User talk:MarkusHagenlocher
Lupinenfoto
[edit]Servus! Wenn das Bild Image:Lupinen Samenstand.jpg aus Deutschland stammt, kann das nur Lupinus polyphyllus sein. Kannst du diese Vermutung über die Herkunft bestätigen? Dann könnten wir das Bild gleich in den entsprechenden Artikel einbauen. Grüße --Franz Xaver 00:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ja, stimmmt. Das Bild stammt aus Deutschland. -- MarkusHagenlocher 20:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Danke, ich hab das Bild jetzt bei Lupinus polyphyllus eingebaut. --Franz Xaver 21:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Photo permission
[edit]Hello, I would like to contact you about permission to use one of your photographs from Wikimedia Commons in a book I am working on. Please contact me at jkwalton5@gmail.com at your earliest convenience. Thank you.
- Hello, which image do you want to use in your book? -- MarkusHagenlocher 09:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Repy to photo permission response
[edit]I am interested in your photo of triticum duram and wish to use it twice. I would need non-exclusive world rights in all languages for both print and digital formats. Certainly you will be given credit in the work for your photo. If you are willing, please let me know how you would like the photo credit to read. My publisher requires this because the work in which your photograph would be used will be under copyright. You retain rights to your photo. You may contact us at jkwalton5@gmail.com. Thank you for considering our request. John Walton
Image deletion warning | Image:Moleskins.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Nard 00:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Ritter Sport Halbbitter.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Jodo (talk) 20:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Ritter_Sport_Halbbitter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-Nard the Bard 20:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
File tagging File:BeBox.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:BeBox.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:BeBox.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
MBisanz talk 07:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Sun-1.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Sun-1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sun-1.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
MBisanz talk 07:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Frostriß.jpg is uncategorized since 24 June 2009.
- Image:DietrichBrandis.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Apfelblutlaus Schnittwunde.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Agrotron TTV620.jpg was uncategorized on 15 September 2009.
- Image:Traktor New Holland T9060.JPG was uncategorized on 15 September 2009.
- Image:Bag-in-box Apfel.jpg was uncategorized on 17 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Verwendung Ihres Bildes "Düngestreuer"
[edit]Ich habe Ihr Bild „Düngestreuer“ auf entdeckt und würde es gerne zur Veröffetnlichung im Netz verwenden. Ich betreibe gemeinsam mit meinem Vater eine Online Wissens-Plattform zum Thema Technik im Obst- und Weinbau (www.obstwein-technik.eu) und bin im Zuge der Weiterentwicklung der Plattform nach repräsentativen Bildern für unsere Produktgruppen / Hauptkategorien (bsp. Arbeitssicherheit, Kulturschutz, etc.) im Technikkatalog http://www.obstwein-technik.eu/Home/Product/19
Ihr Bild Düngestreuer wäreperfekt für die Kategorie Dünger. Da das Thema Urheberrecht sehr komplex ist und ich mir unsicher bin,schreibe ich Sie gleich direkt an. Meine Fragen: 1. Dürfen wir Ihr Bild für die Präsentation im Internet ohne zeitlicheBegrenzung verwenden? 2. Was sind die Bedingungen? 3. Dürfen wir das Bild gegebenenfalls auch bearbeiten, entfremden?
Das Bild würde auf der Startseite des Technikkataloges erscheinen.
Ich freue mich von Ihnen zu hören!
Liebe Grüße und herzlichen Dank! Regina Lind - regina.lind[at]obstwein-technik.eu
- Sehr geehrte Frau Lind, ich möchte dieses Bild unter keine gesonderten Lizenzbedingungen zu Nutzung freigeben. Sie dürfen es gerne unter den hier veröffentlichten Bedingungen nutzen (siehe Seite File:Düngerstreuer.jpg). -- MarkusHagenlocher (talk) 16:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Herzlichen DANK! Regina Lind
Äpfel
[edit]Hallo Markus, ich sehe, dass Du Dich offensichtlich mit Äpfeln auskennst. Ich habe aktuell einige fotografiert, die ich nicht bestimmen kann. Ist aufgrund eines Fotos (ohne Infos über Fruchtfleisch und Kerngehäuse) eine Bestimmung möglich? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- Allein aufgrund ddes Aussehens der Frucht eine Sorte zu bestimmen ist überaus schwer, wenn nicht gar unmöglich. Wenn du keine weiteren Infos über die jeweiligen Äpfel hast, wird es wohl nicht möglich sein. -- MarkusHagenlocher (talk) 12:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für die Info, das hatte ich schon befürchtet. Dann müssen sie leider unbestimmt bleiben, denn Äpfel stibitzen für enzyklopädische Zwecke - da hätten wohl die jeweiligen Eigentümer der Bäume (und Äpfel) mit Recht etwas dagegen. ;-) Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Vielleicht können dir ja die Eigentümer weiterhelfen und sagen, welche Sorten du da fotografiert hast. -- MarkusHagenlocher (talk) 09:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Leider nicht - die Äpfel sind oft "Zukunftsbekanntschaften" auf dem Weg. In den seltenen Fällen, in denen ich Eigentümer ausfindig machen und fragen konnte: warum 99 Prozent nicht wissen, was für einen Apfelbaum sie im Garten, auf dem Grundstück stehen haben - das werde ich wohl in diesem Leben nicht mehr verstehen! ;-) Aber danke für Deine Mühe! --4028mdk09 (talk) 09:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Vielleicht können dir ja die Eigentümer weiterhelfen und sagen, welche Sorten du da fotografiert hast. -- MarkusHagenlocher (talk) 09:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Danke für die Info, das hatte ich schon befürchtet. Dann müssen sie leider unbestimmt bleiben, denn Äpfel stibitzen für enzyklopädische Zwecke - da hätten wohl die jeweiligen Eigentümer der Bäume (und Äpfel) mit Recht etwas dagegen. ;-) Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 12:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Masttrafo.jpg location?
[edit]Hello! I want to know about it's location for moving to specific category. Thanks! Dmitry G (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- This one is located in Baden-Württemberg. -- MarkusHagenlocher (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Dexheimer_370.jpg
[edit]Hallo Markus, hast du zufällig ein Baujahr von diesem Traktor, denn ich vermute, wenn ich die Vorderachse betrachte, dass es sich bereits um eine SC-Ausführung handelt. Die Vorderachse sieht eher nach einer Devon aus, als nach einer Hurth 954. Leider wurde der Zusatz SC nicht immer der Beschriftung der Motorhaube berücksichtigt. Gibt es noch weiter technische Daten zu diesem Traktor? (-- Ubraxa (talk) 19:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC))
- Hallo Ubraxa, ich habe leider auch keine genauere Informationen zu diesem Traktor. Das Bild stammt von einem Oltimer-Traktoren-Treffen, wie man auch an dem Zettel, der in der Schibe hängt sehen kann, auf dem als Typ nur 370 und Hersteller eben Dexheimer angegeben war. --MarkusHagenlocher (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Danke …
[edit]… mal so zwischendurch für Deine vielen guten Fotos (hab gerade die beiden Logset-Bilder entdeckt) :-) --:bdk: 19:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Kollege!
[edit]Hi Markus,
da entdecke ich grade, dass wir beide nicht nur eine Leidenschaft für die Essensfotografie haben, sondern auch noch dieselben Teller in unserem Bestand ;-) File:Gaisburger Marsch.jpg File:Linsen_und_Spätzla01.jpg
Grüßle, --Schwäbin (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Alte Abbildung von der FLORI
[edit]Hallo Herr Hagenlocher,
könnten Sie die Abbildung der FLORI durch unsere neue PICO ersetzen? Ich hab keine Ahnung, wie man das hier im Wiki macht, und würde Ihnen gerne eine aktuelle Abbildung zukommen lassen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen Petra Spandl MESTO Sprühgeräte
File:Bag-in-box Apfel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cake7545 (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
File:Jedlikanyos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:BeOS PR2.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BeOS PR2.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |