User talk:Buchraeumer
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Re: Frames/cropping at Elizabeth and Leicester miniature pair Hilliard.jpg
[edit]It should be fairly easy; a simple oval selection of the images just within the frame should save most of the image while removing the outer edge. I'll open it up when I get a chance later today and see what I can do :) -- Editor at Large • talk 12:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've removed the frames in the jpg, and also uploaded a transparent PNG (at right). I'm sorry it took so long, but hopefully the edit is what you were looking for :) -- Editor at Large • talk 18:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Jane Grey
[edit]Hi Buchraeumer, with File:Jane Grey.jpg and File:Streathamladyjayne.jpg we have two versions of this portrait. The first, File:Jane Grey.jpg, is obviously taken from the NPG website and bears the NPG copyright warning justifiably. The second version, File:Streathamladyjayne.jpg, also had the NPG warning but, since the reproduction was not copied from NPG, the warning was placed wrong. I transfered the information from the first to the second version and searched for a good source, I believe I found one with http://www.somegreymatter.com/streatham.htm. OK? I believe that File:Streathamladyjayne.jpg was not created by Pendragon09 on Wikipedia but was copied from some website. IIn the EXIF we find the comment "Cooper 05/11/14" - maybe this is a hint on the true creator of this good reproduction. With the two versions we now have two good files with accurate file descriptions. Do you agree?Martin H. (talk) 20:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)