In the frame of the ESA’s ARTES5.2 and FLPP-Phase 3 programs, Airbus DS-Crisa and FiberSensing are developing a Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) – based temperature monitoring system for application in space telecommunication platforms and launchers. The development encompasses both the interrogation unit and the FBG temperature sensors and associated fiber harness. In parallel Airbus DS - Crisa is developing a modular RTU (RTU2015) to provide maximum flexibility and mission-customization capability for RTUs maintaining the ESA’s standards at I/O interface level [1]. In this context, the FBG interrogation unit is designed as a module to be compatible, in both physical dimensions and electrical interfaces aspects, with the Electrical Internal Interface Bus of the RTU2015, thus providing the capability for a hybrid electrical and optical monitoring system. |
I.INTRODUCTIONFiber Optic Sensor (FOS) technology presents long recognized advantages which enable to mitigate deficient performance of conventional technology in hazard-environments common in spacecraft monitoring applications, such as: multiplexing capability, immunity to EMI/RFI, remote monitoring, small size and weight, electrical insulation, intrinsically safe operation, high sensibility and long term reliability. A key advantage is also the potential reduction of Assembly Integration and Testing (AIT) time achieved by the multiplexing capability and associated reduced harness. In the frame of the ESA’s ARTES5.2 and FLPP-Phase 3 programs, Airbus DS-Crisa and FiberSensing are developing a Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) – based temperature monitoring system for application in space telecommunication platforms and launchers. The development encompasses both the interrogation unit and the FBG temperature sensors and associated fiber harness. In parallel Airbus DS - Crisa is developing a modular RTU (RTU2015) to provide maximum flexibility and mission-customization capability for RTUs maintaining the ESA’s standards at I/O interface level [1]. In this context, the FBG interrogation unit is designed as a module to be compatible, in both physical dimensions and electrical interfaces aspects, with the Electrical Internal Interface Bus of the RTU2015, thus providing the capability for a hybrid electrical and optical monitoring system. II.FBG INTERROGATORThe FBG interrogator (Interrogation Unit, IU) is the opto-electronic unit that is in charge of illuminating the fiber and of identifying the reflected wavelengths and converting them into the physical parameters to be measured (e.g. temperature). The IU also provides the communication interface required to transmit the acquired parameters to the TM sub-system (TMSS). A.Interrogation unit architectureThe interrogation unit uses a FiberSensing proprietary tunable laser to sweep a broad spectral range (100nm from 1500 to 1600nm), covering all the design wavelengths of the sensors multiplexed along the same fiber. The equipment has multiple redundant optical channels (up to 6), enabling the simultaneous addressing of up-to 120 sensors. Each channel includes an independent protection against single-point failure of the associated fiber. The functional diagram of the interrogation unit is depicted in Figure 1. As already stated, the FBG interrogation unit is being designed as a module for Crisa’s RTU2015, and thus target form factor and interfaces of the unit are compatible, in both physical dimensions and electrical interfaces aspects, with the Electrical Internal Interface Bus of the Modular RTU. The FOS module contains the electronic components in one section and the electro-optical/optical components in a different section, taking the space of two slots of the RTU. The mechanical layout of the module is shown in Figure 2. The key elements of the IU are:
B.Technical featuresThe presented architecture of the IU features 6 optical channels, with up to 20 temperature sensors on each one for a total of 120 sensors. However, the architecture can be expanded easily to accommodate more channels if required, depending only on the system requirements (number of sensors and physical / electrical constraints), since each channel is acquired independently and in parallel (simultaneously) with the other channels. 8 channels is seen as a practical limit for the chosen version of the FPGA and the specifications imposed by the RTU2015. Each fiber channel is provided with protection to a single-point fiber failure. The full set of sensors is swept in 100ms (10Hz). The acquired parameters are stored, each one with its associated timestamp indicating the moment of the acquisition with an accuracy of 1µsec and can be transmitted to the system in the same time. Target wavelength accuracy of the system is ±2pm. Calibration data for the sensors is stored internally in the unit, allowing the possibility to have either a common calibration curve for each type of sensor or independent calibration curve for each individual sensor for improved accuracy. Also, the unit is capable of addressing any FBG based sensor, and thus other type of parameters (such as strain, acceleration or pressure) are also addressable with this equipment. The operating temperature for the IU is the same as for the RTU2015: -35°C to +60°C. Typical power consumption is around 12.3W. However, this value may be as low as 10.8W depending on the actual temperature of the unit, since an important amount of power (1.5W) is dedicated to the thermal control of the SOA device, which must operate at an internal temperature of 20°C in order to avoid performance degradation over time. The IU uses two slots in the RTU2015, and thus the dimensions are 160 × 233.5 × 52 mm3 (double eurocard format). Total mass of the IU is 1200 g. These features are summarized in Table 1. Table 1.Interrogation unit key features III.FBG TEMPERATURE SENSORThe FBG temperature sensors are fully dielectric and have a very small form factor (20 × 6.35 × 2mm) and low weight (1gr), while ensuring proper strain decoupling and robust handling. Sensors have been designed to operate in the -196 to 125°C range. Figure 4 shows the sensor response down to liquid nitrogen temperature and the sensor sensitivity (computed as the derivative of the second order fitting of the sensor response). Although FBG sensors are well known to have decreased sensitivities on low temperatures [3], the current design provides a 2,2pm/°C sensitivity at -200°C, which considering wavelength accuracy of 2pm yields accuracy better than ±1°C. Although sensors are provided with individual calibration formulas, these sensors can be employed over the -55 to 125°C range using a common lookup table for all sensors on each wavelength band, while maintaining an accuracy of±1°C. If individual calibration formulas are used, accuracy over the -55 to 125°C range is improved to 0.2°C. Regarding strain cross-sensitivity, the sensors were attached to an aluminum plate using both aluminium and kapton tape and using 3M Scotch-Weld 2216 adhesive. In all cases, the recorded response was identical to that of the loose sensors, thus proving proper strain decoupling. Mechanical tests have been performed on the sensor, showing fiber pulling tension in excess of 6.5N and output bending radius lower than 10mm. Response time constant has been measured to be 4 seconds. IV.QUALIFICATION OF PHOTONIC PARTSIn order to reach TRL5 on the technologies used in this development, some critical optical components have undergone a pre-qualification test campaign. Couplers, isolators, photodiodes and connectors are optical parts used normally in space developments, so they have not been targeted for this test campaign. For the rest of optical components, critical parameters have been identified for this application, and they have been monitored during mechanical, thermal and radiation tests. The components tested in the campaign and the associated parameters are shown in the next table: Table 2.Testing parameters The test conditions are:
The next table summarizes the test results: Table 3.Summary of testing results The SOA tests are being run at the time of edition of this paper. The tested VOA is a COTS version. It is suitable for launcher applications, whereas for satellite applications a Radiation Hardened version exists. V.FOLLOWING STEPSThe present implementation aims to reach TRL5 for all components and technologies involved with the inclusion of the FOS demonstrator in the AvionicX prototype and the tests on the RTU2015 unit. Present: a laboratory prototype has been built and used to validate the architecture, achieving target accuracy. Testing of critical optical components is being finalized. September 2014: First complete IU prototype + FBG sensor arrays manufactured and ready for testing October 2014: IU + FBG sensors tested (TRB) Q1 2015: Validation of FOS IU within the RTU2015. VII.CONCLUSIONSA complete FBG temperature monitoring subsystem for application in telecom satellites and launchers is being developed to be integrated as part of a Modular RTU with the capability to provide hybrid electrical-optical measurements. The system is currently in the prototyping phase (Engineering Model) and will undergo testing in Q4 2014 and Q1 2015. The developed FOS module can interrogate up to 120 temperature sensors distributed in 6 optical fibers, providing redundancy to single point fiber failure on each channel. Target accuracy is ±2pm with a 10S/s sampling rate. The developed sensor exhibits a very low weight and small form factor (comparable with standard thermistors), while providing a mechanically robust design (low bending radius at the sensor outputs and high fiber pulling strength) and ensuring strain decoupling. Good sensor operation on the -200 to125°C range has already been demonstrated. REFERENCESJ. Ortiz, J. Goyanes, G. Magistrati,
“RTU2015: standardizing the remote interface units,”
Data Systems In Aerospace (DASIA) 2013,
(2013). Google Scholar
J.M. Carnicer, S. Elvira, J. Sánchez,
“Space serial bus for applications based on multiple low-cost & low-resources devices,”
Data Systems In Aerospace (DASIA) 2013,
(2012). Google Scholar
T. Habisreuther, W. Ecke, I. Latka, K. Schröder, R. Willsch,
“Fiber Optic Bragg Grating Sensors at Cryogenic Temperatures,”
in Proc. SPIE,
7653
(2010). Google Scholar
|