Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 21 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Odenplan_station_July_2017_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Odenplans pendelstågsstation (Odenplan commuter train station). --ArildV 18:22, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Too much noise --Berthold Werner 18:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Noise or motion blur. Imo I don't think the noise level is a big problem for a 24mp indoor photo.--ArildV 18:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO it's not an excellent photo, but quality is high enough for Q1. --Michielverbeek 18:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is not too noisy for me. But it seems a bit leaning left. Look at the end of the escalator. And the escalator should be not so bright in the upper part. -- Spurzem 10:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Indeed, it is tilted. To me it is also too noisy, even for this kind of shot, sorry. Poco a poco 16:25, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info New version uploaded @Poco a poco, Spurzem, and Berthold Werner: --ArildV 20:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
    Noise looks much better (tick in the box), but not tilt was applied, Poco a poco 15:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Poco a poco: I did a tilt correction before I uploaded the new version. Did you still think it is a cw or ccw tilt? I don't see it.--ArildV 16:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Tilt in ccw direction, I added a note Poco a poco 19:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support the new version. PumpkinSky 21:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per ArildV, --Cvmontuy 04:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Your vote and your explantion don't match! --Berthold Werner 11:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support not so bad.--Ermell 19:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 22:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 13:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-01-Katukuvaa_pääkaupungissa_RR73754.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa, Chevrolet Caprice --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Where photographed? Any category, geocode, description? --A.Savin 21:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --A.Savin 03:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose title.--Peulle 11:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Schönes Foto eines Chevrolet Caprice; gute Komposition. Wo der Wagen steht, ist unbedeutend. Es ist kein Landschafts- oder Städtebild. -- Spurzem 11:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 07:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 0-8-15 Bild --Frze 08:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --W.carter 07:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-01-Katukuvaa_pääkaupungissa_RR73621.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa, Buick LeSabre --Ralf Roletschek 20:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:49, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Where photographed? Any category, geocode, description? --A.Savin 21:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --A.Savin 03:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose file name.--Peulle 11:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Der Dateiname ist für einen Außenstehenden zugegebenermaßen nicht aussagekräftig. Er sollte geändert werden. -- Spurzem 11:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support per Spurzem--Ermell 18:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 0-8-15 Bild --Frze 08:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 13:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

File:17-07-01-Katukuvaa_pääkaupungissa_RR73619.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Katukuvaa pääkaupungissa, Buick LeSabre --Ralf Roletschek 20:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:49, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Where photographed? Any category, geocode, description? --A.Savin 21:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose --A.Savin 03:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose file name.--Peulle 11:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 11:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell 19:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose 0-8-15 Bild --Frze 08:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --W.carter 09:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)