Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 19 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Bergerac_-_Place_Pélissière_&_Église_Saint-Jacques_-_1.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bergerac (Dordogne, France) - Pélissière square and St James church --Benjism89 17:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sensordust --Grunpfnul 18:22, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Couldn't find any dust spots, where are they? --Plozessor 08:57, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Indeed, few dust spots. --Plozessor 08:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I see a few birds in the sky, which are pretty blurry. I don't think, that it makes the picture unusable. -- Spurzem 15:36, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
No issue with the birds, but there are clear round dust spots. --Plozessor 15:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment I just uploaded a new file with the dust spots removed. Hope they are all gone. --Benjism89 17:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support So it seems, good now! --Plozessor 03:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --Jakubhal 14:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

File:At Geneva 2024 472 - SBB RABDe 500 Interior.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination SBB RABDe 500 Interior at Genève-Aéroport railway station --Mike Peel 07:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Blown highlights and overprocessed. Looks like a mobile phone shot. --Peulle 09:18, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
It is a mobile phone shot, but that should be taken into account when assesing for QI. Thanks. Mike Peel 22:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Is it OK to discuss this one? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed smartphone picture. Smartphones can take acceptable pictures in good light conditions, but this was taken with ISO 640 and is blurry and lacking detail. --Plozessor 05:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Btw, also filename. --Plozessor 05:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
File renamed, not sure there's much more I can do. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not bad for a smart phone. I'm always willing to accept compromises in difficult lighting conditions or action shots, especially when it comes to image noise, but too much detail has been lost here due to the noise reduction. --Smial 10:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)