}} per uploader's above comment.--A09 (talk) 19:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no realistic educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 16:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this photo. Thank you! BabyEMicha3l (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted I requested {{Db-author}} per uploader's above comment.--A09 (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no realirc educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 16:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this photo. Thank you! BabyEMicha3l (talk) 16:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted I requested {{Db-author}} per uploader's above comment.--A09 (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rapper hais Rapper hais (talk) 09:18, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reasoning for nominating for deletion? Seems very suspect to me. --Emergencyninja (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kaldari (talk) 23:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Philips E160.jpg Khanhlong566 (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and block the nominator please. --E4024 (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file name Sree Sannapureddy (talk) 03:45, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to SilenceKBY (talk) 00:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


(non-admin closure) Kept due to vandalism.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 04:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of no value to Wikipedia KJP1 (talk) 08:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. Please ignore this. I hope I have undone the request. I was trying to nominate another image (see below). KJP1 (talk) 08:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep Nominator withdrawn. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Editor has withdrawn their request.--A09 (talk) 19:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soul.jpd.jpg Nyxaros (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Natt11101 (talk) 10:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete duplicate of File:Барсуки.jpg. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hacked copyrights of poster Sandra Hanbo (talk) 10:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Turelio--A09 (talk) 19:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 18:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Satisfies COM:TOO and may be {{PD-simple}} candidate, spam must be removed. A09 (talk) 22:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CROPPED BY MISTAKE Bar (talk to me) 22:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Windows screenshot. Claimed PD-ineligible + DM, should be discussed. King of ♥ 03:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 08:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Wutsje. --Rosenzweig τ 08:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gargarapalvin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: G11. Blatant text copyright violation: Image was uploaded from pexels.com and licensing terms of website is not compatible with Commons' notion of a free license. Kadı Message 17:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio, Could you close this nomination? Best, Kadı Message 08:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded from pexels.com by me (User:Gargarapalvin). However, it was remarked that licensing terms of this website is not compatible with Commons' notion of a free license in this discussion. --Gargarapalvin (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 08:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no free license at the source page. I don't see evidence of a free license anywhere, so this should be deleted per COM:PRP for lacking evidence of a free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this discussion on Help Desk; license on that resource is not free enough for Commons.

A.Savin 23:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Files already have been speedy deleted. --A.Savin 13:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gargarapalvin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: G11. Blatant text copyright violation: Image was uploaded from pexels.com and licensing terms of website is not compatible with Commons' notion of a free license. Kadı Message 17:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kadı: Why the slow DR? To discuss what? -- Asclepias (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. Per the initial speedy nomination by the uploader. Copyvio. No chance that this photo taken in 2022 could possibly have been uploaded before 5 July 2018 and no evidence that it could be otherwise free. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:51, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlphaSkyscraper (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files can be found on the Internet, false authorship claims. Some of them could not meet the threshold of originality.

Gumruch (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. copyvio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gargarapalvin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: G11. Blatant text copyright violation: Image was uploaded from pexels.com and licensing terms of website is not compatible with Commons' notion of a free license. Kadı Message 17:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gargarapalvin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: G11. Blatant text copyright violation: Image was uploaded from pexels.com and licensing terms of website is not compatible with Commons' notion of a free license. Kadı Message 17:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gargarapalvin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: G11. Blatant text copyright violation: Image was uploaded from pexels.com and licensing terms of website is not compatible with Commons' notion of a free license. Kadı Message 17:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gargarapalvin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: G11. Blatant text copyright violation: Image was uploaded from pexels.com and licensing terms of website is not compatible with Commons' notion of a free license. Kadı Message 17:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete New files of low resolution or poor quality which provide little descriptive information of a subject we already have files of may be nominated for deletion citing appropriate rationale(s) Kiwiz1338 (talk) 09:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaby56000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: apparently a fictional country

Enyavar (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bijay 2023 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your free personal web host. No contributions to any wm project.

Achim55 (talk) 08:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 11:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement, no encyclopedic value. Till (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal picture Trade (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Trade (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DJ VECAST (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/file storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete A09 (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NDANGO FESTUS NSINANO. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete A09 (talk) 22:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Low-res .jpg file, even if it may apply for {{PD-simple}} A09 (talk) 22:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality chemical structure image with odd, inconsistent fonts etc. We have File:Potassium laurate.svg as a high quality alternative. Marbletan (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 22:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like borrowed from Facebook. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SMAYOU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copie de https://www.magfarah.com/%D8%A3%D8%AD%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85-%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%81%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B4%D9%83%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9/

Habertix (talk) 01:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Obvious copyright infringment.--A09 (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book jacket ostensibly copyrighted by HarperCollins; no evidence that uploader is the photographer of this public work or how they own the copyright to license as CC0 czar 01:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own": https://casiliteral.com/colaboradores/karly-gaitan-morales/ (Fotografía: ©Lisette Morales) Ankry (talk) 01:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete--A09 (talk) 19:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Kiwiz1338 (talk) 10:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: A photographer is cited in the description and is not the uploader of the photo https://www.instagram.com/mklenotic/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: DVD cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: DVD cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: DVD cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: DVD cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution picture of a band without an article CoffeeEngineer (talk) 03:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The picture is on the internet since 2015 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 03:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete A09 (talk) 19:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 05:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 06:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Qatar A1Cafel (talk) 06:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kosovo A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Moldova A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:FOP Russia 2011 monument is copyrighted WindEwriX (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (c) Kononkov Andrey Kadı Message 09:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of drawings and photos with unknown copyright status. Maybe the collage violates artists' and photographers' copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DERIV of a video feed, where copyright would belong to whoever was doing the filming. Belbury (talk) 12:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam promoting https://mindful.knitterspride.com Tagishsimon (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo likely to be above COM:TOO US A1Cafel (talk) 14:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex logo Trade (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:33, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small resolution and little EXIF. Possibly copyvio Trade (talk) 14:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:33, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Türk var mı beyler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW - photographs of computer screen (see obvious screen-door effect). File:Örtmeliönü Camii.jpg is this; File:Pamuk Kardeşler Restaurant.jpg is this; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 15:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cansayar1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW - photographs of computer screen (see obvious screen-door effect). File:HALİFET GAZİ TÜRBESİ.jpg is this, for example.

Эlcobbola talk 15:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Is this indeed own work including the rest of the front page of the magazine? Wouter (talk) 15:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a screen. What about the copyright of the original photo? Wouter (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JukoFF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Mongolia: COM:Mongolia.

Xunks (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted There is now FOP in Mongolia. Abzeronow (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable event/people, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused non-educational image OGNelson9 (talk) 17:26, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image OGNelson9 (talk) 17:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid deletion reason. A09 (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 DeleteSelf-created artwork without obvious educational use. , it should be deleted because no pages, not even userpages use it OGNelson9 (talk) 13:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is published as copyrighted on Facebook page of the person. Therefore I suggest it should be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 17:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete A09 (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santipalety (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Zakład elektroniki zf częstochowa -ksse skorki.jpg is here; File:Zf it center częstochowa.jpg is here; etc.), user copyvio history, etc.

Эlcobbola talk 17:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1957 Lithuanian book cover by an unknown illustrator. Definitely not free in Lithuania or the United States yet. Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete COM:BOOK and COM:TOO. A09 (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per request of author SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SpinnerLaserzthe2nd Any particular reason you want this deleted? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong year distablsihment. The colours have been abolished in 1974. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SpinnerLaserzthe2nd: Use {{Move}} instead of {{Delete}}. A09 (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria Virginia pitta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:WEBHOST

A09 (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria Virginia pitta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal pictures

Enyavar (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g. File:Նշան Փալանճեան Ճեմարան.jpg is here; File:Մանիշակագոյն վարդ.jpg is here; File:Մեսրոպ Արք. Աշճեան 2.jpg is here; File:Ալենուշ Տէրեան 1.jpg is here; File:Կեդրոնական վարժարան.jpg is here; File:Երկեղէգնեայ_փող.jpg is here; File:Ներսէս Պետրոս Ժթ. Թարմունի.jpg is here; etc.), significant uploader copyvio history, etc. Duck/PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 19:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright. See left bottom the copyright claim Wouter (talk) 20:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete COM:PRP. A09 (talk) 22:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder is "Nina Lubarda Model Management LLC", listed explicitly in metadata. It requires a permission ticket. MarioGom (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits "bluefoto" Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete EXIF also gives "Udine 20 agosto 2022 Calcio serie a Udinese vs Salernitana©Foto Petrussi", @Adeletron 3030: next time use {{Copyvio}} A09 (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press photo taken 1993 (which is after the cut-off date 1973, see Template:PD-Sweden-photo) Adjoka (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of original ownership; taken from news article. – Rhain 23:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No indication it's not the newspaper's copyright. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 2

Per COM:TOYS

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete the Harry Potter images. From their description they appear to be taken from a Youtube Video (which is not freely licensed) and also link to other Flickr Albums containing similar images (which are also not freely licensed). As the linked Flickr album and the source Flickr Album are not the same I am concerned these are not freely licensed and could be COM:FLICKRWASHING.

Deleted: per nomination - (File:Easter Egg Nest (26930997217).jpg is also unambiguous - it is a bird's nest; copyright is explicitly granted without consideration of "quality" or "merit"). --Эlcobbola talk 15:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 3

Commons:Derivative works from botanical illustrations. Painters information need to be supplied to find out if illustrations are in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 4

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 17:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 5

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 17:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 6

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

clpo13(talk) 15:45, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Clpo13: There’s a same image on enwiki saying the opposite. Any reason why it’s below TOO? -- 1989 (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was going off what the Commons version said, but after a closer look at it and the examples at COM:TOO#United States, I'd say there's probably enough originality there to be copyrightable. clpo13(talk) 15:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F3, two files kept per above. --1989 (talk) 20:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 7

Newer duplicates of files that already exists on commons.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 07:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F8. --1989 (talk) 09:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 8

[edit]

Statues and component of the Independence Monument in Asghabat. The monument dates to 2001 as per w:en:Independence Monument, Ashgabat. Since there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan, commercial license clearances from the monument designer as well as statues' sculptors is required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs) 9

[edit]

Violation of architects' copyrights, and Kazakhstan has no commercial freedom of panorama.

Palace of Peace and Reconciliation, ©️2006 Foster + Partners (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Palace of Peace and Reconciliation)
KazMunayGas Headquarters, ©️2002 Basis-A construction company (source)
Other modern architecture

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Courtesy of Spirit of Virginia", which is https://www.firstlady.virginia.gov/spirit-of-virginia-award/ ?

500+ more https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Spirit+of+Virginia .

