Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2010
-
- Nomination Boat cruising in Alanya Peninsula. --kallerna 10:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Berthold Werner 11:01, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Australopithecus africanus - Mrs. Ples Original skull --Archaeodontosaurus 18:52, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Jonathunder 02:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St.Petri church, Augustusburg --Harke 16:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good composition, OK for me --Vomirencostard 17:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Snow in October. Main Mountain at the capital of Canton Schwyz. --Chris.urs-o 14:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support I like the composition, and informative --Vomirencostard 17:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ocelle of a Caligo sp. butterfly. --ComputerHotline 06:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Like the macro, it's ok for me --Chris.urs-o 19:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Idea leuconoe --ComputerHotline 06:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good--Lmbuga 20:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Idea leuconoe --ComputerHotline 06:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good (perhaps, to me, very good)--Lmbuga 20:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete) --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good... appetite :-) --Cayambe 08:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient Roman remains in Volubilis in Morocco. --High Contrast 21:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, please geotag. --Cayambe 08:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dat Otto Huus, east-side --Carschten 18:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Es fehlen Geodaten und eine Lagebeschreibung --Mbdortmund 20:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Info Done Bildbeschreibungsseite überarbeitet --Carschten 17:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Good to me--Lmbuga 01:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dasiphora floribunda (Shrubby Cinquefoil) --Wsiegmund 01:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Composition: Image decompensated - Rule of thirds or too tight crop at top--Lmbuga 01:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock Pigeons in 2010 Northern Hemisphere summer heat, august.--Vizu 18:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline The shadow is disturbing. To me, unfortunate lighting because the head of the central pìgeon is in shadow: I don't like the composition. Not sharp enough or blurry. I don't like the eyes of the central pigeon--Lmbuga 00:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Equator monument in the environs of Cayambe in Ecuador. --Cayambe 14:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
QI & useful. --Jebulon 17:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)My mistake, I wanted to support the other one. Please help reviewer by giving different names to your files and nominations , thanks ! --Jebulon 17:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Support Mattbuck 17:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Outdoor museum "Hedemora gammelgård", Sweden --V-wolf 09:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Malé-Velké Žernoseky Ferry on Elbe, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 04:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Wall of the former Oparno Castle.--Juan de Vojníkov 04:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Former Okuni House is a Japan's national important cultural property in Okayama prefecture. --663highland 15:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Several areas of overexposure. Mattbuck 17:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hydroelectric powerplants "Avestaforsen" and "Avesta Storfors", Avesta, Sweden. --V-wolf 19:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline tilted --Mbdortmund 10:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Comment Could be, but I'm not quite sure. The buildings at the right part of the river are further away (picture is not taken at the center of the bridge). --V-wolf 16:06, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Two of my fellow Swedes have tried to correct the perspective. Is it any better? --V-wolf 18:40, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - unsharp and contrast too high. Mattbuck 17:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Armenian Church Surb Arutiun. By Artemka.--Vizu 11:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Request Very good and useful photo but can you do some slight perspective correction in the left side to make this pillar vertical.--MrPanyGoff 16:34, 21 October 2010 (UTC) I love colors of this photo! — Jagro 17:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Template:Decline as below 2MP threshold. Mattbuck 17:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Facade of the Colosseum --Cody escadron delta 06:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Dust spots and strange thing on the left. Mattbuck 17:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quito, Ecuador: Virgen de Quito on the Panecillo (small piece of bread), altitude 3017 m a.s.l. --Cayambe 08:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Idea leuconoe --ComputerHotline 06:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Assisi, San Rufino --Berthold Werner 06:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 06:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leontopodium alpinum --Böhringer 19:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination sealed and secured chlorine --Alchemist-hp 19:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI. --Elekhh 23:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skull of a Brontotherium. On display at Zurich natural history museum. -- Rama 17:32, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:04, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lighthouse in Alanya. --kallerna 14:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:42, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination File:Jerusalem, Church of all nations --Berthold Werner 09:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good--Lmbuga 21:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thann church. --ComputerHotline 08:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Morpho peleides copulation. --ComputerHotline 08:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion To me, very good--Lmbuga 21:44, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agraulis vanillae --ComputerHotline 08:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Papilio rumanzovia --ComputerHotline 08:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good and good DOF--Lmbuga 20:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old Sava bridge by evening in Belgrade. --Михајло Анђелковић 21:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good! --Kuli 10:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The town hall of Lauffen am Neckar, Germany. -- Felix Koenig 11:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Clear, sharp and good image. Please geocode. --Cayambe 06:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Adršpach (Adersbach) - train station --Pudelek 12:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Interior view of the dome of Little Hagia Sophia, Istanbul. Note: I removed a cable that hung down from the centre. -- H005 15:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Sehr gut. Nice --George Chernilevsky 15:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Harvest Mouse, Micromys minutus --Llez 13:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) --Pudelek 12:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Inaccurate description: Where is it? Geocode would be great. -- H005 15:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Breskens (the Netherlands): Port Scaldis flats -- MJJR 21:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very good -- Felix Koenig 12:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lion Rock, Piha. --Avenue 12:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Good size. Technically, not overexposed or underexposed, but it looks overexposed and underexposed. Chromatic noise in dark areas. To me, CA (I'm not sure speaking of CA). Unsharp--Lmbuga 19:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the thorough review. --Avenue 16:27, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pilsum Lighthouse --Carschten 10:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. Good colours (at sunset?). Better with descrtiption in another language--Lmbuga 11:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
The sunset was in early beginning. I added more detailed description. --Carschten 11:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skull of Spinosaurus -- Archaeodontosaurus 09:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 10:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chocolate chip smile cookie --Jonathunder 04:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice cake. --Cayambe 11:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barack Obama --Jonathunder 03:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI to me. --Cayambe 11:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination On the pedestal of his statue in Paris, the military career of Marshall Michel Ney (1769-1815) --Jebulon 22:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI, very informative --George Chernilevsky 11:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dusty old gear at abandoned iron mine Smältarmossgruvan, Sweden --V-wolf 21:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice --Haneburger 08:21, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination IJzendijke (the Netherlands): windmill De Witte Juffer -- MJJR 21:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye. --Eusebius 20:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 22:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The old railway Station of Ilsfeld, Germany. -- Felix Koenig 19:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion --Lmbuga 19:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A monument (Infanterieregimentsdenkmal) in Worms, Rhineland-Palatinate. -- Felix Koenig 18:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Unfortunate light conditions --Lmbuga 19:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Evangelical Christians and Baptists church The House of the Gospel --George Chernilevsky 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good to me--Lmbuga 19:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Evangelical Christians and Baptists church The House of the Gospel --George Chernilevsky 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good, building could be even a bit darker for my screen --Mbdortmund 22:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eternal fire. Memorial of Glory. Ukraine, Vinnitsa. --George Chernilevsky 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good and impressive--Jebulon 22:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old Soviet jet fighter MiG-15. Ukraine, Vinnitsa. --George Chernilevsky 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good - I find the picture without tree better --Haneburger 08:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old Soviet jet fighter MiG-15. Ukraine, Vinnitsa. --George Chernilevsky 18:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 10:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument of Benito Pérez Galdós, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 16:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too tight crop (upper side). The head it's unsharp.
Unfortunate light condition--Lmbuga 20:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Perspective under the metro in Paris--Jebulon 16:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI & useful (Architecture) --Archaeodontosaurus 10:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Extinct giant pelican with teeth --Archaeodontosaurus 15:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very impressive, at least QI IMO --Llez 17:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South face of the Clarendon Building in Oxford, England by Diliff. --Berthold Werner 14:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion FP ? --Jebulon 16:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beech forest at Malý Blaník, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion a bit dark, but maybe it is so. Otherwise good--Jebulon 22:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Nuzzling Craterellus tubaeformis, with spectators. --V-wolf 22:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Yellow hiking sign.--Juan de Vojníkov 21:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Honeycrisp apple --Jonathunder 20:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Butterfly (Nordmannia ilicis) and beetle (Heliotaurus ruficollis) --by User:David Perez 19:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Murat River in Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 17:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Some says I was born here, but I suspect it is not true. --Jebulon 17:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A monument in Arucas, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 16:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 170101 departs Birmingham New Street in shadow. Mattbuck 14:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A collection of trains at Birmingham New Street. Mattbuck 14:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 221133 departs Birmingham New Street. Mattbuck 14:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 221133 departs Birmingham New Street. Mattbuck 14:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The pediment above the entry of the mineralogy gallery in Museum of Paris. Near the fossil, left, with a hammer, you may see a portrait of Archaedontosaurus, young.--Jebulon 10:27, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fichtelberghaus on the peak of Fichtelberg, Ore Mountains, Germany --Harke 11:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Gefällt mir sehr gut. --Berthold Werner 11:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The pediment and the dome of the Pantheon in Paris. Please see description page--Jebulon 22:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice and well informative --George Chernilevsky 06:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow cap Amanita muscaria --Jonathunder 22:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 06:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New museum in Dortmund, construction site --Mbdortmund 15:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 06:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Xi'an bell tower, China --V-wolf 14:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Pilgerhaus Tabgha" (pilgrim inn) an the Sea of Galilee in Israel --Berthold Werner 12:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC). Please, geotag and I'll support. --Cayambe 12:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Info Done --Berthold Werner 13:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC) - Promotion QI to me. --Cayambe 13:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination "Pilgerhaus Tabgha" (pilgrim inn) an the Sea of Galilee in Israel --Berthold Werner 12:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC). Please, geotag and I'll support. --Cayambe 12:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rapids and bridge in Duluth, Minnesota--Jonathunder 05:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 06:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Minnesota Chief Justice Magnuson --Jonathunder 03:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion OK --George Chernilevsky 06:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmunder U, eastern part --Mbdortmund 00:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Gut --George Chernilevsky 06:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmunder U, eastern part --Mbdortmund 00:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Gut --George Chernilevsky 06:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmunder U, eastern part --Mbdortmund 00:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Gut --George Chernilevsky 06:35, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmunder U, eastern part --Mbdortmund 00:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 06:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lurzenbach, Germany. --Bartiebert 13:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Hard not to mistake between the two... The only difference is 5 or 6, even the time of upload is the same. Please have mercy on reviewers !!!! I'll promote this one, sharper.--Jebulon 23:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plateau de Kirchberg in Luxemb. City, with European Institutions, etc (see annotations). --Cayambe 08:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion nice documentation --Mbdortmund 15:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yardenit, Jordan river baptismal place --Berthold Werner 08:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI and useful--Jebulon 23:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree canopies.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 15:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ebino Plateau --663highland 09:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: facade of Turm am Thurn-und-Taxis-Platz in Frankfurt am Main, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 23:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cildir lake in Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin.--Vizu 16:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cildir lake in Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin.--Vizu 16:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 43131 and 43139 pass at Bristol Parkway. Mattbuck 11:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review Comment Maybe crop of upper part of this image will save it? --Chmee2 11:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
A crop would unbalance it, I'll try content-fill. Mattbuck 14:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Done Mattbuck 02:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Three reliefs above the main entry of the Panthéon in Paris--Jebulon 00:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
Underexposed or bad luminosity: The uppers are too dark--Lmbuga 01:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
New version--Lmbuga 18:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC) I don't vote for evident reasons, but it is a good job, Luis Miguel ! Thanks for improvements--Jebulon 22:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 08:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burg Katz, Patersberg, Germany. By Charlie1965nrw. --Vizu 16:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Interesting picture but a bit noisy, too soft and foggy/missing contrast imo. --Coastside2 18:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC) * 5,5 mb. As for me, contrast is a natural.--Vizu 18:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Support--Jebulon 23:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zebu (Bos taurus indicus). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination USSR Ministry of communication telephone cover (1946).--Vizu 18:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Berthold Werner 06:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Friedensplatz, Dortmund --Mbdortmund 13:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. French annotations added.--Jebulon 23:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Friedensplatz, Dortmund, peace memorial --Mbdortmund 13:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. Doesn't the roof need a perspective correction? (not sure) --Jebulon 22:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jericho, Tell es-Sultan --Berthold Werner 12:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good to me. Some essential questions : what kind of ruins is it ? Is it Frau Berthold dancing disco in full middle of the ruins ? Oriental mysteries...--Jebulon 23:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
For more info for the ruins see [[1]] and the women is not Frau Reinert-Werner ;-) --Berthold Werner 06:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Danilov monastery in Pereslavl, the bell-tower. PereslavlFoto 12:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Danilov monastery in Pereslavl, the bell-tower. PereslavlFoto 12:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 08:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church Notre-Dame du Port in Nice, France. --Myrabella 06:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality and informative.--MrPanyGoff 16:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruins of Oparno Castle and Milešovka Hill in the background.--Juan de Vojníkov 04:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination John Edwards campaigning in Pittsburgh.--Spongie555 04:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good composition --Mbdortmund 00:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House number with grapes.--Juan de Vojníkov 03:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but this is half of the minimum size of 2 MPix --Berthold Werner 13:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of a stained glass window in a 19th-century parish church in Ballymote, Ireland, depicting Madonna and Child. --AFBorchert 22:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion crop a bit tight, else very good --Mbdortmund 13:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway station in Cranzahl, Germany --Harke 17:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 13:22, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Historical hammer, Ore Mountains, Germany --Harke 16:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Photographers taking photos of Jukka Ketomäki at Rannakylä shakedown in Muurame. --kallerna 16:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline composition --Mbdortmund 13:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nasser Al-Attiyah driving at Rannakylä shakedown in Muurame. --kallerna 16:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very good --Mbdortmund 13:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Pilgerhaus Tabgha" (pilgrim inn) an the Sea of Galilee in Israel in the evening. --Berthold Werner 18:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too dark, good exposition has only entrance. — Jagro 17:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The birth of the Papilio memnon.--[[池田正樹 08:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)]] 09:21,19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI --Mbdortmund 18:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Bispbergs klack (where mineral Scheelite first was discovered), Sweden. --V-wolf 14:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion A little diffuse in full screen mode but nice composition altogether. --Bartiebert 09:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Young whau flower, beginning to open. --Avenue 16:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline A little too diffuse. --Bartiebert 09:51, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Israel, Tabhga, Church of the Multiplication --Berthold Werner 11:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Jari-Matti Latvala driving at Rannakylä shakedown in Muurame. --kallerna 08:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Jätkäjätkät performing in Pori Jazz 2010. --kallerna 08:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dani Sordo driving at Rannakylä shakedown in Muurame. --kallerna 08:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ocimum basilicum (basil) flower. --Leonardorejorge 00:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Khalid Al Qassimi driving at Rannakylä shakedown in Muurame. --kallerna 13:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The setting sun shining off the concourse at Bristol Parkway. Mattbuck 13:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 221130 departs Bristol Temple Meads. Mattbuck 13:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Trains at Birmingham New Street. Mattbuck 13:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Slug-infested Russula cyanoxantha. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI to me, although "infested" implies the slugs are still there. --Avenue 03:10, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A historic workhouse in Stockholm.--Ankara 20:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review Perspective looks fake. Did you edit it? If so, I would undo the changes. --BennyJ 15:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC) Fake, in what way? Small perspecitive correction done, but i cant see the problem. The original file is here.--Ankara 15:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Looking through the tunnel underneath Bath Spa station. Mattbuck 20:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review
canmust be cropped, IMO.--Jebulon 22:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
The black surrounds - light at the end of the tunnel effect - was the whole point. Mattbuck 11:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)-- I understand that but there's simply too much black. Crop some of it and people will still get your point. --BennyJ 15:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)<vr> Done to the point where it's only just over 2MP. Mattbuck 14:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Women in Tribal Village in India.--Spongie555 04:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Already an FP here on Commons. Yes, it can be a QI too. --Avenue 11:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skull and neck vertebrae of an Allosaurus fragilis (Allosaurus)--Jebulon 21:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --AFBorchert 22:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 360° Wildgrubenspitzen --Böhringer 21:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
-
- Nomination Skeleton of the Short-beaked Common Dolphin, Delphinus delphis --Llez 21:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion SupportQI & Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Wernau/Neckar, Baden-Württemberg. Picture taken in the evening. -- Felix Koenig 19:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline To me, too tight crop--Lmbuga 21:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Awl on bone - Paleolithic --Archaeodontosaurus 16:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 00:37, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Giant Green Turbo, Turbo imperialis --Llez 14:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 16:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Dortmund, tempest --Mbdortmund 15:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Hübsches Stimmungsbild mit gut gewählter Komposition. -- Felix Koenig 20:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bobure beach --The Photographer 14:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline crop of the car, people unsharp --Mbdortmund 15:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medieval lintel in Nice, France. --Myrabella 07:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful (plutôt début Renaissance) --Archaeodontosaurus 10:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Zut, grillé sur le fil pour la promotion... 12 février 1482, ça se discute pour la période...--Jebulon 22:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spinosaurus Morocco --Archaeodontosaurus 13:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment Interesting image however black background is still visible between bones. --Chmee2 15:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Done Good point --Archaeodontosaurus 16:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC) I marked there more potential problems --Chmee2 18:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Right, I'll take this experimental image, and give the version without background --Archaeodontosaurus 08:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Monument of Benito Pérez Galdós, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 16:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Overview of Paddington station. Mattbuck 11:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review Very noisy and it would look better if it was centered (though it's not bad) --BennyJ 14:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm honestly not sure how I ever got any QIs with that camera. Mattbuck 16:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination blade of grass -- Der Wolf im Wald 00:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment - I like it, but it needs taxonomical categorisation. Mattbuck 14:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red cliffs and icebergs in Greenland by user:mbz1 ברוקולי 14:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Campesino Venezolano --The Photographer 14:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline The man is unsharp--Jebulon 23:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coccoloba uvifera --The Photographer 14:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good--Jebulon 23:11, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk in Luxembourg, detail. --Cayambe 07:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cildir lake in Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin.--Vizu 16:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but the image is full of dustspots (really everywhere). --Cayambe 14:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC) Indeed. And the noise in the sky is not fixable I'm afraid.--Jebulon 23:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 158792 at Nottingham. Mattbuck 11:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Church spire of the Kamp Abbey church --Carschten 10:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Church of the Primacy of St. Peter, Tabgha --Berthold Werner 06:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Pudelek 20:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: solar power station IRT near Trier, Germany -- Der Wolf im Wald 01:03, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review Comment Ein Wolf in meinem Revier ;-) Die Masten im rechten Bildteil kippen nach innen. --Berthold Werner 12:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Příční Street in Malé Žernoseky, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 06:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Needs perspective correction - note hoe fence/buildings on left lean in. Mattbuck 12:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zambian Victoria Falls (Part), Nicolas M. Perrault 01:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too dark, blurry, noisy. --kallerna 06:27, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Limestone head at Ballymote Friary, County Sligo in Ireland. --AFBorchert 22:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acronicta rumicis --Böhringer 21:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice! But (in my opinion) it would look even better without that leaf in the background. --Bartiebert 21:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmunder U --Mbdortmund 20:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harenberghaus from Dortmunder U --Mbdortmund 20:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A bridge in Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo -- Felix Koenig 19:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I miss something left, but otherwise very good. --Jebulon 22:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spinosaurus Morocco --Archaeodontosaurus 19:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Smial 00:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town Hall in Annaberg-Buchholz, Germany --Harke 16:34, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Super, Ansicht, super Wetter, super Komposition, super Qualität → QI für mich und auch das beste dieser fünf. -- Felix Koenig 16:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dortmunder U --Mbdortmund 13:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Underexposed (too dark). But I think you can easily fix this. --BennyJ 16:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arrowhead - later neolithic --Archaeodontosaurus 13:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good and useful. --Cayambe 19:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Christinae Church (German Church), Gothenburg. --Ankara 11:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Strong cyan CAs (easily noticeable at the roofs of the buildings), out-of-focus/soft which was tried to correct by over-sharpening and resulted in an even greater loss of detail (clock, road sign...). Also the tower seems to be slightly tilted but that might be a problem with the building, I guess. However, no QI to me, mainly due to the lack of sharpness. --BennyJ 15:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view of Almería (Spain) --Elemaki 04:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. --Bartiebert 14:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Silybum marianum. Jardin des Plantes of Paris --Jebulon 22:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I don't really like the composition but otherwise very good. -- Felix Koenig 16:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mapple litter in the Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 21:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. Some leaves look like oak. Jonathunder 02:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Beech forest at Malý Blaník.--Juan de Vojníkov 21:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. Would it be possible to geotag and provide an English description? Jonathunder 02:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC) CommentI add further description, but I am unable to geo tag it - forest.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lithic knife. Found in Leugny, Meillet collection. Muséum de Toulouse. -- Rama 08:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)~
