Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:14:25.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constraint characteristics and type synthesis of two families of 1T2R parallel mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2022

Yongjian Ju Open the ORCID record for Yongjian Ju [Opens in a new window] ,
Weisheng Xu ,
Gang Meng  and
Yi Cao
Yongjian Ju
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Weisheng Xu
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Gang Meng
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Yi Cao*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: caoyi@jiangnan.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

PU- and P*U*-equivalent parallel mechanisms (PMs) are critical families of PMs with one translational and two rotational (1T2R) degree of freedoms and have always been a research hotspot among lower mobility PMs. However, researches on these two families of PMs remain to be inadequate, and existing types are few and uncomprehensive. In this study, first, general wrench systems of PU-equivalent are derived based on virtual-chain approach and screw theory, revealing its constraint characteristics under general configuration. Cause of one parasitic motion is put forward and general wrench systems of P*U*-equivalent PMs with one parasitic motion are obtained. In addition, constraint analysis has been carried out to figure out constraint characteristics of P*U*-equivalent PMs with three parasitic motions. Second, branch chains are divided by generating constraints, and their structures are synthesized based on the presented rules. Then, the process for type synthesis of PU-equivalent PMs and P*U*-equivalent PMs and a series of novel 1T2R PMs are attained based on this. Finally, a novel PU-equivalent PM, 2PRU-PRUPc, and a novel P*U*-equivalent PM with one parasitic motion, 2PRU-PUU PM, are analyzed, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed type synthesis method.