RZuo (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Spirit of Virginia is an award from the State of Virginia executive branch. This is clearly the official Flickr account of the governor and it would follow that in the absence of contradictory statute, the governor would be able to control the type of copyright produced by his executive offices. While there is a personal-use-only restriction, that is overridden by the fact that there is a clear Creative Commons license from a source competent to release its images as such. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: DVD cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work by a globally blocked user. High quality with no meaningful exif, PCP Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. High quality with no meaningful exif, PCP Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably taken from https://www.tonicastells.com/about - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no article about depicted person in ru.wiki and per ru:Литвинцев she is not enough notable. In my opinion the photo is out of project scope. Description "русский литератор" is in uploader's almost every photo and this is usually wrong. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: FB/transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   20:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the methyl groups is missing in the chemical structure on the right. The uploader has already made the necessary correction, but uploaded it with a different file name: File:Cycloreversion of Diphosphadiboretane with Chromium Carbonyl Complexes Corrected.png. This incorrect file is therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 18:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on CAS#273221-59-3, the methyl group on the phenyl ring at the right is in the incorrect position. File:Fluo-4-corrected.svg is a chemically correct replacement. (Although, ideally, the Wikipedia articles should represent the parent acid rather than the carboxylate form.) Marbletan (talk) 18:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality chemical structure image with odd, inconsistent fonts etc. We have File:4-Methoxybenzoyl chloride.svg as a high quality alternative. Marbletan (talk) 21:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality chemical structure image with odd, inconsistent fonts etc. We have File:Fumarsäurediethylester.svg as a high quality alternative. Marbletan (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 11:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif data indicates this photo comes from Facebook Vera (talk) 04:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. But it was originally shot by me. I took the photo from a gallery of my photos from FB to upload it on commons. Photo MF (talk) 05:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:AGF given the uploader's explanation and track history. --King of ♥ 08:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Threshold of originality in United Kingdom is not high. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sending the message.However,I created by file:Partidoconservadoruk.png I don't do any copyright violations. Thank you. Ramsal18 (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The logo en:file:Conservatives logo.svg is in English Wikipedia as fair use, which is prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image, see en:File:WeeKimWee-1985.jpg ZandDev (talk) 14:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex logo Trade (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative, COM:PACKAGING. Xunks (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per s:Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc.. --King of ♥ 08:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The illustration was still a copyright of Harole (as in myself) and I have no way to display the image other than to link it externally on Wikipedia. So this file is redundant for my use case. HaroleEthan (talk) 14:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deletd by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 17:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, work of a vandal Ignatus (talk) 07:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Could be also a copyvio of writer's copyrights A09 (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request, highly inaccurate, serves no educational purpose. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, no meaningful uses. --P 1 9 9   20:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image OGNelson9 (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files don't need to be used to be on Wikipedia Commons Kiwiz1338 (talk) 09:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused non educational image OGNelson9 (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insuficient context. Is/Was used on an artilce on enWikiquote for bo article that itself been placed in a deletion process User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 20:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, and taken from FB. --P 1 9 9   20:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very doubtfull copyright issue, see others upload by the user Numerous copyvio by the same contributor. Picture seems to be taken from a movie. Triton (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Original picture probably coming from here (Contributeur:WHPics/Alamy Banque D'Images). 95.182.191.247 17:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong file. Vincent Vanhamme (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2nd half of 16th century painting, can be kept without any problems. Would you like to use the higher resolution 850px instead? If so, click on "Upload a new version of this file". --Achim55 (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: redundant to File:Paiting of Jean de Ligne, Duke of Arenberg.png. --P 1 9 9   20:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benjamincookart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mediocre art of common subjects from a non-notable artist; the baseball card is probably a DW.

Dronebogus (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, because the medium (coloured paper pulp) is unusual, but just commonly enough used to be interesting. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1962, Undelete in 2033 when it will become public domain in the origin country of Lithuania. (U.S. copyright for this will expire next year as it is a 1928 map). Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, will all images deleted due to copyright violation be undeleted someday? 2804:388:5071:A18A:9CD:9648:B171:8DC0 03:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This file will be undeleted when it becomes public domain because I'll add the category for undeletion when the file is deleted. If a file that is deleted due to copyright violation becomes verifiably public domain, then yes it would be undeleted. Abzeronow (talk) 15:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 09:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HQ available and this one sucks Slinkyw (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this request. If there is a better quality version, then it can be changed here via the reupload facility can't it? Or is there a duplicate? JimKillock (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo from [1]. Whether this is unwanted advertising or in scope probably depends on whether de.wikipedia wants to keep de:PvPGym. In any case, it would need a written permission from the copyright holder (see COM:VRT for details). El Grafo (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 00:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not the uplisder's "own work"; uploader us a brand new en:WP account; inags is dated 2010 David10244 (talk) 09:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work; tineye and google reverse image search light up. My problem is that I can't find the original source of this image, and so I can't tell if it's so old as to be PD, but I'm nominating this in light of COM:PRP given the lack of evidence of a free license presented by the uploader. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Red-tailed hawk, I am a new member, I don't know anything about this. I'm just upload this file from my laptop. Can you teach me... Something? 黎春柏 (talk) 02:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikimedia Commons. I used a reverse image search and I was able to find a lot of online files that are the same as the file you uploaded. We cannot host files that you upload unless (1) you are the copyright holder of the image; (2) the image is already in the public domain; or (3) the copyright holder has released the image under a free license. Do you know if any of these are the case for this file that you've uploaded? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think case (2)? --黎春柏 (talk) 06:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you happen to know how old the photo is and/or the photo's country of origin? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with proof of PD. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Adelom16

[edit]

Files seem to be copyrighted from Hemeria, a French company. These 4 files are the only contribution of User:Adelom16 and used on French Wikipédia with a "© Hemeria" statement added by the same user. --vip (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: the name of the photgrapher is in the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thé photograph gave me the pic in person. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB09:8077:5221:D5D9:7583:400A:211F (talk) 06:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Êtes-vous en mesure de faire parvenir cette autorisation à Commons ? Dans ce cas, il faudra suivre un processus pour lequel je ne suis pas familier.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The photograph is not the uploader CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got the pic from the photographer. Free from rights. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB09:8077:5221:D5D9:7583:400A:211F (talk) 06:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Êtes-vous en mesure de faire parvenir uen autorisation de publication à Commons ? Dans ce cas, il faudra suivre un processus pour lequel je ne suis pas familier. --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request [2] and [3] , also see User talk:Johnj1995#Delete Abortion of "PANO_20160923_165000.jpg. Rationale given was, "I'm the author of this image and I wish to delete it." @Ahmed: Andy Dingley (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there is no Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. Also see Category:Al-Kheder mosque. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: Can we expedite the process of deletion? It has been more than a month. --Ahmed (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but one (of many) problems on Commons these days is a shortage of "active editors" (not just admins). There is little I, or most of us, can do to "expedite" stuff, there's just not a good route by which to do it. You would need to give a strong reason why this needs to be deleted.
It's possible that much of Category:Al-Kheder mosque ought to be deleted, because it's a problem for copyright to photograph new and distinctive buildings in Saudi Arabia. This is because of there being no Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. This image might come under that too, and you could help by telling us when it was rebuilt and (if possible) who the architect was.
A clear DR statement, based on Commons:Deletion policy will carry more weight and will be resolved more quickly
I would warn you that "I am the uploader" will not carry much weight, not past 6 years anyway. See Commons:Courtesy deletions. The reasons why are complicated, but take a look at Powelliphantapatrickensis2 / AN/U VoidseekerNZ and the horrible mess that can turn into. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This can most likely be  Deleted per COM:FOP Saudi Arabia. Historical Google Earth images of the area around 26.5634°N, 50.0791°E show that the mosque was under construction in 2009 and a completely different building occupied the site in 2005. That is too recent for PD-Old (50 years post-mortem) even if the architect would have died the same year. --HyperGaruda (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given no FoP in Saudi Arabia, and that this image seems to have been taken almost immediately after the constructing of the new 2016 façade, this seems to be a pretty clear-cut delete. - Jmabel ! talk 16:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image bears the description (translated from Russian): “Unknown English photographer. A group of girls posing for Frederic Cayley Robinson for the polyptych "Acts of Mercy", photo taken between 1915 and 1920.” However, 1. The nurses shown are clearly not from the period 1915-1920: note their hairstyles and skirt lengths. These, combined with the uniforms and informal poses, indicate the photo is from the 1970s. 2. The source link for the image does not work, so there is no evidence of the source or validity of the photo’s description. Note that the artist Frederic Cayley Robinson, who died in 1927, produced a series of paintings for the Middlesex Hospital in 1915-1920; it is possible that this photo was created in that hospital at a much later date. However, those paintings do not appear in the photo, which is therefore without any apparent value for Wikimedia Commons. I nominate this image for deletion because there are neither citations nor sources to support the title and description, which are highly misleading. Masato.harada (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the absence of sourcing evidence makes the copyright status uncertain.Masato.harada (talk) 12:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheNeonClear (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Vietnam, wax figures photographed in Vietnam after December 31, 2022.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions

First, I apologize for not paying attention to Vietnam's regulations effective from 2023. If these photos are copyright infringement, I agree to request delete or removal. However, please study the provisions of Article 25 of the Amended Law of 2023. I understand that this is a permitted case (not infringing on copyright) when the regulations allow use. I noticed that Article 25 of the Law of 2023 changes 2 points compared to Article 25 of the Law of 2009 that is:

- Using the phrase "work of art" (tác phẩm mỹ thuật) instead of the phrase "visual work" (tác phẩm tạo hình), but but I think essentially unchanged.
- Added the phrase "not for commercial purposes" (không nhằm mục đích thương mại).

