An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court to determine and delineate several questions concerning administrative procedure in Social Security disability cases. Among the questions considered was the propriety of using physicians' written reports generated from medical examinations of a disability claimant, and whether these could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under the Social Security Act.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court to determine and delineate several questions concerning administrative procedure in Social Security disability cases. Among the questions considered was the propriety of using physicians' written reports generated from medical examinations of a disability claimant, and whether these could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under the Social Security Act. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 10819825 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 46251 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1030720326 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-01-13 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1971 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • Richardson v. Perales, (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-03 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1971 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Douglas (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Perales (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • Dr. Leavitt's interpretation of the medical data was acceptable evidence in an agency hearing, even if it would have been inadmissible under rules of evidence applicable to court procedure. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Black, Brennan (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Burger, Harlan, Stewart, White, Marshall (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 556, Social Security Act (en)
dbp:litigants
  • Richardson v. Perales (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Blackmun (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 389 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 402 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971), was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court to determine and delineate several questions concerning administrative procedure in Social Security disability cases. Among the questions considered was the propriety of using physicians' written reports generated from medical examinations of a disability claimant, and whether these could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding nondisability under the Social Security Act. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Richardson v. Perales (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Perales (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License