Keywords

1T2Rparallel mechanismsconstraint characteristicsscrew theorytype synthesisparasitic motion
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 40 , Issue 9 , September 2022 , pp. 3033 - 3056
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Xu, Y. D., Zhao, Y., Yue, Y., Xi, F. F., Yao, J. T. and Zhao, Y. S., “Type synthesis of overconstrained 2R1T parallel mechanisms with the fewest kinematic joints based on the ultimate constrain wrenches,” Mech. Mach. Theory 147, 103766 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, J., “Articulated tool head,” Patent 6431802, USA (2002).Google Scholar
Neumann, K. E., “Robot,” Patent 4732525, USA (1988).Google Scholar
Bi, Z. M. and Jin, Y., “Kinematic modeling of Exechon parallel kinematic machine,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27(1), 186–193 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, T., Li, M., Zhao, X. M., Mei, J. P., Chetwynd, D. G. and Hu, J. S., “Conceptual design and dimensional synthesis for a 3-DOF module of the TriVariant-a novel 5-DOF reconfigurable hybrid robot,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 21(3), 449–456 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, T., Song, Y. M., Li, Y. G. and Zhang, J., “Workspace decomposition based dimensional synthesis of a novel hybrid reconfigurable robot,” J. Mech. Robot. 2(3), 191–220 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. G., Liu, H. T., Zhao, X. M., Huang, T. and Chetwynd, D. G., “Design of a 3-DOF PKM module for large structural component machining,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45(6), 941–954 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, X. W. and Gosselin, C. M., “Advances in Robot Kinematics,” In: Type Synthesis of Three-DOF UP-Equivalent Parallel Manipulators Using a Virtual-Chain Approach (J. Lenarcic and B. Roth, eds.) (Springer, Netherlands, 2006) pp. 123–132.Google Scholar
Li, Q. C., Chai, X. X. and Chen, Q. H., “Review on 2R1T 3-DOF parallel mechanisms,” China. Sci. Bull. 62(14), 1507–1519 (2017).Google Scholar
Xu, Y. D., Tong, S. S., Wang, B., Ju, Z. J., Yao, J. T. and Zhao, Y. S., “Application of 2RPU-UPR parallel mechanism in antenna support,” China Mech. Eng. (Chin. Ed.) 30(14), 1748–1755 (2019).Google Scholar
Xie, F. G., Liu, X. J. and Wang, J. S., “A 3-DOF parallel manufacturing module and its kinematic optimization,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 28(3), 334–343 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, F. G., Liu, X. J. and Li, T. M., “Type synthesis and t ypical application of 1T2R-type parallel robotic mechanisms,” Math. Probl. Eng. 10(1), 497–504 (2013).Google Scholar
Carretero, J. A., Nahon, M. A., Buckham, B. and Gosselin, C. M., “Kinematic analysis of a three-dof parallel mechanism for telescope applications,” ASME Design Technical Conference, Sacramento, USA (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, N. A., Nahon, M. A. and Gosselin, C. M., “Motion simulation capabilities of 3-DOFs flight simulators,” Aircraft 35(1), 9–17 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J. J., Hu, Y. D., Bi, S. S. and Zong, G. H., “Kinematics feature analysis of a 3 DOF in-parallel compliant mechanism for micro manipulation,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 17(1), 127–131 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, K. H., “Structural kinematics of in-parallel-actuated robot-arms,” J. Mech. Transmiss. Automat. Des 105, 705–712 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretero, J. A., Podhorodeski, R. P., Nahon, M. A. and Gosselin, C. M., “Kinematic analysis and optimization of a new three degree-of-freedom spatial parallel manipulator,” J. Mech. Design 122(1), 17–24 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, M. S., Shiau, T. N., Tsai, Y. J. and Chang, T. H., “Direct kinematic analysis of a 3-PRS parallel manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 38(1), 71–83 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlet, J. P., “Micro parallel robot MIPS for medical applications,” 8th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Antibes-Juan les Pins, France (October 2001, vol. 2) pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Wang, J. and Fang, Y. F., “Analysis of instantan eous motions of deficient-rank 3-RPS parallel manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 37(2), 229–240 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Z., Tao, W. and Fang, Y. F., “Study on the kinematic characteristics of 3 DOF in-parallel actuated platform mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 31(8), 9 99–1007 (1996).Google Scholar
Li, Q. C., Chen, Q. H., Wu, C. Y. and Huang, Z., “Geomet rical distribution of rotational axes of 3-[P][S]parallel mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 65(7), 46–57 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q. C. and Hervé, J. M., “1T2R parallel mechanisms without parasitic motion,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 26(3), 401–410 (2010).Google Scholar
Li, Q. C., Chen, Z., Chen, Q. H., Wu, C. Y. and Hu, X. D., “Parasitic motion comparison of 3-PRS parallel mechanism with different limb arrangements,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27(2), 389–396 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, T. and Huo, X. M., “Type synthesis of 1T2R parallel mechanisms with parasitic motions,” Mech. Mach. Theory 128(10), 412–428 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, C. X., Liu, H. Z. and Zhang, Y. B., “Type synthe sis of 2T2R, 1T2R and 2R parallel mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 61(3), 184–190 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y. M., Han, P. P. and Wang, P. F., “Type synthesis of 1T2R and 2R1T parallel mechanisms employing conformal geometric algebra,” Mech. Mach. Theory 121(3), 475–486 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. D., Zhang, D. S., Yao, J. T. and Zhao, Y. S., “Type synthesis of the 2R1T parallel mechanism with two continuous rotational axes and study on the principle of its motion decoupling,” Mech. Mach. Theory 108(2), 27–40 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J. F., Fan, X. M. and Ding, H. F., “Investigation of a novel 2R1T parallel mechanism and construction of its variants,” Robotica 39(10), 1834–1848 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, F. G., Liu, X. J. and Li, T. M., “A comparison study on the orientation capability and parasitic motions of two novel articu lated tool heads with parallel kinematics,” Adv. Mech. Eng. 5(6), 249103 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, S., Pinto, C., Altuzarra, O. and Mikel, D., “Analys is of the 2PRU-1PRS 3DOF parallel manipulator: kinematics, singularities and dynamics,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 51(6), 63–72 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. P., Xu, H. Y., Guan, L. W. and Zhi, Y., “A novel 3-PUU parallel mechanism and its kinematic issues,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 42(12), 86–102 (2016).Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Zhao, Y. S. and Zhao, T. S., Advanced Spatial Mechanism (Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2014).Google Scholar