Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 26 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Mountain trip from Sapün (1600 meters) via Medergen (2000 meters) to bridge over Sapüner bach (1400 meters). Panorama from Seebjibodem 2072 (meter).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Excellent; Great Quality -- Sixflashphoto 04:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain trip from Sapün (1600 meters) via Medergen (2000 meters) to bridge over Sapüner bach (1400 meters). Panorama from Seebjibodem 2072 (meter).
-
- Nomination Rope in the port of Exomitis, Santorin, Greece --XRay 03:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Handle of a gate in Fira, Santorin, Griechenland --XRay 03:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window in Fira, Santorin, Griechenland --XRay 03:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Three bells of Fira, Santorin, Griechenland --XRay 03:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 04:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ravenswood Generating Station. --King of Hearts 03:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --XRay 03:27, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ravenswood Generating Station at night. --King of Hearts 03:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 04:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Little Darby Creek -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion The mood at the creek is unique. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mixed Forests in Fall -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meadows in Fall in Blacklick Woods -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Those warm golden brown colors of fall, aren`t they great? Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Meadows and mixed Forests around peak Fall -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Ohio under the command of fall. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blacklick Creek -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Marvellous nature. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge to the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), part of the Promenadenbad, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:22, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motor ship «Klagenfurt» in front of the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Houses are a nice touch, Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peninsula with gazebo, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Great colors, Great mood -- Sixflashphoto 03:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motor ship «Klagenfurt» in front of the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Fantastic Composition , Great Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:19, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poplar trees on the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), part of the lido, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Water was great to highlight the trees -- Sixflashphoto 02:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Menchul Kvasivskyi, Ukraine by User:Billchik.--Aeou 20:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Please supply English description and geo data. Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Shirak province , Akhuryan village, Armenia --Armenak Margarian 17:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Blurring photo, I cannot read the text above the gate. Also the verticals are well done but the horizontals are not straight enough; in this position it is necessary. Please add a geo-location when you nominate a photo and enter after each nomination (btw: I add three enters between your photos)--Michielverbeek 21:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Shirak province , Akhuryan village, Armenia --Armenak Margarian 17:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Nothing is really sharp --Capricorn4049 22:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Mycenaean tomb at the Palace of Nestor site, built ca. 1550-1500 BC--Peulle 16:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windsor Station, Montreal, Canada --Poco a poco 16:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bersenevskaya Embankment, Moscow, Russia --Poco a poco 16:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Land Rover --Berthold Werner 15:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. A minor problem: The preson in the background is disturbing. Hopefully he will love your photograph. --XRay 16:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forau de Aigualluts, the Esera River disappears at this point and seeps completely into the karst. Huesca, Aragon, Spain --Basotxerri 14:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 16:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forau de Aigualluts, the Esera River disappears at this point and seeps completely into the karst. Huesca, Aragon, Spain --Basotxerri 14:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality, Great composition -- Sixflashphoto 15:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape of the Llanos del Hospital plains, Benasque. Huesca, Aragon, Spain --Basotxerri 14:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --XRay 16:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stift Melk, Western view --Thomas Ledl 14:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --GT1976 16:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Right side altar of the Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, South Tyrol --Llez 13:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Thomas Ledl 14:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Right side altar of the Parish church St. Ulrich, Urtijëi, South Tyrol --Llez 13:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oldest stained glass window in situ, depicting the Virgin and apostles during the Ascension of the Christ, Le Mans Cathedral. --Selbymay 09:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 13:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trzcińska Góra, Żeleźniak i Koszela, Bystrzyckie Mountains, Sudetes --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former uranium mine in Kletno 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 13:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former uranium mine in Kletno 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former uranium mine in Kletno 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House No. 13 in Kletno --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thatched roof house in Hamburg-Sülldorf --Dirtsc 07:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dinosaur in Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica, California. --Cayambe 07:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination GMS Westco in the MD channel between Strullendorf and Hirschaid. Direction Danube. --Ermell 07:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altars of the Holy Cross Church in Bundorf Neuses --Ermell 07:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Side altar of the Holy Cross Church in Bundorf Neuses --Ermell 07:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Palais de la Berbie in Albi, Tarn, France. --Tournasol7 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of the building at 2 rue d'Armagnac in Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 13:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the church of Coussergues, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 13:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weilheim an der Teck Fountain.
--Famberhorst 06:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Weilheim an der Teck Fountain.
-
- Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel to Löser (1680 meter). Panorama from mountain road.
--Famberhorst 06:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC) - Promotion A little unsharp, but it was misty and overcast, and I think this is a Quality Image. -- Ikan Kekek 09:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel to Löser (1680 meter). Panorama from mountain road.
