Talk:BSicon/New icons and icon requests
| |||||||
Threads older than 6 months may be archived. |
New Lift Bridge Icons
[edit]Just uploaded (hLIFTae
) and (uhLIFTae
) as different options to represent a lift bridge. Thoughts? Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 18:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- These look really good! You mean vertical lift, right? I can see it possibly working for bascule bridges with the line in the middle. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Originally I was thinking vertical lift, but I’m not sure we need that level of specificity. I had considered a bascule icon with a line in the middle, but this might interfere with border icons. Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 20:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Fair point when it comes to specificity. A few things I would add:
- The heavy rail and base "u" icons look slightly different, with the "u" icon having more of a square in the middle. If I were to pick between one or the other, I would pick the heavy rail one.
- Second, perhaps an icon like (
hLIFT
) should be created (like (hKRZW
)) for a moving segment of a long bridge. But I would not bother with "a" or "e" icons, because separate "a(at)f" or "e(at)g" icons could work instead. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 00:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Originally I was thinking vertical lift, but I’m not sure we need that level of specificity. I had considered a bascule icon with a line in the middle, but this might interfere with border icons. Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 20:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Finally a “moving bridge” icon that makes sense. Please see all the previous discussion at Talk:BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness/Drawbridges. Looks like we’re heading the right way. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- I’m familiar with the past discussions on the subject and your comments/approval are the main ones I’m seeking since this has been your quest for the last eleven years. Do you have a preference for either style? Also, what are your thoughts on naming these? Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 01:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- My 2 c€:
- I like (
hLIFTae
) much better. Works well with, say, (hLIFTae
※WASSERq
) or even something unusual like (hLIFTae
※STRq_saffron
) or (hLIFTae
※RP4q
) . - I suppose that this icon could be used to symbolize several types of movable bridges where the “table” changes shape / position in a symmetric way and stays undivided like those in these images at the right), unlike other types (for which something asymmetric like is more illustrative).
- The chosen name is already taken by (
uLIFT
), so I’d suggest something different, maybe only a small change likeLFT
. I envisage that this set of new icons will replace all hitherto usage, but I think it’s a bad idea to overwrite existing files instead of uploading anew. - Is it a good idea to have variant icons differentiate a working movable bridge from one that is stuck in the closed position? And I mean closed for the waterway traffic (because to show closed for the rail traffic we already have
ex
). I would suggest something like (LLSTRae
) for the former and the usual (STR
) for the latter.
- I like (
- (It was 4 c€ instead!) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Adding to my §4 above, a movable bridge that’s not moving anymore could also be simply identified in a diagram with the normal (
hSTRae
) icon, leaving (hLIFTae
) for a functional movable bridge. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)- As far as non functioning bridges, I think using (
hSTRae
) type icons is the way to go. (Functionally, what is the difference between a bridge that no longer raises and one that never did?) If we need to show that a lifting bridge used to allow passage, we should do something like (hLIFTae
※lENDE@Fq
※lENDE@Gq
) as it uses existing iconography to explain that the crossing line ends. (I’m imagining smaller ENDE bars for such a scenario.) I don’t think we should use (LSTR
) type icons for the main line/path as this says an interruption of some kind, although I do think it could work for the crossing line using a q version of passing underneath a bridge. Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- As far as non functioning bridges, I think using (
- Adding to my §4 above, a movable bridge that’s not moving anymore could also be simply identified in a diagram with the normal (
- I’m familiar with the past discussions on the subject and your comments/approval are the main ones I’m seeking since this has been your quest for the last eleven years. Do you have a preference for either style? Also, what are your thoughts on naming these? Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 01:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- If we need to show functionality of the bridge, we could also make the lifting formation rectangle black. Then we could use the black formation for operating bridges and make it gray for non-operating bridges. Although, now that I think about it, that wouldn't indicate if a closed bridge was locked in the up or down position... Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've uploaded (
exLFTx
) which I think would be appropriate for an out-of-use lift bridge in the raised position. I've included masking so it can be overlaid onto (WASSERq
) or a canal. Useddenim (talk) 23:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)- I’m liking these ideas — looks like this is going somewhere good after all this time. (Maybe move this discussion to Talk:BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness/Drawbridges only when the deed is done, to avoid jinxing it?…) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:41, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- This looks great! The interruption in the line is perfect!