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: John the Baptist church in Kharkov (1857). --Vizu 16:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Former armory of JGSDF Camp_Zentsuji --663highland 15:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Takachiho-gawara in Kirishima --663highland 15:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Takachiho-gawara in Kirishima --663highland 15:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Toshodaiji in Nara --663highland 15:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Fragment of a harpoon decorated with horses, Magdalenian, Muséum de Toulouse collection of prehistory -- Rama 13:06, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The river Rhine in Cologne, Germany. -- Der Wolf im Wald 12:42, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Distinct anticlockwise tilt. Mattbuck 12:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neolithic necklace, calibrated discoid talc pearls. Toulouse museum. -- Rama 11:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment masking problems...--Jebulon 22:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - nice, but only the bottom part is in focus. I'd probably support a crop of just that bit. Mattbuck 12:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Gilbertstraße 34, wine cellar from 1905 --Berthold Werner 10:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion The mast with the french colors and motto needs an explanation in the description page, IMO--Jebulon 21:20, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
;-) I already wondered myself why it takes so long until you ask ;-) I don't know why it stands there. --Berthold Werner 06:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Do you know [[2]] this ? It is a drawing by Goethe.and the photo needs a perspective correction left IMO --Jebulon 23:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Ich habe auch das gefunden, aber ich bin nicht einverstanden mit dem Wort "Baum"...--Jebulon 23:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
What's wrong with the perspective? --Berthold Werner 06:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Some days after, with a new review, I don't remember, nor see any perspective problem here... So promote.--Jebulon 13:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance to the port of Arinaga, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 18:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Could you remove the black disturbing shadow on the street at the bottom right? The image looks also a bit unsharp to me --Carschten 19:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
No, I don't remove it because it isn't a shadow and it's not necessary to retouch something. -- Felix Koenig 19:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
It is almost always necessary to retouch something. That shadow - or whatever - draws the eye to the right unnecessarily. Mattbuck 12:06, 12 October 2010 (UTC) because of the dark thing rightabove--Jebulon 20:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)I meant "below", sorry.--Jebulon 13:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial Lift Bridge at night --Jonathunder 03:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion With some acceptable chromatic aberration on both sides, otherwise very good. Please geotag. --Cayambe 09:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaldaklofsfjöll mountain range during path to Landmannalaugar --Chmee2 19:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Three images with the same nomination text, it is hard for reviewers not to mistake. But this one is particularly nice (and strange). --Jebulon 22:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC) Comment:) sorry for it --Chmee2 22:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC) No problem, at the end I promoted my choice (thanks to the number). Congratulations for this image !--Jebulon 23:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oak milkcap (Lactarius quietus) --George Chernilevsky 18:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. Could you please geocode?--Cayambe 08:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crossroad with cemetery in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 15:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 18:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Toshodaiji in Nara --663highland 09:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Strong CA on the roof and the tree in the left. I think so that there is also WB problems. --Chmee2 14:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a SIG Sauer Pro, complete in his box, with a magazine of 15 ammunitions 9mm. Used by all the homeland security forces in France--Jebulon 23:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality and useful. --Vomirencostard 12:09, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Macro photograph of a wasp drinking from a soda drop, possible Eumeninae subfamily --The Photographer 22:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Small, only 1.282 × 960 --Llez 07:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Too mall and not id'ed. Lycaon 14:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The entrance of Casa Museo de Pérez Galdós, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 18:29, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, with some acceptable chromatic aberration. --Cayambe 14:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anthers of Phormium cookianum. --Avenue 16:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too small DOF, too little sharpness of the parts that are 'in focus'. Lycaon 14:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) in Namibian cheetah reserve. By Nicolas M. Perrault. -- Nicolas M. Perrault 16:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Quite oisy and clear CA (even on the skin visible). Lycaon 14:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boudinage near Kangerlussuaq --Chmee2 12:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good and interesting. Please geocode. --Avenue 16:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Done --Chmee2 15:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, looks like an amazing landscape from the map. QI to me. --Avenue 11:20, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cyclamem persicum flower. Detail of reproductive elements. --Leonardorejorge 00:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline DOF too narrow. Lycaon 14:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of Manuel Vázquez Figueroa, park of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain) (I say this because I can't say in english this: "es: Mirador de la Alameda de Santiago de C."--Lmbuga 23:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Barbary Sheep (Ammotragus lervia). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion best of the four... but however: where is a sperm whale photo?? ;-) --Carschten 10:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment To me, too sharp, but i'm not sure to decline it--Lmbuga 19:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An addax (Addax nasomaculatus). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:03, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment To me, the noise of the background are disturbing (at real size), but i'm not sure to decline it--Lmbuga 19:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marina at Pier 39 in San Francisco by user:mbz1--ברוקולי 12:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --George Chernilevsky 15:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Solar propulsion for an electric fence -- Felix Koenig 18:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Volharding 1 on the Rhine --Carschten 18:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Really nice image... BUT the sky is very noisy and has strange stripes (clone stamp? at the left. Also: there is a halo around the chimney at right. Please, put to Discuss if you disagree. --Cayambe 15:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC))
-
- Nomination Composition with a detailled marshal's baton of a famous statue by François Rude, and the signature of the artist, in Paris --Jebulon 22:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too unsharp at the right bottom and too many background imo (not the best composition). -- Felix Koenig 18:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Headframe of the pit Rossenray, shaft 1. --Carschten 15:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very nice symmetry and good quality. -- Felix Koenig 16:09, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Miélan Church, Gers, France --Florent Pécassou 11:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)~
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bamberg cathedral, left part of "Kirchgattendorfer Altar" --Berthold Werner 08:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Argentinian Army. --Elemaki 03:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: The World's largest "dalecarlian horse" in Avesta, Sweden. --V-wolf 18:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 221137 arrives at Bristol Parkway. Mattbuck 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Pilning railway station. Mattbuck 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 14:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Pilning railway station. Mattbuck 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Egg rack in door rack.--Juan de Vojníkov 02:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion The things people take photos of never ceases to amaze me. I'd have preferred it cropped at the bottom and left, but good. Mattbuck 14:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC) QuestionIs this better?--Juan de Vojníkov 16:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sala terrena decoration in Vrtba Garden, Prague.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review Underexposed ?--Jebulon 21:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View form de:Alsumer Berg -- Arnoldius 09:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion sehr gut --Mbdortmund 11:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A newly arranged park in Germany. --High Contrast 09:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:23, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Clément de Metz, the first bishop of Metz, fighting with the dragon Graoully --Llez 07:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Radiolocator 2K12 KUB --Chmee2 11:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion wow! --Carschten 12:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
This image has my Support, too. --High Contrast 11:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lopan and Kharkov rivers on the air. By Dmitry Sleduk.--Vizu 14:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Really sorry it looks so nice, but if I opened like large image it's too noisy --Chmee2 11:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC) * Comment Mb is a normal. "Yes, you are right, if this will be nomination to Featured Pictures, I will agree with your opinion".) --Vizu 15:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a view of some demonstrators (Communists and "Left Party") in Paris, 12 oct 2010 --Jebulon 22:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment I really like the composition of image, however I have a feeling that there are some CA in the transit of white colour to another (like the paper on the street, letters in the flags...). So I am not sure if promote... --Chmee2 11:28, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Well, I'm afraid you are right, there is CA (and too motion blur) and there is nothing I can do against...Pity... but
Withdrawn --Jebulon 20:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Viola arvensis. --Trachemys 07:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Panoramic image of the Danube in Vilshofen/Donau and the so called Donaurandbruch. --High Contrast 17:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Lack of detail at full size - I'd be more willing to promote if the image were scaled down to remove this problem. Mattbuck 14:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC) Done --High Contrast 14:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Much better. Mattbuck 14:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Oldfield Park railway station. Mattbuck 15:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Oldfield Park railway station. Mattbuck 15:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Keynsham railway station. Mattbuck 15:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bristol Parkway railway station. Mattbuck 15:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Panorama of Belfort, France. --ComputerHotline 16:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Can you remove that spot above the thing tagged "Miotte"? Mattbuck 16:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Because of the not removed spot. --Jebulon 20:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inside the fort de Roppe. --ComputerHotline 16:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment looks a bit too yellow to me --Carschten 21:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Also a bit wonky maybe? Slight CW I think. Mattbuck 16:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC) No answer, no comment, no improvements, let's decline--Jebulon 20:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Russian poet A.S. Pushkin on the Pushkinskaya metro station, Kharkov. --Vizu 11:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Bad centered. I suppose a tilt too (see the signature, and the lines on the wall. All is fixable.--Jebulon 20:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC) :* Done by Butko.--Vizu 16:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Comment Is it good idea promote image whit clear flash reflect in downer part? I understand that isn't easy to make right lighting there, however I don't like images where downer area is much "whiter" than upper area. --Chmee2 11:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Agree. That's why I hesitate for a promotion, but it was hard to explain. The I decline, at the end. Sorry.--Jebulon 20:49, 16 October 2010 (UTC)--Jebulon 20:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baby Cheetah eating meat -- Nicolas M. Perrault 02:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, too blurry. --kallerna 08:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nieuwpoort (Belgium): marina -- MJJR 21:38, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good work --George Chernilevsky 08:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline not sharp enough --Carschten 10:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An ewe Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dallas, Texas. --Bartiebert 20:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective distortion and Inappropriate vignetting--Lmbuga 00:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Bad Liebenzell, Germany. -- Felix Koenig 18:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --Chmee2 08:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Venice. --Bartiebert 16:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, I like it, but needs a complicated correction of perspective: Perspective distortion. Tilted--Lmbuga 23:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Alanya. --kallerna 13:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The rocky outcrop of the Upper Cretaceous, Donetsk region, Ukraine Brizhnichenko
- Promotion nice --Carschten 13:01, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Perforated bovid Incisor for Necklace - Gravettian -- Archaeodontosaurus 12:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 12:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Assegai with double beveled base. Paleolithic, La Madelaine, Tursace (24). -- Rama 11:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful -- Archaeodontosaurus 12:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capernaum, remains of the synagogue --Berthold Werner 08:21, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 18:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic image of Neckarwestheim Nuclear Power Plant. -- Felix Koenig 13:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. Alofok 18:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pollen Close-up of flower in Ovalau, Fiji -- Nicolas M. Perrault 00:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline DOF too short, sorry. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Comment It's to pay greater attention to the pollen. It is as if the flower isn't really important compared to it's pollen. The flower is there to show where the pollen is from. This way, you really get a 3-D effect... The pollen merges out the flower and it seems like it's merging out of the image. Nicolas M. Perrault 20:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC) -- ok but you should rename the picture and change the description then to make it clear. If you do it, I'll give you a pro. --BennyJ 14:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC) -- Is the file name and description fine now? If not, please propose a more appropriate one. Note that by the time you read this, the name of the file might not have been changed yet (because an administrator must do it). I have proposed "Pollen from Fijian Flower close-up.JPG". Is it appropriate? Thanks Nicolas M. Perrault 01:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Young seagull at a beach. --BennyJ 20:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Species needs to be identified, probably Larus michahellis, juvenile. --Cayambe 15:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC) -- How do I identify it? I'm not an expert on this, just a photographer --BennyJ 16:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Wir in der deutschen Wikipedia haben da ein sehr gutes Form ;-) Einfach das Bild bei bei de:WP:RBIO/B eintragen! --Carschten 18:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC) -- Done Thanks for the tip, Carschten. I asked them and they confirmed it as "Larus michahellis, juvenile". So I changed the description and category. It should be alright now. --BennyJ 22:53, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Support ...und jetzt nur noch den Artikel erstellen ;-) --Carschten 10:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sailboat, Sada, Galicia (Spain). (I'm not sure: Poor DOF?,...)--Lmbuga 19:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, please add geolocation. --Cayambe 15:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, added geolocation--Lmbuga 18:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Viscum album in spring (april). --Vizu 13:46, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sky is overexposed in downer part of image + connected CA problems, sorry --Chmee2 08:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Viscum album in spring (april). --Vizu 13:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Strong CA in the case of branches in the background, sorry --Chmee2 08:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of Manuel Vázquez Figueroa, park of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 22:38, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment Too tight crop? I did not have space, but I can try it with another objective--Lmbuga 22:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Withdrawn--Lmbuga 02:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eriophorum scheuchzeri, Ljungdalen Sweden.--Ankara 20:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline OpposeI would say that given light is destroying white balance of image. Shadow side is more blue than white and sunny part look overexposed for me. --Chmee2 11:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Thanks for review. The photo was taken late in the afternoon, maybe not a good idea. --Ankara 11:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow-legged gull -- Alvesgaspar 16:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Noisy bastard, still, it's the one-legged ones you need to watch out for - they'll steal your chips in a second. Mattbuck 11:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westerwinkel castle near Herbern evening sun --Mbdortmund 15:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Composition is bad. Why 2/3 of image is sky? However also the tree on the left is too dark and generally lighting is not ideal in this image. Sorry --Chmee2 11:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zanussi refridgirator interier.--Juan de Vojníkov 06:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too noisy (for example right upper corner of the refridgirator). Next time will be better try more light sources --Chmee2 08:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Triton in Vrtba garden.--Juan de Vojníkov 02:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cobblestone path.--Juan de Vojníkov 02:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 19th century reconstitution of a prehistoric tumb (actual skeletons and items), Toulouse museum. -- Rama 15:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
PS: I am sorry, I did not realise that Archaeodontosaurus had nominated almost the same image right before. Rama 15:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC) - Promotion Good. Mattbuck 14:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination 19th century reconstitution of a prehistoric tumb (actual skeletons and items), Toulouse museum. -- Rama 15:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant in Crâng Park, Buzău, Romania. --Andrei Stroe 14:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Contrast too high IMO - building too dark. Also some overexposure. Mattbuck 14:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Venus and Adonis by V. V. Reiner.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. Mattbuck 14:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Decoration of sala terrena in Vrtba Garden.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. Mattbuck 14:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Deichmühle and the Frisia-Mühle in winter 2009 in Norden, East Frisia (by Matthias Süßen) --Carschten 11:42, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment - large dust spot at the left end of that contrail. Mattbuck 14:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Done dust spots removed --Carschten 16:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Underexposed and noise (especially in the sky)--Lmbuga 00:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monument at the Battle of Grunwald -- Albertus teolog 08:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline It leans to the right, IMO...--Jebulon 16:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Done :-) Albertus teolog 17:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Can anything be done to make the monument stand out from the sky better? Mattbuck 00:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I do not know :-) Albertus teolog 10:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
*Bad quality: Bad contrast, unsharp,... (perhaps I don't understand what happens) --Lmbuga 01:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a bronze horse in a fountain in Paris--Jebulon 22:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marmota marmota --Böhringer 20:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Khao Sok National Park, Thailand, taken from a kayak -- Nicolas M. Perrault 20:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice --George Chernilevsky 10:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Propsteikirche Dortmund, tower --Mbdortmund 20:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 10:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A fisherman is walking over rock formation at Pescadero State Beach by user:mbz1--ברוקולי 18:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 07:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock formation at Pescadero State Beach by user:mbz1--ברוקולי 18:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good too --George Chernilevsky 07:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Stadttheater in Baden, Lower Austria. -- Felix Koenig 14:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:35, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 170507 leads 153333 at Birmingham New Street. Mattbuck 11:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 14:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 323220 at Birmingham New Street. Mattbuck 11:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 14:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Craterellus lutescens. --V-wolf 14:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too soft, sorry --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture of Manuel Vázquez Figueroa, park of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 22:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very sharp and otherwise also good.--Cayambe 16:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bamberg cathedral, right part of "Kirchgattendorfer Altar" --Berthold Werner 08:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Gut --George Chernilevsky 07:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mont Saint Eynard et Bastille --Vomirencostard 16:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition, not sharp at full size but fine at full screen. --Avenue 08:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grenoble panorama - Mont Jalla (new version) --Vomirencostard 16:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Strong barrel effect, with buildings leaning away from centre (especially on the right). --Avenue 08:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Christ on Písek Stone Bridge. --Chmee2 12:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion tilted!? --Mbdortmund 19:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Done --Chmee2 08:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC) Still tilted, horizontally.--Jebulon 21:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
OK now for me, goood compo and colours --Mbdortmund 23:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The weir in the centre of Bath. Mattbuck 12:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Iowa Supreme Court building. --Spongie555 22:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Needs perspective correction and better composition--Lmbuga 22:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Very noisy and the sky is overexposed. Mattbuck 16:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Police nad Metují (Politz an der Mettau) - town hall --Pudelek 12:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Composition problems, fixable IMO. You can chose : 1) I miss the right part of the fountain, OR 2) There is a disturbing "half-person" and a bad edge of a building, right too. Extend if possible, or crop...--Jebulon 22:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Info I chose number 2 ;) --Pudelek 08:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Then it is not centered;)--Jebulon 21:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Now --Pudelek 11:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Good. Thanks--Jebulon 22:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination M/S Ballerina. --Ankara 17:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Comment - some loss of detail in the background. A bit unsharp too? Mattbuck 01:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC) New version uploaded. But still loss of detail in the background. I crop the image to highlight the boat. --Ankara 12:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Clear QI to me now. --Cayambe 17:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bartizan in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 07:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brandenburg Gate. --Spongie555 03:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Carschten 10:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sulphur tuft (Hypholoma fasciculare) colony growing on a tree. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:12, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 07:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red raspberry slime mould Tubifera ferruginosa --George Chernilevsky 18:44, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flint blade of Mousterian -- Archaeodontosaurus 14:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 18:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance portal of the Rheinberg War Cemetery --Carschten 12:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 07:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree swamped with freezing rain --Nicolas M. Perrault 02:31, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Berthold Werner 12:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protestant church of Haigerloch, Germany. -- Felix Koenig 19:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. Alofok 17:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 221137 arrives at Bristol Parkway. Mattbuck 11:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I like the composition and the contrast with the girl sitting in the foreground and the departing train in the background. That's really nice. However, it's a bit noisy. --BennyJ 16:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Belgrade by night --Nikola Smolenski 22:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Good idea but especially the left and middle part of the image is pretty unsharp and the overall image is noisy --BennyJ 15:35, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pistacia vera L. Historic specimen. Please have a look on the file description page.--Jebulon 21:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 18:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Luxembourg, Jardin Napoléon. --Cayambe 08:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Dog looking for his ball. --kallerna 17:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment - I thought remembering it founded it, last time... --Jebulon 23:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Support - nice. Did he find it? Mattbuck 17:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
SupportThis photo is a good.--Vizu 14:29, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Panorama, Poljana Pape Aleksandra 3 Zadar --Böhringer 20:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review Comment It seems to be made tighter than it's in reality, but it's only my impression. JDavid 22:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment - the brightness of the white building spoils it for me. Mattbuck 22:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A memorial on the Rheinberg War Cemetery --Carschten 16:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, barrel distortion --Berthold Werner 17:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Miélan War Memorail, Gers, France --Florent Pécassou 11:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 20:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Yes, but needs to be centered--Jebulon 22:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pano of volcanoes and lava at Lanzarote. --Alchemist-hp 11:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion super --Carschten 15:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dahlia hybrid 'Zebrano'. --Quartl 09:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very good Felix Koenig 19:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Przełęcz Karkonoska (Author: Pjahr) -- Albertus teolog 07:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment po lewej jest potrzebny minimalny crop - widać tam niewielki czarny pasek, powstały pewno przy składaniu panoramki --Pudelek 11:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Done zrobione :-) Albertus teolog 12:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC). Teraz dobrze. --Alchemist-hp 19:24, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tricyrtis formosana (Formosa Toad Lily)--Jebulon 23:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 13:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The islands of Théviec (or Téviec), (right) and Guernic (left), where was found the mesolithic tomb illustrated below here by Archaeodontosaurus and Rama. View from the beach of Saint-Pierre Quiberon, Morbihan, Brittany, France. --Jebulon 22:22, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline poor image quality, blurry, horizon is not level, narrow angle of view. not a quality image, sorry. --BennyJ 17:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination young grass -- Der Wolf im Wald 15:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC))
- Decline Comment I'm not sure, but pour DOF to me --Lmbuga 00:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
The zone out of focus is distracting--Lmbuga 00:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lockout box at Pilning railway station. Mattbuck 13:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Maybe needs a crop left, and maybe the subject is not very 'glamour', but it is a QI with no doubt to me. --Jebulon 22:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Comment Two degrees on the left, ok?--Vizu 16:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two old man. Sculpture in Kharkov. --Vizu 16:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion CommentThe background is a bit dark, but it's not too bad. However, the image needs to be cropped, the edges are not straight. --MichaelBueker 15:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC) * Done--Vizu 16:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Good enough for me.
