User talk:Brandmeister

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Brandmeister!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Permission to use your image

Hi Brandmeister, I would like to use an image you retouched of The Great Wall of China found at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Great_Wall_of_China_at_Jinshanling-edit.jpg in a brazilian TV serie entitled "Critical Uncertainties". Please email me at teka.carbonell@gmail.com so we can talk a little bit more about my project. Thanks, Teka.

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Henry Clive - Sultana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Henry Clive - Sultana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli.GIF

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli.GIF. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Customized racing car.jpg and File:Customized racing car - front.jpg

It's a Nissan 180SX or 200SX (S13) - unfortunately those are separate categories so I've put it in Nissan vehicles for now. The rear lights are from a 180SX, but they may be part of the modification. Peter James (talk) 23:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I asked at WP's Refdesk before upload, but folks there were uncertain. Brandmeister (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Spanish currency

Brandmeister, I thought you'd like to know that I started at discussion at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Is Spanish currency really okay? regarding additions you made to Commons:Currency. Thanks. --Ahecht (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gustave Moreau 004.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gustave Moreau 004.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Konstantin Makovsky - Christmastide Divination.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Konstantin Makovsky - Christmastide Divination.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Tupac Shakur wax figure at Madame Tussauds.jpg

File:Tupac Shakur wax figure at Madame Tussauds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 07:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Brandmeister,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Gods of Egypt advert column.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gods of Egypt advert column.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

BevinKacon (talk) 21:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Brandmeister,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Yandex Notre-Dame fire logo.jpg

File:Yandex Notre-Dame fire logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

B dash (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Madaba map.jpg

Hi, are you the photographer of File:Madaba map.jpg? The file is dated August 2005, has been attributed to you in 2008 by (now inactive) User:Gusgus as an import from English Wikipedia. The license of "our" file is PD old, based on the depicted mosaic's age. But the file rather seems to be a contemporary photo whose photographer is not dead for 70 years or more. Months later, someone else added the source http://www.mcah.columbia.edu/dbcourses/islamic/large/madaba_map.jpg www.mcah.columbia.edu (at Wayback Archive). Columbia University's dbcourses database/Visual Resources Collection had very specific requirements and borrowed slides to staff and students only for very specific purposes. There is no hint that the materials were released under free licenses. The Wayback snapshot is dated April 2005, earlier than the date of "our" file. Can you help clarify the copyright status of this file? Thank you! --Martina talk 04:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Martina. As per our article Madaba Map, the map dates to the 6th century AD, so in File:Madaba map.jpg I've adjusted the tag to Template:PD-old-100 accordingly (as the map's author died over 100 years ago). The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". Brandmeister (talk) 21:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Brandmeister, thanks. Yes, that's WMF's position. If you are not the photographer the author field needs to state "unknown" right? --Martina talk 05:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

The author field is both for the person who created the original work (the map in this case) and the photographer. In both cases they are unknown anyway, so I've tweaked accordingly. Brandmeister (talk) 09:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! --Martina talk 19:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Belgian francs of 1929 obverse+reverse.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belgian francs of 1929 obverse+reverse.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Nelly Diener cropped.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Joe Biden billboard, Warsaw.jpg

Copyright status: File:Joe Biden billboard, Warsaw.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Joe Biden billboard, Warsaw.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Joe Biden billboard, Warsaw.jpg

File:Joe Biden billboard, Warsaw.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~Cybularny ^Speak? 09:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ford Transit firefighting vehicle 517M55.jpg

Copyright status: File:Ford Transit firefighting vehicle 517M55.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ford Transit firefighting vehicle 517M55.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Autopatroller

Hi, I gave you the Autopatroller right. Yann (talk) 10:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, appreciated. Brandmeister (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA, 1968

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA, 1968-bluish tint fix attempt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA, 1968-bluish tint fix attempt.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Volkswagen Caddy blood transport.jpg

Copyright status: File:Volkswagen Caddy blood transport.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Volkswagen Caddy blood transport.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Long chips.jpg

File:Long chips.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)