-
- Nomination Mountain trip from Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) to Tschiertschen. Lovely mountain lake Scheidegg Seeli (2080 meters).
--Famberhorst 06:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain trip from Arosa via Scheideggseeli (2080 meter) en Ochsenalp (1941 meter) to Tschiertschen. Lovely mountain lake Scheidegg Seeli (2080 meters).
-
- Nomination Volvo FH460 at Park and Ride am Bahnhof Wieselburg.
--GT1976 05:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Volvo FH460 at Park and Ride am Bahnhof Wieselburg.
-
- Nomination The Golden Gate Bridge as seen from Marshall’s Beach, October 2017 --Frank Schulenburg 04:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 05:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kunstautomat Bonn. --AKirch-Bonn 13:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water tower by engineer Vladimir Shukhov in Bila Tserkva, Ukraine by User:R naumov.--Aeou 11:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
-
- Nomination Casa Grande, Valhermoso, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 06:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC) CommentLeaning to the left IMO.--Ermell 12:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 17:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Casa Grande, Valhermoso, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 06:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC) CommentLeaning to the left IMO.--Ermell 12:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Navarino Bay, seen from the Palace of Nestor site.--Peulle 06:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment IMO tilted CW (horizon), haze could be reduced. --XRay 12:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Done Tilt corrected.--Peulle 14:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Support OK now. Thank you. --XRay 16:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Plaque in the Santiago Metropolitan Cathedral, Santiago, Chile.
--Carlos yo 04:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Plaque in the Santiago Metropolitan Cathedral, Santiago, Chile.
-
- Nomination: Statue of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, Santiago, Chile.
--Carlos yo 04:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Statue of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, Santiago, Chile.
-
- Nomination: Santa Lucía Building, Santiago, Chile.
--Carlos yo 04:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Santa Lucía Building, Santiago, Chile.
-
- Nomination: Ölüdeniz & 3 Paragliding. Sakhalinio 04:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Detail National Monument).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 18 October 2017 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Scharsterbrug. Skarrenmolen bij Hollandiastraat 7 (Detail National Monument).
-
- Nomination: Fatimid Cemetery in Aswan --Hatem Moushir 03:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 360° panorama from Piz Grisch (Switzerland) --Capricorn4049 03:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Morrow's Honeysuckle and Virginia Creeper climb Sugar Maples -- Sixflashphoto 02:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Heinrich Bedford-Strohm --Sandro Halank 23:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ellen Ueberschär and Heinrich Bedford-Strohm --Sandro Halank 23:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Constantin Knall --Sandro Halank 23:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Christina Aus der Au --Sandro Halank 23:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 360° panorama from Usser Wissberg (Switzerland) --Capricorn4049 21:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Annie Moore Statue by Jeanne Rynhart, Cobh, Ireland --DeFacto 21:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Klong Khong beach. Ko Lanta Yai. Ko Lanta District, Krabi Province, Thailand. --Halavar 19:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Old house in Tirilye, Bursa and magnet -- Sakhalinio 16:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review * Question What exactly was the purpose of this picture? On the photography, nothing is recognisable.--Capricorn4049 17:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Oudegracht, Utrecht. --C messier 12:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Maastricht, Stokstraat 59 --Berthold Werner 06:13, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel towards Ochsenalp. Erosion by human activity.
--Famberhorst 05:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel towards Ochsenalp. Erosion by human activity.
-
- Nomination: Relief on the grave sculpture of Hannah (Secor) Dalton in New York City Marble Cemetery. --Rhododendrites 05:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Gijselaarsbank, Leiden. --C messier 13:17, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Had a bit sharper but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 18:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Labrador Retriever in Anciles, Benasque. Huesca, Aragon, Spain --Basotxerri 12:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Weak front, Right front leg some blurred.--Famberhorst 18:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Before Stockholm Pride 2015 by Jonatan Svensson Glad --Josve05a 00:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
File should be renamed since it does not accurately describe what's in the picture. --W.carter 15:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC) - Decline Oppose Crop, composition, description and motif are useless to me. Besides, it's not sharp enough. --Palauenc05 21:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Before Stockholm Pride 2015 by Jonatan Svensson Glad --Josve05a 00:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hyundai i30 N 24h after 24 h Nürbungring, IAA 2017 --MB-one 08:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Hmm. DoF small, noise and color noise. May be acceptable if noise is reduced. --XRay 12:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
@XRay: Done thanks. --MB-one 16:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 16:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Aston Martin DB4 in Morges 2017 - Film Washi D iso800.jpg
[edit]- Nomination An Aston Martin DB5 in Morges, Switzerland (Analog photograph) --Akela NDE 12:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Behind the front wheel the car is not sharp. Further the image is very dark. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 22:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- A matter of taste, certainly, but this is intentional (focus on the rad grille, and high contrast film). --Akela NDE 09:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose As for Spurzem. Artificial blur. --Smial 08:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - Small, unsharp file -> decline. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like a photo taken in the 1960s.--Peulle 10:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Peulle 11:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Sellagruppe_in_Gröden.jpg
[edit]- Nomination The Sella group, in the Dolomites UNESCO World Heritage Site. --Moroder 09:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment please sharpen. The D850 has no anti-aliasing filter and images need to be sharpened in post. --Granada 11:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Done --Moroder 14:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2017 (UTC)- Neutral I've checked the image again and it's quite unsharp on the left border and on the top of the tree on the right. I would appreciate other opinions. --Basotxerri 15:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Large file, so I think it's sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 20:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Could easily be downsized and thus made sharper. --Cayambe 07:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good sharpness, and quality, regarding the high resolution. --Smial 09:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 11:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Front_loading_garbage_truck_loading_a_dumpster.webm
[edit]
- Nomination A front-loading garbage truck picks up a dumpster, deposits its contents into the truck, then puts the dumpster back down. --Grendelkhan 22:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose overexposure at the sky and the walls. And anyway, which are the criteria for a quality video? Can we promote videos as quality images? --C messier 16:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Of course we can promote videos as QIs, it's been done many times before. Videos are judged the same ways as most photos, perhaps with the exception of size because of the very large file-size required for a video. This video has some overexposed parts, so I don't think it's up to QI standard. --W.carter 09:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
NeutralActually, I think it looks quite good as far as sharpness and resolution are concerned. Since we're judging by the QIC standards, though, the overexposure may be a problem. But honestly, I've seen TV broadcasts with the same problem.--Peulle 13:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I haven't see a front-loading garbage truck before, so that was quite interesting to me. I don't think I'll take a view on whether it's a QI or not, though, because to me the question is whether the interesting subject takes so much of the viewer's attention that some overexposure on the sides isn't important. -- Ikan Kekek 04:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Video shouldn't be judged on the same standards as still images as it's much hard to edit raw video, and the exposure is appropriate for the main subject. -- King of Hearts 06:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad lighting. --Smial 11:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support I've changed my mind; Commons should be about what the average skilled person can do with a good camera, and if professional TV crews are struggling with the same thing, I think this problem is fairly minor here. After all, the subject is well lit - it's the background that's overexposed.--Peulle 10:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment If professional TV crews struggle with lighting in a live interview and/or live reportage (single event) it is of course tolarable. In an instruction video or documentation, in any kind of video that can be composed and repeated it is not. In this video the background is overexposed and the main subject is underexposed. This is bad lighting, and a better lighting situation should be chosen. There is no real difference to stills photography, which also needs to be repeated under better conditions, if possible, to get QI status. --Smial 07:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment You're making good points, but the thing for me is the difference between a photo and a video: a lot of the exposure problems in a photo of this could be handled in post. In fact, we keep asking nominees to do exactly that; brighten the shadows, tone down the highlights. Doing this to individual frames in a video, though, should that be expected as well? I'm trying to focus on what we should reasonably expect a normal non-professional person to do. Granted, FP is a class of its own - "one of the finest on Commons" - but I'm thinking QI status should be possible to obtain without raising the bar too high.--Peulle 11:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Recoding (somewhat darker, somewhat less contrast, somewhat lower gamma) needed less than 2 Minutes: File:Front_loading_garbage_truck_loading_a_dumpster_2.webm. Of course the burnt highlights could not be restored. --Smial 16:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment You're making good points, but the thing for me is the difference between a photo and a video: a lot of the exposure problems in a photo of this could be handled in post. In fact, we keep asking nominees to do exactly that; brighten the shadows, tone down the highlights. Doing this to individual frames in a video, though, should that be expected as well? I'm trying to focus on what we should reasonably expect a normal non-professional person to do. Granted, FP is a class of its own - "one of the finest on Commons" - but I'm thinking QI status should be possible to obtain without raising the bar too high.--Peulle 11:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment If professional TV crews struggle with lighting in a live interview and/or live reportage (single event) it is of course tolarable. In an instruction video or documentation, in any kind of video that can be composed and repeated it is not. In this video the background is overexposed and the main subject is underexposed. This is bad lighting, and a better lighting situation should be chosen. There is no real difference to stills photography, which also needs to be repeated under better conditions, if possible, to get QI status. --Smial 07:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Well done video. It grabbed my attention completely. -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Of course the video is of high value and useful. That is not my point. --Smial 08:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 07:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)