-
- Nomination Ke Karlovu Street, Prague in winter.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Tilted, otherwise ok, though I'd prefer a bit more contrast maybe. Mattbuck 11:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alexander Dyma (Yaroslavl duma deputy) participating a feast in Smolenskoe village, Pereslavl district. --PereslavlFoto 10:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Not quite in focus. Mattbuck 11:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monastery in Wigry -- Albertus teolog 07:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Quite noisy, and a strange colour balance. Mattbuck 17:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Victoria amazonica in Botanical garden of Uppsala, Sweden. --V-wolf 06:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline The background foliage seems strangely blurred. Mattbuck 17:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
CommentIf you check the meta-data you can see that the picture is not altered. --V-wolf 03:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm not saying it is. Mattbuck 11:53, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Three Crosses -- Albertus teolog 20:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline The crosses are rather too bright - overexposure on red/green channels and loss of detail. Mattbuck 17:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Golden Hall of Toshodaiji in Nara. --663highland 16:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good hjob, though that roof makes my eyes go funny. Mattbuck 17:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Luxembourg, drinking water reservoirs, antennas, and a tower with a primary geodesic reference point for the country. --Cayambe 17:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment - strange greys in the sky, and it all seems a bit washed out. Mattbuck 22:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC) -- All in all nothing very special. Too much uninteresting grass, and the partally visible street doesn't fit to the rest of the composition. --Kuli 10:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Comment I accept your vote but sorry, but that grass is 'more than only grass': these are drinking water reservoirs. See the tubes for aeration. --Cayambe 18:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Henri of Luxembourg. --Spongie555 02:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good; useful. --Jonathunder 04:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New tram Škoda 15T, Prague — Jagro 22:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 07:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chris Young. --Spongie555 22:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good, and very funny too, because useful to make a set with this one ? sorry, a little nervous breakdown...--Jebulon 23:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vulcanic crater at Lanzarote. --Alchemist-hp 19:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion for the local terms very good --Carschten 20:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow-legged gull -- Alvesgaspar 16:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westerwinkel castle near Herbern --Mbdortmund 15:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice colors --George Chernilevsky 07:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Westerwinkel castle near Herbern evening sun --Mbdortmund 15:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Sehr gut! --George Chernilevsky 07:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of a Hottentot Fig -- Alvesgaspar 13:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I don't know if colors are processed or not, but I don't care, I find it very nice. suggestions : a geocode would add, and maybe a black masking too !--Jebulon 21:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC) -- Thanks, Jebulon. No, the colours are not processed, they are naturally saturated. It already happened to me, with another species, that out colour system couldn't deal with it. Yes, I will add a geocode. -- Alvesgaspar 22:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Yes, I know your very nice "poster" with asters, (if I'm not wrong). Thats gave me the idea.--Jebulon 23:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A view of Serra da Estrela, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 11:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. needs a geocode IMO. --Jebulon 21:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)isn't geocode a mandatory in FPC ? ;)--Jebulon 21:33, 11 October 2010 (UTC) -- Sorry, but I don't recall the exact spot where the shot was made. No, geocode is only mandatory in VIC. -- Alvesgaspar 22:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunflower at Kamp Abbey (new version) --Carschten 10:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very nice! -- Der Wolf im Wald 19:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porto Covo, Portugal. Coastal view to north -- Alvesgaspar 23:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trollius pumilus, Alpine garden in the Jardin des Plantes de Paris. New in "Commons".--Jebulon 23:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good --George Chernilevsky 07:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Euphorbia myrsinites L., Alpine garden in the Jardin des Plantes de Paris.--Jebulon 22:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 12:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of "Salinas de Janubio" at Lanzarote. --Alchemist-hp 21:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Institute of Classical Archaeology, Tübingen. -- Felix Koenig 15:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 15:43, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mesolithic tomb in Teviec --Archaeodontosaurus 08:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good depth of field. -- Rama 20:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Historical tree (1948) of the Jardin des Plantes de Paris. Critically endangered species.--Jebulon 23:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 07:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tricyrtis formosana in the Jardin des Plantes de Paris.--Jebulon 23:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 07:49, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Christopher Columbus at Las Palmas de Gran Canaria -- Felix Koenig 16:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good... except for the name: Cristobal Colón :-). --Cayambe 15:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burtterfield Graphometer fitted with a compass, on display at Toulon Naval museum -- Rama 15:43, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Did you try an "old red velvet" background like the original one ? Would be better IMO because of the red reflections on the metal.--Jebulon 21:28, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of St Anna Church, Haigerloch -- Felix Koenig 15:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Albertus teolog 07:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teatrons roof.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Strange but good--Jebulon 21:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fresco Lord of forces with us -- Albertus teolog 10:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Strange crop at the basis below. Sorry--Jebulon 21:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Below is a porch roof. I could not otherwise :-) Albertus teolog 11:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Prague Castle and St. Nicholas Church.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Bad light (corner left below), and perspective distortion. Sorry--Jebulon 21:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Nicholas Church from Vrba Garden, Prague-Lesser Quarter, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Underexposed and bad composition, (crop right)--Jebulon 21:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teplické skalní město (Wekelsdorfer Felsen) - stairs to the castle Střmen (Burg Stremen) --Pudelek 18:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline heavy chromatic aberrations, sorry --Carschten 16:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mount Bispbergs klack, Sweden. --V-wolf 06:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Papa Gueye. Naïve art graffiti. --Vizu 12:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs a crop left, IMO. But I'll support if done. I add a french description in the file page.--Jebulon 20:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC) :* Done File cropped. Thanks for a french description.--Vizu 17:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC). Better now, thank you.--Jebulon 21:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two cooling towers in Pesochin Power Station. --Vizu 17:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC) :* Done Id - ok.--Vizu 11:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Unsharp areas and the telegraph pole really spoil this. Mattbuck 01:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC) :*There was the only spot available for taking this picture over the river, so it's impossible to avoid the telegraph pole.--Vizu 15:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Support after my corrections --Carschten 12:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Helena -- Albertus teolog 10:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion some small chromatic aberrations, a bit noisy sky, but otherwise good --Carschten 11:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oberschelden, Germany. --Bartiebert 09:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion nice colours --Carschten 10:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bamberg cathedral, middle part of "Kirchgattendorf Altar" --Berthold Werner 06:54, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good quality, very nice composition (even if it looks a bit too grey) --Carschten 10:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The 'Saint-François' tower in Nice, France. --Myrabella 06:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Berthold Werner 08:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Malé Žernoseky village, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 06:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Carschten 10:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunflower at Kamp Abbey --Carschten 20:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn --Carschten 09:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bamberg cathedral, detail of "Kirchgattendorfer Altar" --Berthold Werner 17:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice--Jebulon 21:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Staghorn Sumac (Rhus typhina) in Marki, Poland. --Crusier 15:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality is O.K. -- MJJR 21:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amphiprion percula in the Warsaw Zoo. --MichaelBueker 14:31, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too noisy. Sorry --Chmee2 17:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gardens of Alcazar de Cordoba, Spain.--Jebulon 10:27, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Info Minor issues fixed.--Jebulon 22:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Support Good now QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 23:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jens Liljestrand, Swedish writer. --Ainali 19:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice lighting, great setup. --MichaelBueker 15:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow Stagshorn Fungus. --Quartl 17:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice and yes, QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 15:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The Bridgwater and Taunton Canal at Durston. Mattbuck 01:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: St Philips Marsh T&RSMD. Mattbuck 01:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bath Spa railway station. Mattbuck 01:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bath Spa railway station. Mattbuck 01:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Inside the fort de Roppe : casemate de Bourges. --ComputerHotline 09:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review According to the rules, I cannot decline because of this, but I think this place is very ugly.--Jebulon 00:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Seconded. Mattbuck 14:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a bush of Euphorbia characias, Jardin des Plantes de Paris--Jebulon 22:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dwarf variety of pomegranates, alpine garden of the Jardin des Plantes in Paris--Jebulon 17:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 19:43, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clematis 'Henryi' --Captain-tucker 16:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good.--Jebulon 22:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mesolithic tomb in Teviec --Archaeodontosaurus 14:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very good quality and nice view -- Felix Koenig 15:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC) a future FP, IMO--Jebulon 17:43, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Part of the garden of Alcazar of Cordoba, Spain.--Jebulon 23:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses in Norway. --Spongie555 22:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Very funny, I'm waiting for the electric toy-train at low resolution ! But I see many issues (water drops ? Please se annotations). There is a strong perspective problem right too, due the roofs of the two neighboring white buildings. I my opinion, if you chose and accept an artificial background like this one, you may keep the façades only, and "destroy" all the roofs... --Jebulon 23:51, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Per above reasoning. Lycaon 12:38, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Fixable, nevertheless.--Jebulon 17:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A pomegranate, symbol of the city, in Granada, Spain --Jebulon 22:25, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A field near Much Dewchurch. Mattbuck 09:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A field near Much Dewchurch. Mattbuck 09:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 150261 at Bridgwater. Mattbuck 09:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gundi. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Common Heliotrope. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Young Japanese Macaque interacting with his mother. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Peleides Blue Morpho feeding on a banana. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Closed Lotus Flower. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Gut --George Chernilevsky 19:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clipper. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Gut --George Chernilevsky 19:40, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Clipper on the t-shirt of a child. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination African Clubmoss. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very sharp and well-lit. QI. --MichaelBueker 11:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Visitors watching an icebear. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Heřmanovice (Hermannstadt) - St. Andrew church --Pudelek 12:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Gable of the house in Dlouhé Pole village, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment - can you increase the brightness a bit? Mattbuck 13:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment Is this better?--Juan de Vojníkov 02:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
SupportI think it qualifies now. --MichaelBueker 11:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Five-storied Pagoda of Zentsu-ji --663highland 13:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review CA on the stone fence left --Jebulon 22:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm inclined to decline on grounds of composition - the tree makes me feel as if the whole thing's falling over. Mattbuck 10:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entwined carrots --Jonathunder 23:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion No explicit sexual contents in "Commons", please. Otherwise good, very sharp, even if i'd prefer a "non grainy" background--Jebulon 23:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old tram from 1920s in Kharkov. By Ace^eVg.--Vizu 16:49, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline The main subject is very good, even the background is overexposed in the corner left above.
QI nevertheless--Jebulon 23:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Oppose Below the mark for me - overexposured background and below the 2Mpix. --Elekhh 06:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC) You are right concerning the size, I remove my support. Sorry.--Jebulon 11:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 15:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sveti Sedmochislenitsi Church (The Seven Saints) in Sofia. --MrPanyGoff 13:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very good, super perspective -- Felix Koenig 18:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 185122 passes Melton Ross. --Dan Sellers 20:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 10:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Knife of the Hitler Jugend -- Rama 12:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Again, seems poorly cut-out. Please renominate when fixed. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid that the original photograph was too contrasted to allow for a better version. Sorry. Rama 08:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pholiota squarrosa. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 14:35, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination President Barack Obama. --Spongie555 03:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion A very good photograph. --MichaelBueker 08:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A panorama from the assassinated Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink's funeral. --Spongie555 03:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good.--Ankara 13:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Alanya. --kallerna 17:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Well done. A bit hazy towards the back, but you can't blame the camera for smog! --MichaelBueker 08:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greater Rhea. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good composition. --Jonathunder 09:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A view of Serra da Estrela, Portugal (unassessed last time) -- Alvesgaspar 23:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition...--Carschten 19:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The monument to the Tsar Liberator in Sofia. --MrPanyGoff 06:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Delicate flowers and buds of a Meadow Saxifrage -- Alvesgaspar 20:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Not sure about sharpness, I need other advices--Jebulon 21:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment Lack of sharpness probably caused by diffraction. --Quartl 15:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Well I like it. Mattbuck 14:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kharkov bridge sculpture on sunset.--Vizu 17:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment As there was obviously fog on that day and the non-overexposed sky on the other image of the same subject here does not look much different, this is one of the rare cases were overexposure did no harm. Also I do not understand the size argument. The image has more than 7 MP. The reason why we can only decline here is perspective and framing. The crop at the right is so tight that there is not enough space left for the necessary corrections of tilt or perspective.--Johannes Robalotoff 16:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Done--Vizu 16:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
OK then. Mattbuck 14:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Porthmadog railway station. Mattbuck 12:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Lake Nemrut inside the crater of Nemrut Volcano, Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 15:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Maybe a bit darker… —Jagro 11:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment Blue and green channel blown in the left part of the sky, exposure should be corrected. --Quartl 16:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose per previous. Mattbuck 13:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The river Tornada, near its mouth at the bay of São Martinho do Porto, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 13:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Please see annotated dust spots--Jebulon 22:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC) -- I can't see the annotations but removed a couple of them. Thanks, Alvesgaspar 22:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
The sky looks a bit strange top right, but generally good. Mattbuck 13:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow farm in Zlivice, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment cw tilt --Carschten 12:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC) Question What is "cw tilt"?--Juan de Vojníkov 10:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC) Comment clockwise tilt, meaning the image is leaning to the right. --Quartl 18:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose per Carschten. Mattbuck 13:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 159018 passes through Keynsham. Mattbuck 14:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review Comment looks oversharpened, especially the rear has lot of artifacts. Could you upload a new version? --Carschten 16:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't have the original anymore, so not really. Mattbuck 22:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Minnesota Chief Justice Skjerven Gildea -- Jonathunder 21:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Magna cum laude--Jebulon 22:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Feuerwanze --Böhringer 20:47, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too noisy and too shallow DOF, sorry. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African Grey Parrot. --Quartl 20:13, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tramway in Nice, France. --Myrabella 10:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Importance of a well-made caption --Archaeodontosaurus 15:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mascaron of Vrba garden, Prague, Czech republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 22:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry I disagree with the composition, and with the too strong yellow color.--Jebulon 23:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC) CommentStrong yellow? I wasnt manipulating colors.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shopping center in Maspalomas, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 20:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok to me. --Cayambe 18:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dome of the church in Ingenio, Gran Canaria -- Felix Koenig 18:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion nice church --Pudelek 18:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sahlgrenska huset, Gothenburg.--Ankara 09:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Albertus teolog 10:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Offering table from God Khaldi temple in Rusahinili. Altar Urartu. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 12:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy and unsharp. Mattbuck 22:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nemrut Volcano, Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 12:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Several dust spots. Mattbuck 22:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pholiota squarrosa. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LKT forest tractor.--Juan de Vojníkov 22:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective distorsion, disturbing car in background--Jebulon 23:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Argiope bruennichi --Böhringer 19:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset on Lausanne cathedral -- Rama 18:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline strong halo -- Felix Koenig 18:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC). The same dustspot...(but if removed, i'll put this pic in consensual review)--Jebulon 23:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Removed, thank you. But Felix Koenig is right, the hal is very strong and is definitely not a desirable feature. Rama 23:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset on Bel-Air tower seen from Lausanne cathedral -- Rama 18:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline halo --Carschten 19:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the tip, I've tried to alleviate the issue somewhat. Rama 20:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC) There is a dustspot too. Please see annotation--Jebulon 23:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes, got it. Thank you very much. Rama 23:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Ordovician trilobite Megalaspides --Llez 18:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alexander Dyma (Yaroslavl duma deputy) participating a feast in Smolenskoe village, Pereslavl district. --PereslavlFoto 10:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI of Aleksandr Mikhailovitch. I think the good word is "representative", instead of "deputy" (I've had same problem in french...)--Jebulon 23:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pieta in Askeby church, Linköping, Sweden--Xauxa 00:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Some noise in the background at full resolution, but otherwise very good. -- MJJR 21:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nemrut Volcano in Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 16:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Seems overexposed to me. Also, there is an anticlockwise tilt (check the posts) -- Alvesgaspar 13:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The bay of Sõ Martinho do Porto, Portugal. View from outside. -- Alvesgaspar 23:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 13:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bay of São Martinho do Porto, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 23:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 13:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bedroom inside the fort de Roppe. --ComputerHotline 16:17, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Albertus teolog 10:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Wigry -- Albertus teolog 09:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline A bit noisy, some haloes and generally unsharp. Mattbuck 21:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Houses on the bank of Zlivice Pond, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. Mattbuck 21:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Church of Ascension in Vilnius -- Albertus teolog 18:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review Need a perspective correction: better if the towers were parallels to the border of the photograph IMO.--Jebulon 17:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Done I did what I could ;-) Albertus teolog 18:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The crater of Nemrut Volcano, Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 16:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI, but the two dustspots in the sky should be removed. --Elekhh 05:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skanskaskrapan, Gothenburg.--Ankara 10:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 07:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Levallois points - Mousterian --Archaeodontosaurus 09:33, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 07:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fagus sylvatica: autumn insights. --Bartiebert 18:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Surely an artistic shot, but only a tiny fraction of the image is in focus. --Quartl 15:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of Helianthus tuberosu T137 22:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Severely blown in the red channel. --Quartl 15:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Comment I have uploaded new version. T137 22:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
The oversaturation is still there (though contrast is a bit better now). If you still have the raw, you can try converting it into adobe rgb. --Quartl 07:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry but it is deleted. patience T137 07:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow curtain comparison.--Juan de Vojníkov 10:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Lacks sharpness. --Quartl 15:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow curtain.--Juan de Vojníkov 10:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok. --Quartl 15:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Murat River in Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 17:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good to me. --Quartl 15:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cat of May. --Vizu 12:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Comment Low contrast. Categorization not precise enough. (See rules on category page for cats.) Description insufficient. (At least the English one. I cannot review the Russian one.)--Johannes Robalotoff 16:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC) :* Done categorization, description. --Vizu 16:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Comment OK, after solving the description issue there remains the contrast problem (most likely caused by your flash). Contrast should be easy to improve by simple blackpoint adjustment. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Done I improve contrast. --Butko 18:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Done сategorization:Siberian male cat. --Vizu 16:11, 2 October 2010 (UTC) - Promotion OK. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination Cat of May. --Vizu 12:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Comment Low contrast. Categorization not precise enough. (See rules on category page for cats.) Description insufficient. (At least the English one. I cannot review the Russian one.)--Johannes Robalotoff 16:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC) :* Done categorization, description. --Vizu 16:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Comment OK, after solving the description issue there remains the contrast problem (most likely caused by your flash). Contrast should be easy to improve by simple blackpoint adjustment. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:29, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter spruce. By Korniyenko. --Vizu 11:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Underexposed, lacks contrast, composition. --Quartl 15:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Louka village, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Jardín de cactus, Lanzarote. --Alchemist-hp 23:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dead pigeon on the ground. --Ainali 19:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination First second after striking a match --Multimotyl 18:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Bad crop: right side--Lmbuga 21:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I'd probably promote several of those individually, but I don't like the montage - it makes the crop look weird when the smoke disappears. Mattbuck 00:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination AGA factory in Luleå, Sweden. Photo by User:Njaelkies Lea. --Ankara 12:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Wonky. Mattbuck 00:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter spruces. By Korniyenko. --Vizu 09:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion A few annoying wires, but generally good. Mattbuck 00:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Christophstreet, building from 1902/3 --Berthold Werner 07:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed area at top of building. Mattbuck 00:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ledum palustre in Mrzeżyno forest reserve, Pomerania --JDavid 17:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Good detail on the leaves, but quite disturbing background, sorry. --Quartl 15:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Electric locomotive VL8 --Butko 09:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline The main subject (the locomotive) is very nice here but the sky and the building in the upper right corner are overexposed.--MrPanyGoff 12:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
There is cloud in the upper right corner. White it is natural color --Butko 07:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Burnham-on-Sea Atlantic 75 lifeboat at sea. --Geof Sheppard 07:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline I oppose till the cw tilt is corrected --Carschten 13:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salzburg Cathedral --Arne mueseler 12:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Comment Geometry still OK, although not entirely free of distortion. However there is too much color noise visible. Can you get rid of it without serious side effects? --Johannes Robalotoff 18:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline As no improved version was uploaded.--Johannes Robalotoff 17:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a very old jewish pomegranate, symbol of the city, in Granada, Spain--Jebulon 23:11, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Luxembourg Rambrouch. Tower with main geodesic reference point. --Cayambe 20:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion CommentGood.
