Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:35:53.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field deployment of a portable X-ray diffraction/X-ray flourescence instrument on Mars analog terrain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

P. Sarrazin ,
D. Blake ,
S. Feldman ,
S. Chipera ,
D. Vaniman  and
D. Bish
P. Sarrazin*
Affiliation:
inXitu, P.O. Box 730, Mountain View, California 94042
D. Blake
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, MS 239-4, Moffett Field, California 94035
S. Feldman
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, MS 239-4, Moffett Field, California 94035
S. Chipera
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS D469, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
D. Vaniman
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS D469, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
D. Bish
Affiliation:
Indiana University, 1001 E 10th Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405
*
a)Electronic mail: psarrazin@inxitu.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

CheMin is a miniature X-ray diffraction/X-ray fluorescence instrument that is included in the payload of the Mars 2009 Mars Science Laboratory mission. A portable CheMin prototype was built to test the capability of the instrument for remote in situ mineralogical characterization of geological materials. The instrument was successfully deployed at a variety of Mars analog sites in Death Valley, CA, in May 2004.

Type
XRD Instrumentation and Techniques
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 128 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, A. K. et al. (1976). “Mineralogic and petrologic implications of Viking geochemical results from Mars: Interim report,” Science SCIEAS 194, 1288–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banin, A. et al. (1997). “Acidic volatiles and the Mars soil,” J. Geophys. Res. [Planets] 102, 13341–13356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. F. et al. (2000). “Mineralogic and compositional properties of the Martian soil and dust: Results from Mars Pathfinder,” J. Geophys. Res., [Planets] JGREA2 105, 1721–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, D. and Post, J. (1993). “Quantitative mineralogical analysis using the Rietveld full-pattern fitting method,” Am. Mineral. AMMIAY 78, 932–942.Google Scholar
Blake, D. F. et al. (2000). “Remote X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence analysis on planetary surfaces,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. AXRAAA 43, 487–496.Google Scholar
Blake, D. F. et al. (1992). “Design of an X-ray diffraction/X-ray fluorescence instrument for planetary applications,” Lun. Planet. Sci. Conf. XXIII, 117–118.Google Scholar
Blake, D. F. et al. (1994). “A mineralogical instrument for planetary applications,” Lun. Planet. Sci. Conf. XXV, 121–122.Google Scholar
Chipera, S. J. and Bish, D. L. (2002). “FULLPAT: A full-pattern quantitative analysis program for X-ray powder diffraction using measured and calculated patterns,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 35, 744–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Details of the program can be found at the following web address: http://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/reports/.Google Scholar
Feldman, W. C. et al. (2003). “The global distribution of near-surface hydrogen on Mars,” Sixth International Conference On Mars, abstract #3218, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
Fisk, M. R., and Giovannoni, S. J. (1999). “Sources of nutrients and energy for a deep biosphere on Mars,” J. Geophys. Res. 104, 11805–11815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, R. A. (2004). “A wet early Mares seen in salty deposits,” Science SCIEAS 303, 1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MER Rover web site: http://www.ipl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/.Google Scholar
Sarrazin, P. (2004). “Vibrating sample holder for XRD analysis with minimal sample preparation,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. AXRAAA 48.Google Scholar
Sarrazin, P. et al. (1998). “A miniature XRD/XRF Instrument for in situ characterization of Martian soils and rocks,” J. Phys. IV JPICEI 8, 465–470.Google Scholar
Sherman, J. (1955). “Theoretical derivation of fluorescent X-ray intensities form mixtures,” Spectrochim. Acta SPACA5 10.1016/0371-1951(55)80081-1 7, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaniman, D. et al. (1998). “Landed XRD/XRF analysis of prime targets in the search for past or present Martian life,” J. Geophys. Res. 103, 477–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed