User talk:Moeng
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Filnik 22:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Moeng,
I'd like to use this picture on nl:Tijdlijn van de Kredietcrisis, which lists the main events of the global credit crisis. However, you ask for your name to be mentioned in the caption, which, as fas as I know, is not normally required when using other people's pictures in Wikipedia articles. I'm quite willing to do it, but I just thought I'd check whether you would also like it to be done in this context. By the way, do I understand correctly that the gist of the message is something like "we've got a new owner, but don't worry, we're operating normally"? Regards, MartinD (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi talk ... You may use it as you like. It is not meant for interwiki-context, it is meant for external use ... but thank you for asking !! ... kind regards ... -- Moeng (talk) 07:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi again MartinD (talk) ... I forgot your other question ... The whole translation is: "Roskilde Bank continues with new owners - The National Bank and The Private Saving Trust are the new owners of Roskilde Bank. The new situation means that the National Bank wil be the main shareholder. The Bank will continue as before, and continue with bank-business as usual. Agreement You may have with the bank is still valid, like they were before 24th August 2008. You shall be served as you always have been. Read more on our homepage www.roskildebank.dk" - Roskilde Bank was the 10th largest bank in Denmark, but have made too many and too big and too risky credit agreement to some very big customers. The loss until now might be as big as 1 billion Euro. It it the first bank overtake by The Danish National Bank since 1928. ... -- Moeng (talk) 07:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I'll add the pic to our article. As to 1 billion euros of losses: I work in finance, and you get used to them... According to Bloomberg, the total losses at banks (so excluding pension funds, insurance companies and private persons) stands as 500 billion dollars. It's just a figure, not a number anymore. Best regards, MartinD (talk) 09:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 15:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- The upload has been corrected, ... thanks ... --Moeng (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Exterior- Gateway View.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
JovianEye (talk) 06:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Helle-Thorning-Schmidt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Obotlig (talk) 06:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- I apologise for any confusion over this and have responded on my own talk page. Obotlig (talk) 03:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Obotlig - I have responded on your talk page ... have a good day from --Moeng (talk) 08:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
File:5-Dimensionel Pavillon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fnielsen (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Mughal Historical Map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Question about File:Arion-lusitanicus Spanish-slug.jpg
[edit]File:Arion-lusitanicus Spanish-slug.jpg Is this a photo of the Spanish slug (Arion vulgaris) or Portuguese slug (Arion lusitanicus)? It's a good photo by the way. Brightgalrs (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your name on some previous Danish DR and so would like to invite you to give your opinion at this one, which affects a number of photos of this popular tourist attraction. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 15:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Skift af titel på billede på Wikipedia
[edit]Kære Mogens
Dit flotte billede af Det Gule Palæ i Roskilde på Wikipedia kommer op som noget af første, når folk googler Museet for Samtidskunst. Det er også et godt billede! :-) Men siden slutningen af 2021 er museet fraflyttet det Gule Palæ, så det er lidt ærgerligt, da især udenlandske turister, kan blive lidt forvirrede. Derfor: kan du hjælpe mig med at ændre titlen på dit Wikipedia-billede? Det skal nok hedde noget i stil med Roskilde Royal Mansion eller Roskilde Palæ. Vi ville i så fald blive rigtig glade på museet. Der findes i øvrigt en wikipediaside for Roskilde Palæ, som det måske kan tilknyttes.
Det er dette billede, det drejer sig om: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Museum_of_Contemporary_Art,_Roskilde.jpg
Rigtig god dag :-) Vh Amanda Museet for Samtidskunst i Roskilde (talk) 10:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hej Amanda Museet for Samtidskunst i Roskilde (talk) -- Tak for din mail, selvfølgelig skal navnet da rettes, og jeg burde selv have opdaget det tidligere. Jeg har lavet en navneændringsanmodning, og det sker formentlig ganske hurtigt. -- Venlig hilsen Mogens -- --Moeng (talk) 11:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Neel Mukherjee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Hdiw8wuiw.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)