User talk:Godot13/Archive1

Image Promotions for January & February, 2013

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead Sea salt formation (Aerial view, 2007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Cathedral - Cupolas (2001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:43, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cranes in the Port of Bremerhaven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice, but it is a bit tilted. Kruusamägi 03:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)  New version Slight rotation adjustment, please review again -- Godot13 05:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC) QI for me. Kruusamägi 00:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thatched-roof villa in the Maldive Islands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe not very sharp but very nice. QI. --JLPC 11:31, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial view of Mar Saba 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Rock, Facade (2008) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction and some sharpening. Mattbuck 09:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)  Done-- Godot13 20:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Damn, scrolling that is a mindfuck. Mattbuck 23:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC) -- LOL! - Godot13 23:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant (Loxodonta Africana) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremlin Regiment-Changing of the Guard-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dichrostachys cinerea (Kruger National Park, South Africa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 10:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Electric Lighting & Jaguar (Cape Town, South Africa, 2002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice. But I think it's a bit over saturated --Uberprutser 23:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment Understood. I chose Velvia 50 color slide film because of its high color saturation. I put up an alternate version (very slight). Let me know which you prefer.--Godot13 23:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment If this is slide film I'm very impressed. What camera/lens was used? --Uberprutser 21:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Bronze Horseman (St. Petersburg, Russia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant (Loxodonta Africana) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems very blue in the shadows. Mattbuck 13:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)* Support Quality detailed picture, I can see the tinge of blue in the water and on the front of the elephant as per the previous comment, never the less picture is still quality and the blue colours are probably just down to the amount of light in that area.--Danesman1 17:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC) Thank you. Slight color adjustment made.-- Godot13 17:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial view of Mar Saba 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please sharpen. Mattbuck 13:26, 21 January 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks. -- Godot13 17:35, 21 January 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 00:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catherine's Palace (2001) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Interesting camera.--ArildV 08:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Isaac's Cathedral (St. Petersburg, 2003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Now very nice --Moroder 07:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Basil's Cathedral, Exterior detail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. --A.Savin 10:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcatraz Island Watch Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --A.Savin 11:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael's Monastery - Facade (Kiev, 2007) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:59, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Guard, Stockholm Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Savior on Spilled Blood (St. Petersburg, 2003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky has rather a lot of artifacts, especially on the right, but not especially noticable. --Mattbuck 15:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recoleta Cemetery - Our Lady of Pilar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Outdoor covered walkway (Cabo San Lucas).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purple Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) 2008 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it needs a bit of sharpening. Mattbuck 17:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)  Done Very minor sharpening added. More creates too much noise. Enough?-Godot13 00:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Looks good. Mattbuck 06:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremlin Regiment 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Marble Temple-Door (Bangkok).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivan the Great Bell Tower - Cupola (Moscow, 2001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 07:12, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Al-Bahr Mosque (The Sea Mosque)-Minaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA not really gone, but just ok for QI --Poco a poco 18:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abu Haggag Mosque-Façade (Luxor, Eqypt, 2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Basil's Cathedral (Moscow, 2004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albert Memorial, Detail (London, 2006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd have gone a bit further, but better --Poco a poco 19:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Tablets on the Temple Mount (Jerusalem, 2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Rock, South Facade (2008) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Prophet (Temple Mount, 2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 19:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Ascension on the Temple Mount (Jerusalem, 2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2007-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yad Vashem (Prism Skylight) 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lorenzo Hatch engraving (medallion).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Michael's Monastery - Facade (Kiev, 2007) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichtbringer ("Bringer of Light") by Bernhard Hoetger (1936).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria della Salute, Venice 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament Building (Budapest, Hungary).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Cathedral - Cupolas (2009) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:01, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of the Rock, Facade (2008) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Distorted and tilted. --Tuxyso 06:32, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Corrected-Godot13 07:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC) QI now. --Tuxyso 07:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS) 2003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 00:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kremlin Regiment, Changing of the Guard, Moscow (2007) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Old Arcades (Die Alten Arkaden), Central Cemetery (Zentralfriedhof), Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Underexposed, see notes --The Photographer 20:54, 13 February 2013 (UTC)  Done New lightly corrected version. Also, alternate with crop as an option-Godot13 00:07, 14 February 2013 (UTC) Seems okish. Mattbuck 11:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harbor in Tromsø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spot needs fixing, otherwise good. Mattbuck 23:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)  Done Dust spot removed.-Godot13 02:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC) OK then. Mattbuck 10:29, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain of Qayt Bay on the Temple Mount (Jerusalem, 2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed - right side is straight, but left leans out. Mattbuck 23:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)  Done It was a full degree rotation. - Godot13 02:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Better, but I'd suggest sharpening in future. Mattbuck 10:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skateboarding in Central Park (New York) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Cathedral (2009) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! State Hermitage Museum (St. Petersburg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 08:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reflection of the Metropolitan Cathedral (Santiago, Chile).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ercé 7:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Old Arcades (Die Alten Arkaden), Central Cemetery (Zentralfriedhof), Austria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, some technical flaws (f/2,8 mm?)--Moroder 08:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Russia-2007-Moscow-Kremlin Senate at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but slight CW tilt. --Selbymay 08:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)  Done - Godot13 17:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Good to go. --Selbymay 20:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel Bridge (Kapellbrücke), Lucerne, Switzerland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA / distortions --Poco a poco 19:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC) Fixed- Godot13 23:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Pedro de Valdivia (Santiago, Chile).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 08:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier (Moscow, 2004).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of the Unknown Soldier (Moscow, 2004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Athena, Parliament building (Vienna) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment with less sky better imo --Rjcastillo 00:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)  Done Good suggestion - Godot13 03:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady in front of Týn-Tower front view (Prague).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tugboat (Bugsier 3) in the Port of Bremerhavan (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 01:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big Ben clock tower (London, 2009) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but some irrelevant CA. In my experience it depends on the aperture (f/5) it's much less with f/11 cheers --Moroder 14:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homes in Longyearbyen (Spitsbergen) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality --Arcalino 08:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! School children (Lukhanyo Primary School, Zwelihle Township (Hermanus, South Africa) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please, add the permision and personality template --The Photographer 16:36, 24 February 2013 (UTC)  Done Thank you for the reminder - Godot13 20:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Info No problem, well done --The Photographer 12:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of a Griffin, Parliament building (Vienna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not categorized. A bit chromatic aberration. See notes --Rjcastillo 05:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)  Done New version loaded Please have another look.-Godot13 18:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port cranes in Bremerhaven.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 07:54, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drinking elephant.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceramics of the Dome of the Rock Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope is too broad it should reduce. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)  Done I had difficulty finding the best scope for this image. I created a sub-category/scope in line with another found under İznik Ceramnics. - Godot13 (talk) 08:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Category:Tiles in Israel to Category:Ceramics of the Dome of the Rock Mosque --Godot13 (talk) 08:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial photographs of Dead Sea salt formations.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Wrong scope. We don't see the Dead See here. Salt formation on the Dead Sea would be suitable here. Yann (talk) 07:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)----

Scope changed from Aerial photographs of the Dead Sea to Aerial photographs of Dead Sea salt formations --Godot13 (talk) 08:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

I changed my vote to comment. The scope seems fine. I am not sure which one is the best. Yann (talk) 11:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

 Support Good with new scope. Geological interest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sled dogs of Svalbard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support It's certainly the best image in its scope.--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. cmadler (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of the Prophet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 10:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of the Ascension.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moscow Kremlin Wall at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Masada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:37, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Summer Pulpit (Jerusalem).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Question Are there other summer pulpits? I think the scope needs a location specifier.  B.p. 20:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

This is the only summer pulpit category in WC, and the only summer pulpit located on the Temple Mount (parent category). I could change the wording of the scope to either "Summer Pulpit on the Temple Mount" or "Summer Pulpit (Minbar al-Sayf)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godot13 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC) (UTC)

 Comment There were several recent VIs for objects on the Temple Mount with names that don't seem worldwide unique. However, the appropriate name for the site may be controversial... So I suggest to add just Jerusalem as location specifier. --Ikar.us (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Summer Pulpit to Summer Pulpit (Jerusalem) --Godot13 (talk) 03:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support The new scope is better, Ikar.us is right. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 08:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lenin Mausoleum at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 11:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted.  B.p. 06:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of the Tablets (Spirits), Jerusalem.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 11:02, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted.  B.p. 06:49, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eternal Flame Memorial (Nizhny Novgorod).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 19:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laguna Miscanti (Antofagasta, Chile).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Three images with different views of the lake have the same geolocation positioned 100 m off shore. Geolocation should not be an afterthought but as much as possible integrated into the image taking event. Log it or write it down on the spot, or look it up ASAP when returning from a trip.  B.p. 07:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
  • The images were taken in 2006. I did not have GPS in my camera, I did not have a GPS device on my trip, and quite frankly wasn't conscious of keeping track. I used the geolocation provided by the Wikipedia article on this location. I guess I should have indicated it was for the object (location) and not the camera position.-- Godot13 (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

