Next Article in Journal
Bioactive Insecticides from Chemometric Diverse Ant-Associated Symbionts Streptomyces novaecaesareae and Streptomyces nojiriensis against the Fall Armyworm Larvae
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring and Detection of Insecticide Resistance in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Evidence for Field-Evolved Resistance in Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Biology, Impact, and Management of Xyleborus Beetles: A Comprehensive Review

by
Sared Helena Rodríguez-Becerra
1,
Rafael Vázquez-Rivera
1,2,
Karla Irazú Ventura-Hernández
1,3,
Tushar Janardan Pawar
1,* and
José Luis Olivares-Romero
1,*
1
Red de Estudios Moleculares Avanzados, Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351, Xalapa 91073, Veracruz, Mexico
2
Facultad de Química Farmacéutica Biológica, Universidad Veracruzana, Circuito Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán s/n, Zona Universitaria, Xalapa 91090, Veracruz, Mexico
3
Instituto de Química Aplicada, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. Luis Castelazo Ayala s/n, Col. Industrial-Animas, Xalapa 91190, Veracruz, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(9), 706; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090706
Submission received: 9 August 2024 / Revised: 11 September 2024 / Accepted: 13 September 2024 / Published: 17 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Xyleborus beetles are tiny insects that impact forests and agriculture. These beetles burrow into trees and crops, causing damage that affects both the environment and the economy. This review aims to provide a clear understanding of the biology and behavior of Xyleborus beetles, including their life cycle, habitat, and feeding habits. We also discuss the various methods currently used to manage and control these pests, such as chemical treatments, biological controls, and integrated pest management strategies. By highlighting recent scientific advancements and identifying future research needs, this review offers insights for researchers, farmers, and policymakers. Understanding and effectively managing Xyleborus beetles is crucial for protecting our forests and agricultural resources, ultimately benefiting society by reducing economic losses and preserving ecological balance.

Abstract

Xyleborus beetles, a diverse group of ambrosia beetles, present challenges to forestry and agriculture due to their damaging burrowing behavior and symbiotic relationships with fungi. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the biology, ecology, and management of Xyleborus. We explore the beetles’ life cycle, reproductive strategies, habitat preferences, and feeding habits, emphasizing their ecological and economic impacts. Control and management strategies, including preventive measures, chemical and biological control, and integrated pest management (IPM), are critically evaluated. Recent advances in molecular genetics and behavioral studies offer insights into genetic diversity, population structure, and host selection mechanisms. Despite progress, managing Xyleborus effectively remains challenging. This review identifies future research needs and highlights innovative control methods, such as biopesticides and pheromone-based trapping systems.

1. Introduction

The genus Xyleborus is a group of ambrosia beetles belonging to the subfamily Scolytinae within the family Curculionidae. These beetles are known for their unique symbiotic relationships with fungi, which they cultivate within the galleries they bore into wood. This mutualistic association is a defining characteristic of ambrosia beetles, distinguishing them from other bark beetles that primarily feed on the phloem of trees. The name “ambrosia” refers to the fungal “gardens” these beetles create and tend, which serve as their primary food source. The denomination of “bark beetle” originates from the fact that many species feed on the inner bark (phloem) layer of trees. However, this subfamily also includes numerous species with different lifestyles, such as those that bore into wood, feed on fruits and seeds, or tunnel into herbaceous plants [1]. This intricate interaction has ecological and economic implications, making Xyleborus a key subject of study in both forestry and agriculture [2,3]. Xyleborus is a genus of beetles classified under the domain Eukaryota and belongs to the kingdom Animalia. It is part of the phylum Arthropoda, which encloses animals with jointed limbs and exoskeletons. Within the class, Insecta, Xyleborus is categorized under the order Coleoptera, commonly known as beetles. This genus is specifically part of the family Curculionidae, which includes weevils and belongs to the subfamily Scolytinae, known for bark beetles. The tribe Xyleborini contains the genus Xyleborus, which is recognized for its wood-boring behavior.
The study of Xyleborus dates to the early 19th century when entomologists first began to document the diversity and behavior of bark and ambrosia beetles [4]. Over the decades, extensive research has been conducted to understand their taxonomy, life cycles, and the intricate relationships they maintain with their fungal symbionts. Early work focused primarily on identifying species and describing their morphological traits, but advancements in molecular biology and genetics have since revolutionized our understanding of these beetles. The ability to sequence DNA and analyze genetic material has provided deeper insights into the evolutionary relationships among Xyleborus species and their symbiotic fungi [5,6,7].
The study of Xyleborus beetles is crucial due to their ecological and economic impacts. These beetles are notorious for their ability to infest a wide range of host plants, including economically relevant timber and fruit trees [2,3,5]. Their burrowing activity can cause damage, leading to reduced wood quality, decreased crop yields, and even tree mortality. This not only results in economic losses for forestry and agricultural industries but also affects ecosystem stability and biodiversity [8]. The symbiotic relationship between Xyleborus beetles and their fungal partners adds another layer of complexity. The fungi cultivated by these beetles can be pathogenic to plants, exacerbating the damage caused by the beetles themselves [7]. Understanding the dynamics of this relationship is crucial for developing effective control measures.
Despite their destructive potential, Xyleborus beetles also play important roles in their natural ecosystems. As decomposers, they contribute to the breakdown of dead and dying wood, facilitating nutrient cycling and promoting forest health. Their galleries provide habitats for other organisms, including fungi, bacteria, and other invertebrates. This intricate web of interactions underscores the importance of a balanced perspective when studying Xyleborus beetles. Although they can be pests in managed environments, they also fulfill essential ecological functions in natural settings [9,10,11,12].
The economic impact of Xyleborus beetles is severe, particularly in regions where forestry and agriculture are major economic drivers. In the forestry sector, infestations can lead to losses in timber quality and quantity [13,14]. Beetle-infested wood often suffers from staining and structural damage, reducing its market value. In extreme cases, large-scale infestations can necessitate costly management interventions, including tree removal and replacement. In agriculture, Xyleborus beetles pose a threat to fruit trees and other crops [11]. For example, infestations in avocado and mango plantations can lead to reduced yields and increased production costs [15,16]. The global trade in these commodities means that infestations can have far-reaching economic consequences, affecting not only local producers but also international markets.
Effective management of Xyleborus beetles requires a multifaceted approach. Preventive measures, such as monitoring and early detection, are critical for managing infestations before they become unmanageable [17,18,19]. Chemical treatments, while effective in some cases, must be used judiciously to minimize environmental impact and the development of resistance [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Biological control methods, including the use of natural predators and entomopathogenic fungi, offer promising alternatives to chemical treatments [26]. Integrated pest management (IPM) strategies, which combine multiple control methods, are increasingly being recognized as the most effective approach for sustainable management [27].
Recent advances in molecular genetics have opened new avenues for research on Xyleborus beetles. Techniques such as DNA barcoding and genome sequencing are providing detailed insights into the genetic diversity and population structure of these beetles [5,28,29]. Behavioral studies are shedding light on their mating and dispersal strategies, while innovative control methods, such as pheromone-based trapping systems, are being developed [15,19,30,31,32]. Despite these advances, challenges remain. The complexity of Xyleborus biology and their interactions with symbiotic fungi means that there is still much to learn. Future research needs to focus on understanding these interactions in greater detail, as well as developing more sustainable and ecologically sound management practices.
This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the current knowledge on Xyleborus beetles, with a focus on their biology, ecological roles, and the challenges they pose to forestry and agriculture. The objectives are to describe the biology and ecology of Xyleborus beetles, evaluate their economic and ecological impact, critically assess current control and management strategies, highlight recent advances in Xyleborus research, and identify future research needs. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying future research needs, this review aims to provide a comprehensive resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. Effective management of Xyleborus beetles will not only mitigate economic losses but also contribute to the health and stability of forest ecosystems.

2. Biology and Ecology of Xyleborus

2.1. Life Cycle and Reproduction

The life cycle and reproduction of Xyleborus beetles involve the construction of galleries, fungal inoculation, larval development, and adult dispersal (Figure 1). Their reproductive strategy is characterized by inbreeding and a close symbiotic relationship with fungi, which are critical for their survival and success [33].

2.1.1. Host Tree Selection

Most ambrosia beetles colonize stressed, weakened, dying, and dead trees [17], using olfactory signals (mainly ethanol) [34] and visual cues in their search for suitable hosts for colonization and reproduction. These beetles are attracted to trees with larger stem diameters [35]. It is still not entirely clear why some ambrosia beetles, such as X. glabratus, infest healthy trees. It has been observed that this beetle is attracted to volatile compounds produced by Lauraceae, such as α-copaene and calamenene, and that it attacks smaller stems [19,36,37].
In an experiment conducted by Martini et al., it was observed how the volatile compounds generated by Persea palustris, inoculated with R. lauricola, play an important role in the attraction and repulsion of X. glabratus to the plant. In three days after infection, X. glabratus is repelled by infected leaf odors due to an increase in methyl salicylate, a known behavioral repellent. However, at 10 and 20 days, the beetles are more attracted to the infected leaf odors compared to non-infected plants. This increased attraction is associated with a rise in sesquiterpenes and aldehydes in the leaf volatiles [38]. Additionally, compounds such as eucalyptol, cubeb, and α-copaene, which are known attractants, are present in higher amounts in infected leaves during these later stages [39,40]. These changes in volatile profiles are linked to the activation of the salicylic acid pathway by the fungal infection, which initially increases methyl salicylate release and later alters other volatile emissions, thereby impacting X. glabratus behavior [38].

2.1.2. Egg Laying and Gallery Construction

This life cycle of Xyleborus beetles begins when a female selects a suitable host tree and starts to bore into the wood to construct a gallery system. These galleries are intricately designed tunnels that serve as both a breeding site and a nursery for the fungal symbionts. The female beetle uses her mandibles to chew through the wood, creating a network of tunnels. She lays her eggs in these galleries, which are strategically placed to optimize the growth of both the beetle larvae and the fungal garden [3,14].

2.1.3. Fungal Inoculation

A critical aspect of the gallery construction is the inoculation of the tunnels with fungal spores. Female Xyleborus beetles carry these spores in specialized structures called mycangia, which are located near their mandibles or in other parts of their bodies, depending on the species. As the female excavates the galleries, she releases these spores into the wood. The spores quickly germinate and proliferate within the moist, nutrient-rich environment of the galleries, forming a dense fungal mat [14,41].
Larvae grow by feeding on symbiotic fungi seeded by their mother, but during the pupal stage, the contents of their gut are emptied. Then, the naïve adults acquire their own symbionts through feeding [14,41].
Environmental factors such as climate type, host plant, microbes and their metabolism and arthropods have been observed to affect the fungal diversity within the mycangia of Xyleborus [30,42,43,44,45]. In general, it has been observed that Raffaelea species constitute the primary symbionts of these ambrosial beetles. However, species from the orders Hypocreales and Saccharomycetales have also been found, demonstrating a broad diversity within the mycangial communities [46]. A study conducted during the life cycle of X. affinis suggests that the yeasts and bacteria contained in the beetles’ microbiome are closely involved in the cultivation of filamentous fungi such as Raffaelea [44]. These studies indicate that further research is still poorly understood the biological mechanisms involved in these mutualistic relationships.

2.1.4. Larval Development

The eggs laid by the female beetle hatch into larvae, which are entirely dependent on the fungi for nourishment. The larvae feed on the growing fungal mycelium, which provides them with all the necessary nutrients for their development. This relationship is highly specialized, as the fungi break down complex wood polymers into simpler compounds that are easier for the larvae to digest. The larvae undergo several molts as they grow, eventually reaching the pupal stage within the safety of the gallery system [14,41].

2.1.5. Pupal Stage and Emergence

After completing their larval development, the beetle larvae enter the pupal stage. During this stage, they undergo metamorphosis, transforming into adult beetles. The pupal stage is a period of physiological and morphological changes, preparing the beetles for their life outside the galleries. Once metamorphosis is complete, the new adult beetles emerge from the pupal cases and continue to reside in the galleries until they are ready to disperse [2,3,14,41].

2.1.6. Reproductive Strategy and Inbreeding

One of the most notable features of Xyleborus beetles’ reproductive strategy is their reliance on inbreeding. The sex ratio within the galleries is heavily skewed towards females, with males being produced in much smaller numbers. Males are typically haploid and smaller than females. This skewed sex ratio facilitates brother–sister mating within the confined space of the galleries. The inbreeding strategy ensures that the fungal symbionts are passed on to the next generation without the need for the beetles to find new fungal partners, thus maintaining the stability of the mutualistic relationship [2,41].

2.1.7. Generational Overlap and Population Dynamics

Xyleborus beetles often exhibit overlapping generations within a single gallery system. This means that different life stages (eggs, larvae, pupae, and adults) can coexist within the same gallery. Most Xyleborus species like X. dispar, X. affinis, and X. glabratus reproduce by arrhenotokous parthenogenesis, where males are rare, and females can reproduce without fertilization. In this system, females produce unfertilized eggs that develop into males, while fertilized eggs develop into females. This allows them to maintain high populations even in the absence of males, contributing to their success as pests. The population dynamics of Xyleborus beetles are thus closely linked to the health and availability of their host trees, as well as the successful cultivation of their fungal symbionts [14,47,48,49].

2.1.8. Ecological and Evolutionary Implications

The reproductive strategies and life cycle of Xyleborus beetles have ecological and evolutionary implications. The reliance on inbreeding and the tight association with fungal symbionts have led to highly specialized and co-evolved relationships. These beetles have evolved to exploit a niche that is relatively inaccessible to other insects, giving them a competitive advantage. However, this specialization also makes them vulnerable to disruptions in their environment, such as the loss of suitable host trees or changes in the composition of their fungal partners [2,43].

2.2. Habitat and Distribution

The habitat and distribution of Xyleborus beetles are shaped by a combination of environmental factors, host tree availability, reproduction, and their symbiotic relationships with fungi. Their ability to adapt to various environments and colonize a wide range of tree species has facilitated their global distribution and, in some cases, their status as invasive pests, especially those beetle species that are capable of colonizing live trees [2,50,51].
Table 1 provides a compilation of the global distribution of Xyleborus species that affect economically important plants. Xyleborus beetles are distributed globally, with species occurring in a wide range of climatic zones, from tropical rainforests to temperate woodlands. They are particularly diverse and abundant in tropical and subtropical regions, where the warm and humid conditions favor the growth of their fungal symbionts and the decomposition of wood [2,3,48,52].
The habitat preferences of Xyleborus beetles are primarily influenced by the availability of suitable host trees and the presence of their symbiotic fungi [53]. These beetles typically inhabit forested areas, including both natural forests and managed plantations. They prefer environments where dead or dying trees are abundant, as these provide the ideal conditions for gallery construction and fungal growth [7,14,54].
Table 1. Distribution and fungal association of economically important Xyleborus.
Table 1. Distribution and fungal association of economically important Xyleborus.
Xyleborus
Species
Fungus-AssociatedAffected PlantsDistribution
Xyleborus affinisFusarium oxysporumArchidendron clypearia (Jack) Benth. [55,56]Global
[25,26,33,57,58,59,60]
Ceratocystis fimbriata Manguifera indica [2,61]
Raffaelea lauricola Persea americana
Persea borbonia
Persea palustris
Sassafras albidum
Lindera benzoin
Cinnamomum camphora
Xyleborus dispar Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Dutch elm disease Northern Europe
[62]
Xyleborus glabratus Raffaelea lauricola Persea americana
Persea borbonia
Persea palustris
Sassafras albidum
Lindera benzoin
Cinnamomum camphora
Asia, North America,
[9,36,63]
Xyleborus
bispinatus
Unknown Ficus carica L. Italy [64]
Raffaelea lauricola Persea americanaMexico [3,65,66]
Florida, USA [8,37]
Unknown Apate monachusIberian Peninsula [67]
Xyleborus
volvulus
Raffaelea lauricola Persea americanaFrom United States to South America. It is also found in Africa and Asia
[9,47,49,68]
Xyleborus
perforans
Fusarium parceramosumPinnus spp.America, Europe, and Australis
[69]
Fusarium aff. solani
Ophiostoma ips
Raffaelea deltoideospora
Sporothrix pseudoabietina
Xyleborus
ferrogineus
Ceratocystis cacaofunestaTheobroma cacao L. [51]Latin America and Africa
[60,69]

Invasive Species and Range Expansion

Several Xyleborus species have become invasive outside their native ranges, causing ecological and economic damage. These invasions are often facilitated by human activities, such as the global trade of timber and ornamental plants, which can inadvertently transport beetles and their fungal symbionts to new areas [42]. Once established in a new environment, invasive Xyleborus species can spread rapidly, infesting local tree populations and outcompeting native bark and ambrosia beetles.
One notable example is X. glabratus, which was introduced to the southeastern United States and has since spread throughout the region, causing widespread mortality in redbay and avocado trees due to laurel wilt disease, a condition caused by its fungal symbiont Raffaelea lauricola [52]. Similarly, X. similis has been reported in various countries outside its native range, affecting a wide range of tree species and contributing to ecological disruptions [42].
Another example is X. perforans, which has as sociated fungi such as Fusarium parceramosum, Fusarium aff. solani, Ophiostoma ips, Raffaelea deltoideospora, and Sporothrix pseudoabietina. These fungi affect Pinus spp. trees, causing economic and ecological impact [52].
Another study evaluates the potential invasion of the exotic Asian ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, in Mexico and the southern United States. Using ecological niche modeling and spatial multi-criteria evaluation, it identifies high-risk regions based on climate suitability, forest stress factors, and the presence of susceptible host species, primarily within the Lauraceae family. Interestingly, the results suggest that these beetles, which carry pathogenic fungi, pose a significant threat to both native and cultivated forest ecosystems, such as avocado crops [70].