But slightly tilted?--Ankara 20:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC) Mmh.. I've annotated 1 antenna on the tower, another one on the large structure at the top of the large structure at right, and also two fence structures at right. What do you think? Thanks for reviewing. --Cayambe 20:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC) It was probably a mistake.--Ankara 20:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sundial with a compass function, belonging of Alexandre Blanc, first lieutenant in the 3rd Swiss regiment in service of the First French Empire. On display at Vevey historical museum. -- Rama 09:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good--Lmbuga 10:41, 4 October 2010 (UTC) - You might want to add it to the correct sub category of Category:Sundials. --Kuli 18:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, Fleischstrasse, statue of St. Nicolaus --Berthold Werner 09:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --Lmbuga 15:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stigbergsliden, Gothenburg.--Ankara 19:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stigbergsliden, Gothenburg.--Ankara 19:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 09:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall in Großbottwar, Germany. -- Felix Koenig 18:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Technically not 100% perfect but this image good enough to meet the QI criteria. --High Contrast 18:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Mary's Maternity Church in Trzebiatów, Pomerania, Poland --JDavid 09:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- Albertus teolog 07:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Kamp Abbey with the Terraced gardens in foreground --Carschten 15:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Two steps right :-) Albertus teolog 21:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manuel Reimóndez Portela. Galicia (Spain)----Lmbuga 22:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination--Lmbuga 20:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumn leaves. --Vizu 17:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Needs id (and filename spelling). --Quartl 07:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Done id - ok. --Vizu 16:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
I actually meant the id of the leaves. Anyway, in the upper half many are overexposed, so I have to decline, sorry. --Quartl 16:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greece vs Spain @ Euro 2008 --Arne mueseler 12:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
-
- Nomination Portrait of a Plumed Basilisk. --Quartl 09:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very Good --Archaeodontosaurus 10:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Samples of nasrid columns, capitals, arches and stuccos, in Alhambra, Granada, Spain--Jebulon 23:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Berthold Werner 09:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the arab fortress of Salobrena, Spain --Jebulon 22:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Slight ca at the bow, but still good. --Berthold Werner 09:21, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The "Virgin of the snows", Sierra Nevada, Spain--Jebulon 21:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion As for me, very good and original photo.--Vizu 21:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC) Sorry, too small. Back soon with another version.--Jebulon 22:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC) Not sure the previous version was too small, at the end... Well, let's submit this one --Jebulon 22:21, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nakatsu-bansho-en garden in Marugame--663highland 13:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 20:21, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shiitake mushrooms cooked with garlic. DocteurCosmos 10:31, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion ...but I hate mushrooms *gag!*... --Carschten 12:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Female tennis player Anastasiya Yakimova in Moers --Carschten 19:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition and colours, good quality -- Alvesgaspar 20:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment Good, but I suggest a recrop. --kallerna 11:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Done better now? --Carschten 11:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC) -- I think it is worse now, as the crop is too tight, especially in front of her -- Alvesgaspar 14:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination From a tight street, view of a baroque façade of the cathedral of Guadix, Andalusia, Spain--Jebulon 23:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment There are strange effekts at the upper border. --~~~ Who wrote ? Anyway, it was my mistake (bad cropping). Corrected now. Thanks--Jebulon 20:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
It was me. There is still remaining a dustspot or something like this on the upper left. --Berthold Werner 06:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC) Done I see. I've fixed it, now --Jebulon 01:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape of the Ring of Kerry, Ireland. --High Contrast 23:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Location too unspecific, the Ring is 179 km long. --Quartl 09:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment Unnatural green to me and bad quality to me--Lmbuga 21:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Finally decline on groudns of noise and that telegraph pole. Mattbuck 21:31, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A mosque in Aleppo, Syria --Bgag 16:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Aggressive noise reduction washed out detail. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:34, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunate. Also that tower top left irks me. Mattbuck 10:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Batter-fried cheese curds --Jonathunder 13:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline CA and unsharp. Mattbuck 10:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windmill at Puerto de las Nieves, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 10:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Carschten 11:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Frédéric Le Play, Jardin du Luxembourg, Paris--Jebulon 22:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 03:13, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spikes of Wall Barley (Hordeum murinum) -- Alvesgaspar 21:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I'm sorry, but it is very good...--Jebulon 21:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of a Trifolium angustifolium -- Alvesgaspar 21:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion O yes, very nice.--Jebulon 21:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of a Arctotis sp. flower with unknown critters -- Alvesgaspar 21:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good to me. --Jebulon 21:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Artist's Conk (Ganoderma applanatum) --George Chernilevsky 19:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good light. --Quartl 20:04, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zinc. --Alchemist-hp 18:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 19:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old wall at Karmir Blur, Urartu. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 17:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very good quality and lightning --Carschten 19:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge over the River Conwy at Tal-y-Cafn. Mattbuck 12:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion very good --Carschten 12:42, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment just out of curiousity: what do we see here? --Quartl 19:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
It's one of the riveted metal bits that make up the structural join just below the toprail. Mattbuck 22:05, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frecce Tricolori. --Airwolf 10:04, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but this time a larger dof would have been necessary to keep all crafts on focus -- Alvesgaspar 20:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central Railway Station in Kharkov. By Artemka. --Vizu 17:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry but image quality is below standard (look at the sky) and the colours are dull due to poor lighting -- Alvesgaspar 20:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Tagus river, Portugal. View to south from Vila Velha de Ródão -- Alvesgaspar 13:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Carschten 12:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cottage of Dlouhé Pole village, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline chromatic aberrations, bad composition --Carschten 12:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alanya Peninsula seen from sea. --kallerna 07:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but composition is also part of image quality and this one is dull. Looks like we were left with a single photo of a large panorama! -- Alvesgaspar 20:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A female European garden spider (Araneus diadematus) with traces of dew on its web --Wjh31 22:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Very blurry and soft, looks smudged around the edges. I don't think that zoom lenses are known for good photo quality when reversed. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Done scaled down to 2k pixels wide to improve apparent sharpness --Wjh31 13:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Agree with THFSW, only a small part of the spider is in focus, sorry. --Quartl 19:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Erinaceus europaeus by night -- T137 13:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too dark and undetailed. I see no reason for making this kind of pictures by night -- Alvesgaspar 20:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marguerite flower. --Quartl 07:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good enough. I love wild flowers and minimalism. Could be sharper though -- Alvesgaspar 20:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Stuttgart Central Station tower --Harke 17:47, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Audi S3 Alofok 13:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A portion of the Pont Neuf. Shame about the dull sky. Maedin 10:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry Meadin, it's not only the sky which is dull. Better wait for a sunny day. -- Alvesgaspar 16:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basket of garlic bulbs --Jonathunder 15:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. Mattbuck 12:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination International center of windsurfing, Gran Canaria. The building is really curved, so there's no distortion. -- Felix Koenig 14:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Strange curves in the sky. Mattbuck 12:17, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stairs in the booking office of Llandudno Junction station. Mattbuck 14:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, even if the sky is overexposed and there are some chromatic aberrations. QI imo --Carschten 16:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The show commences. Airwolf 14:43, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment - could you try cropping out the grass, or at least painting out the shed? Mattbuck 12:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
How's this? Airwolf 12:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Support quality good. But I think the old crop is better for seeing how high the planes are flying --Carschten 16:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rhododendron Leafhopper. --Quartl 20:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment - I feel it doesn't stand out too well. I can understand that it's meant to be camouflaged, but it's just all so green... Mattbuck 10:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
These bugs are tiny (< 1cm) and a rhododendon leaf is huge in comparison. But they are probably beyond the possibilities of my current equipment for QI. --Quartl 19:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Biface of Lower Paleolithic --Archaeodontosaurus 08:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Carschten 09:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The bridge to Orléans Island over the St. Lawrence River.--Letartean 01:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy, hazy, OOF lights distracting. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hälleviksstrand kyrka. --Ankara 22:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Not the best lighting (too dark) and the building is tilt -- Alvesgaspar 00:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central Market Hall in Sofia. South entrance. --MrPanyGoff 20:45, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI IMHO, maybe a bit sharper. — Jagro 11:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zwingenberg castle, Germany. -- Felix Koenig 17:53, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline sky and white of the castle a bit overexposed and too unsharp imo, sorry --Carschten 09:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Robinson R44 --Airwolf 17:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Epilobium angustifolium at the Nemrut Volcano, Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 15:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Messy composition, poor lighting and focus -- Alvesgaspar 23:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake Nemrut inside the crater of Nemrut Volcano, Turkey. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 15:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, though a bit too bright to my taste. In these sunny conditions I use to underexpose a tad to improve the contrast later -- Alvesgaspar 23:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pedestrian tunnel at São Martinho do Porto, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 13:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --kallerna 13:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The nave of the old basilica St. Sofia in Sofia. --MrPanyGoff 09:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice perspective — Jagro 11:38, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Child's grave -- Albertus teolog 09:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI, despite the background...--Jebulon 22:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view of Ilsfeld, Germany. -- Felix Koenig 19:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Non optimal point of view: 50% of the image is used by the field in the foreground, 40% is sky. The object is partially covert and to distant. -- Xorx 12:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transfăgărăşan road in Romania, seen northwards from Bâlea Lake.Andrei Stroe 21:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI to me. --Cayambe 11:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transfăgărăşan road in Romania, seen northwards from Bâlea Lake.Andrei Stroe 21:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 11:49, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bâlea Cabin in the Făgăraş Mountains, Romania, being covered by a cloud.Andrei Stroe 21:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion -- Ver nice! But first fix the tilt, please. -- Alvesgaspar 21:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC) Rotated slightly CCW. Andrei Stroe 16:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC) Good to me.--Jebulon 22:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coast in Alanya Peninsula. --kallerna 12:35, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I was to promote, but please remove the dustspots first ! (Two with an annotation, but some others small --Jebulon 16:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC))
Info Fixed. --kallerna 07:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC) OK good now.--Jebulon 22:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aleppo Citadel, Syria --Bgag 23:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Albertus teolog 13:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mount Warning's view in australia (New South Wales) from the clarrie hall dam. Picture taken in the morning. --Pouts31 07:51, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Lovely. Jonathunder 23:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Inside the fort de Roppe : detail of stairs to access in underground galleries. --ComputerHotline 09:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Inside the fort de Roppe : stairs to access in the gun turret. --ComputerHotline 09:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Inside the fort de Roppe : detail of stairs to access in the gun turret. --ComputerHotline 09:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Inside the fort de Roppe : stairs to access in the gun turret. --ComputerHotline 09:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Inside the fort de Roppe : stairs to access in underground galleries. --ComputerHotline 09:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View of Aleppo, Syria --Bgag 03:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View of Aleppo, Syria --Bgag 03:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hammam of the Aleppo Citadel --Bgag 03:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: John the Baptist church, Kharkov. --Vizu 18:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Uspensky Cathedral, by EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 23:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry. Clouds and the part superior of the tower overexposed. Dark zones ot the trees subexposed--Lmbuga 20:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Church of St. St. Constantine and Helena - Plovdiv. Wall fresco in the portico. --MrPanyGoff 16:51, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good color and capture of the detail. Jonathunder 23:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Vercingétorix, Alésia, Alise-Sainte-Reine (Côte d'Or). --Siren-Com 14:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Question So "yellow" ?--Jebulon 10:21, 26 September 2010 (UTC) - R: All pictures I have taken that day are like this, no changing color (can see another one in same Category) Siren-Com 17:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
False colors: File:Alesia Denkmal Vercingetorix01.jpg--Lmbuga 19:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fly Agaric. --Quartl 20:18, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 20:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Persistent Waxcap. --Quartl 18:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 18:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sulphur Tuft. --Quartl 18:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 19:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. John Evangelical Church in Trzebiatów, Pomerania JDavid 17:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Bardzo dobrze! Alofok 18:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in La Aldea de San Nicolás de Tolentino de Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 16:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, the cars aren't annoing. Alofok 18:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Young Fly Agaric. --Quartl 15:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 16:18, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Side entrance view of the church in Ingenio, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 15:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Needs a perspective correction right IMO--Jebulon 16:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
It was already corrected, now I corrected a bit more. -- Felix Koenig 16:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Support still some small distortions, but I like the quality and the view at the church. QI imo --Carschten 16:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter spruces. By Böhringer Friedrich. --Vizu 12:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Useless artefacts in the sky, due to the sun. --Jebulon 16:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC) :* UFO artefacts))? --Vizu 16:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumn spruce. By Korniyenko. --Vizu 11:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Partly overexposed (blown highlights). Lycaon 19:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Public Mineral Baths in Sofia. West elevation fragment. --MrPanyGoff 10:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 06:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Village cross from Răşinari, Sibiu County, in the Village Museum in Bucharest, Romania.Andrei Stroe 21:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Oversaturated. Lycaon 19:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden church from Timişeşti, Gorj County, at the Village Museum in Bucharest, Romania.Andrei Stroe 21:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Nice place, but very bad shadow, and underexposure.Need a reshot with a better light --Jebulon 16:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Comana monastery church, Giurgiu County, Romania. Renominated after failed nom and reprocessed to remove strange artifacts.Andrei Stroe 19:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good to me--Lmbuga 21:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment To me to tight from (close to) the top. --JDavid 17:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter river. By EvgenyGenkin. --Vizu 09:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy and blurry.--MrPanyGoff 07:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter spruces. By Böhringer Friedrich. --Vizu 09:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 06:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Lycaon 10:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Noisy sky. Can be fixed. Lycaon 19:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kharkov bridge sculpture. --Vizu 13:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Comment Could you crop the tiny but somewhat disturbing rest of a plant at the right side? (But don't crop too much.) Otherwise OK for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Done Correction made. --Vizu 13:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion OK now. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boat cruising towards Alanya harbour. --kallerna 13:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Fine. Lycaon 16:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Maybe you should nominate it as FP (I cannot, because of overquota, but I'll support for sure !), after removing a dustspot in the upper left corner, visible at high resolution (annotation)--Jebulon 16:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC). And a geocode too.--Jebulon 16:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dalmatian Pelican and Great Cormorant in danube delta. --Cody escadron delta 07:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Im sorry. Good idea. But unfortunately too much noise. --Ankara 12:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
-
- Nomination Jug Orchid Gnangarra 03:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Good idea, but too many blurring areas and the first image is underexposed --Archaeodontosaurus 19:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Armour of druzhinnik --Butko 12:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Not good reflections. Blurry as a whole.--MrPanyGoff 07:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Vornbach Abbey in Bavaria. --High Contrast 22:46, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Not perfect, but QI imo. -- Felix Koenig 17:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Verwaltungsgebäude Alltours at sunset --Carschten 14:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I don't really like the sunset, but nice view and high quality. -- Felix Koenig 17:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Konponchudo of Enryakuji --663highland 13:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline IMO, a crop of the trees, one left and the right would add.--Jebulon 22:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
poor composition for me --Pudelek 11:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cemetery in Telde, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 15:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs a perspective correction ?--Jebulon 22:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure. I think so too, but the result of ShiftN wasn't better than the original. -- Felix Koenig 10:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Support good imo --Carschten 15:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Market square in Kempten. -- Alofok 20:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion I don't like the flowers in the foreground (disturbing), but very good quality. -- Felix Koenig 18:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 158958 arrives at Oldfield Park. Mattbuck 14:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Trakai Island Castle -- Albertus teolog 20:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Sky slightly overexposed, but QI to me. --Cayambe 07:55, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Church of the Holy Mother of God in Plovdiv. West elevation detail. --MrPanyGoff 19:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Not that exciting, but sharp and otherwise technically also good. --Cayambe 17:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spring river. --Vizu 16:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed, blurred details.--MrPanyGoff 07:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination EURO 2012 Football flower emblem in Kharkov. --Vizu 08:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed.--MrPanyGoff 07:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tornado F3 taking off --Airwolf 23:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment - Technically good, but I'm not sold on the composition. Mattbuck 15:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Support quality and composition are good enough, but light could be better. --Carschten 16:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parador in Cruz de Tejeda, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 18:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion some little CAs, but overall good --Carschten 16:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a Japanese traditional dram of Gagaku in Kotohira Gu --663highland 16:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Bad composition, bottom side and regular quality (unsharp zones) to me--Lmbuga 20:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A lot sights of Duisburg at night --Carschten 15:57, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion The composition isn't perfect, but it's very interesting and useful. -- Felix Koenig 17:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Royal Hotel in Bath. Mattbuck 09:40, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Is a perspective correction possible ?--Jebulon 21:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
I suppose it could be, but to me such images always look worse than the non-perspectived version. Perhaps someone could give it a try? Mattbuck 11:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Perspective distortion--Lmbuga 20:19, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gil Eannes masts. Nsandre 21:24, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline good, but there are two strange spots on 1055,70 and 1586,144. Could you remove or identify them? --Carschten 16:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Oppose delined till the spots are corrected --Carschten 15:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mullus surmuletus. — Lycaon 17:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Why so tight crop on left hand side? --kallerna 20:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
It's only black, it can be easily extended if necessary. Lycaon 14:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Crop fixed --George Chernilevsky 13:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus 19:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windmills in Castile-La Mancha, Spain--Jebulon 00:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hammerdal church, Strömsund, Sweden. --Xauxa 22:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Well composed, good photo.--MrPanyGoff 06:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Conscript's certificate of participation in reserve training originating from 1897 --Thermos 19:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Colour, white balance, crop (the composition is bad)
-
- Nomination The main entrance of the Public Mineral Baths in Sofia. --MrPanyGoff 13:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC) Good.--Ankara 17:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
-
- Nomination Red Square in Russia --Spongie555 16:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, valuable.--MrPanyGoff 19:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roses, Bastavales, Brión, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 22:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice --George Chernilevsky 11:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greece vs Sweden 0:1 (Euro 2008) --Arne mueseler 19:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice, shame about the girl picking her nose. Mattbuck 11:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rasos Cemetery -- Albertus teolog 12:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp and overexposed. Mattbuck 11:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sign during the south africa aparthaid. --Spongie555 03:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too small --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pompey the Great, new version improved--Jebulon 00:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 07:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Point Lobos--Mbz1 17:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 07:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset mirage,sunspot mirage, green rim and green flash--Mbz1 16:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support good --George Chernilevsky 07:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tatra T3, I.P.Pavlova, Prague — Jagro 15:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI --George Chernilevsky 07:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tatra T3, Spořilov, Prague — Jagro 15:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 07:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kharkov bridge sculpture on sunset. --Vizu 13:52, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed sky. Size. --JDavid 15:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Comment As there was obviously fog on that day and the non-overexposed sky on the other image of the same subject here does not look much different, this is one of the rare cases were overexposure did no harm. Also I do not understand the size argument. The image has more than 7 MP! The reason why we can only decline here is perspective and framing. The crop at the right is so tight that there is not enough space left for the necessary corrections of tilt or perspective. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kharkov Children's railway, by Victor Korniyenko. --Vizu 13:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed roof. Chromatic aberration --JDavid 15:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Malá Fatra - Snilovské sedlo --Pudelek 14:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 07:34, 29 September 2010 (UTC) Could you add geo coordinates, please? Thank you! --Kuli 09:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Swedish black pudding /Dcastor 12:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Nice subject, but unfortunately most of it is unsharp. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:05, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Swedish black pudding /Dcastor 12:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline It's a pity that also this one has so low DOF. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, relief of Sankt Martin --Berthold Werner 11:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lavatera trimestris --Butko 09:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Red channel strongly blown. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Head of Erinaceus europaeus by night T137 00:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
-
- Nomination Manuel Reimóndez Portela. Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 22:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Goord. --Berthold Werner 07:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruins of a tower at the Aleppo Citadel --Bgag 22:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Diamond DA42 -- Rama 19:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trier, building of the former "Reichsbank" --Berthold Werner 18:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, 1. Traffic signs are distracting, 2. Shadowing and sunlight not very good, 3. Areas with sun a bit overexposed, 4. Slighty bad perspective. --Kuli 13:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roses, Bastavales, Brión, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 20:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Okay imo -- Pro2 11:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination L-159. --Airwolf 14:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good! --George Chernilevsky 17:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination IAR 99. --Airwolf 14:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI --George Chernilevsky 17:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aleppo Citadel, Syria --Bgag 00:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Could be promoted after a perspective correction (the tower left, for example)--Jebulon 21:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC) Done--Bgag 21:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Good improvements IMO.--Jebulon 21:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nova Rock Festival Second Stage (Austria) --Arne mueseler 19:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Areas of overexposure on the tents. Mattbuck 15:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stadium Salzburg --Arne mueseler 19:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Overexposed sky. Mattbuck 15:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The tomb of Joachim Lelewel -- Albertus teolog 09:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs a perspective correction IMO--Jebulon 21:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC) Done Albertus teolog 13:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC) Good now --Jebulon 21:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination European Lanner Falcon, portrait. --Quartl 00:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Steppe Eagle, portrait. --Quartl 00:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good portrait Albertus teolog 18:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Michael gate, at the cathedral (former mosque) of Cordoba, Spain --Jebulon 21:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Albertus teolog 08:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Nicholas wooden orthodox church in Vinnitsa. Build in 1746. --George Chernilevsky 19:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline The bottom right corner of the image is very underexposed. Mattbuck 13:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Frescoes Michelangelo Palloni -- Albertus teolog 08:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Noised too much --George Chernilevsky 16:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Geum triflorum (Old Man's Whiskers) --Wsiegmund 16:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 16:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Ferris wheel of the Funfair Moers, Germany --Carschten 15:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment - can you paint out that bit of the ride which is cut off on the right? Mattbuck 13:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Done --Carschten 15:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Then promotion shall be yours. Mattbuck 15:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sarcophaga carnaria. --Trachemys 08:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Sarcophaga sp. cannot be identified to species level from images. --Quartl 07:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC) -- Unsharp, little detail -- Alvesgaspar 23:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Winter in Kharkiv. 2010 year.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Winter. Small green car. --Vizu 14:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Size image. --JDavid 15:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support much over 2 MP. No valid oppose reason here. Discuss --Carschten 16:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment And noissy shadow below the engine? --JDavid 16:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor composition. Noise. --Kae 08:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Picris echioides in Pacifica.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Picris echioides--Mbz1 20:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Wrong id. Lycaon 20:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Lycaon 15:29, 28 September 2010 (UTC)- Support Id corrected, good quality. --Quartl 07:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Zentsu-ji in Zentsu-ji City Kagawa pref16s5s4020.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Zentsu-ji --663highland 15:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Same again: very good! --A.Ceta 15:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Perhaps blurry, but I don't like the crop: left & upper side: Composition--Lmbuga 23:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Random composition, poor image quality. -- Alvesgaspar 23:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Zentsu-ji in Zentsu-ji City Kagawa pref32n4592.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Goeido of Zentsu-ji --663highland 15:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support same again: very good! --A.Ceta 15:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Strong perspective distorsion--Jebulon 22:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- As above plus poor image quality. -- Alvesgaspar 08:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Shops in Kilkenny.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Two shops in Kilkenny, Ireland. --High Contrast 23:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Nice image. --A.Ceta 15:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Blown highlights. Lycaon 16:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lycaon. Mattbuck 15:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Medium voltage power line near Azraq.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Medium voltage power line near Azraq, Jordan. --High Contrast 23:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Excyclopedic worthy and good quality. --A.Ceta 15:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Beg do differ. Insufficient quality (not sharp, WB problems and haloes). Lycaon 16:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- As above -- Alvesgaspar 23:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Taktshang.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Takshang Monestary --Spongie555 17:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed sky or fog. Maybe VI but not QI. JDavid 09:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose on grounds of overexposure. Mattbuck 15:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- SupportI see no overexposure! If there was fog, it is supposed to appear whashed out. I fact, it is perfectly exposed! --Stegop 18:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Of course it is overexposed: 11.9 % of the image is pure white (RGB(255,255,255)). Lycaon 04:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Tashichoedzong-Bhutan-2001.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Tashichho Dzong.--Spongie555 03:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support QI, usefull --Ianare 16:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much noise. Lycaon 11:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy and extremely unsharp away from the center. Even parts of the main subject are unsharp. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Kharkov DZhD 08.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Children's railway station, by Ace^eVg. --Vizu 13:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Size image. Overexposed white column. --JDavid 16:01, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support image size is okay
, the teeny white coulds are just white, but not overexposed. No valid oppose reason here. Discuss --Carschten 16:05, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Er meint, die Säule sei überbelichtet, nicht die Wolken. --Mbdortmund 16:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Danke... schneller im Tippen als im Lesen ;) But I think it's still good enough --Carschten 13:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
OpposeCould be still QI if perspective would be corrected. Size minimum is just reached. The (existing) overexposure is still bearable as nothing was lost by it. I will oppose until perspective will be corrected. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Done perspective distortions are corrected now --Carschten 17:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support because perspective correction was done as requested. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Pardosa amentata qtl3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Spotted Wolf Spider on Hoary Ragwort. --Quartl 07:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good! --Kuli 13:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, IMO too unsharp. Compare to this. --kallerna 13:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- The other image shows the spider from a different angle and has comparable quality, indeed. --Quartl 13:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp an too little subject--Lmbuga 20:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Bolted joint bridge.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A detail of bridge construction utilising bolted joints --Thermos 15:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Nice, if a bit noisy. Mattbuck 13:43, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy indeed. Lycaon 04:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Noised but solutionable with a new version --Lmbuga 20:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Graphocephala fennahi qtl1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Rhododendron Leafhopper. --Quartl 07:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review
- Support nice photo of tiny insect --George Chernilevsky 07:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO main subject too small, the image is noisy + not the sharpest one. Sorry. --kallerna 07:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Info Cropped more towards the hopper. These buggers are small (<1cm). --Quartl 08:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Consider buying some kind of extension tubes or close-up lenses? Btw this wasn't good enought to be QI. --kallerna 11:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- A closeup lens wouldn't do much on a macro lens, but I do consider buying some extension tubes. --Quartl 13:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support QI IMO.--Mbz1 13:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Agree with Kallerna, subject too small and fuzzy. -- Alvesgaspar 08:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Zentsu-ji in Zentsu-ji City Kagawa pref04s3s4290.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Zentsu-ji --663highland 15:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Nice shot! --A.Ceta 15:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs perspective correction. Lycaon 16:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Opposeg Good subject, but Needs perspective correction! --Archaeodontosaurus 05:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Ours des carvernes - Crâne.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Cave bear Skull --Archaeodontosaurus 14:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Happy to be the first to promote!--Jebulon 17:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose not happy to be the first to oppose, but the image loos very blurry and noisy to me. Could you correct it? --Carschten 17:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Done Correction made: low noise --Archaeodontosaurus 17:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Noise is not (no longer?) a problem, but very little of the skull is actually sharp. For a static object this can be better. Lycaon 07:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment yes, but without a tripod at the top of a ladder was not an ideal position :) --Archaeodontosaurus 06:02, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ouch! ;-). Lycaon 06:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Gud är kärleken.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: "Gud är kärleken" ('God is the Love') Hosjö graveyard, Falun, Sweden --V-wolf 22:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review
- Support not perfect, but interesting view --Mbdortmund 00:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I hope the rainbow is really true !!--Jebulon 00:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- The rainbow was there – I actually saw where the rainbow ended, in lake Hosjön (an optic illusion of course). I could alter some light- or color settings if that's preferable. --V-wolf 00:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Opposestrong halo --Carschten 14:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- CommentNew version uploaded (please revert if the other was better). Is the halo still there? --V-wolf 22:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's a bit better, but the halo is still there. --Carschten 18:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yet another version uploaded. Duller colors, but maybe better light settings? Same questions: Is this one better and is the halo still there? V-wolf 15:21, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hey! Higher resolution (still very good quality), no halo, nice composition --> QI :-) Support now --Carschten 12:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The cross looks pasted (not saying it is, halos and extreme sharpness make it look like it is), and I don't like the crop (makes me wonder what's underneath). ZooFari 14:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Yet another version up. This time without any photoshopping, just cropping. --V-wolf 11:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunate crop. Lycaon 13:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Unfortunate crop. --Lmbuga 22:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support - not perfect, but I like the composition and the quality. Felix Koenig 15:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Tail of Czech Air Force Airbus A319 CJ.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tail of Airbus A319. --Airwolf 23:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support Good. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tight crop below IMO. Let's discuss--Jebulon 09:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Agree, the framing is not the best. Alvesgaspar 14:50, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination I think I have this picture before cropping, I just need to find it. If I do, I'll renominate with more of the lower part visible. Airwolf 14:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Arantxa_Parra_Santonja,_Moers_I.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The female tennis player Arantxa Parra Santonja after a match in Moers in an interview --Carschten 20:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support OK.--Mbz1 20:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a good framing -- Alvesgaspar 12:05, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- could you explain me what you mean more precisely? --Carschten 14:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- I believe he meant cropped out legs, but it looks like there was a table there, so the framing is understandable IMO.--Mbz1 16:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- I mean the unfortunate table and glass in the foreground. -- Alvesgaspar 07:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- When I cropped out the glass, a big part at the bottom would be missing. I can try with retouching, but it's difficult... --Carschten 12:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
I think I'll renominate it when I found a good resolution. --Carschten 19:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Luxembourg City porte des Bons Malades 01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Luxembourg City, World Heritage Site. --Cayambe 20:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support I wish the crop on the top was different, but still QI.--Mbz1 20:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Oversharpened with halos along edges and grain in the shadows. Probably also a bit undersaturated. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:27, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Agree, poor quality due to poor lighting. -- Alvesgaspar 15:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose bad light, bad composition, bad quality. Not a QI imo sorry. --Carschten 14:14, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Krankentransportwagen in Passau.JPG
[edit]- Nomination A Ford Transit ambulance in Germany. --High Contrast 11:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support OK. Lycaon 16:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed curve of the roof, backdoor, ambulancelight. --JDavid 16:05, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support Although normally being the bad guy who looks for overexposure everywhere I would say that nothing was lost here by overexposure. I see no color aberrations from partly blown RGB channels. The totally white highlights on the roof would look exactly like this for the human eye in the sunlight. There are no other problems. For me the picture is clearly QI. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support It is clearly QI for me too --George Chernilevsky 11:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support overexposure - nice joke --Carschten 14:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, this is very good joke. JDavid 15:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- if you photographed at sunlight, some brighter, white pixels are inevitable. I can't find just one ffffff-pixel, so to oppose here because of overexposure looks like a joke to me. --Carschten 15:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, although I opposed against the relevance of overexposure above (and supported the promotion), I do not find it OK to make user JDavid's position ridiculous. There are many overexposed pixels (even regions) in the image. It's just that they are only slightly overexposed, so that this does not have a serious visible effect. In most of the overexposed pixels here only one or two RGB channels are blown. (The regions with overexposed red channel are much larger than the regions that JDavid marked on the externally linked page.) Therefore you do not find an ffffff at once. (But there are ffffff. I hope I do not have to tell the coordinates.) --Johannes Robalotoff 17:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but when I see, that a good-quality-photo is delined because of ~0,3% (I've count it lavish by myself) overexposed pixels, I can't think this QIC but the perfect photos on Commons... --Carschten 19:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Donaufähre in Obernzell bei der Überfahrt nach Österreich.JPG
[edit]- Nomination A ferry on the danube at the German-Austrian border region. --High Contrast 23:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support In my view not perfect (especially sharpness) but the composition makes it a quality image. --A.Ceta 15:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is tilted, compostion and image quality are not good enough -- Alvesgaspar 08:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The image is overprocessed with aggressive noise reduction and (in-camera?) software sharpening. Detail is spoiled by this and severe overexposure on the boat. Seems as if the image were made with a camera from a totally different class than the very good ambulance picture by the same author above? --Johannes Robalotoff 17:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose tilted, bad quality, overexposed ship --Carschten 14:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Bus of the Yarmouk University.JPG
[edit]- Nomination A Toyota bus of the Jordanian Yarmouk University. --High Contrast 23:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good, detailed shot of this bus. --A.Ceta 15:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tight crop: Composition--Lmbuga 21:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose composition and crop --Pudelek 11:45, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Amanita_citrina_2010_G1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Citron Amanita (Amanita citrina). --George Chernilevsky 19:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Very good.--Mbz1 19:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Much better than the panoramic version, illustrative, however slightly overexposed. --Ikiwaner 17:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
{{Oppose}} Bad exposition and poor DOF--Lmbuga 22:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC) and too green: White balance --Lmbuga 22:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC))- Done Error Corrected --Archaeodontosaurus 19:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks You, but i revert this image back. Natural color of fungi is lemon yellow, not cream brown --George Chernilevsky 19:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- I am in discord with George Chernilevsky. I annul my vote by the stress that brings about the reversion of Chernilevsky & the upload of Archaeodontosaurus--Lmbuga 21:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Luis Miguel Bugallo! The alternative looks colorfully, however it is not natural look for me. It is old wood, very dark, old oaks above and an elder and raspberry bush below. I used a tripod and flash with the white filter for more natural result --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks for your words and sorry--Lmbuga 19:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Montserrat_panorama.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 350 mega pixel panorama from summit of Montserrat Mountain --Wjh31 09:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Stiching errors. Try downsampling. --kallerna 13:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC).