• Location/object amended so I am no longer in the water.- Godot13 (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Der Lichtbringer (Bringer of Light).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ivan the Great Bell Tower, Cupola detail.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thatched roofs in resort hotels in the Maldive Islands.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Should there really be a scope for thatched holiday villages in the Maldives. Are they different from those on the Seychelles, Kiribati or the Comoros?  B.p. 19:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment There is a parent category Thatched roofs by country with 47 countries listed. There is another category Thatched roofs containing 11 subcategories. I did not create the current category, but I did think that something like thatched roofs in resorts would be too generic. - Godot13 (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

::*Would you like to suggest an alternate scope? - Godot13 (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment A list of islands in the Maldives indicates 20 Atolls (each with a designated capital island) with approximately 190 different inhabited islands. The Seychelles have 25 administrative regions with 115 islands. Comoros consists of four main islands that speak between them three official languages (Comorian, Arabic and French). Republic of Kiribati has 32 atolls and one raised coral island. Yes, I think each of these counties should have its own thatched roof category.-- Godot13 (talk) 18:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't say they shouldn't, but is a holiday village thatch representative for the local thatching culture? I'm not convinced. And even if it is, visible details of the technique used are rather skimpy.  B.p. 16:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Thatched roofs in the Maldive Islands to Thatched roofs in resort hotels in the Maldive Islands --Godot13 (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support : Best in new scope after a useful discussion. I must admit my first vote was too hasty. --JLPC (talk) 09:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support : Now good, with a relevant scope (BP was right, at first, IMO).--Jebulon (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Façade of the Dome of the Rock.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Façade of the Dome of the Rock.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Congratulations for this set! Your closure was nearly complete, but it missed the "titlescope=" parameter in each step (to be added in the Valued Image Set Candidate (VISC), in the valued image set gallery page, and in the VIS tag). The "titlescope" is the scope without any link or special formatting; it can be shortened if the scope is very verbose. I've fixed it and I let you add the VIS tag to the other images of the set. Kind regards, --Myrabella (talk) 07:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! - Godot13 (talk) 06:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The First 1928 U.S. Banknotes.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The First 1928 U.S. Banknotes.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The Bronze Horseman.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The Bronze Horseman.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Sea-air helicopter rescue training exercise.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Sea-air helicopter rescue training exercise.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Image Promotions for March & April, 2013

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suez Canal Bridge (2008) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive view and composition --Moroder 07:47, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Central Park (New York) 09 Street performers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 18:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suez Canal Bridge (2008) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Rjcastillo 02:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pechersky Ascension Monastery - Entrance (Nizhny Novgorod, 2007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (tiny bit of barrel distortion) --Moroder 22:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephant (Loxodonta Africana) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Recoleta Cemetery - Mausoleum 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tree at Earth Lodge (Sabi Sabi Lodge, South Africa).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, considering it’s a film scan. --Kreuzschnabel 21:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US-$5-LT-1928-Fr.1525.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. --A.Savin 11:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade clock of the Ministry of Interior building, József Attila Street and István Széchenyi Square cnr., Budapest, Hungary (2011) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria Hotel (Stavanger, Norway, 2011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Door (Tallinn, 2009) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Red and green CA. --A.Savin 11:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Fixed (or improved)--Godot13 20:06, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Better, but there are still CA. If you have the raw file, you could filter them out using the converter. --A.Savin 13:15, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Found raw, new image uploaded, some improvement, not sure...--Godot13 07:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)  Support OK now. --A.Savin 11:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament Building (Budapest, Hungary) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Godot13 21:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Löwendenkmal - The Lion Monument (Lucerne) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some blue fringing - maybe could be desaturated? Mattbuck 23:34, 4 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Is it better?--Godot13 21:37, 5 March 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 21:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thatched-roof in the Maldive Islands 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop a bit tight, and sharpness on the low side. Improvable ?--Jebulon 23:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Unfortunately this is all the space this image has...I may have something different. Thanks anyway--Godot13 21:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Could you sharpen it? It would be QI then for me. Mattbuck 23:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Light sharpening--Godot13 23:28, 10 March 2013 (UTC) good to me. Mattbuck 00:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US-$10-LT-1901-Fr.114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The edges are very jagged - fixable. Otherwise, very good.--Óðinn 18:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Fixed-Godot13 05:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Much better --Óðinn 07:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cranes outside the Port of Bremerhaven (2009) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but it seems to be CW tilted. --Selbymay 07:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Slight tilt applied-Godot13 02:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC) It makes me feel seasick personally, and feels tilted, but I can't find anything to back up that assessment, so ok. Mattbuck 10:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Aerial 00-Negev-Makhtesh Ramon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 06:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Makhtesh Ramon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock & Chain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots on the right side, otherwise QI imo.--ArildV 19:15, 7 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Fixed, thanks--Godot13 00:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Support--ArildV 07:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Makhtesh Ramon 02 (Ibex).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a bit CA --Rjcastillo 02:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)  Support Fine with me. --Iifar 06:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC) CA reduced--Godot13 14:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Tel Aviv 01-Reading Power Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:38, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Tel Aviv 02-Aviv Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 08-Al-Bahr Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok regarding sharpness --Poco a poco 07:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 09-Al-Bahr Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 13-Mahmoudiya Mosque.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 09:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 21-Fishing boats.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (even if I wonder if we need this size of file for a single shot like this). --Selbymay 09:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 20-Saint Nicholas Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good image, but cut better to me. imho. See note. --Rjcastillo 01:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Your comment makes sense, thanks--Godot13 01:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 23-Sailboats.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Aerial 21-Masada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Rjcastillo 04:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Aerial 08-Negev-Phosphate Plant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but ok --Poco a poco 07:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 25-St. Peter's Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think there's a slight clockwise tilt, and I'd also suggest a crop. Mattbuck 11:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC) Both  Done. Thanks--Godot13 19:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 12:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 10-Al-Bahr Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good qual., looks analogue to me? --A.Savin 09:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Aerial 09-Negev-Serpentine Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Aerial 06-Negev.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest, Hungary (2011) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather soft at the top. Mattbuck 17:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)  Not done Mattbuck 23:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC) I had completely missed this one/your comment. Will attempt to fix today...--Godot13 16:50, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Fixed It's better, but it may not be enough...--Godot13 22:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 22:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Images

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crane in the Port of Tallinn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I suggest focusing the subject on: "Crane in the Port of Tallinn". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the direction-Godot13 (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Port cranes in Estonia to Crane in the Port of Tallinn --Godot13 (talk) 17:43, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panthera pardus (African leopard), drinking.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good scope and good shoot --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of George V in Westminster.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 19:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-31E, landing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panthera leo krugeri (White Transvaal lion), grooming.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful no problem for me: All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:20, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Makhtesh Ramon, Aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reading Power Station, Tel Aviv, Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masada, Northern Palace, Upper Terrace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 02:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The Suez Canal Bridge.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The Suez Canal Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Images (Banknotes)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Small Type, Legal Tender, Series 1928.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Small Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1953.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:07, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Legal Tender, Series 1863.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me. I think it would be useful to make a gallery for images promoted in this caterogry.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

• Gallery made--Godot13 (talk) 00:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1899.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me. I think it would be useful to make a gallery for images promoted in this caterogry --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:53, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$2 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1896.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$1 United States Banknote, Small Type, Legal Tender, Series 1928.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$2 United States Banknote, Small Type, Legal Tender, Series 1928.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$0.50 U.S. Fractional Currency, Third Issue, $0.50.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 01:10, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$0.03 U.S. Fractional Currency, First Issue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:44, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$10 United States Banknotes, Large Type, Legal Tender, Series 1901.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued image This image has been assessed under the valued image criteria and is considered the most valued image on Commons within the scope: $1 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1891. You can see its nomination here.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$2 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1886.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:32, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$50 United States Banknote, Large Type, Legal Tender, Series 1880.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$0.50 U.S. Fractional Currency, Fourth Issue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1886.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1891.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$0.10 U.S. Fractional Currency, First Issue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$0.50 U.S. Fractional Currency, First Issue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albert Gallatin, Signature.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Please read the discussion under the "Jefferson's siganture" nomination. I think it is the same here...--Jebulon (talk) 10:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