Compared with the above regulation, I find that the uploaded images still meet the requirements of Wikicomons according to the new regulations of Vietnam. Specifically: These are aesthetic works, displayed in public (Ba Na Hills Wax Museum), to introduce the image of that work, and importantly, it is not used for commercial purposes, and when I upload to Wikicomons of course not for commercial purposes. Looking forward to your guidance. Best regards--Phương Huy (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vi: Trước tiên, tôi xin lỗi vì không chú ý đến quy định của Việt Nam có hiệu lực từ năm 2023. Nếu những tấm ảnh này là vi phạm quyền tác giả thì tôi đồng ý đề nghị xóa bỏ. Tuy vậy, mong các bạn nghiên cứu quy định tại Điều 25 Luật sửa đổi năm 2023. Tôi hiểu rằng đây là trường hợp được phép (không xâm phạm quyền tác giả) khi quy định cho phép sử dụng. Tôi nhận thấy Điều 25 của Luật năm 2023 thay đổi 2 điểm so với Điều 25 của Luật năm 2009 đó là: - Sử dụng cụm từ "tác phẩm mỹ thuật" thay vì cụm từ "tác phẩm tạo hình", nhưng tôi nghĩ rằng về bản chất là không thay đổi. - Bổ sung thêm cụm từ "không nhằm mục đích thương mại". Đối chiếu với quy định trên, tôi nhận thấy rằng các tấm hình đã tải vẫn đáp ứng quy định của Wikicomons theo quy định mới của Việt Nam. Cụ thể: Đây là các tác thẩm mỹ thuật, được trưng bày nơi công cộng (Bảo tàng tượng sáp Bà Nà Hills), để giới thiệu hình ảnh của tác phẩm đó, và quan trọng là nó không sử dụng vào mục đích thương mại, và khi tôi tải lên Wikicomons đương nhiên không nhằm mục đích thương mại. Rất mong nhận được sự hướng dẫn của các bạn. Trân trọng--Phương Huy (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears this Vietnamese FOP nomination page is related to this COM_talk:FOP discussion. But again, the interpretation is correct as Vietnamese FOP simply does not allow the use of free culture licenses over photos of copyrighted public works or art from Vietnam made by architects, sculptors, or applied artists who only died 50 years ago or less (or more so who are still alive today). Commons only allows free culture Creative Commons licensing where commercial reuses by end-users should not be restricted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, it is very unfortunate but we have to comply with the law of Vietnam, the country of physical location of these wax artworks. Photos are confirmed to be uploaded after New Year's Day, 2023 (01/01/2023). When will Vietnam revert that non-commercial restriction, is yet to be seen. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation, I agree that it is necessary to comply with Vietnamese laws in this case, and again apologize for not paying attention to update the new regulations. In general, Vietnamese law as well as Wikicomons policy is quite complicated for me, so I will try to research. Looking forward to your guidance. Best regards--Phương Huy (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo Kadı Message 09:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder for the work depicted initially approved this, but then asked that a different image be substituted. Nick Number (talk) 18:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Number: You can use {{Db-author}} A09 (talk) 22:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The monument dates to 2001 as per w:en:Independence Monument, Ashgabat. Since there is no commercial freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan, a commercial license clearance from the monument designer is required. Prior deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Independence Monument, Ashgabat. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The artist still lives, so at least the license of this artwork is wrong. Till (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Avamaro as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo. The outer ring is certainly below COM:TOO US. The graphic seems to be a modified version of what appears on the state seal and state flag (both PD-old); are the changes below TOO? King of ♥ 02:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep DW of File:Coat of arms of Rhode Island.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Fry1989. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Albim cover https://music.apple.com/us/album/chip-chip-ep/1464575574 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 03:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
You're right, the picture is the same as the cover of the 'Chip Chip' EP. It is a picture taken with his cellphone by David Lafore himself. He happens to live with me and he asked me to use this same picture to illustrate his Wikipedia page. If he wants is so, I guess that it is ok and that it doesn't violate any copyright. StefiMac84 (talk) 16:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I forgot to answer back, and I am sorry for that. In case the file got deleted or if you want to secure it, you can open a VRT request by following the instructions on this page: [4]. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work claimed here, but also uploaded as non-free to w:File:Chandigarh emblem.png. Heavily used file, so I'm starting a deletion request instead of tagging with {{Copyvio}} in case someone could prove PD due to age or something. Stefan2 (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alexphangia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: w:File:Chandigarh emblem.png. Widely used, converting to DR for discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, recreation g4 as well. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing by blocked spammer (Wikiprofessionals Inc.). MarioGom (talk) 08:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Panels has become a Disambiguation page, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/12/Category:Panels, so there is no use to keep the subcategories by country, also to avoid misunderstanding JopkeB (talk) 08:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission see metadata - Author Johannes Vande Voorde - Copyright holder © Johannes Vande Voorde Hoyanova (talk) 09:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I like to know why this photo is not approved? Ine vrt (talk) 09:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublette, Datei wurde schon vorher hochgeladen VSchagow (talk) 09:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete duplicate of File:2021082701 Ringblitz SIGMA-EM-140 DG 2021.jpg (both uploads were made one second apart). ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 20:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by an untrustworthy Flickr user. Unclear authorship. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

X to doubt. The file has been up for years and the source says Public domain.--Blockhaj (talk) 17:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Blockhaj The source is a flickrwashing account that passes off third-party work as their own. I earlier tagged File:Stratolaunch aircraft.jpg from the same Flickr account as copyvio because it's the work of Stratolaunch. This photo may very well be in the public domain, but you'll have to find something other than this Flickr account to verify that information. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a derivative work and there is no indication of what the underlying table/object is licenced as. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work due to absence of EXIF Trade (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptor of this statuette, de:Helene Scholz-Zelezny, died in 1974, so this work of art is not in the PD yet in either Austria or Italy (where she lived). The file should therefore be deleted, it can be restored in 2045. By then the (uncredited at the original source) photo will be 129 years old, old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Rosenzweig τ 16:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Photographs are protected by copyright up to 50 years after publication. Since the photograph was published in the newspaper Wiener Bilder Nr. 9 vom 27. Februar 1916, S. 14 more than 100 years ago, there is no copyright infringement according to § 72, 3 UrhG. Auguste de Gouges (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not (primarily) about the photograph, it's about the work of art it shows, which has a copyright as well. And in Germany (and Austria, and many other countries), photographs are protected for the photographer's lifetime plus another 70 years; only X-ray images, satellite imagery, photos by automated photo booths and such are deemed “simple” photographs (de:Lichtbild) which are protected for 50 years from publication. Please inform yourself about copyright before uploading any more files. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany, or Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany/de for the German version. --Rosenzweig τ 18:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptor of this statuette, de:Helene Scholz-Zelezny, died in 1974, so this work of art is not in the PD yet in either Austria or Italy (where she lived). The file should therefore be deleted, it can be restored in 2045. By then the (apparently uncredited) photo will be 121 years old, old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Rosenzweig τ 16:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


@Rosenzweig I understand the formal reasons, even if published without objections nearly 100 years ago. You can delete the file. Regards--Svenkaj (talk) 16:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-simple and {{Trademarked}} must be presented. A09 (talk) 22:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per irongargoyle. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tycuca as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo scanned from book|source= Bogdan Pokropiński: Parowozy wąskotorowe produkcji polskiej, Wydawnictwa Komunikacji i Łączności, Warszawa 2016

King of ♥ 17:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The license is valid. --RAN (talk) 22:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Woher der Autor natürlich seine Fotos hat, weiß ich nicht, es ist aber auf jedem Fall eine Werkfotografie aus dem Jahr 1929. Rainerhaufe (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Licence is invalid. Photo was scanned from book from 2016. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. The editor massively provides photographs from the book about steam locomotives, published in 2016. It come from the private collection of the author of the book. I can't imagine someone will scan all the old photos from the new book and will share them here. We cannot assume that every photograph before 1953 was immediately published at that time. In the same way, we do not assume that every photographer died 70 years ago. In my opinion, this is unfair to the person who published the book and collected information for it. this photograph and others may come from the private collection of the author of the book or another person. Imagine you are sharing a photo from your grandfather's collection with someone who is writing a book. Then someone scans it, and puts it on a website. As long as there's no evidence that the photograph was released before 1953, we're talking about a fake license. Either we are honest and follow copyright law or we disregard the rules and publish as we please. --Tycuca (talk) 11:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per RAN. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lizenz unklar RoBri (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The YouTube channel has a history of posting watermarked clips from mass media with dubious free license. Not impossible for the person behind the channel to be the original source or being allowed to use them but there's been a lot of clips going around the social media. Unless the cameraman at some point mentions the youtube channel (I don't speak portuguese) or something else indentifying I think it's better to assume copyvio.

TFerenczy (talk) 14:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TFerenczy. Thanks for opening this discussion. Give me a few minutes so I can expose my arguments. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First, the YouTube channel owner seems to be called Jefferson. According to the name of his channel, he lives in Goiânia, which is 175 km from Brasília. So I don’t think it’s impossible for the guy in the video to be the channel owner. Second, there are two video that we can undoubtly see Jefferson: this and this. There’s also the channel profile picture. Jefferson (Ribeiro) really looks like the guy in the video, if I’m not seeing wrong.
There are also Jefferson’s Instagram and LinkedIn account, where you can see some other photos of him and compare with the guy in these three videos. I’ve also found his Facebook account, even though I won’t post it here because I don’t want to doxx anyone, but I can ask him if he is in fact the guy in the video (not sure if he would answer me…). Taichi, do you want to say something? RodRabelo7 (talk) 13:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This "Jefferson" guy must provide a formal permission vía Volunteer Response Team, your argument is only based on conjectures and assumptions, not a definitive fact of the owner of the image. Sorry, but I don't change my possition. Taichi (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just contacted him. Hope he answers me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He stopped answering me when I asked if it was him on the videos, ahahah!  Delete then, assuming copyvio… RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I support deleting this to be honest, we already have free images available for the articles, no need for all this copyvio. SnoopyBird (talk) 20:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn’t seem like a valid reason for them to be deleted, to be quite honest. But being a possible copyright violation is indeed a reason for it. Also, the other images are probably gonna be deleted as well, unfortunately… RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that the TV Brasil videos were confirmed to be released on a license equivalent to CC, if not CC exactly. If the license status can't be confirmed for *these* videos, they have to be deleted. If the owner of the YouTube channel made these videos then this is just a matter of getting him to confirm he gives permission if in fact he is ok with the use. If he is not the person who made the video, that's a problem but it's YouTube's copyright problem, and we have to delete the videos so that we aren't in it outselves. If we can determine who made the video and they give permission for the use, then we can use them. If we don't know who made the videos then we have to delete them. If we know who made the video but can't confirm that they agree to the use, then we have to delete them. That is my understanding of the situation. If TV Brasil is indeed ok with the use of *their* videos, perhaps they made equivalent videos to the ones we have to delete. Elinruby (talk) 05:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion; insufficient evidence of permission from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable "own" claim. Photo have a metadata which start with FBMD, and that indicates it were uploaded from Facebook before contribution here. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Representing the agency that's currently managing Ultragaz's account, we ask for the deletion because we have a new logotype. This one doesn't correpond to the actual identity of Ultragaz and it's not meant to be used anymore. Wiperagency (talk) 18:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We will keep this for historical reference. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Representing the agency that's currently managing Ultragaz's account, we ask for the deletion because we have a new logotype. This one doesn't correpond to the actual identity of Ultragaz and it's not meant to be used anymore. Wiperagency (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We will keep this for historical reference. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be a crop of his facebook photo (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=549435070341114&set=a.360377252580231). Also the uploader has not responded to a query about whether they took the photograph or, if not, where they got it from. I think we know now that they got it from Facebook. Archer1234 (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mywildlive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own work: totally inconsistent EXIF data: 5 different cameras, one without. File:Polar Bear Fireweed.jpg was published here. These images need COM:VRT or user identity to be verified as Martin Gregus himself (also done by contacting VRT).

P 1 9 9   19:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. MarioGom (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep {{PD-simple}} applies. A09 (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Likely out of scope and no context to identify which school this is for. Without knowing the location of the school, it is also impossible to determine the proper threshold of originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Entered PD in 2000 in the EU (70yrs for anon works), so it was restored by URAA to 95yrs in the YSA. Undelete in 2025 --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 22:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD, taken sometime between 1955-1965 as this was when Torsten Falkentoft was station master Adjoka (talk) 22:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 05:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Below COM:TOO Italy and COM:TOO USA. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of unknown auhor taken after 1953 Adjoka (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:10, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DHN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/after-3-days-concrete-pillar-yet-to-be-excavated-to-rescue-10-year-old-boy-inside-4555518.html.  Keep Security camera footage, doesn't qualify for copyright. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Mdaniels. --Ellywa (talk) 16:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kiwiz1338 as Copyvio (Db-f9) and the most recent rationale was: url=https://www.metservice.com/. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 02:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader of File:Metservice Logo 2018.svg is not the copyright holder of this logo Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am not sure but to me this logo is mostly text so it is not original enough. It could be considered a "Text logo" not violating the copyright rule. Pierre cb (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So do we change the license from his work to {{PD-ineligible-USonly|New Zealand}} Kiwiz1338 (talk) 00:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess it would be more {{PD-textlogo}} Pierre cb (talk) 04:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok in my opinion if the license gets changed to {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}} we can remove the deletion tag. Any rejections? Kiwiz1338 (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question. This appears above COM:TOO UK and below COM:TOO USA. Where is New Zealand's TOO relative to that of the UK?

Deleted: Per COM:TOO New Zealand “threshold test for originality is not high”, the determining factor being “whether sufficient time, skill, labour, or judgment has been expended in producing the work”. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. I consider this logo above the low TOO of New Zealand because it needed skill to develop and therefore decided it had to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Logo. Looks like some heraldry symbol, is it PD-old? King of ♥ 03:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: Its origin looks, indeed, to be some old (medieval?) heraldry. However, in this specific case, it looks more like a modern stylized adaptation of that old heraldry symbol. At least, in my humble opinion. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 17:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no evidence this logo is in PD or is freely licensed. --Ellywa (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mdaniels5757 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1.  Question Is this a "portrait" within the meaning of subsection (e) of {{PD-IDGov}}? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This can be considered a portrait "en profil" imho. --Ellywa (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alexphangia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: w:File:Arunachal Pradesh Seal.svg. Widely used, converting to DR for discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and:

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak keep. The fragility of the graphs extension shows that we should not rely on it in order to declare images redundant. SVG would be an improvement, but those SVGs would need to exist for any redundancy claim to be made. The charts are graphical and educational in nature, and therefore fall within Commons's scope. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per RTH. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alexphangia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: w:Seal of Goa.png. Widely used, converting to DR for discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per en:Annexation of Goa. Goa became part of India after 1960, and a civilian government was installed in 1962. The logo is thus created after this point in time. The age of the logo is not exactly known to me, but it is probably younger then 60 years. So {{PD-India}} cannot be valid, as that requires an age of anonymous published material of more then 60 years. The exact creation date of the logo should be known in order to determine when it can be undeleted. Perhaps somebody can comment. It is not mentioned on en:Emblem of Goa. So the logo must be deleted for now, regrettably. --Ellywa (talk) 07:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clarionetist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1968 photo, we need proof that the uploader took it or has the rights to it. Not a 2021 own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs OTRS from Shervin Lainez - not own work of uploader

Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://www.facebook.com/leiacidades/photos/capacutuca-ben%C3%A9-a-hist%C3%B3ria-de-um-dos-maiores-pe%C3%B5es-do-brasilcircula%C3%A7%C3%A3o-divin%C3%B3pol/1770412519669943/ Py4nf (talk) 21:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamieson Mae (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, some have author info in exif. Some have permission granted to the athletics club but we need a release for Commons as well

Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No evidence of suitable free licenses having been issued by the copyright holders. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The current license (CC-BY-SA 4.0) is clearly wrong. This file might be still available under {{PD-textlogo}} (therefore avoids deletion). However, there is a catch. The four stripes under the text part gives an impression of "sunset over the sea", which might be worth artistic appreciation. A close-up look of this part reveals that this is only some heavily-stretched triangles, which falls under simple geometric shape. Therefore this deletion request is filed to determine whether this logo can be licensed under {{PD-textlogo}}. See also Commons:TOO Japan. MilkyDefer 10:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I think this fits in PD, judging from files included in Category: Logos of anime. Designism (talk) 04:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per PD-textlogo. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Commons requires that "PD-logo" images be considered to be as such not only under the copyright laws of the United States (where the Commons' servers are located), but also under the copyright laws of the country of first publication (country of origin), which in this case would seem to be Brazil. While it might be argued that this logo (badge) would be considered to be PD in the United States per COM:TOO United States, the situation with respect to Brazil seems much less clear per COM:TOO Brazil. If the Commons page about Brazil's TOO is accurate and Brazil's TOO is higher than the US TOO, then this would likely be "PD-logo" Brazil and thus is OK to for Commons. I'm not sure, however, whether the "considerably higher" wording in TOO Brazil is correct and it should actually be "considerably lower". So, what needs to be clarified is Brazil's TOO; in particular, if anyone can find any copyright court cases which might provide some examples of what kinds of logos Brazilian copyright law considers to be eligible for copyright protection would be helpful. Otherwise, I don't think Commons can keep this per COM:PCP.
I'm just going to add that English Wikipedia is treating en:File:Brazil women's national football team logo.png and en:File:Brazilian Football Confederation logo.svg as non-free. Of course, English Wikipedia might just be wrong, and those files might no longer be needed if the consensus is that the "PD-logo" licensing for this file is acceptable. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per PD-textlogo. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kein Hinweis auf CC in der Quelle erkennbar Ralf Roletschek 19:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Creative Commons licenses are non-revokable, and the owner of the account appears to be the creator of the video from which this screenshot was taken. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alexphangia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: w:File:Manipur emblem.svg. Widely used, converting to DR for discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak delete. The license appears to not be genuine if this is an official flag of Manipur. I can't figure much out about the origin of this file (such as the first publication date), so I think it might be wise to delete in line with COM:PRP unless evidence can be provided of the file's freedom. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per Redtailed hawk. The design of the symbol appears modern; we would need the date of first publication to determine whether the image is in Public Domain. --Ellywa (talk) 19:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alexphangia as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: w:File:Emblem of Meghalaya.png. Widely used, converting to DR for discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The current version appears a symbol in PD. Some other versions look very modern and are supposedly copyrighted. I will delete those versions as a consequence. --Ellywa (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Trade as no permission (No permission since). COM:SIG? King of ♥ 05:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Red-tailed hawk and COM:TOO India, similar TOO as the USA and therefore this signature is imho not elegible for copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Panels has become a Disambiguation page, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/12/Category:Panels, so there is no use to keep the subcategories by country, also to avoid misunderstanding JopkeB (talk) 09:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Panels has become a Disambiguation page, see Commons:Categories for discussion/2022/12/Category:Panels, so there is no use to keep the subcategories by country, also to avoid misunderstanding JopkeB (talk) 09:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shwangtianyuan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

wallpapers might not be free.

Roy17 (talk) 20:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Have you read the news about copyright infringement case for wallpapers between Huawei and Trannsion? I think you are come to request deletion for this over here. But I would like to say these photos' subject is a smartphone, not a wallpaper. If I would like to upload a wallpaper (even the interface of UI), I upload to local wiki only. So I don't support your opinion. 阁下是否看过华为与传音关于壁纸侵权案的新闻呢,我看您就是冲着这过来的吧!不过我首先要说的就是,我拍摄的照片,其主体是智能手机而非壁纸。如果我只上传壁纸(甚至是系统界面)的话,我只会上传至本地的Wiki。所以我不支持阁下的观点,故保留上述图片。--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 04:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, background images on mobiles may not be free (COM:PCP). --Wdwd (talk) 17:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shwangtianyuan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PACKAGING.

Wcam (talk) 14:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept some and deleted others per KoH. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shwangtianyuan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of non-free 2D work. Not de minimis as the copyrighted work is the central part of the subject.

Wcam (talk) 16:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is not free 1.b2-b4 (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Этот файл получен с официального сайта Администрации Петрозаводского городского округа по ссылке: http://www.petrozavodsk-mo.ru/petrozavodsk_new/gov/glava/biography.htm
Любарский Владимир Константинович - Глава Петрозаводского городского округа. Его фото: http://www.petrozavodsk-mo.ru/files/upload/LvpLrDQ-jFD8ABjX5OCXuTb68u_gkQ9NjZ0hIxQWeNTM8bQFQ_PPi8wzgiiE6spVHiSXvaTKxKpjx4aEACGCloPF.jpg 217.77.48.10 14:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no indication of a free license in the source site. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this image I had uploaded is a copyright violation, after coming across another image similar to this in a fairly recent book. The caption from the source I took it from originally contained misleading information that led me to believe it was an old work. Please delete this file. ThethPunjabi (talk) 07:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence agaibnst the PD claim. --Krd 18:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no information about free license at the fb-page. Photo is not licensed by CC BY licence. So need permition from the author Kharkivian (talk) 11:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kharkivian, I have received a respond from tro.info@post.mil.gov.ua about that. Due to "2 стаття 8 документу 2811-IX", all the materials from the official pages of Armed Forces of Ukraine are licensed under BB CY 4.0. RajatonRakkaus (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. only in case if this photos were published at MoD of Ukraine website. Only in that case. Every photo which published by another websites, fb (or another social media) pages, even that pages belong to the UAF units must to have its own permission for CC BY 4.0 license from its author or UAF units (at websites or fb-page). By the way, photos that publishing by the General Staff of the UAF also don't have permission for the free license because at zsu.gov.ua and fb-page there are no any note about this license.
8 of the law N 2811-IX allows only UAF units symbols by PD. Kharkivian (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But if you have official document you must it upload to the Commons. --Kharkivian (talk) 09:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RajatonRakkaus: Any updates on the communication? You can forward it to the volunteer response team at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org if you are willing to provide this information. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, no. I received answers from Ukrainian TDF and MoD and both say that the content is free, but both cannot say why. RajatonRakkaus (talk) 06:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also covered a similar situation:

King of ♥ 05:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission through VRT would be required to maintain these two images. --Ellywa (talk) 23:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]