- Downsampling corrects stitching errors?--Wjh31 14:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The problem is that other frames are sharper than others, so it could help. But overall the photo is too big considering the sharpness. --kallerna 07:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Done Downsampled to 15k pixels wide --Wjh31 18:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Much better. --kallerna 11:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Any remaining barriers to QI? --Wjh31 17:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, it's much better, but the stiching errors are still too visible. --kallerna 09:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Výří skály u Oslova from Dědovické stráně (2).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Natural reservation Výří skály u Oslova, Písek District, Czech Republic --Chmee2 20:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Possibly should be rotated a tiny bit clockwise, but QI-worthy IMO. Mattbuck 13:37, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacking details (very soft). Lycaon 09:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose nice composition (even if it's a bit tight at the bottom), but unsharp and some little chromatic aberrations --Carschten 19:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Malá Fatra - panorama by Pudelek.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Malá Fatra, Slovakia --Pudelek 12:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry, I like the image, but, with adobe lightroom, the sky (left side) is overexposed other parts inferiors subexposed, but I like the image and I don't know if it's QI --Lmbuga 19:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose seems noisy, bad composition (among others tight crop at bottom and the left --Carschten 12:57, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Composition is okey, a little bit noisy, but okey for me. Alofok 21:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Lisnice near Sepekov (6).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Building in the village Líšnice , part of Sepekov village, Czech Republic --Chmee2 19:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment - not technically overexposed, but the building does seem very bright to me. Can you play with the curves a bit? Mattbuck 10:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the pictutre. With Adobe lightroom 3.0 the image it's not overexposed or subexposed, but I think: color noise (water) and a bit of noise (all the image), unsharp or blurry (dark zones)--Lmbuga 19:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose nice compoistion, but chromatic aberrations and perspective distortions --Carschten 12:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Kolobrzeg fire station 2010-06 front.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fire station in Kołobrzeg, Poland. --JDavid 15:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support OK. Lycaon 16:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Partially unsharp. --High Contrast 16:10, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Barrel and perspective distortion--Lmbuga 16:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support QI IMO.--Mbz1 16:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Enough for QI --Pudelek 17:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
File:SMP September 2010-8.jpg
[edit]- Nomination New version of breaking wave in the tunnel -- Alvesgaspar 16:29, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose nothing really sharp, the cave is distracting and has no (encyclopaedical) value, also some CA in it. --Carschten 16:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Can we discuss it, please? encyclopaedic value is not a Commons' requirement -- Alvesgaspar 16:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC
- Comment encyclopaedic value was just one of four opppose-reasons, but I have no problem if you want discuss and hear some other opinions. So let's discuss --Carschten 17:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment For what it's worth, I think this image has educational value. Jonathunder 12:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The other is ten times better, it's sharper and the composition is superb comparing to this. --kallerna 17:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I can not see the encyclopedic value --Archaeodontosaurus 10:20, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Notre Dame 2010.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Notre Dame de Paris --Sfu 20:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose The distortion is really unnatural --Jebulon 22:53, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Girl August 2008-1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Portrait of a girl from Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 23:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Very good--Lmbuga 08:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposure of the green T.shirt, IMO. Let's discuss--Jebulon 09:42, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support T-Shirt was spotlighted by the sun, but I think it isn't distracting, just natural. So no problem imo. QI --Carschten 09:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Info Jebulon is right, the greens in the shirt are overexposed. I have uploaded a new version where the highlights were slightly darkened. Please tell me if it is better, so I can replace the original. -- Alvesgaspar 14:47, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks. But I'm sorry, I don't see here a significative improvement. The young girl's face is very good (and pretty, Alvesgaspar), but the shirt is not very good IMO--Jebulon 20:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I don't see it a problem. ZooFari 02:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05 edit.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Wedding of Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden, and Daniel Westling; --Spongie555 03:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Didn't we have this image here already? --Quartl 07:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Comment I just checked and you did but they retouched the picture so didnt know till i saw the original Mbz1 04:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)I do not recall making comment on this nomination, and not sure what's going on here.--Mbz1 21:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)- Support I think it is OK for QI.--MrPanyGoff 07:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Other (near identical) version is QI. Lycaon 21:19, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose as Lycaon. --Quartl (talk) 20:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lycaon. --kallerna 11:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I didnt know we had an identical one when i nominated it. This is an edit of the other one so i didnt see the QI template so i thought it wasnt featured.-- Spongie555 03:40, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Morigo Building.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Morigo Building, Tokyo. by Wiiii --Elekhh 05:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose Unnatural distortion--Lmbuga 01:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Indeed perspective correction as done here perfectly, can create an unnatural feel, however so far this was a requirement for promotion rather than a reason to decline. We need some consistency in assessments. --Elekhh 02:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I do not agree since for me it is not a quality image, but I understand you. I change “decline” by “Discuss” --Lmbuga 10:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Horizontal perspective distortion --Lmbuga 10:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment See the first version--Lmbuga 10:27, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Indeed perspective correction as done here perfectly, can create an unnatural feel, however so far this was a requirement for promotion rather than a reason to decline. We need some consistency in assessments. --Elekhh 02:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose After all, the purpose of perspective correction is to make the picture look more natural. In some cases however, the effect goes in the opposite direction. This is such a case. The image looks overcorrected, although the vertical lines may be exactly upright if you measure them. The reason why it looks so unnatural might be what user Lmbuga points out. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Actually agree with your critique, but than the principle has to be applied consistently. --Elekhh 06:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Ab mollusca 16.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chamelea gallina --Butko 14:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Does not meet 2MP requirement. Mattbuck 12:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed I increase size. 2MP now --Butko 05:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment added discuss-status --Carschten 13:33, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Changing too coarse (fr:Trucage grossier) --Archaeodontosaurus 14:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Archaeodontosaurus, I'm afraid I don't understand your argument. I think it is well done. --MichaelBueker 08:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
File:ChevroletCruze-2010dim3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chevrolet Cruze second generation (J300). --MrPanyGoff 11:50, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support QI Good work and very original --Archaeodontosaurus 13:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I think the single frames are too small, also disturbing lights from the roof on the car --Carschten 14:26, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose To me, bad composition: I don't like the shoes at the bottom (windows of the car), also disturbing lights from the roof on the car--Lmbuga 01:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Chimney and two hiperboloide cooling towers on Kharkov.JPG
[edit]- Nomination: Chimney and two hiperboloide cooling towers. Power station in Pesochin. --Vizu 18:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Хороший Albertus teolog 09:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of details and tilt. Lycaon 19:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Info I've uploaded a version with corrected tilt and colors and with some quality improvements --Carschten 09:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Kind and nice for sure, but for which photo are we voting, now ?--Jebulon 23:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- ))) --Vizu 16:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Sympetrum sanguineum THWZ 02.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Sympetrum sanguineum --THWZ 22:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Bit noisy, but good. Mattbuck 14:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Insect macro shot have (traditionally) had high standards for QI. In this case, the lighting is good, composition is good for showing dorsal details, but the subject is not sharp enough. --Relic38 02:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with Relic38, the head should be in focus. --Quartl 12:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Sympetrum sanguineum THWZ 03.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Sympetrum sanguineum --THWZ 22:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Possibly a bit out of focus at the front, but good. Mattbuck 14:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately too OOF for me. --Relic38 02:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose too blurry. --Quartl (talk) 12:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Lampost-454.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lampost in Pereslavl museum. --PereslavlFoto 12:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Two-thirds of the image are blurred. --Quartl 15:38, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- CommentBlurred by tilt lens, an effect to emphasize the lampost.--PereslavlFoto 17:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- I surmised so, but I still don't see the point of it. Set to discuss. --Quartl 19:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose overexposed --Carschten 13:24, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Question What part of the lampost is overexposed?--PereslavlFoto 22:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- extensive for your: bad composition (cropped bank in foreground, disturbing background), background complete and disturbing overexposed, main motive small and unsharp, background at the sides extremly abnormal blurry and unsharp. This image so far away from QI status... --Carschten 19:56, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- 1) What part of the background is overexposed and shiny white? 2) The main motive (the lampost?) is narrow itself and cannot take much place, but how can it be avoided? 3) Background on the sides are unsharp to stress the center, yet is unusual, and I could make unsharp background, albeit you would say: «the sides abnormal sharp and distracting from the main motive». Thank you for the comments, after clearing the point I hope to redo this photo possible w/o bank.--PereslavlFoto 21:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Especially because of the bench in foreground (composition) --Jebulon 22:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Viljo koirarannalla 9.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A dog with his ball. --kallerna 06:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose lack of composition: Right a big part without anything, but the water trace of the dog at left is cropped out. --Carschten 13:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I'd support if it were cropped a bit on the right. Mattbuck 21:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Carschten. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Jardin du Luxembourg 2010.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Gardin du Luxembourg, Paris --Sfu 19:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose "Jardin". Sorry, dark parts are underexposed, and clear parts are overexposed (windows of the right wing). The composition is not very good.--Jebulon 21:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)- new version uploaded --Sfu 22:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support For me it's ok for QI.--MrPanyGoff 12:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment barrel distorsion IMO, the façade looks curved IMO.--Jebulon 00:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- new version uploaded. --Sfu 20:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Much better now, concerning the distortion (no more) and the light (good job). I still consider that the compo is not very good and does not show the real aspect of the palace, but I remove my oppose because of the hard work made for improvements due to my nitpicking. Thank you.--Jebulon 22:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Ivanovskoe-0098.jpg
[edit]- Nomination House to the left from school, Ivanovskoe settlement, Pereslavl district. --PereslavlFoto 16:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose sky --Pudelek 18:07, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- You mean I have to make artifical sky? The real one was light and dull cloudy one, and much brighter than the house.--PereslavlFoto 21:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- sky is overexposed - Pudelek 12:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- You mean I have to make artifical sky? The real one was light and dull cloudy one, and much brighter than the house.--PereslavlFoto 21:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with Pudelek. It is overexposed, especially right (look at the "leaves without branches" near the parabolic antennas)--Jebulon 20:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
File:CentralMarketHall-Sofia-C.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Central Market Hall in Sofia. --MrPanyGoff 19:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Good--Ankara 21:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose subexposed--Lmbuga 23:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Agreed, underexposed. --Relic38 03:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Overexposure can be very hard to avoid, I think the photograph is well done. --MichaelBueker 08:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Cableway in Yalta 05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Cableway in Yalta --Butko 09:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Feels tilted, and also unsharp. Mattbuck 21:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- FixedI rotate bit counter clockwise and make more sharp --Butko 07:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Ok to me now. --Cayambe 15:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Support Yes--Jebulon 20:53, 8 October 2010 (UTC)- Oppose Very much oversharpened, yielding strong halos on the wires/cables. Lycaon 23:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Change to Oppose, because after a second contemplation, Lycaon is right. I didn't notice the halos. Sorry--Jebulon 00:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Homemade cloudberry jam.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Homemade cloudberry jam.--Ankara 12:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good, and surely good too.--Jebulon 22:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Looks underexposed to me. Lycaon 19:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Better. Lycaon 15:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Oppose Underexposed to me--Lmbuga 01:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Better--Lmbuga 22:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- New version uploaded. Better? --Ankara 13:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support now, but imo it could be still a bit brighter --Carschten 20:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! --MichaelBueker 09:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Ara chloropterus qtl1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Red-and-green Macaw. --Quartl 20:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose cropped out tail --Carschten 13:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, in this case intentionally to emphasize the main plumage. The tail feathers are quite long and the image would need to be twice as high to get them all on. --Quartl 16:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Agree with Quartl. --Cayambe 09:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I also hear the Norwegian Blue parrot has an especially beatiful plumage. --MichaelBueker 11:17, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Certainly, but the Norwegian Blue prefers keepin' on it's back ;-). --Quartl 18:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Lmbuga 23:18, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Ostaš - sandstone formation in the Czech Republic - view from mountains.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Ostaš - sandstone formation in the Czech Republic. View from mountain --Pudelek 18:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose I think the branch ruins the composition. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I don't think so. It is obvious that it is an artistic intentional choice. It needs a discussion IMO.--Jebulon 20:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose the subject is "sandstone formation in the Czech Republic" – the branch has nothing to do with this. --Quartl 19:21, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- in the title is "view from mountain"... --Pudelek 10:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support per Jebulon --Carschten 09:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The branch may be a hand-held. It's very artistic, but not encyclopedic. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- It's very artistic, but not encyclopedic. - this is QI, not VI --Pudelek 09:42, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Gaius Iulius Caesar Octavianus Augustus.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Octavian Augustus.--Jebulon 23:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support To me, very good--Lmbuga 01:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too zealous cutting. Some images are simply not appropriate for masking. Lycaon 23:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- I strongly disagree with this comment. Too zealous review too, IMO... --Jebulon 17:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support For me it is the white background Inconvenient. I tried a light gray background and uniform. This is not FP but QI. --Archaeodontosaurus 18:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure with the light reflections at the head, which are disturbing imo. Furthermore a stepped cutting out, see Image Notes --Carschten 09:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Info Thanks for comment. I cannot change the eventually disturbing reflections on the face. But I softened the cut of the base.--Jebulon 17:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- „I cannot change the eventually disturbing reflections on the face“ That's why I'm not opposing ;-) --Carschten 18:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Info Thanks for comment. I cannot change the eventually disturbing reflections on the face. But I softened the cut of the base.--Jebulon 17:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for QI imo. The stepped cutting is a very minor flaw imo. --Cayambe 09:36, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Estrela Março 2010-11.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A view of Serra da Estrela, Portugal (unassessed last time) -- Alvesgaspar 23:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support I don't know why... QI, I think.--Jebulon 23:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose little detail, looks a bit unsharp to me, composition could be better too (e.g. cropped out car at bottom) --Carschten 11:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- But a very good and interesting example of work with difficult light(s), IMO. Extraordinary clouds too...--Jebulon 17:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Slightly increasing the contrast effect was most striking, but for me QI --Archaeodontosaurus 18:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe 15:17, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Carschten--Lmbuga 23:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Young Shaggy Parasol.JPG
[edit]- Nomination A Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:48, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment To me, poor DOF--Lmbuga 22:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- I used f/10. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- weak Support, DOF really a bit short but else good and useful --Mbdortmund 19:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- weak Oppose per Mbdortmund, but the DOF is too short to me --Carschten 09:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- weak Oppose To me, poor DOF, sorry--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 23:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Škabrijel z reko Sočo.jpg
[edit]- Nomination River Isonzo-Soča seen from the mountain. T137 14:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Pretty. Mattbuck 01:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- OpposeOverexposed and what actually is the subject here?--MrPanyGoff 12:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The subject here is Soca river view from border area; rather than the overexposed photograph shows a subject in which there was mist.It's impossible have better exposure at that time. T137 15:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose overexposed. PS: Than is a question if nominated image like this photographed in the time when ideal lighting situation was not there. I suggest visit in "the right time" with nicer light --Chmee2 09:19, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I agree, you're right. but it is not always possible to visit places any day and time! --T137 09:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I know it and also I have this problem in many cases. However I think so then I/you have to be self-critical enough to not nominated for some honors cause not all images taken somewhere are appropriate for QI/FP and other. --Chmee2 09:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I agree, you're right. but it is not always possible to visit places any day and time! --T137 09:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm really very sorry, but the plants in the foreground really distract too much from the river. I know the problem when you took just one picture of a great scenery, and then you're thousands of kilometers away... --MichaelBueker 11:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support The image meets the QI-criteria. I find it not overexposed and the plants in front do not distract anything too much - in my view. --High Contrast 17:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon front 05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Detail of tower, 1928. --Cayambe 08:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good.--Ankara 13:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per really bad composition. Sorry --Chmee2 08:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Part of the building is cropped. --Berthold Werner 08:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- In my opinion there is no problem to show a detail of a building, in this case, the tower's entrance.--Ankara 11:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- However if you want to show entrance of the building, more suitable crop will be appropriate --Chmee2 11:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Louka (okres Písek), rybník na jihu.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Pond near Louka, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 22:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Shame of the missing edge of the pond left, but otherwise good.--Jebulon 23:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- CommentWell, Aktron was there.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of details in the image and also colours are not really good. Lightning was to strong. --Chmee2 09:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy --Archaeodontosaurus 10:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Metz_Cathedral_001.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Coronation of Mary, Window, Cathedral of Metz, France --Llez 06:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good. It would be even better if you could expand the description. --Jonathunder 17:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done Window by Hermann de Munster, 14. Century --Llez 19:37, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- The correction is not at its end, imo. You have to re-scale a bit: look at the halos, for example. They are supposed to be circular, but they are oval. I put it in CR, but do not oppose now.--Jebulon 20:44, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support very good now. -- Felix Koenig 20:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Julia Babilon, Damen-Tennis-Bundesliga Moers, 02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Female tennis player Julia Babilon in Moers do a service --Carschten 11:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- CommentI'm not sure here. It is a good photo, but the man behind her is disturbing.--Ankara 20:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I don't think that the man is disturbing; very good quality and view. -- Felix Koenig 18:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Ankara. Furthermore it would be better, IMO, as a "portrait" than as a "landscape". I suggest a discussion in CR--Jebulon 20:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)<
- Comment it's an official game so what should I do against vistitors?? The man is in full-res unsharp and that was all I can do. --Carschten 21:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Sorry, but the composition is not good. Alvesgaspar 22:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- because of the visitors? Or what? --Carschten 09:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Not only the visitors but the whole background, as well as the framing. You already have a very good version when she is serving. -- Alvesgaspar 19:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice subject.. but the composition is too busy. --Elekhh 05:14, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Národní divadlo, Škoda 15T.jpg
[edit]- Nomination New tram Škoda 15T, Prague — Jagro 22:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion * Support colours imo a bit "warm" but still good --Mbdortmund 23:43, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Noise (sky), motion blur (driver), ghosts (near the sign). Needs a discussion IMO --Jebulon 09:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support very good night shot. It's almost impossible to haven't a ghost or something other what Jebulon points out. --Carschten 12:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Wilno - kosciol Wniebowstapienia Panskiego.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Church of Ascension in Vilnius -- Albertus teolog 10:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The composition is imo not very good: Leaves at the top right, sings at the bottom left, tight crop at all corners... --Carschten 11:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment not so bad, but leaves should be removed --Mbdortmund 15:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Monument Huerto de las Flores.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Monument in the botanic garden of Agaete, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 17:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose The plants left and right below are very disturbing. The shadow on the plaque is too strong: it is impossible to read the first lines of the poem.--Jebulon 20:21, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- I propose this correction, because the idea of the poem in the garden I like --Archaeodontosaurus 18:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I really don't prefer the rework, because the stone isn't grey and the sign isn't so bright. That doesn't improve the image, sorry. Please upload as a derivative work. -- Felix Koenig 16:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed--Lmbuga 00:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Moulin composition.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Composition with the wings of a mill in Spain.--Jebulon 23:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Review
- Support OK. Mattbuck 13:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Week Oppose cause of some CA and unsharpness in right down corner of the image. (Subjectively I don't like the composition too). Sorry --Chmee2 09:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Forests in Alberschwende 3.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Two winter spruces. By Böhringer Friedrich. --Vizu 11:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment - beautiful, but a bit unsharp. Mattbuck 21:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Deserves the QI label IMO.--Jebulon 21:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose unsharp --Carschten 21:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Then discuss.--Jebulon 23:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support per Jebulon. --Cayambe 09:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose rather noisy in the sky. Lycaon 18:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Maybe "bit unsharp" at 10Mpix (!) but perfectly sharp at 2MPix. --Elekhh 05:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - but the image is 10MP. The image should be quality at the size it is, not just in thumbnail. Mattbuck 02:07, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, if someone were just to sharpen the damn thing... Mattbuck 02:09, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think the same criteria applies to all images, which is to meet minimum quality requirements at 2 Mpix. Why be unjust and punish those who upload higher resolution images? --Elekhh 04:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think the criteria is to meet minimum quality requirement at whatever size the image is. That's not punishing people who upload at higher res - I expect exactly the same from all photos, which is that they be the best they can be at the resolution they are. Mattbuck 16:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think the same criteria applies to all images, which is to meet minimum quality requirements at 2 Mpix. Why be unjust and punish those who upload higher resolution images? --Elekhh 04:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Of course, if someone were just to sharpen the damn thing... Mattbuck 02:09, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Per Elekhh --Cayambe 07:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
File:HaMatzevaRishonLeZion001.jpg
[edit]- Nomination "HaMatzeva" monument in Rishon LeZion, Israel. --MathKnight 07:21, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- SupportGood to me. --Jebulon 11:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy, poor details. Lycaon 12:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Is that an oppose? --Berthold Werner 08:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it is (da Lyacon beim "Discuss"-Setzen weder bei Jebulon (der ja Pro stimmt) noch bei sich ein Pro/Contra vorgeschrieben hat, kann man beide als Stimme werten.) --Carschten 09:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary. So did I for my support vote, because it was not very clear IMO--Jebulon 21:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Is that an oppose? --Berthold Werner 08:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distortion, Chromatic noise (sky)--Lmbuga 00:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose noisy, poor details, maybe too colorful --BennyJ 13:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Pulteney Bridge MMB 01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Pulteney Bridge in Bath. Mattbuck 12:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good.--Ankara 13:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the building on the right is unsharp. --Chmee2 20:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Slightly unsharp towards the right, but still QI to me. --Cayambe 14:05, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I don't like the composition: Left side, the bridge is not complete--Lmbuga 00:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- If I'd left more in at the left, then you'd see the wall which continues from where I was standing to the end of the bridge. Mattbuck 02:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lmbuga. I miss something left.--Jebulon 22:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Canon EOS 400D with lens.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Canon EOS 400D -- Der Wolf im Wald 14:40, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose The back of the camera is OOF. I think this may need a discussion. Anyway, it's only a Canon... --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Yes, back is OOF, but it looks good. QI in my opinion.--Kae 19:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry... I love the lightning, but imo the DOF is too low. Also (very) small for a studio shot. I think you can repeat the photography with a smaller aperture. --Carschten 12:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Victory Day Kharkov 2010.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Victory! (1945). Graffiti. --Vizu 08:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- I do not know the rule of copyright about graffitis in Ukraine, but if free, I support.--Jebulon 22:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sky is strongly overexposed and part of image is noisy too. Sorry --Chmee2 08:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Massively overexposed, the light even seems to bleed into the foreground --BennyJ 15:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- ...new version? --Vizu 15:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose the sky is unsalvageable overexposed. The image is noisy, too, sorry --Carschten 12:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Luxemb City pl d Armes 02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Place d'Armes, in the very centre of Luxemb. City. --Cayambe 10:26, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Gut --George Chernilevsky 07:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose noisy, a lot of parts are overexposed (little detail, looks imo like a soft halo) --Carschten 11:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too harsh light, overexposed. --kallerna 13:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Overexposed, mmh... This image is about light and shadows. Everything in the background can be clearly read: Café français, Burger restaurant... --Cayambe 18:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Lactarius_turpis_2010_G1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ugly Milk-cap Lactarius turpis --George Chernilevsky 18:44, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too soft and noisy, I think. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Main object is good in focus --George Chernilevsky 07:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC) - Oppose Mainly because of the disturbing background. --kallerna 13:59, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support This is a natural background so I think it's fine. Given the low height of the mushroom, there is also no way to blur the background by using a narrower DOF --BennyJ (talk) 15:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose background is fine imo, but the image is too noisy and the DOF is poor. --Carschten 10:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Coturnix chinensis qtl1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Asian Blue Quail. --Quartl 02:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose A bit noisy, and I'm not entirely convinced it's quite in focus. Mattbuck 17:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I think the noise rate is acceptable (there are much worse "quality images" out there), focus seems to be ok. IMO no reason to decline. --BennyJ 18:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The flash shadow is disturbing IMO.--Jebulon 22:51, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Harsh flash. --Elekhh 21:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Conus_marmoreus_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The Marbled Cone, Conus marmoreus --Llez 17:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose I'm afraid you will have to go back to the tripode... The images at left are not on perfect focus. -- Alvesgaspar 18:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Info I changed the left picture, but all others have been in focus. You can see in full resolution that the border of the mouth at the second and third picture from left is completely sharp, also the spira in all. The colour patttern isn't sharp in the original, so it can't be sharp on the photo (see also the other photos of this species on Commons here). I also observed, that the whole picture seems somewhat unsharp in the preview, but in full resolution the borderlines and the mouth (not the colour pattern!) are sharp, what means, the shells are in focus. --Llez 19:21, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Poor quality. To me the images at left are out of focus, or unsharp. At the botton of the second image, I can see chromatic noise--Lmbuga 00:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment ??? I can only repeat: please have a look on the border of the mouth (the opening of the shell), it is completely sharp and in focus over the total length! --Llez 05:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I agree, they look relatively sharp at the borders. It seems to be the texture of the shells that makes them look as if they were unsharp. But I fear we can't change nature ;) However, I think the shells could still receive a little more software sharpening to compensate for that effect --BennyJ 15:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for supporting. I tried already to correct the texture, but more correction results in oversharpening the borders and an unnatural contour of the texture. The picture is also a VI-candidate and should therefore show the realty. It's a pity, but that's nature, and nature fulfills not always all the wishes of photographers. --Llez 19:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Can't see anything wrong with this. QI. Lycaon 14:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment maybe it's nature, but something looks wrong with the "pink" color at high resolution. "Mother-of-pearl" color ? Not very nice IMO.--Jebulon 23:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Matthew Wilson 1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Matthew Wilson driving at Rannakylä shakedown in Muurame. --kallerna 13:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support
Bad composition on the left.Light - ok.--Vizu 18:59, 15 October 2010 (UTC) - Comment I would like to see another opinion, IMO there's nothing wrong with the composition. --kallerna 07:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I believe that composition is ideal cause it is possible see the movement of the car. Clear QI for me --Chmee2 08:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Ford go to left (1\3), is not to rigth (2\3)?.--Vizu 14:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, you are right, if this will be nomination to Featured Pictures, I will agree with your opinion. However this is only QI (lower standards for images...) so for me whole car is there, nothing really important is missing, techniques parameters of image also OK (sharpness, no chromatic aberration, good exposition etc.) so QI standards overstep. --Chmee2 15:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. --Vizu 15:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, you are right, if this will be nomination to Featured Pictures, I will agree with your opinion. However this is only QI (lower standards for images...) so for me whole car is there, nothing really important is missing, techniques parameters of image also OK (sharpness, no chromatic aberration, good exposition etc.) so QI standards overstep. --Chmee2 15:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Ford go to left (1\3), is not to rigth (2\3)?.--Vizu 14:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Not absolute perfect composition but clear QI.--Ankara 16:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support QI -- S 400 HYBRID 22:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Lampe Pigeon 1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A "Lampe Pigeon", kerosene lamp from ca. 1885--Jebulon 17:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good light.--Vizu 07:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- CommentSeveral areas are imperfect black. I marked for example one this area, so let's discuss --Chmee2 15:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC) Done. Is it a problem with the toothed wheel ? Note that it is a bit worn by use.--Jebulon 17:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC) No really. I see around this wheel several "flying" dark gold spots if I lightning my monitor. I will try to mark them --Chmee2 17:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC) I'm really sorry, but i magnified a few minutes ago the original file at X 1600 and looked very carefully, but I didn't find any problem you noticed. Are you sure with your monitor ?--Jebulon 22:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC) I made several crops what I see and marked with arrows. Let's try if you find as well (and also please check others images which I marked). And I hope that my monitor (and eyes) are OK :)) --Chmee2 07:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC) It seems that I have a problem with my monitor or my eyes, because you are absolutely right (I'm watching another screen, now). A lot of thanks for your very careful and patient review, I'll improve this at home tonight --Jebulon 10:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC) I think it is good now. Done--Jebulon 21:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I fixed today the image. Don't ask me why but there was problem with some colour profile. If I opened with GIMP, it wrote me "Camera RGB Profile" so I saved it without this profile and all the gold spots were gone. Several areas remained not ideal but I overpainted with black colours and now is good. It looks QI for me now. --Chmee2 12:06, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Funny indeed : I work with GIMP too, and have no problem. Well, thank you, at the end ! I'll soon upload another masked image (with GIMP), please review it in the same conditions and say me what happens with the GIMP! A bientôt.--Jebulon 17:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? George Chernilevsky 06:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Funny indeed : I work with GIMP too, and have no problem. Well, thank you, at the end ! I'll soon upload another masked image (with GIMP), please review it in the same conditions and say me what happens with the GIMP! A bientôt.--Jebulon 17:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Entrance Casa de Colón.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Entrance of Casa de Colón (house of Columbus), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 18:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Very good, but needs a perspective correction IMO. The threshold is perfectly horizontal, but not the rest. I'll promote if done.--Jebulon 21:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Perspective is already corrected with ShiftN, should be enough, I think. -- Felix Koenig 19:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, to me, needs horizontal perspective correction, not vertical--Lmbuga 21:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, needs really a perspective correction, and/or a rotation, except the threshold, nothing is straight (look at the window through a grid...).--Jebulon 20:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry. I don't understand. To me "horizontal perspective correction it's the same than rotation (but not always). I change “Decline” by “Discuss”. Thanks for your compression: Poor english--Lmbuga 19:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs Horizontal perspective correction--Lmbuga 19:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Křešice (Divišov), stavení u potoka.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Křešice village, Czech Republic.--Juan de Vojníkov 10:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion please correct the tilt! If it's done I will support --Carschten 21:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Need tilt correction. 8 days without activity -> declined --Chmee2 11:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)- CommentFixed. I studied how to do so yesterday.--Juan de Vojníkov 18:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Could be brighter but still ok. --Berthold Werner 07:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Is this better?--Juan de Vojníkov 09:07, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes --Berthold Werner 10:27, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I don't lke the crop: I don't like the picture. To me, they lack environmental data--Lmbuga 23:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Fort Napoléon des Saintes 2010-03-30.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Fort Napoléon des Saintes. --Slaunger 20:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Clouds overexposed--Lmbuga 00:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The clouds are no problem. there is a distortion of the summit, which is curved. This seems easy to fix. --Archaeodontosaurus 07:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for your reviews. I agree with both of you in your observations, which I had overlooked myself. I have corrected the barrel distortion using verical and horizontal control points on the straight sections of the facade. There are still blowns in the sky. I do not perceive them as problematic myself. I have the raw though and could try and see if I can get a jpeg out of it with some structure all over in the clouds. Haven't actually tried working in that way with raws before, but I could try.--Slaunger 23:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Clouds overexposed and no fixed--Lmbuga 18:33, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment I am not able to improve the exposition--Lmbuga 22:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Square in Telde.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A square in the city of Telde, Gran Canaria. -- Felix Koenig 18:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Bad composition: Not really worthfull for an Encyclopedia. But also we can't see the most important objects: the figures. Alofok 18:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support no technical problems, some encyclopedic value --Archaeodontosaurus 07:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose To me, there are technical problems: Shadow, dark areas underexposed, blurry: bad quality--Lmbuga 18:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Extra 300LP Löchgau.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Extra 300LP at Löchgau, Garmany. -- Felix Koenig 18:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good--Lmbuga 21:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed. --kallerna 08:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Of course the mobile tower in the background is overexposured. It's a white vehicle and the sun was shining, so what? It doesn't belong to the motive and it's small in the background. Felix Koenig 10:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't mean that, the whole photo is bit overexposed. --kallerna 13:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- OK, sorry then. But then I'm not able to see any other overexposure. -- Felix Koenig 16:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Gosh, some overexposure, but it's a very high quality iamge with nice lightning, even if it's not perfect. Once again: this is QI, not FP... --Carschten 13:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support QI to me, agree with Carschten.--Jebulon 22:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Deutsches Reitpony.jpg
[edit]- Nomination German Riding Pony --Carschten 15:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment To me, disturbing background and noise--Lmbuga 21:15, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Background (maybe a bit disturbing but) appropriate and there is no noise, that's the fur. --Carschten 09:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Support Ok. Useful, realist; and good--Lmbuga 10:37, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Bad backkground, overexposed, needs new level adjustment. --kallerna 08:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Support - background isn't perfect, but imo not overexposed. QI. -- Felix Koenig 12:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Kharkov embankment on Kharkov River, 5.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Kharkov embankment. --Vizu 18:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose tilted--Jebulon 11:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC) :* Done File name - ok.--Vizu 18:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment overdone perspective correction? --Elekhh 21:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose To me, too tight crop--Lmbuga 01:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose overdone perspective correction and tight framing. --Elekhh 22:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Xerocomus_subtomentosus_2010_G1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Boring Brown Bolete Xerocomus subtomentosus --George Chernilevsky 18:44, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too noisy. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is texture, not noise. --George Chernilevsky 07:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- The background is noisy as well. But I personally can live with that. --BennyJ 17:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support almost every macro photo is a bit noisy. Here I would support a soft denoising, but in spite of that the image is very good. --Carschten 10:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- weak oppose. Noise interferes with the mushroom's texture. Lycaon 14:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Sunset at Land's End in San Francisco with Cirrus clouds.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sunset at Land's End in San Francisco with Cirrus clouds by user:mbz1--ברוקולי 01:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Excellent, interesting shadows. Maybe a bit underexposed but I can live with that. --BennyJ 06:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Opposebadly done HDR. Some parts are over-, some other underexposed. Should be merged again. --Carschten 11:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)- Info -- I've just received a message from Mbz1 informimg that this is not a HDR... Alvesgaspar 13:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- but where are these light differences comming from? That can't be normal... --Carschten 14:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe they are caused by clouds that are not in the field of view (behind the camera) or something. I still believe it looks quite interesting. As long as not stated otherwise, I would regard this as being indended and not as a photographic mistake. Therefore, I can't really see any reason not to let this image pass. --BennyJ 15:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- hm, okay, I removed my oppose and the photo is interesting (of course!). But with the strange light conditions I don't support. --Carschten 17:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Interesting moment, it is rare illumination IMO. Technically good --George Chernilevsky 18:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Ok. Very interesning ligth. --Vizu 15:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Definitely something have been made. --kallerna 10:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose To me, unnecessary or inappropriate use of artistic filters or effects.--Lmbuga 00:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support This image is good and does definately meet the QI criteria. If this image would run for a Featured vote then it would be important to discuss things like artistic filters or any effects that were used. --High Contrast 12:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Very unnatural. Lycaon 14:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment To me this image is not QI. If there is no filters, effects…, the contrast is excessive: dark zones and clear zones: luminosity unsuitable and excessive -and sometimes little- for an unique image--Lmbuga 18:19, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lycaon & Lmbuga. Maybe a nice artsy idea, but not for a QI in "Commons"--Jebulon 22:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose to me image looks too much edidted and unnatural, I would rather support
--J. Lunau 11:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support This has such a great atmosphere, it makes one think of another world. Lovely perspective and composition. Beauty of the earth captured in a moment.Coastside2 15:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose unnatural --Archaeodontosaurus 06:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II in Milan.JPG
[edit]- Nomination The Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II in Milan, Italy, seen from the Milan Cathedral.. --High Contrast 09:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline * OpposeOverexposure in important areas.--Elekhh 21:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- And what do you think are those "important areas"? --High Contrast 07:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Parts of the sidewalk and the front of the building. Not too important, I think. But it is a nice and special shot (looks like a drawing) at a descent quality, I support it. --BennyJ 15:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Made the exposure less obstructive. Revert if disagree. ZooFari 23:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- And what do you think are those "important areas"? --High Contrast 07:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose To me it's not overexposed. To me it's underexposed (dark areas), but not too much. It's improvable--Lmbuga 20:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose It's neither under- nor overexposed, but too contrasted - bright areas too bright, dark areas too dark. -- H005 15:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 06.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) --Pudelek 16:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Nice place, nice colors. but visible CA on the trees especially left, and disturbing red thing under the bench.--Jebulon 22:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- In my opinion this CA is acceptable. I move to discuss --Pudelek 10:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The red thing doesn't matter for a QI (it's not a technical problem and would only be an issue for an FP I think). But the CAs are indeed quite noticeable. Do you think you can fix them with your software? It should be possible without any loss of quality. If you do it, I will support. --BennyJ (talk) 14:55, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion the "red thing" does matter, because it ruins the composition, and composition is a part of the technical quality of the picture.--Jebulon 16:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I have removed the "red thing". There was more serious CA in the rocks which I now have removed. The CA in the left trees is not an easy fix but it's only minor fringing and not a big deal in my opinion. Revert file if you disagree. ZooFari 22:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Caves Gran Canaria.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Caves in Gran Canaria, belonging to heritage site Cuatro Puertas. -- Felix Koenig 19:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