2.3. Natural Enemies

The natural enemies of the Xyleborus beetles, which are part of the ambrosia beetle group, include a variety of predators, parasitoids, and pathogens. These natural enemies play a crucial role in controlling beetle populations in their natural habitats. Below is a list of some key natural enemies:
(a)
Predators
Clerid Beetles (Cleridae family): Species such as Thanasimus dubius are known predators of bark beetles, including Xyleborus. They actively hunt adult beetles and larvae in their galleries [71,72].
Ants (Formicidae family): Plagiolepis sp. is an indigenous predator of the coffee twig borer, Xylosandrus compactus, and shows potential as a biological control agent for this pest in Ugandan coffee plants [73].
(b)
Parasitoids
Braconid Wasps (Braconidae family): Parasitoid wasps like Dendrosoter sulcatus are known to parasitize the larvae of Xyleborus beetles. They lay eggs inside the beetle larvae, and the wasp larvae consume the beetle from within.
Eulophid Wasps (Eulophidae family): Some species within this family are known to parasitize ambrosia beetle larvae.
Pteromalid Wasps (Pteromalidae family): These wasps can parasitize various stages of Xyleborus beetles, primarily targeting the larvae within their galleries [74].
(c)
Pathogens
Fungal Pathogens (e.g., Beauveria bassiana): This entomopathogenic fungus infects and kills Xyleborus beetles, reducing their populations. It can be naturally present in the environment or applied as a biocontrol agent [9].
(d)
Nematodes: Certain species of nematodes, such as Steinernema and Heterorhabditis, can parasitize and kill Xyleborus beetles. They enter through natural openings and release bacteria that kill the beetles [75].
(e)
Woodpeckers: These birds can excavate infested wood to reach and feed on both adult Xyleborus beetles and their larvae. Woodpeckers are natural predators of many bark beetle species, including ambrosia beetles. For instance, particularly Three-toed Woodpeckers, play a role in regulating bark beetle populations in coniferous forest landscapes [76].

3. Economic and Ecological Impact

The redbay ambrosia beetle, X. glabratus, can affect the economy and ecology due to their role as a vector of plant pathogenic fungi, leading to damage to various tree species and crops. Their role as decomposers contributes to nutrient cycling and forest health, but their ability to infest healthy trees and introduce pathogenic fungi can lead to economic losses and ecological disruptions. Effective management strategies are essential to mitigate these impacts and protect both economic resources and ecosystem health [36,77].

3.1. Economic Impact

Xyleborus beetles have an economic impact, particularly in regions where forestry and agriculture are major economic drivers [78]. In the forestry sector, these beetles cause losses estimated at USD 1000/acre in orchards infested wood often suffers from structural damage and staining due to the fungal symbionts introduced by the beetles. This staining, commonly referred to as “ambrosia stain,” can reduce the market value of timber, even if the structural integrity remains intact. Additionally, severe infestations can lead to tree mortality, necessitating costly management interventions such as tree removal and replacement [2,3,19].
In the agricultural sector, Xyleborus beetles pose a threat to fruit trees and other crops. For example, the redbay ambrosia beetle, X. glabratus is a pest in avocado orchards in the southeastern United States. This beetle transmits the fungus R. lauricola, which causes laurel wilt, a disease that has led to extensive tree mortality in commercial avocado plantations. The economic losses associated with laurel wilt include reduced yields, increased management costs, and the loss of marketable fruit, which can have far-reaching impacts on the profitability of avocado production [47,79].
The economic impact of Xyleborus beetles, particularly through laurel wilt disease affecting the avocado industry, is serious. Annual potential sales losses in southern Florida’s avocado industry could reach up to USD 30 million, with 75% and 50% crop reductions leading to USD 22.5 million and USD 15 million in losses, respectively. Property values of avocado groves could plummet by about USD 326 million if all bearing trees are destroyed. Additionally, increased management and control costs, including prophylactic treatments and intensified monitoring, could raise annual expenses by approximately USD 4.5 million. Overall, the Florida avocado industry faces an estimated annual economic impact of around USD 100 million due to this disease [78,80,81].
Other crops impacted by ambrosia beetles and their associated fungi include citrus, grapevine, cacao, coffee, macadamia, peach, and tea. These beetles, by shifting from dead or declining trees to healthy ones, pose a threat to these crops, leading to decreased yields and increased management costs [18].
For example, X. ferrugineus is a species capable of infesting wood pieces stored in fields and sawmills, as well as piles of freshly cut and moist wood. It causes the death of apparently healthy trees by introducing fungi that cause vascular wilts, such as Ceratocystis fimbriata, which can lead to the death of cacao trees [69,82]. Similarly, X. affinis infests tropical woods and exhibits similar behavioral characteristics and effects, impacting cacao and mango crops and trees within the laurel family [16,60].
The global trade in timber and ornamental plants has facilitated the spread of Xyleborus beetles to new regions, where they can become invasive pests. Invasive Xyleborus species, such as X. glabratus and X. similis, have established populations outside their native ranges, causing economic damage to local forestry and agriculture industries. The introduction of these beetles often leads to increased management costs, including monitoring, quarantine measures, and chemical treatments to control their spread [50].

3.2. Ecological Impact

Invasive species of Xyleborus can alter the ecosystems they invade by competing with native species, modifying community structures, and spreading dangerous pathogens since they carry and cultivate fungus as a resource of food for their progeny [3]. Therefore, it is crucial to understand and manage these impacts to protect the biodiversity and integrity of affected ecosystems.
Invasive species of the genus Xyleborus have demonstrated impacts on the ecosystems they colonize. Scientific studies have documented how these species disperse intercontinental, negatively affecting local communities. Laurel Wilt Disease has extirpated populations of Lauraceae species across the southeastern United States, including Persea borbonia L. Spreng., Persea palustris Raf., Lindera benzoin (L.) Blume, Sassafras albidum (Nuttall) Nees, Persea americana Mill, affecting coastal lowland ecosystems from North Carolina to Texas [36,83,84]. These invasions can alter the composition of native communities and compete with native species for essential resources, resulting in decreased biodiversity and changes in ecosystem structure [85].
Additionally, a study about the potential invasion of exotic ambrosia beetles, such as Xyleborus glabratus, in various ecosystems used ecological niche models to predict their impacts. This study indicates that these beetles can establish themselves in a variety of habitats, spreading pathogens like the fungus R. lauricola, which causes the disease known as “laurel wilt.” This disease severely affects trees in the Lauraceae family, posing an ecological risk to these ecosystems [51].
Moreover, the fungi introduced by Xyleborus beetles can also affect the microbial communities within the infested trees. The fungal symbionts can outcompete native fungi and other microorganisms, leading to shifts in the microbial diversity of the wood. These changes can affect the decomposition processes and nutrient cycling within the forest ecosystem, further impacting the overall health and biodiversity of the forest [2,86].

3.3. Ecosystem Services

The activities of Xyleborus beetles can have both positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services. On the positive side, their role in the decomposition of dead wood contributes to nutrient cycling and soil formation, essential processes for maintaining forest productivity and health. Their burrowing activities create microhabitats that support a diverse array of organisms, enhancing ecosystem resilience. These services include carbon sequestration, air and water purification, climate regulation, and the provision of habitat for wildlife [86,87].
Moreover, the loss of these services due to disruptions caused by invasive beetles can have implications for both the environment and human well-being. The decomposition process facilitated by these beetles helps in nutrient cycling and soil formation, maintaining the productivity and health of forests [10]. Additionally, the creation of microhabitats by their burrowing activities supports biodiversity and ecosystem resilience, contributing to essential services like carbon sequestration and climate regulation [11].
Understanding and managing the impact of Xyleborus beetles is crucial to preserving these vital ecosystem functions and mitigating the broader environmental and societal consequences of their activities.

4. Control and Management Strategies

4.1. Preventive Measures

Preventive measures methods focus on minimizing the conditions favorable for Xyleborus glabratus establishment and spread. Removing and properly disposing of infested plant material is crucial. Sanitation practices, such as chipping and burning infected wood, help reduce beetle populations and prevent disease spread. Additionally, maintaining tree health through proper irrigation and fertilization can make trees less susceptible to beetle attacks. Practices such as removing infested trees and destroying them promptly can significantly reduce the spread of laurel wilt [58,88].
Understanding the host selection behavior of X. glabratus is crucial for developing effective management strategies. Studies have shown that X. glabratus uses the diameter of the host tree’s stem as a visual cue to select its host. Beetles are more likely to infest trees with larger diameters, indicating that tree size is an important factor in host selection [53]. With the knowledge of these preferences, it is possible to develop management strategies that target high-risk trees. Effective management of X. glabratus requires diligent monitoring and early detection. Continuous surveillance programs are essential in areas with established populations and regions at risk of infestation. Trap-based monitoring systems using lure-baited traps can detect beetle presence before the onset of laurel wilt symptoms in host trees [89].
Various types of lures have been tested, including those based on manuka oil, phoebe oil, cubeb oil, and α-copaene, derived from different botanical sources. Manuka oil, extracted from the New Zealand tea tree (Leptospermum scoparium), and phoebe oil, derived from Brazilian walnut (Phoebe porosa), have been effective in attracting beetles. Cubeb oil, derived from the cubeb pepper plant (Piper cubeba), and α-copaene, a sesquiterpene found in various plants, are particularly potent attractants. Cubeb oil and α-copaene traps have demonstrated higher capture rates of X. glabratus, making them favorable for monitoring programs [90,91].
Additionally, studies have been conducted using volatile substances from different sources. Volatile compounds from the leaves of redbay (Persea borbonia) have been found to attract X. glabratus, highlighting the role of host plant volatiles in beetle behavior [92]. Research has also shown that volatile organic compounds produced by the laurel wilt pathogen, Raffaelea lauricola, can attract X. glabratus, suggesting a symbiotic relationship between the beetle and the fungus [53]. Regular monitoring using these lures allows for timely intervention and the implementation of control measures to prevent further spread.
Experiments comparing the attraction of X. glabratus to avocado wood and litchi wood demonstrated that the beetle is more attracted to litchi wood. This increased attraction is attributed to the higher content of α-copaene in litchi wood compared to avocado wood. This finding underscores the importance of α-copaene in the beetle’s host selection process and provides insights for developing more effective lures [92,93].
Studies have also explored the use of eucalyptol as a lure. Field trials demonstrated that traps baited with eucalyptol captured significant numbers of X. glabratus, underscoring the compound’s attractiveness to the beetle. This is particularly relevant for avocado trees, as variations in eucalyptol content among different avocado cultivars may influence their susceptibility to the beetle. Some varieties of avocado might have higher eucalyptol levels, making them more attractive to X. glabratus and thereby more susceptible to infestation and subsequent laurel wilt infection [39,91].

4.2. Chemical Control

Chemical control involves the use of insecticides and fungicides to protect high-value trees from Xyleborus glabratus and laurel wilt. Preventive treatments with systemic insecticides like bifenthrin and permethrin have shown effectiveness in reducing beetle populations and preventing new infestations [94]. Fungicide treatments, particularly with propiconazole, have demonstrated efficacy in protecting trees from laurel wilt when applied through root flare injections. However, these treatments require regular reapplication and may not be feasible on a large scale due to cost and potential environmental impacts [95].
Recent studies have been focused on evaluating possible repellents for X. glabratus. Cloonan et. al. (2023) compared the performance of Piperitone to that of the known repellent verbenone to assess its potential as a cost-effective alternative. Piperitone showed significant repellent effects against X. glabratus, comparable to verbenone, but at potentially lower costs. The study suggests that piperitone could be an effective tool for integrated pest management (IPM) programs aimed at controlling X. glabratus and managing laurel wilt [96].
Due to most of the beetle population being found within infected trees, insecticides have shown little effectiveness in controlling the pest. However, it is important to apply these insecticides around the trunks of infected trees to prevent their movement. Malathion, Danitol® (fenpropathrin, Bayer, S.A., Santiago, Chile), and Epi-merk® (abamectin, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA) are the most used insecticides. There are also adjuvants like NuFilm® (Miller Chemical, Atlanta, GA, USA) that improve the efficacy of the insecticides [97]. Additionally, there are studies on insecticides that have been evaluated in combinations, such as zeta-cypermethrin + bifenthrin and lambda-cyhalothrin + thiamethoxam, which provides useful tools for integrated pest management strategies [94]. However, the variable effectiveness of other insecticides highlights the need for further research and the development of more robust control measures.
Our research group is also working on chemical control strategies to mitigate the risks posed by Xyleborus species, specifically through the development of chiral nitroguanidine-based compounds. These compounds have shown promise in targeting these beetles, aiming to enhance the efficacy of pest control methods while minimizing environmental impact [21,22,23,98,99].

4.3. Biological Control

Biological control methods are being explored to manage Xyleborus glabratus populations. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) such as Beauveria bassiana and Isaria fumosorosea, have shown promise in laboratory and field trials by causing significant mortality in beetle populations [58]. Research is ongoing to optimize delivery methods and assess the long-term effectiveness of these biological agents in various environmental conditions. Additionally, biological control agents, such as parasitoids and predators, are being investigated for their potential to reduce beetle populations naturally [96].
Research has shown that several strains of Beauveria bassiana infect more than 12 species of bark beetles, indicating its broad-spectrum potential. Moreover, field studies have demonstrated that B. bassiana and Metarhizium brunneum can significantly reduce beetle populations, suggesting that these fungi could be integrated into pest management programs for X. glabratus [88].
In addition to these studies, research on Xyleborus affinis, a closely related species, has provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of Beauveria bassiana as a biological control agent. This study highlighted that B. bassiana not only caused significant mortality in X. affinis but also exhibited potential for horizontal transmission among beetle populations. The findings suggest that similar strategies could be effective against X. glabratus, offering a broader application of EPF in managing ambrosia beetles [88].
A study by Peña et al. (2013) highlighted the role of predators and parasitoids associated with Scolytinae in Persea species in both Florida and Taiwan. Predators identified included species from the families Laemophloeidae, Staphylinidae, Zopheridae, and Monotomidae, while parasitoids from the families Braconidae, Eulophidae, Pteromalidae, Encyrtidae, Eupelmidae, and Bethylidae were also found. Notably, in the context of X. glabratus, Bethylidae, Braconidae, Encyrtidae (possibly Closterocerus sp.), and Scelionidae were observed emerging from infested wood [100].
The development of host resistance through breeding programs is a critical long-term strategy. Efforts are underway to identify and propagate tree genotypes that exhibit resistance to laurel wilt. Preliminary studies have identified red bay and swamp bay clones with tolerance to the disease, and these clones are being evaluated in field trials [29]. Conservation and propagation of resistant germplasm are essential components of integrated management strategies. Resistant varieties of avocado and other lauraceous hosts are being developed to provide long-term solutions for managing laurel wilt [101].

4.4. Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

An Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach combines multiple control methods to manage X. glabratus and laurel wilt effectively. IPM strategies include monitoring and scouting, sanitation, chemical, and biological control, and the development of resistant host plants. Public education and outreach are also vital to prevent the spread of the beetle and disease through human activities, such as the movement of infested firewood. IPM emphasizes the integration of these methods to achieve sustainable and effective management while minimizing environmental impact [102].
These beneficial effects of applying IPM strategies have been observed in other pests caused by ambrosia beetles. Trypodendron lineatum (striped ambrosia beetle), is a significant pest in British Columbia’s forest industry. The IPM program for ambrosia beetles in British Columbia began in 1981, with the cornerstone being the use of semiochemical-based mass trapping, particularly for T. lineatum [103]. This program was developed as an alternative to the previous reliance on chemical insecticides, such as DDT and lindane, which were phased out due to environmental concerns. Despite the initial costs of setting up and maintaining these traps, the long-term savings and reduction in pest damage have proven the IPM strategy to be cost-effective [104]. Additionally, the environmental benefits of reducing chemical pesticide use have added value to this approach.
In Sri Lanka, tea plants (Camellia sinensis) were affected by Xyleborus fornicatus, and various IPM techniques such as biological control, cultural practices, mechanical control, and the judicious use of chemical pesticides were employed for the management of X. fornicatus [105]. Selection and planting of tea cultivars that are either resistant or tolerant to X. fornicatus is a primary strategy for control of X. fornicatus, also, proper pruning techniques and sanitation measures are critical in reducing the wood rot that can occur due to fractures and wounds induced by X. fornicatus. This includes removing affected wood and applying wound dressings to large prune cuts to prevent further damage [106].

5. Research and Advances

Recent years have witnessed advancements in the study of Xyleborus beetles, with an increasing number of research articles being published annually. This trend reflects the growing recognition of the ecological and economic impact of these beetles and the urgent need for effective management strategies. Figure 2 illustrates the surge in research activities over different periods, highlighting the accelerated pace of scientific inquiry into the biology, behavior, and control of Xyleborus beetles. The exponential growth in publications underscores the importance of continuous research to address the challenges posed by these pests and to develop sustainable solutions for their management.

5.1. Molecular and Genetic Studies

The genetic variability of X. glabratus populations across Asia was assessed using COI (mitochondrial DNA) and CAD (nuclear DNA) markers, revealing diverse genetic types and leading to the identification of two new species, X. insidiosus and X. mysticulus, based on phylogenetic and morphological data. Additionally, sexual dimorphism in mandible size and shape in X. affinis was linked to temperature-induced phenotypic variation, potentially impacting ecological activities like feeding. For X. principalis, gene sequence analysis showed significant variation in the COI gene (up to 14.2% divergence), but minimal variation in the 28S gene, with no geographic or consistent morphological patterns, indicating X. principalis is monophyletic but lacks consistent differentiation [5,6].