• As with the Jefferson check, cropping the signature removes all historical context, in my opinion...--Godot13 (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support, too. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thomas Jefferson, Signature.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment I think File:Thomas Jefferson Signature.svg is better.--Paris 16 (talk) 07:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment A signature on a document is much more valuable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

• In addition, this is a check made out to himself (signed twice) while he was the President of the United States (04 March 1801 to 04 March 1809). File:Thomas Jefferson Signature.svg is a tracing made of a signature.--Godot13 (talk) 08:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment - I prefer the actual signature than the tracing. The actual signature shows stress points and gives idea of flow as well. But for being useful and thus valuable, i would prefer a cropped image that shows only his signature. That way it can be used in infoboxes. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I tend to agree with §§Dharmadhyaksha§§. We need both the check, as an unique and very interesting document with a high historical value, and a crop of the signature, which should "fit" better with the scope IMO. And I agree with Archaeo and nominator: a real signature is much more valuable than a tracing. For this scope, I'll support a crop.--Jebulon (talk) 10:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment If necessary I will come up with a better scope. To crop this signature is to delete very important context: that the signature was made while Jefferson served as President. In my opinion, it takes what can be a valued image and turns it into just another signature image.--Godot13 (talk) 18:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support with context. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:25, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Quite silly to have two completely different formatted scopes for to similar cases. Please fix this one.  B.p. 21:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Signatures of Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Jefferson, Signature --Godot13 (talk) 01:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support With adapted scope.  B.p. 05:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Idem --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support traditional scope format. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Per others.--Jebulon (talk) 17:23, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Jebulon (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1923.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$2 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1899.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The reverse is aligned by design, not margins.--Godot13 (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$1 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1886.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$1 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1899.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$1 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1923.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$2 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1899.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Silver Certificate, Series 1896.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Treasury Note, Series 1890.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$5 United States Banknote, Large Type, Treasury Note, Series 1891.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$0.05 U.S. Fractional Currency, First Issue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$0.25 U.S. Fractional Currency, First Issue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set (Banknotes)

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Hawaii overprint banknotes.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Hawaii overprint banknotes.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: North Africa series.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
North Africa series.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Demand Notes .

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Demand Notes .
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit bright IMO. Mattbuck 23:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC) Fixed--Godot13 16:47, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 11:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: United States Fractional Currency, Complete Type Set.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
United States Fractional Currency, Complete Type Set.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Masada Northern Palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parliament Building (Budapest, Hungary) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Christian Ferrer 05:24, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Have you tried a another crop (see my suggestion)? --Tuxyso 06:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Crop applied, better, thanks--Godot13 15:37, 6 May 2013 (UTC) Much better. --Tuxyso 14:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock & Chain 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EISCAT Satellite (Spitsbergen, Svalbard).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Aerial-Mount of Olives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice light, QI imo. --Laitche 21:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount of Olives Jewish Cemetery (Aerial view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I suggest to add "Aerial View" in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, done.-Godot13 (talk) 19:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Vyšehrad-Saints Peter and Paul (portal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Astronomical clock face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:08, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prague Astronomical Clock (Face).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : complete and clear view, good crop, high res. : best in rich scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 12:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul (Vyšehrad) (Portal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Vyšehrad cemetery arcade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and colours. Pymouss 21:04, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-View from Charles Bridge of Smetana Museum & Water Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, although it could be brigther --Poco a poco 08:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Vyšehrad-Saints Peter and Paul.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 13:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Street performers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent--Jebulon 10:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saints Peter and Paul (Vyšehrad), East (rear) view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Agree with nomination's reason. Useful in Wikipedia. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 19:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vyšehrad Cemetery, Arcade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Avdat (SE side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 17-Jaffa Clock Tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jaffa viewed from Tel Aviv.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Agree with your nomination - best in scope. Halavar (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skylines of Jerusalem.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met (good, but no Very high resolution :) )--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Czech-2013-Prague-Astronomical clock face.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Czech-2013-Prague-Astronomical clock face.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Avdat, The southern villa, arches..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Peter's Church, Jaffa, main façade (SE side).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skylines of Tel Aviv-Yafo, from Jaffa/Yafo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Al-Khidr.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cannons in Jaffa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Featured Picture Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Israel-2013-Aerial-Mount of Olives.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Israel-2013-Aerial-Mount of Olives.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mar Saba, Aerial view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. (I took the liberty of adding "from SW" to the scope according to the geocode. Correct , please, if I'm wrong.) --JLPC (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Ein Avdat 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and high quality. --NorbertNagel 19:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of Al-Nahawiyyah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palestine-2013-Aerial-Mar Saba Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a very nice and valuable picture, but borderline with respect to QI criteria. You better try to nominate it as valuable image (VI). --NorbertNagel 11:40, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Comment appreciated, could you please let me know in which area(s) it is borderline for QI? Thanks-Godot13 08:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC) The slightly darker regions in the lower and lower left part of the image. --NorbertNagel 18:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Small exposure correction has lightened some areas slightly.-Godot13 21:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC) Well, the darker areas weren't too dark but just slightly noisy. However, considering the high resolution, this is not a big issue. I'll better promote before you further reduce the contrast of your image. :-) --NorbertNagel 18:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Al-Nahawiyyah, NE side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Temple Mount and Western Wall, Aerial view, SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prague Castle at dusk, SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Yusuf, Northern view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of Yusuf 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Myrabella 08:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$10 United States banknote, Silver Certificate, Series 1878, Countersigned by A.U. Wyman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sabil Suleiman (Mahmoudiya Mosque).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A National American Woman Suffrage Association cheque, handwritten by association treasurer Harriet Taylor Upton with autograph countersignatures of Susan B. Anthony and Alice Stone Blackwell..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Or you can chager the scope for "National American Woman Suffrage Association check". Or you can put this picture competition four times with a scope by autograph. It's possible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:22, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 Comment My concern with putting it up four times is that would be four separate promotions for the same image. Please let me know what you think of the ALT proposed scope...-Godot13 (talk) 17:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment The alternative scope, seems to me perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, scope changed.-Godot13 (talk) 07:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Susan B. Anthony, signature on cheque; Alice Stone Blackwell, signature on cheque; Harriet Taylor Upton, handwritten cheque; National American Woman Suffrage Association, cheque. to A National American Woman Suffrage Association cheque, handwritten by association treasurer Harriet Taylor Upton with autograph countersignatures of Susan B. Anthony and Alice Stone Blackwell --Godot13 (talk) 07:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Quincy Adams, signed check.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! US-$5-SC-1899-Fr.271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good qualiy.--ArildV 06:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock & Chain 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock & Chain 02.jpg/2 has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 05:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benjamin Franklin, signed check.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ulysses S. Grant, signed check.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa-Port Entrance House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrew Jackson, signed check.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arbeit macht frei, Theresienstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Al-Khalili (Temple Mount), SE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Moses (Temple Mount), North view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Terezin-Theresienstadt-Arbeit macht frei.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Theresienstadt-Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of Al-Khidr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Subject is ok --Christian Ferrer 15:26, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-View from Charles Bridge of Prague Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the dust spots.--XRay 11:28, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Away from home, will do ASAP. Done Thanks-Godot13 08:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Comment still 2 dust spots (see notice) --P e z i 16:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks.-Godot13 21:10, 18 October 2013 (UTC) Tilted on the right, CA. Mattbuck 15:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)  Done tilt corrected, can not find CA...-Godot13 10:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Tagged. Mattbuck 19:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC). Thanks Mattbuck, yellow CA removed.-Godot13 20:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC) I think I'd have gone for less sky and water, but ok. Mattbuck 18:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Vyšehrad-Statue of San Sebastian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Church of Our Lady in front of Týn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 08:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Theresienstadt concentration camp.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Theresienstadt concentration camp.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Theresienstadt-Block A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (several soft dust spots in the sky - please remove). --NorbertNagel 19:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Municipal House (West corner door).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Quality IMO (perhaps the shadows are a bit dark, but it's really good)--Lmbuga 19:39, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Vyšehrad-Tomb of Julius Mařák.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theresienstadt concentration camp, Holocaust memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vyšehrad Cemetery, Tomb of Břetislav Benda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues of Saint Sebastian in Prague, Vyšehrad Fortress..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Too wide scope and wrong categorization of image. I moved your image to the proper categories. Now you should change the scope. I think the best name would be "Statue of Saint Sebastian in Vyšehrad Fortress in Prague".
Changed above, thanks.-Godot13 (talk) 00:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)  Support Great. Now, all criteria met. Halavar (talk) 02:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Aqsa Mosque, Southern exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Islamic Museum (Temple Mount), entrance sign.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Yusuf Agha, Southern exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: US Federal Reserve Bank Note (FRBN) type set (by denomination)..

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
US Federal Reserve Bank Note (FRBN) type set (by denomination)..
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jaffa 20-Saint Nicholas Monastery-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive size but not sharp in full resolution and there is some red CA at the upper right. I promote, if you remove the CA. Optionally you may also reduce the resolution by about 20% to get a really sharp image in full resolution. --NorbertNagel 18:29, 7 November 2013 (UTC) Both  Done.-Godot13 17:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prague Municipal House, Door, West corner..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Joseph (New Town, Prague), Painting, exterior (over main entrance)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St Nicholas of Old Town in Prague, Portal (SW exposure/entrance)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:45, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Vyšehrad-Tomb of Rod Jana Kolare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicolas Monastery in Jaffa, Northern exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaque marking the corner of Franz Kafka Square, and the birthplace of Franz Kafka..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
James Madison, signed check..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-View from the Charles Bridge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Theresienstadt-Special housing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
$10,000 banknote, Small Size, Gold Certificate, Series 1934..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock-Detail 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock-Detail 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Town Hall-Old Town-Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:US-$10000-GC-1934-Fr.2412.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:US-$10000-GC-1934-Fr.2412.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Theresienstadt-Entrance to cells 27 and 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lichtenstein Palace, Prague, NE Exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Public lighting lamp-post in Hradčanské Square, Prague, female figure detail..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
James Garfield, Signed check.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 23:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Benjamin Harrison, Signed check.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 23:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of the Dome of Rock, Jerusalem.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013(2)-Tel Aviv-Hassan Bek Mosque 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Gas lamp at Prague Castle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need add scope --The Photographer 17:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)  Done-Godot13 04:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Well done --The Photographer 12:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Jacob Astor, signed check..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leland Stanford, signed check..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Czech-2013-Prague-Vyšehrad-Tomb of Břetislav Benda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Rock-Detail 01.jpg

Congarts. It's FP in Hebrew. Tomer T (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks Tomer T!-Godot13 (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Congratulation too

C3% A9dia: Accueil_principal You're on the front page of Wikipedia France.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. It would be the big money... ;-) --Godot13 (talk) 06:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Henry Clay, signed check..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Alone in scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
James Fenimore Cooper, signed check..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of the Chain, southern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. Halavar (talk) 10:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of the Chain, dome interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of the Chain, Mihrab.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Halavar (talk) 10:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013(2)-Aerial-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Temple Mount (south exposure).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013(2)-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Chain (south exposure).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 05:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Aqsa Mosque, NE exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Shouln't we make a MVIC when there is already a VI (File:Jerusalem Al-Aqsa Mosque BW 2010-09-21 06-38-12.JPG from nearly the same view and overlaping scope? --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment - You are correct. It has been set up.-Godot13 (talk) 16:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Hard choice, because both images are very good. But I support this one because is more recent and it has better colors for me. Halavar (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Better lighting and much higher resolution. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Israel-2013(2)-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Chain (south exposure).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Israel-2013(2)-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Dome of the Chain (south exposure).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Israel-2013(2)-Aerial-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Temple Mount (south exposure).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Israel-2013(2)-Aerial-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Temple Mount (south exposure).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
République Française Banknote, 1792 Issue, 400 Livres..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Very interesting. Yann (talk) 09:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Banque Royale Banknote, 1720 First Issue, 100 Livres Tournois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Very interesting. Yann (talk) 09:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Banque Royale Banknote, 1720 Second Issue, 10 Livres Tournois..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domaines Nationaux Banknote, 1791 Third Issue, 5 Livres..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Too bad we do not see a side. It would reduce the scope to "anterior side", or near term I do not know use.
 Comment There is nothing on the back, they are all one-sided, otherwise I would have shown both.-Godot13 (talk) 06:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
République Française Banknote, 1793 First Issue, 125 Livres..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
République Française Banknote, 1795 Franc Issue, 1,000 Francs..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013(2)-Jerusalem-View of the Dome of the Rock & Temple Mount 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments After reviewing again I came to the conclusion that it is ok --Poco a poco 14:12, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domaines Nationaux Banknote, 1790 Issue, 100 Livres..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:34, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
République Française Banknote, 1793 First Issue, 250 Livres..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
République Française Banknote, 1794 Issue, 500 Livres..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Israel-2013-Jerusalem-Temple Mount-Al-Aqsa Mosque (NE exposure).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)