{{o}} To me, too tight crop--Lmbuga 21:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Why? The picture shows all the caves, and it's impossible to show the whole mountain in this perspective. -- Felix Koenig 16:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Appears ok to me, so Discussion. --Cayambe 08:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support okay --Carschten 15:23, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment It is not always easy to know the reason for a photo. Because I believe that I have understood it, I have erased the vote--Lmbuga 00:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Wilno - kosciol sw. Mikolaja 2.JPG
[edit]- Nomination St. Nicholas Church, Vilnius -- Albertus teolog 09:55, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment tilt/perspective needs correction. Mattbuck 16:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I can not decline the image by respect, because the image has been in the discussion 14 days, but, too tight crop--Lmbuga 20:53, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose distortions, tight crop --Carschten 15:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Fontaine quatre parties monde observatoire place camille jullian.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Four marine horses fighting against water and... contrast ! --Jebulon 17:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Support --Cayambe 14:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Not QI for me. Quite confusing picture in which very little of the topic is clearly visible and the technical aspects are not sufficiently good neither (blurry). Lycaon 14:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good. Not blurry to me. I think that it's the water--Lmbuga 22:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you. I honestly don't know, especially for the horse right, which is maybe a little unsharp (but the water...)--Jebulon 23:15, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support It is a bit blurry but it's ok to me. Still a good shot. --BennyJ (talk) 16:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose This picture isn't QI for me too. Sharpness at this size should be better, the horses at the edges are poorly cropped out. --Carschten 15:13, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry. I can't understand your words (it's my problem). I think that the water is reason sufficient to not have more clearness (or sharpness). Others will vote, I have voted what I think--Lmbuga 23:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Lycaon. --H005 15:27, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- I would like to thank Cayambe, Archeo and BennyJ for kind support, but I have to agree with opponents, as I still have a doubt about blur, and the compo is not as good as it needs. I withdraw my nomination--Jebulon 17:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
File:SchlossCharlottenburgNacht.jpg
[edit]- Nomination "Charlottenburg Palace" in Berlin, Germany illuminated at night --BennyJ 09:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support for me perfect. --Alchemist-hp 18:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Need perspective correction IMO.--Ankara 10:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose until perspective correction. There is noise too, but it is the night, and it is not a real problem. The perspective is, IMO.--Jebulon 23:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support - excellent, FP for me. -- Felix Koenig 14:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Until perspective correction.--Ankara 10:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
NeutralThe unique problem, to me, is the correction of the perspective, but I like the image --Lmbuga 20:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- The perspective is alright and part of the composition, I'm not gonna change anything about it (especially since this would result in a loss of quality and in a smaller field of view - which is defintely not what I intended). There is only minor perspective divergence here and it's absolutely within the range of what you would expect from an image like this at a focal length of 17mm. Only because something CAN be software-manipulated, doesn't mean it has to (see some of the over-corrected images above). If you don't think it's a quality image because of that, I will actually have to live with that. I always care about making a good image, not about unnecessary "optimizations" that result in a loss of quality, sorry. --BennyJ 20:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- You use the word manipulated and "fake" above. Your image is a manipulation of reality. It is manipulated by your lens and your camera. Darkroom technician can, and has, correct perspective distortion in the printing process during the history of photography. I see absolutely no artistic reason to manipulate (which your lens and camera do) walls so that they lean, rather than to show the house as it looks in reality. --Ankara 21:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- You can have that opinion, I don't share it. It's a matter of taste. Your image above does indeed look wrong (left wall) to me but that's only my personal taste as well and I did not judge it. So you can still get the promotion :) Good luck. --BennyJ 21:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support for me perfect too - high quality even with the perspective. I agree with BennyJ: because correction could be done, does not mean, it has to --J. Lunau 13:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Disagree. It has to. Perspective distortion is known as a technical issue, like vignetting, noise, chromatic aberrations, over or underexposition, motion blur etc... due to the lens or camera, and must be corrected if no specific justification (rare). If not, it cannot be a quality image. Overcorrection is an issue too. In my opinion.--Jebulon 13:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, there is no general "rule" like this. And even if there was one: Rules can be broken. See the first image at the right (which is a QI btw.) The perspective is a lot more "distorted" than it is in my image, but it's still appropriate and even helps to visualize the size and glory of that mighty building. Or the second one which has minor "perspective distortions" (like my one) but is even FP (because it's great!). It's all relative. I accept your personal taste and your vote but I can't agree. --BennyJ 14:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- I said "if not specific justification". It is the case for the first example you give. The distortion is a real choice of the photographer. Then no problem to me : it would be ridiculous to decline because of distortion, and I completely agree with you. The second case is different. I think that FP are not exactly "better than QI", the standards are not the same. For your own pic (very nice and interesting, well balanced and perfectly composed and sharp, imo), it looks (to me) like if the job was "unfinished", if you understand what I mean. That's why I think it is not here only a matter of taste. I find this discussion very interesting ! --Jebulon 08:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Great justification ;) Yeah it looks _to you_ like the job is unfinished, but it isn't. Be happy with your opinion, I think all has been said and there's nothing left to discuss in terms of perspective. Oh an btw: FP is the highest category a picture can get on Commons and every aspect (technical and non-technical) matters. It is really hard to achieve this status and there are many experts who investigate every little detail of candidating pictures (at least in Germany). Just in case you didn't notice: My picture got FP status yesterday and no one ever mentioned any perspective "distortions" at all. Whatever, have a nice day :) --BennyJ 09:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Also File:RomaCastelSantAngelo.jpg had never been FP today.--Ankara (talk) 09:13, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is FP, you should read the page again --BennyJ 09:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Today. There are several quality issues that would not be acceptable for a FP today. Original Nomination and promotion was 2005.--Ankara (talk) 09:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- That's an assumption. You can't know this but need to accept the fact that it is FP. Maybe you should spend more time improving your own photography (I don't wanna say it's bad but.. u know...) than speculating about whether or not a decision is right. This discussion has become way too complex and off-topic for a simple QI, I think. So I will stop here --BennyJ 09:47, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe you should behave a little less arrogant, to think about the criticism that your photo get instead of just denying it. And above all, do not take things personally (it is just childish). And we all have much to learn, even you my dear friend. It's been a pleasure to participate in this constructive discussions with you despite the childish nonsense in your last post. Once again, thank you very much.--Ankara 09:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- That's an assumption. You can't know this but need to accept the fact that it is FP. Maybe you should spend more time improving your own photography (I don't wanna say it's bad but.. u know...) than speculating about whether or not a decision is right. This discussion has become way too complex and off-topic for a simple QI, I think. So I will stop here --BennyJ 09:47, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Today. There are several quality issues that would not be acceptable for a FP today. Original Nomination and promotion was 2005.--Ankara (talk) 09:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is FP, you should read the page again --BennyJ 09:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- I said "if not specific justification". It is the case for the first example you give. The distortion is a real choice of the photographer. Then no problem to me : it would be ridiculous to decline because of distortion, and I completely agree with you. The second case is different. I think that FP are not exactly "better than QI", the standards are not the same. For your own pic (very nice and interesting, well balanced and perfectly composed and sharp, imo), it looks (to me) like if the job was "unfinished", if you understand what I mean. That's why I think it is not here only a matter of taste. I find this discussion very interesting ! --Jebulon 08:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, there is no general "rule" like this. And even if there was one: Rules can be broken. See the first image at the right (which is a QI btw.) The perspective is a lot more "distorted" than it is in my image, but it's still appropriate and even helps to visualize the size and glory of that mighty building. Or the second one which has minor "perspective distortions" (like my one) but is even FP (because it's great!). It's all relative. I accept your personal taste and your vote but I can't agree. --BennyJ 14:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Disagree. It has to. Perspective distortion is known as a technical issue, like vignetting, noise, chromatic aberrations, over or underexposition, motion blur etc... due to the lens or camera, and must be corrected if no specific justification (rare). If not, it cannot be a quality image. Overcorrection is an issue too. In my opinion.--Jebulon 13:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Perfect! Btw: this is a featured picture on the German Wikipedia. So it would be ridiculous if it wasn’t a quality image too (QI is a considerably lower category than FP) (talk)--Coastside2 11:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Oh, ein neuer Freund ! Herzlich Willkommen ! Erster Tag in "Commons" ! :)) --Jebulon 16:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Meinst du mich? Ich bin lange bei wikipedia dabei. Kenn ich dich oder was soll diese überschwängliche Begrüßung?--Coastside2 18:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs perspective correction--Lmbuga 23:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs perspective correction --Archaeodontosaurus 06:53, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Lovely picture. I really like it. -- Fish-guts 09:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great image, and already FP on German wikipedia, where the standards are very high.--Mbz1 13:55, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support For me a very good picture. Alofok 16:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Great coalition of german wikipedians ! Impressive ! result of canvassing ? Not a problem to me, but funny...--Jebulon 23:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I know, Alchemist-hp, Felix Koenig, J. Lunau, Alofok and the photographer are different and independent users from Germany. Fish-guts comes from Switzerland and he's normally not active with images there. I do not know Coastside2, at least not under this username. --Quartl (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- The picture was Kandidat für exzellente Bilder (≙ FPC on Commons) a short time ago, so many German users know the picture and vote also here at Commons. -- Felix Koenig 17:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- I do not suspect anything here, I just find funny this german "support run" and nothing else. It seems that this picture is going to be promoted as QI, it is nor a scandal neither a shame (even if it needs a perspective correction ! lol) and it is really not a problem to me, I can live with that. Congratulations and good luck to the photographer for new nice pics.--Jebulon 17:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- The picture was Kandidat für exzellente Bilder (≙ FPC on Commons) a short time ago, so many German users know the picture and vote also here at Commons. -- Felix Koenig 17:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I know, Alchemist-hp, Felix Koenig, J. Lunau, Alofok and the photographer are different and independent users from Germany. Fish-guts comes from Switzerland and he's normally not active with images there. I do not know Coastside2, at least not under this username. --Quartl (talk) 15:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Great coalition of german wikipedians ! Impressive ! result of canvassing ? Not a problem to me, but funny...--Jebulon 23:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Congratulations and good luck to the german photographer for new nice pics--Lmbuga 21:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I can't say this in english: es: Yo soy un usuario menor que lleva muy poco tiempo colaborando en estas páginas, pero aún siendo así, me parece una falta de respeto para con los que aquí colaboran (no para conmigo, pues acabo de llegar) que alguien aduzca como motivo o como apoyo de algún motivo que esta imagen debe ser o no debe de dejar de ser lo que digan que es en la Wikipedia alemana. Los proyectos son diferentes, respetemos las diferentes comunidades--Lmbuga 22:18, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- I am going to solicit that they translate these words--Lmbuga 22:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment This image is beautiful, too bad that the prospect is not corrected. Too bad for those who are denied all year for their error of perspective. They must have a strange idea of justice.--Archaeodontosaurus 10:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Ngiao (Myoporum laetum) flowers.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ngaio flowers. --Avenue 14:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Appealing composition and valuable with good resolution and DOF, but I find the shadows on the flowers distracting.--Wsiegmund 18:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe this could be discussed ?--Jebulon 22:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose noisy. Should be photograph again with ISO 100/200 and a tripod. --Carschten 13:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Concorde Air France Musee du Bourget P1020006.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Concorde in Musée de l'Air et de l'Espace, Le Bourget. --Pline 13:46, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
{{opp}}It's a good image, not easy, but noised to me. To me, not QI to me--Lmbuga 22:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Yes noisy, I agree. But at high resolution only. Could it be possible to be less noisy ? I put it in discuss.--Jebulon 22:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- I apply noise filter Done --Pline 08:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Now, good. Thanks--Lmbuga 18:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Kirishima-jingu07bs4592.jpg
[edit]- Nomination a sculpture of Kirishima-jingu's Chokushiden --663highland 09:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment tilted--Jebulon 09:25, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Info I corrected the tilt, then I cannot support. I put it in discussion, I think it is good now. --Jebulon 23:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support, also made the overexposure less obvious. ZooFari 20:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Carschten 12:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 05.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) --Pudelek 16:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good, with acceptable chromatic aberration on both sides. Please, geocode. --Cayambe 20:35, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, the CA needs a discussion IMO.--Jebulon 22:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Some (moderate) CAs but still acceptable --BennyJ 14:59, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose at the right and left the CA are okay, but the half stairs are red and green and not only brown. This isn't acceptable imo --Carschten 15:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Red and green? I can only see algae and dust, most wooden items get that after a while in outdoor environment. --V-wolf 00:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Carschten, the new version didn't explain anything to me. I still only see algae, dust and rust. It's patina and natural, to remove it artificially would decieve the viewer. --V-wolf 16:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Us Carschten--Lmbuga 17:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support as V-wolf. I don't even see a lot of red and green and should that be bad imo?--McIntosh Natura 01:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose As Carschten. I put an annotation on the other CA upper right, visible even on thumbnail.--Jebulon 22:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral I rest my case. --V-wolf 23:04, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition, shame about the CA on lower stairs and at upper right. --Avenue 16:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Paris - Mondial de l'automobile 2010 - Volvo S60 - 002.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Volvo S60, Paris, Mondial de l'automobile 2010 --Thesupermat 07:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Bad exposure, too dark (underexposed areas). Too noisy... I think this may need a discussion. -- S 400 HYBRID 21:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC
Support Good. Rama 10:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
{{o}} Per S 400 HYBRID. + Chromatic noise: can be see in the front wheel--Lmbuga 00:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment (Poor english) But the image it's not bad, it's good. I made (or "do") an retouched image, in case somebody wants to propose it: File:Paris - Mondial de l'automobile 2010 - Volvo S60 - 002. retouched.jpg (The front wheel of the two images must be seen) --Lmbuga 00:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is possible that I am not right--Lmbuga 01:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- J'ai changé l'image. --Thesupermat 20:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support - As for free image in so called free wiki projects I think it is a great photo. A little tilted which is not so fatal.--MrPanyGoff 16:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support The actual image it's better and to me QI--Miguel Bugallo 20:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop too tight, tilted and the front is a bit too dark. At least the crop should be wider. -- H005 15:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Шахтер граффити Харьков.JPG
[edit]- Nomination "Miner". Naïve art graffiti in Kharkov.--Vizu 15:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
SupportGood to me --Lmbuga 21:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)- Question FOP in Ukraine? --Myrabella 08:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
File:NKS SSSR.jpg
[edit]- Nomination USSR Peoples Comissariat of Communications emblem (1933) on telephone cover. Kharkov.--Vizu 16:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Bad flash luminosity--Lmbuga 21:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- OpposeIMO, this picture seems to be easy to re-shot. Then I notice that it is not sharp enough, that the crop is too tight, and the light in the corner left above is not good. --Jebulon 15:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Moschus-Steinbrech.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Saxifraga moschata --McIntosh Natura 10:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Sorry, to me, bad quality: Perhaps poor dof or bad crop. Few clear areas--Lmbuga 22:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment"few clear areas": the only thing which is thought to be clear here, is the flower itself; I think it's good, that the background is blurred out!--McIntosh Natura 22:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
{{Oppose}}Poor DOF or bad crop. The flower is too little--Lmbuga 10:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)- Comment So you think it would be better, if I cropped the picture? (by the way, I don't even think the flower is too little; the size of the blossom is about 15mm / 2/3 inches diameter and its not needed that the blossom fills the picture)--McIntosh Natura 13:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, the flower is small in relation to the image, not in relation to the reality. If the reality was in focus, I could have another opinion--Lmbuga 19:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Uneven bokeh, and the flower doesn't stand out from it enough. I also agree that the flower is too small. -- H005 16:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I can't vote 2 times--Lmbuga 19:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with H005 & Lmbuga --Jebulon 21:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:ThyssenKrupp Quartier Essen 01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The new ThyssenKrupp headquarter in Essen --Arnoldius 22:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Foreground and main object too dark IMHO. -- H005 15:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment OK for 18:40 imo --Mbdortmund 20:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support not perfect, but above-average night quality --Carschten 15:25, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support good --BennyJ 17:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good to me. To me it's not underexposed. The reality is as dark as the image--Lmbuga 00:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Battersea Power Station, Nine Elms, London.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Battersea Power Station, Nine Elms in London (by User:Hellodavey1902). --High Contrast 09:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support A bit noisy but still good. (with greetings to Pink Floyd) --Berthold Werner 11:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose To me, clearly underexposed and big areas underexposed. Vertical lines of right tilted. I can't understand the luminosity (too yelow or orange to me, and it's not sunset because is too dark). To me the better of the image it's Pink F. --Lmbuga 22:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support noisy, but very good view. -- Felix Koenig 20:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support As for me, good. --Vizu 18:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Kharkiv city hall - UkSSR coat of arms.jpg
[edit]- Nomination USSR coat of arms on Kharkov city hall. By Ace^eVg.--Vizu 10:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good, but better if little perspective distortion corrected, IMO--Jebulon 21:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC) I tried a perspective correction. Then I cannot support, so I put it in Discussion. Thank you. --Jebulon 22:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner 06:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Jerusalem Oesterreichisches Hospiz BW 4.jpg
[edit]- Nomination View from the roof of the Austrian Hospice on the old town of Jerusalem --Berthold Werner 09:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Good to me. The left church (at the backgrund) have e little CA (green and violet line), but the CA not disturb--Lmbuga 11:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Comment Sorry. Vertical perspective distortion. More CA below the church. I don't know if I must decline--Lmbuga 11:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC) - Tried to remove CA and distortion. --Berthold Werner 14:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Sorry and thanks. Better to me. It is a difficult image and a image with technical merit--Lmbuga 19:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Crassostrea_gigas_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The Pacific Oyster, Crassostrea gigas --Llez 12:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose The lower left one is overexposured / shows white without details --Mbdortmund 13:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment and Info Sorry, that's not correct. The left (e.g. anatomically the right valve) shows only the (coloured) impression of the adductor muscle and the pallial sinus, the rest is nearly pure white (and not overexposed), but some brown colour spots are visible and the uppermost part is slighltly darker (visible in higher resolution). The other valve has additional colour patterns so that it looks quite different. This valve also looks a bit darker, as it is strongly arched, whereas the other is flat. PS: If you leave your adress on my talk page, I'd like to send you the original for comparison. --Llez 14:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC) - Support Not overesxposed to me. I like it--Lmbuga 19:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Don't see any problem here, only good things--Jebulon 22:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
File:Jack adaptor IMG 6580.jpg
[edit]- Nomination TRS connector. -- Rama 07:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Well done. --AFBorchert 08:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment To me, regular quality: Bad clarity, not sharp enough. To me the image can be a valued image, but not QI (I'm not sure, I will learn if others think)--Lmbuga 23:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
OpposeSee above--Lmbuga 19:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC) - Support Sharpness is sufficient, and I can't see an issue with clarity. I'd recommend some color denoising though. -- H005 16:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, I can't say what is clarity (es:"claridad"), it's not luminosity. This version have more clarity and less chromatic noise, and it's more sharp to me--Lmbuga 19:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- But I'm not sure: Is my version better?--Lmbuga 19:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Clarity it's not contrast, but the edges have better definition. I can upload my version of the image without clarity if you want--Lmbuga 19:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Clarity is the right word, and no doubt it's better in your edit - but it wasn't actually bad in the original version. Just the color noise was a slight issue. You fixed both, I recommend uploading your edit as an update to the original image, not as a new picture. -- H005 20:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I can't know when I can upload a image over other. I need the permision of the first uploader. --Lmbuga 20:59, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- It is common practice to do that even without the uploader's consent, given that it is just a technical improvement. If for whatever reason he does not want it, it's a just one click to revert the update and restore the old version. -- H005 22:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Now I think that I can't vote--Lmbuga 06:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)