- Normally I’m in favor of masks for elevated/bridge icons, but I’m wondering if we want the under layer to show through here to indicate that the water/line/road below passes through unobstructed. Anyone have thoughts on this? Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 00:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Noted; there is now (
exLFTx
) and (exMLFTx
). Useddenim (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)- Oh, I like it! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Noted; there is now (
- I agree. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've uploaded (
- If we need to show functionality of the bridge, we could also make the lifting formation rectangle black. Then we could use the black formation for operating bridges and make it gray for non-operating bridges. Although, now that I think about it, that wouldn't indicate if a closed bridge was locked in the up or down position... Lost on Belmont 3200N1000W (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- Worth noting that I uploaded (
lLFT
) to offer flexibility for the line (e.g. (lLFT
※tSTR violet
※STR brown
※MSTR
※WASSERq
) ). AlphaBeta135talk 23:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
I've added an alternate swing bridge icon that matches the lifts: (SWG
) & (SWGW
). Useddenim (talk) 00:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Also (
eLFT
) & (xeLFTW
) for bridges where the span is inoperable and fixed in place. Useddenim (talk) 00:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)- I like the idea of these over the previous versions of road and rail lift bridges over water and navigable waterways ( (
HBK2q
), (umHKRZ2
), (uHKRZ2-Au
) & (uHKRZ2-G2u
)). - Would it be possible to get (
lLFT
), (eLFT
) rotated 90 degrees so this new version can replace the previous ones? -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 18:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)- @ThylacineHunter: Done: (
lLFTq
) (eLFTq
) Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 01:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ThylacineHunter: Done: (
- I like the idea of these over the previous versions of road and rail lift bridges over water and navigable waterways ( (
- I’m loving this, especially (
SWG
)| -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
YRD but diagonal
[edit] (YRD
) but diagonal? can it be done? would the three-track (dYRD
) superimposed on a full-width tile to save the track width from cliipping beyond the borders? maybe even just (PSL
) on the diagonals if that's simpler. please and thank you. -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 01:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- There's already (
KYRD4
) which could be used as a starting point. Useddenim (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC) - I made (
YRD2+4
) from Useddenim's terminal yard there. I'll work on the opposite corners soon. And now (YRD3+1
) is done. VanIsaac (en.wiki) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)- It looks really good! (Says a guy who hates halfwidth lines, too!) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I was surprised at how good it looked too! Credit certainly goes to Useddenim for the original KYRD geometry in setting me up for pleasing and intelligible iconography. VanIsaac (en.wiki) 04:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Kudos to everyone! thanks again. -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I was surprised at how good it looked too! Credit certainly goes to Useddenim for the original KYRD geometry in setting me up for pleasing and intelligible iconography. VanIsaac (en.wiki) 04:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- It looks really good! (Says a guy who hates halfwidth lines, too!) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Diagonal and half icons
[edit]Hi! I would like to inquire if it would be possible for the following three icons to be derived:
Thank you! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 10:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just had another, was wondering if (
tSTRu
) and (tSKRZ-G4u
) were possible too? Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)- @OrdinaryScarlett: I've made (
tSTRu
), andtSKRZ-G4u
is possible with (RP4oq
※MRP4q
※tSTR
) . I couldn't create the other icons as I am new to the text editor. Hope this helps! --Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)- @OrdinaryScarlett: (
NULgq~L
) and (NULgq~R
) --Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)- You’ve been an amazing help. Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 11:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Squishyawaylittle6: Hopefully this is alright to ask you for, but in the same vein as (
tSTRu
), do you think you could also help me create (tKRZu
)? It should just be (tSTRu
) but with a solid horizontal line through the middle. Thank you! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)- Nevermind, just figured out how to make it myself! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 04:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryScarlett: (
- @OrdinaryScarlett: I found (
tSKRZ-G4
), no "u" suffix is necessary. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 03:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)- Ah yeah, that too, but I was looking for an icon with the road on an elevated bridge crossing across the underground line. Thank you though! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 11:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- My mistake. Would (
tSKRZ-G4hl
) (tSKRZ-G4h
) (tSKRZ-G4hr
) work then? Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 00:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)- Yeah, I was looking for an icon like that, but with the bridge segment beginning and ending within the same icon. It’d be what Squishy made with the overlays above, but as one singular icon. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- The icon was uploaded: (
tSKRZ-G4u
) --Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)- Oh my god, thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 23:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Glad to help, you're welcome. -- Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 12:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh my god, thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 23:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- The icon was uploaded: (
- Yeah, I was looking for an icon like that, but with the bridge segment beginning and ending within the same icon. It’d be what Squishy made with the overlays above, but as one singular icon. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- My mistake. Would (
- Ah yeah, that too, but I was looking for an icon with the road on an elevated bridge crossing across the underground line. Thank you though! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 11:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryScarlett: I've made (
tunnel icon
[edit]Hello. I request a tunnel version of (dSTR3+1h
). Thanks! -- Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 23:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting outline for elevated Bahnhof station with elevated corner
[edit]Hello, I was wondering if a cross between ( Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 22:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
lhSTR+hc3
) and (lhBHF
) could please be made, to accommodate a large station immediately preceding an above-grade level junction, for this scenario. I would only need an "l"(L) variation, as I would be using one of three different colors for the station and a fourth color for the corner. I also do not expect a need for corners 1, 2, 4, or any combinations, just 3. I would greatly appreciate it! Thank you!
- I withdraw my request. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 17:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Hotdog with ketchup: Done: (
lhBHF+hc3
), and sorry for the late response 😞 – Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)- Thank you so much! I withdrew the request as another way to complete the diagrams worked, but since it is available, I have now implemented it. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're certainly welcome! I just learned how to make it. – Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 18:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! I withdrew the request as another way to complete the diagrams worked, but since it is available, I have now implemented it. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Hotdog with ketchup: Done: (
Yellow diagonal tunnel transition(s)
[edit]I hope everyone's having a good day. I'm requesting (extSTRr+1e
) be recolored with the standard (exSTR yellow
) coloration (the out-of service shade in this case, but the in-service one will be useful at a [likely far-]future date). thanks in advance! -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 08:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- (
extSTRr+1e yellow
) & (tSTRr+1e yellow
). OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 09:49, 15 July 2024 (UTC)- thanks! you rock! -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Narrow-line stopblocks
[edit]As (ENDE@Fq
) and similar have equivalent standalone (lENDE@Fq
) (lENDE@Gq
) (lENDE@G
) and (lENDE@F
) to overlay, can we get the equivalent stopblock for (nSTRq
) at the four edges? with the same line weight as (nENDEeq
)? thanks in advance -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 02:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjdestroyerofworlds: Done: (
nlENDE
) (nlENDE@F
) (nlENDE@G
) (nlENDEq
) (nlENDE@Fq
) (nlENDE@Gq
) -- Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 02:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Squishyawaylittle6: Thanks so much! these will be a big help! -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 03:07, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- While you're at it, you might want to check out the length discrepancies between the normal-weight stopblocks. e.g. (
lENDE@F
) is a different length than (lENDE@G
). take a looksee: (lENDE@F
※lENDE@G
)
- (
lENDE@F
) is still based off an older version of (ENDE
) and has not been updated unlike (lENDE@G
). -- Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 03:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- (
Camping facilities
[edit]Something a little artistic finally. There doesn't seem to be a symbol for camping or campsites. It would be maybe marginally useful in rail diagrams, but would be quite useful in trail and even river and some bus diagrams. Is there a universal symbol for camping other than an A-frame tent? -Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Mjdestroyerofworlds: There doesn't seem to be any universal camping symbol other than a tent, so I'll try my best to make a tent icon. Are you okay with that? — Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 23:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done: (
CAMP
) and (exCAMP
) Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 23:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done: (
Curved road median HST variants
[edit]
|
Hi! I was looking to see if it'd be possible to have curved variants of (vRP2HST
), specifically for (HST+1
) and (HST3
). Thank you! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 02:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryScarlett: Done (
vRP2HSTs+1
) (vRP2HSTs+1~RR
) (vRP2HST3+n~LL
) (vRP2HST3+n
), though the dashes don't align very well. Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)- Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I laid out the icons to the right to show the error. If someone could fix this it would be great. – Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
|
- Here's an alternative solution using (
bvRP2HSTs+1
). Useddenim (talk) 04:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Here's an alternative solution using (
Diagonal road median HST variants
[edit]Hi! Can someone please help create HST variants of (vRP2BHF3+1
) and (vRP2BHF2+4
)? Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 02:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryScarlett: Done (
vRP2HST3+1
) (vRP2HST2+4
) – Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 17:44, 28 August 2024 (UTC)- Nice work! Thank you so much again! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Missing non-navigable watercourses transition
[edit]Can someone please add the missing image from BSicon/Catalogue/watercourses/non-navigable#Transitions – (uWWSELlg
). -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done. The file existed, there was just a typo in the name. VanIsaac (en.wiki) 21:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
How would you name it?
[edit]if one wants to "substract" (vSTR+4
) from (vÜSTr+4
), what would the correct name for the resulting shift icon be? -Fessor (talk) 13:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Fessor: It would be (
v-SHI2r+4
), I think. – Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 23:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)- I would probably call it either (
vSTR+4-~l
) or (vSTR+4~l-
), considering how (vSTR+4~l
) is named. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 02:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- I would probably call it either (
Lighthouse
[edit]Can someone please design a lighthouse icon. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 08:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ThylacineHunter: There's ⛯, the Unicode map symbol for a lighthouse, or did you want a pictogram? Useddenim (talk) 14:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Useddenim Yes please. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- I had thought of using (
VIEWr
), but didn't want it being confused with a viewpoint/lookout. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 07:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)- Maybe (
lv-INT
※VIEWr
※WDOCKSm
) ? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)- @ThylacineHunter: (
LIGHTHOUSE
). Useddenim (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @ThylacineHunter: (
- Maybe (
- I had thought of using (
- @Useddenim Yes please. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Thin version of WECHSEL
[edit]Can someone make a thin version of the WECHSEL icon? (nWECHSEL
), (nuWECHSEL
), (nWECHSELq
), and (nuWECHSELq
) Bg's school acc (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- Just found out I can do the same thing by making (nKSTRe!~unKSTRa!~GRZq), but using only one icon would be nice. Bg's school acc (talk) 18:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Bg's school acc: Done (
nWECHSEL
) (nWECHSELq
) (unWECHSEL
) (unWECHSELq
) Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 21:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)- Thanks! (sry for late reply) Bg's school acc (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Bg's school acc: you can make {{BS-o}} to show its icons automatically by adding
|txt=anything
. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)- Thanks, nice to know! Bg's school acc (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Bg's school acc: Done (
HST version of BHF icon
[edit]Hi! I would like an HST version of (mtBHF+1 red~cerulean
). Thank you! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 10:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @OrdinaryScarlett: Done (
mtHST+1 red~cerulean
). The circle is a bit off. Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 00:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)- Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 03:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome! – Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 03:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 03:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Narrow + single + parallel + curve
[edit]We have (nSTRl+4-
), but I need "narrowization" of (STR2+r-
), I mean (nSTR2+r-
). And I'd be able to flip it later to create the rest so there is no need to add all 4 variants. Thanks. --Fessor (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Fessor: Done (
nSTR2+r-
) (n-STRl+4
) (nSTR3+l-
) (n-STRr+1
) Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 15:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Parallel + shift rotated 45 deg
[edit]I need a parallel junction like (SHI2grq-
) but rotated. The closest thing I can think of would be (vSTR3+1~l
) subtracted from (vÜSTr3+1
). Thank you. --Fessor (talk) 21:23, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Actually, I guess 'twould be even better to have just that link between two parallels so I could overlay icons from Category:BSicon/railway/parallel lines/uw without asking you to construct new staff over and over again. --Fessor (talk) 21:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Fessor: Is (
SPL1+3
) okay? Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)- Not really... Sorry. --Fessor (talk) 21:32, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Squishyawaylittle6: I believe I've got it: (
vSHI2r3+1
) --Fessor (talk) 21:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)- @Fessor: Yes, though I believe that the correct name is
v-SHI2r3+1
as the current name,vSHI2r3+1
, would be a (vSHI2r
) going diagonally, and in this case, it is a (v-SHI2r
) going diagonally. Squishyawaylittle6 (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)- Oh, sure. Rename it if you can, pls. --Fessor (talk) 22:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Fessor: Yes, though I believe that the correct name is
Parallel crossovers across
[edit]I need (vÜSTBlq
) icon. (vÜSTBrq
) would be nice to have too, but I'll leave it up to you. Thanks. --Fessor (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Managed to do that myself. --Fessor (talk) 12:11, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Fixing uw/crossing/curve
[edit]It isn't that small of a mismatch if yu look closer: in Chrome one stroke of (eKRZ2+ro
), (eKRZ3+lo
), (eKRZl+4o
), (eKRZq+1o
), (eKRZ2+ro
), (eKRZq+4o
), (eKRZr+1o
) + (KRZ2+ro
), (KRZl+4o
) and a few more is thinner at the end than the rest of darkred lines. I cannot upload a new version of those files since my rights are not sufficient (also having just 450 edit so far, so not requesting it yet). Could someone fix like a dozen of icons so all existing templates (e.g. en:Template:Norristown Branch) & future ones look nice? --Fessor (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Large buildings
[edit]Hello, I was wondering if a set of 2-3 icons could be spun off from (BUILDING
) for large buildings for when a road or railway travels through or beneath them. Perhaps something like (BUILDING-L
) and (BUILDING-R
), possibly with an M icon (similar to (lINT-L
)– (lINT-M
)– (lINT-R
)) A specific example I can think of where this could be useful is the McCormick Place convention center, which has a commuter rail stop beneath it. It would be greatly appreciated if this could please be taken into consideration. Thank you! Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 15:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)