5.2. Behavioral Studies

X. affinis is one of the ambrosia beetle species potentially considered harmful. However, observations indicate that tunnel excavation, once the species is established in the trunk, is an exclusive task of the females, who extend the gallery where they live. The larvae, females, and adult males graze and feed on fungi that cover the gallery walls. In a blocking function, the females remain inactive to use their bodies to protect the tunnels. Activities related to nest care include grooming the nest and individuals, cultivating fungi, and caring for the brood. Cannibalism is an observed behavior where they feed on larvae, pupae, or dead adults to maintain hygiene in the nest [33].
In the galleries of X. bispinatus, eggs are laid, and the larvae feed on fungi cultivated by the females on the gallery walls. These same females are responsible for constructing the main and secondary tunnels. The length of these tunnels is related to the number of adults, suggesting that gallery extension is vital for available food. Laying eggs at the farthest ends of the galleries may represent an adaptation for optimal use of space and food resources. The founding females seem to keep the main gallery clear to allow it to be used as a corridor to manage ambrosia gardens, and care for the eggs, and larvae. In their symbiotic relationship with fungi, Raffaelea arxii and Raffaelea subfusca are the most prevalent and are cultivated in the galleries, as they are essential for the nutrition of larvae and adults [107].
Ambrosia beetles, such as X. affinis, engage in symbiotic mutualisms with fungi for nutritional purposes. The practice of fungal farming involves selecting beneficial fungi as the main food source, protecting these fungi from pathogens, and providing the necessary nutrients for their growth. Bacteria play an important role in the agricultural practices of ambrosia beetles, helping to defend fungal crops, fix atmospheric nitrogen, degrade plant biomass, and plant defenses. The metabolic capabilities of bacteria and yeasts are crucial for supporting the beetle-fungus agricultural symbiosis, especially in the early stages of gallery development. Bacteria and fungi provide essential nutrients that the beetles need for their development, influencing their behavior and reproductive success [44].

6. Future Directions

Xyleborus beetles, known for their symbiotic relationship with fungi, have a unique life cycle that allows them to thrive across diverse environments. This mutualism is integral to their survival, enabling rapid population growth and colonization of new areas. Their reproductive strategies and habitat preferences have been well-documented, with a particular focus on the impact of invasive species such as X. glabratus and X. similis. Recent research has also highlighted the economic and ecological damage caused by these beetles, particularly through the introduction of pathogenic fungi that disrupt forest ecosystems and agricultural productivity [78,80,97].
Despite advancements in understanding the biology and ecology of Xyleborus beetles, several critical gaps remain. The intricate relationship between beetles and their fungal symbionts poses challenges for developing targeted management strategies that do not adversely affect other ecosystem components. Furthermore, the rapid adaptation of invasive species in non-native regions underscores the need for more stringent quarantine and monitoring measures. Although there have been promising developments in chemical and biological control methods, there is still a need for optimized and sustainable Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies that can be adapted to different environmental conditions [42,98]. The spread of diseases like laurel wilt underscores the broader environmental implications of Xyleborus infestations. Effective management of these beetles requires an integrated approach that combines preventive measures, chemical control, biological control, and IPM strategies. Further exploration into the genetic diversity and population structure of Xyleborus beetles is crucial. Advanced molecular tools, such as DNA barcoding and genome sequencing, can deepen our understanding of beetle-fungal interactions and support the development of targeted biocontrol agents [5,6,29,108].
Investigating the behavioral ecology of Xyleborus beetles, particularly their host selection mechanisms and mating behaviors, will be essential for improving detection and control methods. Research on volatile organic compounds that influence beetle attraction and repulsion can lead to the development of more effective lures and repellents. There is a need for continued research into the integration of various control methods, including chemical, biological, and cultural approaches, into cohesive IPM strategies. Evaluating the effectiveness of these combined measures in different environmental contexts will help develop robust and adaptable IPM programs. Conservation of resistant tree genotypes and the development of breeding programs for disease-resistant varieties are critical for long-term management. Identifying and propagating resistant germplasm will provide sustainable solutions to mitigate the impact of Xyleborus beetles on forestry and agriculture. The ongoing threat posed by Xyleborus beetles necessitates continuous research and collaboration among scientists, policymakers, and industry stakeholders. By addressing the identified knowledge gaps and pursuing targeted research in the areas outlined above, it will be possible to develop more effective and sustainable management strategies. These efforts will be essential in mitigating the economic and ecological damage caused by these beetles while preserving forest ecosystems and ensuring agricultural productivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; methodology, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; software, S.H.R.-B. and T.J.P.; validation, S.H.R.-B., T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; formal analysis, S.H.R.-B., K.I.V.-H. and T.J.P.; investigation, S.H.R.-B., K.I.V.-H. and R.V.-R.; resources, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; data curation, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H.R.-B., K.I.V.-H., R.V.-R. and T.J.P.; writing—review and editing, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; visualization, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; supervision, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; project administration, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R.; funding acquisition, T.J.P. and J.L.O.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CONAHCYT, The Master Scholarship of K.I.V.-H. [CVU:1301333)], Ph.D. Scholarship of S.H.R.-B. [CVU:1138449] and Postdoctoral Fellowship of T.J.P. [MOD.ORD.10/2023-I1200/331/2023]” and “This work was published thanks to the support of Consejo Veracruzano de Investigación Científica y Desarrollo Tecnológico—COVEICYDET.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank CONAHCYT for Scholarships and economical support to the INECOL.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kirkendall, L.R.; Biedermann, P.H.W.; Jordal, B.H. Evolution and Diversity of Bark and Ambrosia Beetles. In Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 85–156. ISBN 9780124171732. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hulcr, J.; Stelinski, L.L. The Ambrosia Symbiosis: From Evolutionary Ecology to Practical Management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017, 62, 285–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rabaglia, R.J.; Dole, S.A.; Cognato, A.I. Review of American Xyleborina (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Occurring North of Mexico, with an Illustrated Key. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2006, 99, 1034–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Smith, S.M.; Beaver, R.A.; Singh, S.; Cognato, A.I. Taxonomic Clarification and Neotype Designation for Three Indian Xyleborine Species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Zootaxa 2018, 4394, 138–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cognato, A.I.; Smith, S.M.; Li, Y.; Pham, T.H.; Hulcr, J. Genetic Variability among Xyleborus glabratus Populations Native to Southeast Asia (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) and the Description of Two Related Species. J. Econ. Entomol. 2019, 112, 1274–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jordal, B.; Tischer, M. Genetic and Taxonomic Assessment of the Widespread Afrotropical Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus principalis (Coleoptera, Scolytinae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2020, 40, 707715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Osborn, R.K.; Castro, J.; Duong, T.A.; Hulcr, J.; Li, Y.; Martínez, M.; Cognato, A.I. Symbiotic Fungi Associated with Xyleborine Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and the Imperative of Global Collaboration. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2023, 116, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dreaden, T.J.; Campbell, A.S.; Gonzalez-Benecke, C.A.; Ploetz, R.C.; Smith, J.A. Response of Swamp Bay, Persea palustris, and Redbay, P. borbonia, to Raffaelea spp. Isolated from Xyleborus glabratus. For. Pathol. 2017, 47, e12288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saucedo-Carabez, J.R.; Ploetz, R.C.; Konkol, J.L.; Carrillo, D.; Gazis, R. Partnerships between Ambrosia Beetles and Fungi: Lineage-Specific Promiscuity among Vectors of the Laurel Wilt Pathogen, Raffaelea lauricola. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 76, 925–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gugliuzzo, A.; Biedermann, P.H.W.; Carrillo, D.; Castrillo, L.A.; Egonyu, J.P.; Gallego, D.; Haddi, K.; Hulcr, J.; Jactel, H.; Kajimura, H.; et al. Recent Advances toward the Sustainable Management of Invasive Xylosandrus Ambrosia Beetles. J. Pest Sci. 2021, 94, 615–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cloonan, K.R.; Montgomery, W.S.; Narvaez, T.I.; Carrillo, D.; Kendra, P.E. Community of Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in Agricultural and Forest Ecosystems with Laurel Wilt. Insects 2022, 13, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hlásny, T.; König, L.; Krokene, P.; Lindner, M.; Montagné-Huck, C.; Müller, J.; Qin, H.; Raffa, K.F.; Schelhaas, M.-J.; Svoboda, M.; et al. Bark Beetle Outbreaks in Europe: State of Knowledge and Ways Forward for Management. Curr. For. Rep. 2021, 7, 138–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Spence, D.J.; Smith, J.A.; Ploetz, R.; Hulcr, J.; Stelinski, L.L. Effect of Chipping on Emergence of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and Recovery of the Laurel Wilt Pathogen from Infested Wood Chips. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 2093–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Biedermann, P.H.W.; Klepzig, K.D.; Taborsky, M. Fungus Cultivation by Ambrosia Beetles: Behavior and Laboratory Breeding Success in Three Xyleborine Species. Environ. Entomol. 2009, 38, 1096–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ward, S.F.; Riggins, J.J. Drivers of Invasion by Laurel Wilt of Redbay and Sassafras in the Southeastern US. Landsc. Ecol. 2023, 38, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Souza, A.G.C.; Maffia, L.A.; Murta, H.M.; Alves, Y.H.; Pereira, R.M.; Picanço, M.C. First Report on the Association between Ceratocystis Fimbriata, an Agent of Mango Wilt, Xyleborus affinis, and the Sawdust Produced during Beetle Colonization in Brazil. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 2013, 97, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Olatinwo, R.O.; Fraedrich, S.W.; Mayfield, A.E. Laurel Wilt: Current and Potential Impacts and Possibilities for Prevention and Management. Forests 2021, 12, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hughes, M.A.; Inch, S.A.; Ploetz, R.C.; Er, H.L.; van Bruggen, A.H.C.; Smith, J.A. Responses of Swamp Bay, Persea palustris, and Avocado, Persea americana, to Various Concentrations of the Laurel Wilt Pathogen, Raffaelea lauricola. For. Pathol. 2015, 45, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hughes, M.A.; Smith, J.A.; Ploetz, R.C.; Kendra, P.E.; Mayfield, A.E.; Hanula, J.L.; Hulcr, J.; Stelinski, L.L.; Cameron, S.; Riggins, J.J.; et al. Recovery Plan for Laurel Wilt on Redbay and Other Forest Species Caused by Raffaelea lauricola and Disseminated by Xyleborus glabratus. Plant Health Prog. 2015, 16, 173–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carrillo, D.; Crane, J.H.; Peña, J.E. Potential of Contact Insecticides to Control Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a Vector of Laurel Wilt Disease in Avocados. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 2286–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bonilla-Landa, I.; Cuapio-Muñoz, U.; Luna-Hernández, A.; Reyes-Luna, A.; Rodríguez-Hernández, A.; Ibarra-Juarez, A.; Suarez-Mendez, G.; Barrera-Méndez, F.; Caram-Salas, N.; Enríquez-Medrano, J.F.; et al. L-Proline as a Valuable Scaffold for the Synthesis of Novel Enantiopure Neonicotinoids Analogs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 1455–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reyes-Luna, A.; Yáñez-Barrientos, E.; Alba-Mares, X.N.; Olivares-Romero, J.L.; Alonso-Castro, Á.J.; Cruz Cruz, D.; Villegas Gómez, C. Metabolomic Approaches in Assessing the Insecticidal Activity of the Extracts from Argemone Ochroleuca Sweet (Papaveraceae) against Three Diverse Crop Pests of Economic Importance. Chem. Biodivers. 2024, 21, e202301279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodríguez-Hernández, A.; Bonilla-Landa, I.; Vidal-Limon, A.; Ibarra-Juárez, A.; Barrera-Méndez, F.; Medrano, F.J.E.; Díaz de León, R.E.; Olivares-Romero, J.L. Synthesis, Insecticidal Activity, and Ensembled Docking of Nitroguanidines Bearing S- and R-Proline. Pest Manag. Sci. 2023, 79, 1912–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guerrero-Analco, J.A.; Murrieta-León, D.L.; Licona-Velazquez, S.; Monribot-Villanueva, J.L.; Ibarra-Juárez, L.A.; Hernández-Cervantes, G.; Ramírez-Vázquez, M.; Carmona-Hernández, O.; Lozada-García, J.A.; Pucheta-Fiscal, E.; et al. Antifungal and Insecticidal Activities of Selected Plant Species from Cloud Forest of Veracruz, Mexico: A Contribution to the Search of Novel Control Agents against Ambrosia Pest Complexes. Chem. Biodivers. 2023, 20, e202300274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Castrejón-Antonio, J.E.; Tamez-Guerra, P.; Montesinos-Matías, R.; Ek-Ramos, M.J.; Garza-López, P.M.; Arredondo-Bernal, H.C. Selection of Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) Strains to Control Xyleborus affinis (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Females. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Castillo-Esparza, J.F.; Mora-Velasco, K.A.; Rosas-Saito, G.H.; Rodríguez-Haas, B.; Sánchez-Rangel, D.; Ibarra-Juárez, L.A.; Ortiz-Castro, R. Microorganisms Associated with the Ambrosial Beetle Xyleborus affinis with Plant Growth-Promotion Activity in Arabidopsis Seedlings and Antifungal Activity against Phytopathogenic Fungus Fusarium sp. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 85, 1396–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mir, M.M.; Iqbal, U.; Mir, S.A. Production Technology of Stone Fruits; Springer: Singapore, 2021; ISBN 9789811589201. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamilton, J.L.; Noah Workman, J.; Nairn, C.J.; Fraedrich, S.W.; Villari, C. Rapid Detection of Raffaelea lauricola Directly from Host Plant and Beetle Vector Tissues Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 3151–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ibarra Caballero, J.R.; Jeon, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Fraedrich, S.; Klopfenstein, N.B.; Kim, M.S.; Stewart, J.E. Genomic Comparisons of the Laurel Wilt Pathogen, Raffaelea lauricola, and Related Tree Pathogens Highlight an Arsenal of Pathogenicity Related Genes. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2019, 125, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ward, S.F.; Riggins, J.J. Warm Temperatures and Host Tree Abundance Explain Variation in Directional Spread by Laurel Wilt. Biol. Invasions 2023, 25, 2747–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hanula, J.L.; Sullivan, B. Manuka Oil and Phoebe Oil Are Attractive Baits for Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), the Vector of Laurel Wilt. Environ. Entomol. 2008, 37, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hanula, J.L.; Mayfield, A.E.; Reid, L.S.; Horn, S. Influence of Trap Distance from a Source Population and Multiple Traps on Captures and Attack Densities of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 1196–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Biedermann, P.H.W. Cooperative Breeding in the Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus affinis and Management of Its Fungal Symbionts. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 518954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miller, D.R.; Rabaglia, R.J. Ethanol and (-)-α-Pinene: Attractant Kairomones for Bark and Ambrosia Beetles in the Southeastern US. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mayfield, A.E.; Brownie, C. The Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Uses Stem Silhouette Diameter as a Visual Host-Finding Cue. Environ. Entomol. 2013, 42, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fraedrich, S.W.; Harrington, T.C.; Rabaglia, R.J.; Ulyshen, M.D.; Mayfield, A.E.; Hanula, J.L.; Eickwort, J.M.; Miller, D.R. A Fungal Symbiont of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle Causes a Lethal Wilt in Redbay and Other Lauraceae in the Southeastern United States. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fraedrich, S.W.; Harrington, T.C.; Bates, C.A.; Johnson, J.; Reid, L.S.; Best, G.S.; Leininger, T.D.; Hawkins, T.S. Susceptibility to Laurel Wilt and Disease Incidence in Two Rare Plant Species, Pondberry and Pondspice. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martini, X.; Hughes, M.A.; Killiny, N.; George, J.; Lapointe, S.L.; Smith, J.A.; Stelinski, L.L. The Fungus Raffaelea lauricola Modifies Behavior of Its Symbiont and Vector, the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Xyleborus Glabratus), by Altering Host Plant Volatile Production. J. Chem. Ecol. 2017, 43, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuhns, E.H.; Martini, X.; Tribuiani, Y.; Coy, M.; Gibbard, C.; Peña, J.; Hulcr, J.; Stelinski, L.L. Eucalyptol Is an Attractant of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle, Xyleborus glabratus. J. Chem. Ecol. 2014, 40, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kuhns, E.H.; Tribuiani, Y.; Martini, X.; Meyer, W.L.; Peña, J.; Hulcr, J.; Stelinski, L.L. Volatiles from the Symbiotic Fungus Raffaelea lauricola Are Synergistic with Manuka Lures for Increased Capture of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus glabratus. Agric. For. Entomol. 2014, 16, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Biedermann, P.H.W.; Vega, F.E. Ecology and Evolution of Insect-Fungus Mutualisms. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 431–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Campbell, A.S.; Ploetz, R.C.; Dreaden, T.J.; Kendra, P.E.; Montgomery, W.S. Geographic Variation in Mycangial Communities of Xyleborus glabratus. Mycologia 2016, 108, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Six, D.L. Ecological and Evolutionary Determinants of Bark Beetle—Fungus Symbioses. Insects 2012, 3, 339–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ibarra-Juarez, L.A.; Burton, M.A.J.; Biedermann, P.H.W.; Cruz, L.; Desgarennes, D.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; Latorre, A.; Alonso-Sánchez, A.; Villafan, E.; Hanako-Rosas, G.; et al. Evidence for Succession and Putative Metabolic Roles of Fungi and Bacteria in the Farming Mutualism of the Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus affinis. mSystems 2020, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Saucedo, J.R.; Ploetz, R.C.; Konkol, J.L.; Ángel, M.; Mantilla, J.; Menocal, O.; Carrillo, D. Nutritional Symbionts of a Putative Vector, Xyleborus bispinatus, of the Laurel Wilt Pathogen of Avocado, Raffaelea lauricola. Symbiosis 2018, 75, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Y.; Huang, Y.T.; Kasson, M.T.; Macias, A.M.; Skelton, J.; Carlson, P.S.; Yin, M.; Hulcr, J. Specific and Promiscuous Ophiostomatalean Fungi Associated with Platypodinae Ambrosia Beetles in the Southeastern United States. Fungal Ecol. 2018, 35, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Menocal, O.; Cruz, L.F.; Kendra, P.E.; Crane, J.H.; Ploetz, R.C.; Carrillo, D. Rearing Xyleborus volvulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Media Containing Sawdust from Avocado or Silkbay, with or without Raffaelea lauricola (Ophiostomatales: Ophiostomataceae). Environ. Entomol. 2017, 46, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rabaglia, R.J.; Smith, S.L.; Rugman-Jones, P.; Digirolomo, M.F.; Ewing, C.; Eskalen, A. Establishment of non-native xyleborin eambrosia beetle, Xyleborus monographus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), new to North America in California. Zootaxa 2020, 4786, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cruz, L.F.; Menocal, O.; Mantilla, J.; Ibarra-Juarez, L.A.; Carrillo, D. Xyleborus volvulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Biology and Fungal Associates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gohli, J.; Selvarajah, T.; Kirkendall, L.R.; Jordal, B.H. Globally Distributed Xyleborus Species Reveal Recurrent Intercontinental Dispersal in a Landscape of Ancient Worldwide Distributions Phylogenetics and Phylogeography. BMC Evol. Biol. 2016, 16, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hulcr, J.; Black, A.; Prior, K.; Chen, C.Y.; Li, H.F. Studies of Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Their Native Ranges Help Predict Invasion Impact. Fla. Entomol. 2017, 100, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mahony, Z.I.; Scarlett, K.; Carnegie, A.J.; Trollip, C.; Laurence, M.; Guest, D.I. Fungi Associated with the Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus perforans (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) on Drought-Stressed Pinus in New South Wales, Australia. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2024, 53, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hulcr, J.; Mann, R.; Stelinski, L.L. The Scent of a Partner: Ambrosia Beetles Are Attracted to Volatiles from Their Fungal Symbionts. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 1374–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bateman, C.; Kendra, P.E.; Rabaglia, R.; Hulcr, J. Fungal Symbionts in Three Exotic Ambrosia Beetles, Xylosandrus amputatus, Xyleborinus andrewesi, and Dryoxylon onoharaense (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Xyleborini) in Florida. Symbiosis 2015, 66, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yin, M.L.; Chen, H.X.; He, Y.Z.; Gao, X.; Huang, S.B.; Wang, J. First Report of Fusarium oxysporum Causing Fusarium Dieback on Archidendron Clypearia in China. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Batra, L.R. Ambrosia Fungi: A Taxonomic Revision, and Nutritional Studies of Some Species. Mycologia 1967, 59, 976–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ospina-Garcés, S.M.; Ibarra-Juarez, L.A.; Escobar, F.; Lira-Noriega, A. Evaluating Sexual Dimorphism in the Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Using Geometric Morphometrics. Fla. Entomol. 2021, 104, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Castrejón-Antonio, J.E.; Tamez-Guerra, P.; García-Ortiz, N.; Muñiz-Paredes, F.; Sánchez-Rangel, J.C.; Montesinos-Matías, R. Biocontrol of Xyleborus affinis (Curculionidae: Scolitinae) Females and Progeny by Beauveria Bassiana (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) in a Sawdust Artificial Diet Model. Insects 2023, 14, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kendra, P.E.; Montgomery, W.S.; Niogret, J.; Deyrup, M.A.; Guillén, L.; Epsky, N.D. Xyleborus glabratus, X. affinis, and X. ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): Electroantennogram Responses to Host-Based Attractants and Temporal Patterns in Host-Seeking Flight. Environ. Entomol. 2012, 41, 1597–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rangel, R.; Pérez, M.; Sánchez, S.; Capello, S. Fluctuación Poblacional de Xyleborus ferrugineus y X. affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) En Ecosistemas de Tabasco, México. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2012, 60, 1577–1588. [Google Scholar]
  61. Vega, F.E.; Ranger, C.M. Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species; Oxford University Press (OUP): Oxford, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jürisoo, L.; Süda, I.; Agan, A.; Drenkhan, R. Vectors of Dutch Elm Disease in Northern Europe. Insects 2021, 12, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Menocal, O.; Cruz, L.F.; Kendra, P.E.; Berto, M.; Carrillo, D. Flexibility in the Ambrosia Symbiosis of Xyleborus bispinatus. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1110474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Faccoli, M.; Campo, G.; Perrotta, G.; Rassati, D. Two Newly Introduced Tropical Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) Damaging Figs (Ficus Carica) in Southern Italy. Zootaxa 2016, 4138, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gomez, D.F.; Rabaglia, R.J.; Fairbanks, K.E.O.; Hulcr, J. North American Xyleborini North of Mexico: A Review and Key to Genera and Species (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Zookeys 2018, 2018, 19–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Castrejón-Antonio, J.E.; Montesinos-Matías, R.; Acevedo-Reyes, N.; Ayala-Zermeño, M.Á.; Berlanga-Padilla, A.M.; Arredondo-Bernal, H.C. Especies de Xyleborus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Asociados a Huertos de Aguacate En Colima, México. Acta Zool. Mex. 2017, 33, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gallego, D.; Di Sora, N.; Molina, N.; Gonzalez-Rosa, E.; Mas, H.; Knížek, M. First Record of Xyleborus bispinatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) and Evidence of Stable Populations in the Iberian Peninsula. Zootaxa 2022, 5174, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Castrejón-Antonio, J.E.; Montesinos-Matías, R.; Tamez-Guerra, P.; Guardiola, L.T.F.; Laureano-Ahuelican, B.; Bernal, H.C.A. Infestation of Xyleborus volvulus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Mangifera indica L. (Mangifera: Anacardiaceae) in Manzanillo, Colima. Fla. Entomol. 2018, 101, 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Paladines-Rezabala, A.; Moreira-Morrillo, A.A.; Mieles, A.E.; Garcés-Fiallos, F.R. Advances in Understanding of the Interaction between Ceratocystis cacaofunesta and Xyleborus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) on Cocoa Trees. Sci. Agropecu. 2022, 13, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lira-Noriega, A.; Soberón, J.; Equihua, J. Potential Invasion of Exotic Ambrosia Beetles Xyleborus glabratus and Euwallacea sp. in Mexico: A Major Threat for Native and Cultivated Forest Ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Costa, A.; Reeve, J.D. Olfactory Experience Modifies Semiochemical Responses in a Bark Beetle Predator. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 1166–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schrey, N.M.; Reeve, J.D.; Anderson, F.E. Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of the Bark Beetle Predator Thanasimus dubius F. (Coleoptera: Cleridae) Reveals Regional Genetic Differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 3317–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Egonyu, J.P.; Baguma, J.; Ogari, I.; Ahumuza, G.; Kyamanywa, S.; Kucel, P.; Kagezi, G.H.; Erbaugh, M.; Phiri, N.; Ritchie, B.J.; et al. The Formicid Ant, Plagiolepis sp., as a Predator of the Coffee Twig Borer, Xylosandrus compactus. Biol. Control 2015, 91, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Husein, D.; Rugman-Jones, P.; Dodge, C.E.; Chien, I.; Lara, J.R.; Liu, F.-L.; Liao, Y.-C.; Tuan, S.-J.; Stouthamer, R. Parasitoids Associated with Ambrosia Beetles in the Euwallacea fornicatus Species Complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Taiwan. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2023, 33, 891–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jaramillo, J.; Borgemeister, C.; Baker, P. Coffee Berry Borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Searching for Sustainable Control Strategies. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2006, 96, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fayt, P.; Machmer, M.M.; Steeger, C. Regulation of Spruce Bark Beetles by Woodpeckers: A Literature Review. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 206, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Harrington, T. Raffaelea Lauricola, a New Ambrosia Beetle Symbiont and Pathogen on the Lauraceae. Mycotaxon 2008, 104, 399–404. [Google Scholar]
  78. Evans, E.A.; Ballen, F.H. An Econometric Demand Model for Florida Green-Skin Avocados. HortTechnology 2015, 25, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mayfield III, A.E.; Entomologist, F.; Thomas, M.C.; Entomologist, T. The Redbay Ambrosia Beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff (Scolytinae: Curculionidae); DACS-P-0165; Pest Alert; Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services: Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2009.
  80. Evans, E.A.; Crane, J.; Hodges, A.; Osborne, J.L. Potential Economic Impact of Laurel Wilt Disease on the Florida Avocado Industry. HortTechnology 2010, 20, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ploetz, R.; Perez-Martinez, J.; Konol, J.; Fernandez, R. Management of laurel wilt of avocado, caused by Rafaelea lauricola. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 149, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Romero, P.; Ibarra-Juárez, L.A.; Carrillo, D.; Guerrero-Analco, J.A.; Kendra, P.E.; Kiel-Martínez, A.L.; Guillén, L. Electroantennographic Responses of Wild and Laboratory-Reared Females of Xyleborus affinis Eichhoff and Xyleborus ferrugineus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to Ethanol and Bark Volatiles of Three Host-Plant Species. Insects 2022, 13, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gramling, J.M. Potential Effects of Laurel Wilt on the Flora of North America. Southeast. Nat. 2010, 9, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mayfield, A.E.; Smith, J.A.; Hughes, M.; Dreaden, T.J. First Report of Laurel Wilt Disease Caused by a Raffaelea sp. on Avocado in Florida. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hulcr, J.; Dunn, R.R. The Sudden Emergence of Pathogenicity in Insect-Fungus Symbioses Threatens Naive Forest Ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 278, 2866–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Six, D.L.; Wingfield, M.J. The Role of Phytopathogenicity in Bark Beetle–Fungus Symbioses: A Challenge to the Classic Paradigm. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2011, 56, 255–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ulyshen, M.D. Wood Decomposition as Influenced by Invertebrates. Biol. Rev. 2016, 91, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Reverchon, F.; Contreras-Ramos, S.M.; Eskalen, A.; Guerrero-Analco, J.A.; Quiñones-Aguilar, E.E.; Rios-Velasco, C.; Velázquez-Fernández, J.B. Microbial Biocontrol Strategies for Ambrosia Beetles and Their Associated Phytopathogenic Fungi. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 737977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kendra, P.E.; Niogret, J.; Montgomery, W.S.; Sanchez, J.S.; Deyrup, M.A.; Pruett, G.E.; Ploetz, R.C.; Epsky, N.D.; Heath, R.R. Temporal Analysis of Sesquiterpene Emissions from Manuka and Phoebe Oil Lures and Efficacy for Attraction of Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kendra, P.E.; Montgomery, W.S.; Deyrup, M.A.; Wakarchuk, D. Improved Lure for Redbay Ambrosia Beetle Developed by Enrichment of α-Copaene Content. J. Pest Sci. 2016, 89, 427–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kendra, P.E.; Montgomery, W.S.; Schnell, E.Q.; Deyrup, M.A.; Epsky, N.D. Efficacy of α-Copaene, Cubeb, and Eucalyptol Lures for Detection of Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 2428–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Niogret, J.; Kendra, P.E.; Epsky, N.D.; Heath, R.R. Comparative Analysis of Terpenoid Emissions from Florida Host Trees of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle, Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Fla. Entomol. 2011, 94, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kendra, P.E.; Montgomery, W.S.; Niogret, J.; Peña, J.E.; Capinera, J.L.; Brar, G.; Epsky, N.D.; Heath, R.R. Attraction of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, to Avocado, Lychee, and Essential Oil Lures. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Peña, J.E.; Crane, J.H.; Capinera, J.L.; Duncan, R.E.; Kendra, P.E.; Ploetz, R.C.; McLean, S.; Brar, G.; Thomas, M.C.; Cave, R.D. Chemical Control of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, and Other Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Fla. Entomol. 2011, 94, 882–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mayfield, A.E.; Barnard, E.L.; Smith, J.A.; Bernick, S.C.; Eickwort, J.M.; Dreaden, T.J. Effect of Propiconazole on Laurel Wilt Disease Development in Redbay Trees and on the Pathogen In Vitro. Arboric. Urban For. 2008, 34, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cloonan, K.R.; Montgomery, W.S.; Narvaez, T.I.; Kendra, P.E. A New Repellent for Redbay Ambrosia Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), Primary Vector of the Mycopathogen That Causes Laurel Wilt. Plants 2023, 12, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Crane, J.; Ploetz, R.; Carrillo, D.; Evans, E.; Wasielewski, J.; Pybas, D. Current management recommendations for Laurel Wilt of avocados. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 2016, 129, 4–10. [Google Scholar]
  98. Luna-Hernández, S.A.; Bonilla-Landa, I.; Reyes-Luna, A.; Rodríguez-Hernández, A.; Cuapio-Muñoz, U.; Ibarra-Juárez, L.A.; Suarez-Mendez, G.; Barrera-Méndez, F.; Pérez-Landa, I.D.; Enríquez-Medrano, F.J.; et al. Synthesis and Insecticidal Evaluation of Chiral Neonicotinoids Analogs: The Laurel Wilt Case. Molecules 2021, 26, 4225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Pawar, T.J.; Romero, J.L.O.; Delgado-Alvarado, E.; Martinez-Castillo, J.; Silva, A.A.; Vallejo-Montesinos, J.; Jimenez-Halla, J.O. Synthesis and Insecticidal Activity of Nitroguanidines Featuring R- and S-Proline. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Engineering Veracruz (ICEV), Boca del Río, Mexico, 23–26 October 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  100. Peña, J.E.; Weihman, S.W.; McLean, S.; Cave, R.D.; Carrillo, D.; Duncan, R.E.; Evans, G.; Krauth, S.; Thomas, M.C.; Lu, S.S.; et al. Predators and Parasitoids Associated with Scolytinae in Persea Species (Laurales: Lauraceae) and Other Lauraceae in Florida and Taiwan. Fla. Entomol. 2015, 98, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ploetz, R.C.; Pérez-Martínez, J.M.; Smith, J.A.; Hughes, M.; Dreaden, T.J.; Inch, S.A.; Fu, Y. Responses of Avocado to Laurel Wilt, Caused by Raffaelea Lauricola. Plant Pathol. 2012, 61, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Deguine, J.-P.; Aubertot, J.-N.; Flor, R.J.; Lescourret, F.; Wyckhuys, K.A.G.; Ratnadass, A. Integrated Pest Management: Good Intentions, Hard Realities. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Borden, J.H.; Chong, L.J.; Gries, R.; Pierce, H.D. Potential for Nonhost Volatiles as Repellents in Integrated Pest Management of Ambrosia Beetles. Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 2001, 6, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Borden, J.H.; Stokkink, E. Semiochemical-Based Integrated Pest Management of Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in British Columbia’s Forest Industry: Implemented in 1982 and Still Running. Can. Entomol. 2021, 153, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sivapalan, P. An Integrated Management Strategy to Minimize the Economic Damage to Mature Tea, Caused by the Shot-Hole Borer Beetle (Xyleborus fornicatus Eichh.). Tea Sci. 1985, 54, 4–10. [Google Scholar]
  106. Walgama, R.S. Ecology and Integrated Pest Management of Xyleborus fornicatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Sri Lanka. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2012, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Cruz, L.F.; Rocio, S.A.; Duran, L.G.; Menocal, O.; Garcia-Avila, C.D.J.; Carrillo, D. Developmental Biology of Xyleborus bispinatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Reared on an Artificial Medium and Fungal Cultivation of Symbiotic Fungi in the Beetle’s Galleries. Fungal Ecol. 2018, 35, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chang, H.; Liu, Q.; Hao, D.; Liu, Y.; An, Y.; Qian, L.; Yang, X. DNA Barcodes and Molecular Diagnostics for Distinguishing Introduced Xyleborus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) Species in China. Mitochondrial DNA 2014, 25, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Life cycle and reproduction of Xyleborus.
Figure 1. Life cycle and reproduction of Xyleborus.
Insects 15 00706 g001
Figure 2. Number of research articles published on Xyleborus beetles from 1980 to 2024, aggregated in 5-year periods. Data for this graph were collected from SciFinder, Web of Science, and Scopus.
Figure 2. Number of research articles published on Xyleborus beetles from 1980 to 2024, aggregated in 5-year periods. Data for this graph were collected from SciFinder, Web of Science, and Scopus.
Insects 15 00706 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodríguez-Becerra, S.H.; Vázquez-Rivera, R.; Ventura-Hernández, K.I.; Pawar, T.J.; Olivares-Romero, J.L. The Biology, Impact, and Management of Xyleborus Beetles: A Comprehensive Review. Insects 2024, 15, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090706

AMA Style

Rodríguez-Becerra SH, Vázquez-Rivera R, Ventura-Hernández KI, Pawar TJ, Olivares-Romero JL. The Biology, Impact, and Management of Xyleborus Beetles: A Comprehensive Review. Insects. 2024; 15(9):706. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodríguez-Becerra, Sared Helena, Rafael Vázquez-Rivera, Karla Irazú Ventura-Hernández, Tushar Janardan Pawar, and José Luis Olivares-Romero. 2024. "The Biology, Impact, and Management of Xyleborus Beetles: A Comprehensive Review" Insects 15, no. 9: 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090706

APA Style

Rodríguez-Becerra, S. H., Vázquez-Rivera, R., Ventura-Hernández, K. I., Pawar, T. J., & Olivares-Romero, J. L. (2024). The Biology, Impact, and Management of Xyleborus Beetles: A Comprehensive Review. Insects, 15(9), 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090706

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop