Next Article in Journal
Relationship between the Biofilm-Forming Capacity and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates: Results from a Laboratory-Based In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
CsrA Regulates Swarming Motility and Carbohydrate and Amino Acid Metabolism in Vibrio alginolyticus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/microorganisms9112382
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Challenging the Conventional Interpretation of HCMV Seronegativity

by
Shelley Waters
1,
Silvia Lee
1,2,
Ashley Irish
3 and
Patricia Price
1,*
1
Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medicine, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia
2
Department of Microbiology, Pathwest Laboratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch 6150, Australia
3
Renal Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch 6150, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(11), 2382; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112382
Submission received: 20 October 2021 / Revised: 16 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Virology)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The majority of adults in the world (around 83%) carry antibodies reactive with HCMV and are thought to retain inactive or latent infections lifelong. The virus is transmitted via saliva, so infection events are likely to be common. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a life without exposure to HCMV. From 45 seronegative individuals (13 renal transplant recipients, 32 healthy adults), we present seven cases who had detectable HCMV DNA in their blood and/or saliva, or a CMV-encoded homologue of IL-10 (vIL-10) in their plasma. One case displayed NK cells characteristic of CMV infection before her HCMV DNA became undetectable. In other cases, the infection may persist with seroconversion blocked by vIL-10. Future research should seek mechanisms that can prevent an individual from seroconverting despite a persistent HCMV infection, as HCMV vaccines may not work well in such people.

1. Introduction

It is often assumed that a person who has antibodies reactive against a specific virus (i.e., is defined as “seropositive”) has been infected and may retain that virus. Viruses such as herpesviruses are known to persist for life while other viruses such as influenza are cleared after infection. The corollary is that a person who is seronegative has never been infected. From this, it is a small step to assume that such people have never been exposed to an infectious dose of the virus. Whilst this is logical with novel viruses (e.g., Zika or SARS-CoV-2), it does not fit the clinical data with respect to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). The majority of adults in the world (around 83%) carry antibodies reactive with HCMV [1]. Active infections are usually controlled in healthy individuals, but the virus enters a latent or inactive state and persists with periodic reactivations. In individuals with acquired immune deficiencies, HCMV infections induce diverse but well-characterized clinical syndromes, and reactivations are relatively common [2,3].
HCMV can be transmitted vertically (transplacentally and through breast feeding) and via organ transplantation and blood transfusions [4]. However, saliva may be the most common route of transmission, as HCMV and murine (M) CMV persist in the salivary gland [5,6]. We have linked the presence of HCMV DNA in saliva with activation of systemic immune responses consistent with a systemic infection [7]. HCMV may pass to a new host through an oral route [4,8], though murine studies suggest the intranasal route effectively initiates primary infection [9]. Transmission via saliva is readily demonstrated in nurseries and crèches [10] but is likely in other situations where individuals are close together. This is not restricted to particular populations.
It is accepted that HCMV establishes latency in fixed tissues such that active replication and viral progeny become undetectable. However, in vitro studies have shown that numerous viral genes continue to be expressed, including UL111a, which encodes HCMV viral IL-10 (vIL-10). Poole and Sinclair [11] dubbed HCMV latency as “sleepless latency”. Throughout life, HCMV undergoes reactivation events and can be shed from asymptomatic hosts or may cause disease.
HCMV vIL-10 is differentially spliced, creating several variants [12]. The best characterized transcripts are cmvIL-10, which is only expressed during lytic infection, and LAcmvIL-10, which continues to be expressed during latency. There is evidence that both variants play a role in immunosuppression with LAcmvIL-10 having more restricted functions. A function of LAcmvIL-10 is downregulation of MHC-II, aiding in the prevention of antigen presentation during latency [13].
Despite the plethora of opportunities to become infected, some people remain seronegative all their lives. We considered whether this represents a failure to seroconvert when infected or rapid clearance of HCMV by specific aspects of the innate immune system. The former is possible as we have identified reports of HCMV DNA in urine from seronegative children aged 4–15 years [14] and in blood from seronegative adults [15]. Furthermore, HCMV pp65- and IE-1-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were detected in seronegative renal transplant recipients (RTR) [16]. Here we describe seven seronegative adults who presented evidence of HCMV infections. Our investigations illustrate mechanisms that may contribute to their failure to seroconvert. This includes vIL-10, which interacts with human IL-10R1, initiating signalling via STAT-3. Its biological activity includes the modulation of cellular IL-10 synthesis [13]. HCMV vIL-10 has been detected in plasma [17] with reagents that are available commercially. The reagents utilized in the assay do not cross-react with human IL-10 or EBV vIL-10 and detect both LAcmvIL-10 and cmvIL-10.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Cohort

Eighty-two RTR were recruited from renal clinics at Royal Perth Hospital (Western Australia). Inclusion criteria were clinical stability >2 years after transplant, no CMV disease or reactivation within 6 months of sample collection and no current anti-viral treatment. RTR with hepatitis B or C were excluded. Healthy adults recruited as controls were matched with the RTR by age and gender [14]. Ethics approval was obtained from the Royal Perth Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (EC 2012/155) and endorsed by the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (HR16/2015; HRE2021-0044). The ethics approval complied with the declaration of Helsinki. Participants provided written informed consent. Here we present case studies of five healthy controls and two RTR.

2.2. Immunological Responses to HCMV

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated by Ficoll density centrifugation. Plasma was stored in −80 °C and PBMC in liquid nitrogen. Plasma HCMV IgG titres were assessed using in-house ELISAs based on a lysate of fibroblasts infected with HCMV AD169, recombinant CMV gB (Chiron Diagnostics, Medfield, MA, USA) or IE-1 protein (Miltenyi Biotech, Cologne, Germany). Results were presented as arbitrary units (AU)/mL based on a standard plasma pool [14]. FcRγ− and NKG2C+ NK cells (CD3−CD56dim) and Vδ2− γδ T-cells were enumerated using multicolour flow cytometry, as the populations are expanded in CMV-seropositive RTR [18,19]. Gating strategies are illustrated in Figure 1 and Supplementary Materials Figure S1. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assays utilised anti-IFNγ antibodies (MabTech, Stockholm, Sweden). Cells were stimulated with a CMV lysate, CMV pp65 peptide pool (NIH AIDS reagent program, Woburn, MA, USA) or a CMV IE-1 peptide pool (JPT, Berlin, Germany). The number of spots in unstimulated wells were subtracted from the number in stimulated wells and adjusted per 200,000 PBMC.

2.3. vIL-10 ELISA

Levels of HCMV vIL-10 were assessed using a sandwich ELISA. First, 96-halfwell plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with 50 μL/well anti-CMV vIL-10 goat polyclonal antibody (AF117, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 2 μg/mL. The plates were then washed three times with 150 μL/well of PBS-0.005% TWEEN and blocked for 1 h with 1% BSA/PBS. A standard curve from 4000 pg/mL to 62.5 pg/mL was created using recombinant HCMV vIL-10 with carrier protein (117-VL-025, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Plasma samples were diluted 1:10 in 1%BSA/PBS and a QC was created by spiking a plasma sample with 500 pg/mL of standard (CV = 17%). A total of 50 uL/well of anti-CMV vIL-10 goat polyclonal biotinylated antibody (BAF117, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 0.2 μg/mL was added (2 h, room temperature), followed by a streptavidin-HRP conjugate (30 min, room temperature) and TMB substrate (20 min, room temperature). Reactions were stopped with 25 uL/well 1M H2SO4 and read at 450 nm. Concentrations of vIL-10 were interpolated from the standard curve [20]. The minimum level detected by this assay was 62.5 pg/mL. The assay was confirmed to specifically detect vIL-10 and not cross react with human IL-10 by replacing the recombinant vIL-10 with recombinant human IL-10 (Human IL-10 DuoSet ELISA, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). No cross-reactivity was observed. Young et al., (2017) confirmed that the reagents used in the vIL-10 ELISA do not cross-react with human IL-10 or EBV vIL-10, and demonstrated detection of LAcmvIL-10 and vIL-10 generated during lytic infections [17].

2.4. Detection of CMV DNA in Saliva

Saliva (approximately 5 mL) was collected after a water mouth wash by asking the participant to spit into a tube. Samples were centrifuged (1000× g, 10 min). DNA was extracted from the pellet using FavorPrep Blood Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kits (Favorgen, Ping-Tung, Taiwan) and stored at −80 °C. Each DNA extraction run included a no-sample control with saliva replaced by PBS. HCMV was detected using an in-house qPCR assay with primers targeting the UL54 gene (CMV DNA polymerase) presented in Table 1 [7]. Quantitation was achieved using a standard curve created using DNA extracted from a lysate of HCMV (AD169)-infected fibroblasts and serially diluted 10-fold. Samples were considered positive if a steady amplification curve was initiated before 38 cycles (the lowest point on the standard curve). Positive results were normalized against the gene encoding beta-2-microgobulin and values were reported in arbitrary units (range: 44–721) [21]. Some samples also underwent amplification of MIE by qPCR using the same protocol as UL54 with the primers described in Table 1. All qPCR runs included at least two no-template controls, with PBS controls from the DNA extractions spread across a series of qPCR runs. No amplicons were detected.
To achieve greater sensitivity, samples were also assessed with a nested PCR to detect UL55 [22] (encoding gB; see Table 1), using a PCR buffer with 35 mM MgCl2 for the inner reaction and 30 mM MgCl2 for the outer PCR in a total volume of 20 µL, with 1 µL of each primer (10 µM), 2 µL PCR buffer, 1 µL 40 mM dNTPs, 0.2 uL Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 5 µL DNA (diluted 1:2) for the outer PCRs, and 3 µL of the outer PCR product for the inner PCRs. The cycling conditions for the outer PCRs were 1 cycle of 5 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C and then 1 cycle of 1 min at 72 °C. The inner PCRs ran only 30 cycles. PCR products from the inner PCRs were run on 1% agarose gel in 0.5× TBE buffer stained with GelGreen (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA) for 1 h at 120 volts. Amplicons were sent for purification and Sanger sequencing by the Australia Genome Research Facility (AGRF). All nested PCR runs included a no-template control carried from the outer PCR to the inner PCR, a no-template control for the inner PCR and DNA extracted from uninfected fibroblasts. No amplification was detected.

2.5. Detection of CMV-Encoded miRNA in Saliva

Saliva pellets were thawed and mixed with TRI reagent (1:4) before RNA extraction using the MagMAX—96 for Microarrays kit, as described previously [23] (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Custom reverse transcription primer pools were generated, and cDNA synthesis for all miRNA assays was performed in a single reaction, according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Applied Biosystems, PN 4465407). A pre-designed primer and probe assay targeting mature miRUS5-2-3p (assay ID: 469255_mat was purchased from Applied Biosystems). RNA from HCMV seronegative healthy participants and uninfected THP-1 cells were used to ensure specificity. These showed no amplification up to 40 cycles. Sensitivity was determined using 10-fold serial dilutions of HCMV AD169 RNA. Samples with cycle thresholds below 104 dilution of the standard (i.e., after cycle 32–36, depending on the miRNA assayed) were considered negative. All samples were run two to four times and called positive if at least two replicates produced amplification.

3. Results

Eighty-two RTR and eighty-one healthy controls were recruited in 2014 and tested for HCMV-reactive IgG in plasma, HCMV UL54 DNA in saliva and vIL-10 in plasma and saliva. There were no differences in gender or ethnicity between the two groups, but the RTR were marginally older (54 (21–86) vs. 57 (31–76); p = 0.07; Mann–Whitney test, data available in [24]). Levels of CMV reactive antibodies were determined using in-house ELISAs, recognizing a lysate of fibroblasts infected with HCMV AD169 (“HCMV lysate”), gB or IE-1 protein. The cut-off defining seropositivity was 3600 AU/mL based on the HCMV lysate [25,26]. This cut off was determined in relation to samples from individuals deemed to be seronegative using the ARCHITECT CMV IgG assay (Abbott Diagnostic Systems, Lake Forrest, IL, USA). Determinations of HCMV serostatus of RTR were concordant with the ARCHITECT CMV IgG assay according to clinical records. Determinations of serostatus were identical when based on gB or IE-1 (data not shown).
Using this cut-off, 13/82 RTR and 32/81 healthy controls were seronegative (χ2, p = 0.0007). Here we present seven individuals who were HCMV seronegative by all three ELISAs. Additionally, all seven cases were had no T-cell responses to CMV lysate, IE-1 and pp65 according the ELiSpot assay. Cases 2–7 returned for follow-up in 2017. All remained seronegative by the same ELISA assays, and none had detectable HCMV DNA in their saliva as assessed by in-house UL54 qPCR assay. T-cells were not re-assessed.
Cases 1, 2 and 3 had detectable HCMV DNA in their saliva samples, whilst Cases 4, 5, 6 and 7 had detectable HCMV vIL-10 in their plasma (Table 2). No HCMV vIL-10 was detected in saliva samples from seronegative or seropositive individuals, but vIL-10 was detectable in plasma from 3/32 seronegative healthy controls and 0/13 seronegative RTR in 2014 with one seronegative RTR having detectable vIL-10 in 2012 and 2017 (not 2014). In 2017, 4/23 seronegative healthy controls had detectable vIL-10, including the three who were positive in 2014.

3.1. Three Individuals Were Seronegative despite Detectable HCMV DNA

Case 1 is a 33-year-old female RTR who received a donor kidney six years before sample collection. She had remained free of graft rejection, diabetes, HCMV or cardiac disease since transplantation and was stable on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Her transplanted kidney was from a HCMV-seronegative donor. Accordingly, there was no detectable HCMV IgG, IgA and IgM in her saliva or plasma (Table 2 and unpublished data). She had no HCMV-reactive T-cells when assessed by EliSpot assay. Case 1 was HCMV DNA positive in saliva by our in-house qPCR assays, detecting MIE and UL54, but negative in plasma and buffy coat. Sanger sequencing of amplicons encompassing gB produced by nested PCRs of the saliva identified a mixed infection where the predominate genotype was gB2. The presence of multiple strains was confirmed by sequencing the genes encoding the NK cell receptor homologues UL18 and UL40 (data not shown). HCMV vIL-10 was not detectable in plasma in 2014 or 2017.
Case 2 is a 57-year-old female healthy control who was seronegative for HCMV IgG in plasma and HCMV DNA negative by qPCR assays targeting MIE and UL54 in plasma and the associated buffy coat samples. However, she had detectable HCMV DNA in her saliva when assessed with the nested PCR targeting gB (UL55). Sanger sequencing identified a mixed infection where the predominate genotype was gB2. HCMV-miR-US5-2-3p was also detected in her saliva [23]. Neither IgA, IgG and IgM antibodies reactive with HCMV antigens nor HCMV vIL-10 were detectable in her saliva or plasma (Table 2; data not shown). She had no HCMV-reactive T-cells when assessed by EliSpot assay. Analysis of her PBMC by flow cytometry revealed expanded populations of FcRγ− and NKG2C+ NK-cells, characteristic of HCMV infection [19,27] (Table 2). The FcRγ− population comprised 27.3% of CD3−CD56dim NK-cells, compared with a median (range) of 9.1% (5.4–19.1) for other seronegative healthy controls (Figure 1). The NKG2C+ population comprised 7.1% of CD3−CD56dim NK-cells, compared with a median (range) of 2.6% (0.9–4.0) for other seronegative healthy controls (Figure 1). The same phenotypes were assessed at 2017 showing populations with 15.5% FcRγ− and 11.1% NKG2C+ CD3−CD56dim cells. In 2017, she had not seroconverted and no HCMV DNA was detected in her saliva. This case suggests the possibility that NK cells can control HCMV replication without seroconversion.
Case 3 was also a healthy female with detectable HCMV DNA in her saliva. She was seronegative in 2014 and 2017, and had no T-cell responses when assessed against three HCMV antigens (Table 2). HCMV vIL-10 was not detectable in her plasma in 2014 or 2017, and no expanded populations of FcRγ− and NKG2C+ NK-cells were evident. Expanded populations of Vδ2− γδ T-cells are associated with HCMV seropositivity in RTR and healthy controls [18]. Case 3 had a detectable population of Vδ2− γδ T-cells (2.2% of all γδ T-cells; Table 2), compared with a median (range) of 0.47% (0.06–2.08) for other seronegative healthy controls and 0.96% (0.05–3.8) for seropositive healthy controls.

3.2. Four Seronegative Individuals Had Detectable HCMV vIL-10 in Plasma

Case 4 is a 55-year-old male healthy control who was seronegative for HCMV IgG in plasma by our in-house ELISA assays and HCMV DNA negative by our in-house qPCR assay targeting UL54 in saliva. He works in a hospital environment and is frequently exposed to patients with active HCMV infections, but remained seronegative when tested in 2012, 2014 and 2017. However, HCMV vIL-10 was detected in his plasma at all three time points (1840, 639 and 916 pg/mL) vs. the median (range): 166 (0–1440) for seronegative healthy controls tested in 2014. The case establishes the possibility that vIL-10 may suppress seroconversion. This is supported by Cases 5, 6 and 7 (Table 2). Case 5 was an RTR who failed to seroconvert when given a HCMV-positive donor kidney. Case 6 remained seronegative with detectable plasma vIL-10 from 2006 to 2021. Cases 4–7 had no HCMV-reactive T-cells when assessed by EliSpot assay (Table 2).

4. Discussion

HCMV seronegativity is widely assumed to define an individual who is not carrying the virus and has not done so recently. Some seronegative transplant recipients face complications following organ transplantation despite prophylaxis and receiving an organ from a HCMV seronegative donor [28].
From a cohort of 45 (32 controls and 13 RTR) individuals we have identified seven (5 controls and 2 RTR) individuals who remained HCMV seronegative despite evidence of current HCMV replication or latent carriage—specifically HCMV DNA, miRNA, vIL-10 and/or FcRγ− NK cells or Vδ2− γδ T-cells characteristic of HCMV seropositivity. We consider the possibility that these cases can be explained by low viral load and poor persistence of viral replication. However, many health adults retain readily detectable HCMV-reactive antibodies and T-cells throughout their lives in the absence of detectable HCMV DNA using highly sensitive PCR assays. It could be argued that these seven individuals mount antibody responses selectively to proteins in the UL133–UL154 region that is deleted in AD169, or UL128–131, which are rendered non-functional by to a frameshift mutation in UL131 in AD169 [29,30]. However, we know of no mechanisms that would explain this selectivity.
Cases 1, 2 and 3 had HCMV DNA in saliva, and Case 2 also had detectable HCMV-miR-US5-2-3p [23]. Case 2 had a striking population of FcRγ− and NKG2C+ NK cells in circulation. Several studies have linked this population with HCMV seropositivity [27]. We have linked detection of UL54 HCMV DNA in saliva from the same cohort of RTR with systemic markers of HCMV infection [7]. Here we show that Case 2 cleared the salivary infection without seroconversion, since she was DNA and antibody negative in 2017. Her NK cell response may have favoured compartmentalization to the saliva. This may also be achieved through intrinsic immunity mediated by restriction factors (RS), such as interferon gamma-inducible protein 16 (IFI16), which can prevent HCMV DNA sensing by inhibiting UL54 (DNA polymerase) by interacting with CMV pp65 [31]. IFI16 has been found in saliva [32]. Case 3 had a detectable population of Vδ2−γδ T-cells, which may have cleared the virus sufficiently to prevent seroconversion [33] despite the HCMV DNA found in her saliva.
Cases 4–7 had measurable levels of HCMV-encoded vIL-10 in their plasma, which were relatively stable over several years. No individuals had detectable HCMV-reactive T-cells in 2014. Case 6 had detectable vIL-10 over a 15-year period (2006–2021). All samples were tested for HCMV-reactive antibodies and remained negative. Young et al. (2017) detected vIL-10 in single samples from a few seronegative donors [17]. We show that levels of vIL-10 can be relatively stable in seronegative individuals over time.
The detection of vIL-10 may reflect transcription of the encoding gene (UL111a) during HCMV latency [12], explaining the lack of detectable HCMV DNA. We postulate that these individuals harbor latent or replicating HCMV in tissue(s) other than blood or the salivary gland.
We considered the possibility that the presence or absence of detectable vIL-10 reflects variations in UL111a [23]. Viruses identified in Cases 1, 2 and 3 were subjected to amplicon-based enrichment for next generation sequencing of a selection of HCMV genes, including UL111a. The sequence from all three cases had variations when compared to the Toledo reference strain but none were unique to these three samples; i.e., they were also seen in viruses sequenced from HCMV seropositive HIV+ individuals from Jakarta (Indonesia; [24]) and RTR and/or healthy controls from Perth, Australia (manuscript in preparation).
The detection of vIL-10 was not rare in the seronegative samples tested (4/32 healthy adults and 1/13 RTR tested between 2014–2017). Case 6 had antibodies reactive with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and all cases are healthy adults active in the community, so any immunosuppressive effects of vIL-10 are presumably HCMV-specific. The individuals also had no T-cell responses to three HCMV antigens (Table 2), so vIL-10 may also reduce specific T-cell responses. However, proof that vIL-10 downregulates immune responses to HCMV awaits more extensive studies, including further clinical surveys (with analyses of responses to other vaccines) and animal model studies to establish causality. The latter will be complicated as human and mouse CMV show poor homology. Biological effects of vIL-10 to be investigated include enhanced signalling of the CXCR4/CXCL12 pathway triggered by the chemokine receptor homologue US27 [34]. This is distinct from the Stat3-dependent effects of vIL-10, which include modulation of dendritic cell function and macrophage activation [35].
Blockage of HCMV seroconversion by vIL-10 has implications for the efficacy of HCMV vaccines. HCMV vaccines currently in phase I or II clinical trials seek humoral responses to selected HCMV antigens, but their efficacy remains low (i.e., <50% [36]). Indeed, a blockade of vIL-10 has been proposed as a vaccine strategy [35]. Our data supports further development of this approach.

5. Conclusions

We have shown that a proportion of HCMV seronegative adults present evidence of active or latent HCMV infections. These may be transient with control by NK cells (as in Case 2) or persistent with seroconversion blocked by vIL-10. It is clear that seropositivity is a risk factor for adverse outcomes following renal transplantation [37]. However, some seronegative individuals still face complications following organ transplantation and HCMV may play a role.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9112382/s1, Figure S1: Vδ2 expression on T-cells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W. and P.P.; methodology, S.W., S.L. and P.P.; formal analysis S.W.; investigation, S.W. and P.P.; resources, P.P. and A.I.; data curation, S.W. and S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; writing—review and editing, P.P., S.L. and A.I.; visualization, S.W.; supervision, P.P. and S.L.; project administration, P.P.; funding acquisition, P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Grant ID1068652) and by Curtin University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Royal Perth Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: EC 2012/155) and endorsed by Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval numbers: HRE 2016/2015 and HRE2021-0044).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data described in this paper are available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all individuals who participated in this study and acknowledge the Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute for provision of laboratory space and technology platforms and the support of the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zuhair, M.; Smit, G.S.A.; Wallis, G.; Jabbar, F.; Smith, C.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Griffiths, P. Estimation of the worldwide seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Med. Virol. 2019, 29, e2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jacobson, M.A.; Mills, J. Serious cytomegalovirus disease in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clinical findings, diagnosis, and treatment. Ann. Intern. Med. 1988, 108, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rubin, R.H.; Tolkoff-Rubin, N.E.; Oliver, D.; Rota, T.R.; Hamilton, J.; Betts, R.F.; Pass, R.F.; Hillis, W.; Szmuness, W.; Farrell, M.L.; et al. Multicenter seroepidemiologic study of the impact of cytomegalovirus infection on renal transplantation. Transplantation 1985, 40, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cannon, M.J.; Hyde, T.B.; Schmid, D.S. Review of cytomegalovirus shedding in bodily fluids and relevance to congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev. Med. Virol. 2011, 21, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Amin, M.M.; Stowell, J.D.; Hendley, W.; Garcia, P.; Schmid, D.S.; Cannon, M.J.; Dollard, S.C. CMV on surfaces in homes with young children: Results of PCR and viral culture testing. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Thom, J.T.; Walton, S.M.; Torti, N.; Oxenius, A. Salivary gland resident APCs are Flt3L- and CCR2-independent macrophage-like cells incapable of cross-presentation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 44, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Waters, S.; Lee, S.; Lloyd, M.; Irish, A.; Price, P. The Detection of CMV in Saliva Can Mark a Systemic Infection with CMV in Renal Transplant Recipients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Mayer, B.T.; Krantz, E.M.; Swan, D.; Ferrenberg, J.; Simmons, K.; Selke, S.; Huang, M.-L.; Casper, C.; Corey, L.; Wald, A.; et al. Transient Oral Human Cytomegalovirus Infections Indicate Inefficient Viral Spread from Very Few Initially Infected Cells. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00380-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Farrell, H.; Lawler, C.; Tan, C.S.E.; MacDonald, K.; Bruce, K.; Mach, M.; Davis-Poynter, N.; Stevenson, P.G. Murine Cytomegalovirus Exploits Olfaction to Enter New Hosts. mBio 2016, 7, e00251-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Robinson, J. Infectious diseases in schools and child care facilities. Pediatr. Rev. 2001, 22, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Poole, E.; Sinclair, J. Sleepless latency of human cytomegalovirus. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 204, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Jenkins, C.; Abendroth, A.; Slobedman, B. A novel viral transcript with homology to human interleukin-10 is expressed during latent human cytomegalovirus infection. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 1440–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Poole, E.; Neves, T.C.; Oliveira, M.T.; Sinclair, J.; Da Silva, M.C.C. Human Cytomegalovirus interleukin 10 Homologs: Facing the Immune System. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yamamoto, Y.; Morooka, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Ihra, M.; Yoshikawa, T. Analysis of the shedding of three beta-herpesviruses in urine and saliva of children with renal disease. J. Med. Virol. 2014, 86, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Larsson, S.; Soderberg-Naucler, C.; Wang, F.; Moller, E. Cytomegalovirus DNA can be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from all seropositive and most seronegative healthy blood donors over time. Transfusion 1998, 38, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Litjens, N.H.R.; Huang, L.; Dedeoglu, B.; Meijers, R.W.J.; Kwekkeboom, J.; Betjes, M.G.H. Protective Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-Specific T-Cell Immunity Is Frequent in Kidney Transplant Patients without Serum Anti-CMV Antibodies. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Young, V.P.; Mariano, M.C.; Tu, C.C.; Allaire, K.M.; Avdic, S.; Slobedman, B.; Spencer, J.V. Modulation of the Host Environment by Human Cytomegalovirus with Viral Interleukin 10 in Peripheral Blood. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, S.; Affandi, J.S.; Irish, A.B.; Price, P. Cytomegalovirus infection alters phenotypes of different gammadelta T-cell subsets in renal transplant recipients with long-term stable graft function. J. Med. Virol. 2017, 89, 1442–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, S.; Doualeh, M.; Affandi, J.S.; Makwana, N.; Irish, A.; Price, P. Functional and clinical consequences of changes to natural killer cell phenotypes driven by chronic cytomegalovirus infections. J. Med. Virol. 2019, 91, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Young, V.P.; Mariano, M.C.; Faure, L.; Spencer, J.V. Detection of Cytomegalovirus Interleukin 10 (cmvIL-10) by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2244, 291–299. [Google Scholar]
  21. Watzinger, F.; Suda, M.; Preuner, S.; Baumgartinger, R.; Ebner, K.; Baskova, L.; Niesters, H.; Lawitschka, A.; Lion, T. Real-time quantitative PCR assays for detection and monitoring of pathogenic human viruses in immunosuppressed pediatric patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 5189–5198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Barbi, M.; Binda, S.; Caroppo, S.; Primache, V.; Didò, P.; Guidotti, P.; Corbetta, C.; Melotti, D. CMV gB genotypes and outcome of vertical transmission: Study on dried blood spots of congenitally infected babies. J. Clin. Virol. 2001, 21, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Waters, S.; Lee, S.; Munyard, K.; Irish, A.; Price, P.; Wang, B.H. Human Cytomegalovirus-Encoded microRNAs Can Be Found in Saliva Samples from Renal Transplant Recipients. Noncoding RNA 2020, 6, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, S.; Brook, E.; Affandi, J.; Howson, P.; Tanudjaja, S.A.; Dhaliwal, S.; Irish, A.; Price, P. A high burden of cytomegalovirus marks poor vascular health in transplant recipients more clearly than in the general population. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2019, 8, e1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Price, P.; Lee, S.; Affandi, J.; Parsons, R.; Naylor, L.H.; Watts, G.F.; Irish, A. Cytomegalovirus antibody and vascular pathology in renal transplant recipients. J. Med. Virol. 2017, 89, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Estiasari, R.; Aryanto, I.; Lee, S.; Pramana, S.; Djauzi, S.; Price, P. Determinants of cognitive health in Indonesian HIV patients beginning antiretroviral therapy. J. Neurovirol. 2020, 26, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Costa-Garcia, M.; Vera, A.; Moraru, M.; Vilches, C.; López-Botet, M.; Muntasell, A. Antibody-mediated response of NKG2Cbright NK cells against human cytomegalovirus. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 2715–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Slifkin, M.; Tempesti, P.; Poutsiaka, D.D.; Snydman, D.R. Late and atypical cytomegalovirus disease in solid-organ transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33, E62–E68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cha, T.A.; Tom, E.; Kemble, G.W.; Duke, G.M.; Mocarski, E.S.; Spaete, R.R. Human cytomegalovirus clinical isolates carry at least 19 genes not found in laboratory strains. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wang, D.; Shenk, T. Human cytomegalovirus virion protein complex required for epithelial and endothelial cell tropism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18153–18158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Biolatti, M.; Dell’Oste, V.; Pautasso, S.; von Einem, J.; Marschall, M.; Plachter, B.; Gariglio, M.; De Andrea, M.; Landolfo, S. Regulatory Interaction between the Cellular Restriction Factor IFI16 and Viral pp65 (pUL83) Modulates Viral Gene Expression and IFI16 Protein Stability. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 8238–8250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Alunno, A.; Caneparo, V.; Carubbi, F.; Bistoni, O.; Caterbi, S.; Gariglio, M.; Bartoloni, E.; Landolfo, S.; Gerli, R. Interferon gamma-inducible protein 16 (IFI16) and anti-IFI16 antibodies in primary Sjogren’s syndrome: Findings in serum and minor salivary glands. Reumatismo 2015, 67, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kaminski, H.; Garrigue, I.; Couzi, L.; Taton, B.; Bachelet, T.; Moreau, J.F.; Dechanet-Merville, J.; Thiebaut, R.; Merville, P. Surveillance of gammadelta T Cells Predicts Cytomegalovirus Infection Resolution in Kidney Transplants. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tu, C.C.; Arnolds, K.L.; O’Connor, C.M.; Spencer, J.V. Human Cytomegalovirus UL111A and US27 Gene Products Enhance the CXCL12/CXCR4 Signaling Axis via Distinct Mechanisms. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01981-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Avdic, S.; McSharry, B.P.; Slobedman, B. Modulation of dendritic cell functions by viral IL-10 encoded by human cytomegalovirus. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bernstein, D.I.; Munoz, F.M.; Callahan, S.T.; Rupp, R.; Wootton, S.H.; Edwards, K.M.; Turley, C.B.; Stanberry, L.R.; Patel, S.M.; Mcneal, M.M.; et al. Safety and efficacy of a cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine in adolescent girls: A randomized clinical trial. Vaccine 2016, 34, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Rezzouk, B.; Bouattar, T.; Belkadi, B.; Razine, R.; Bayahia, R.; Ouzeddoun, N.; Benamar, L.; Rhou, H.; Bouihat, N.; Ibrahimi, A.; et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Era of Antiviral Prophylaxis with Valacyclovir: A Single-Center Study in Morocco. Transpl. Res. Risk Manag. 2021, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 09 02382 g001 550
Figure 1. FcRγ and NKG2C expression on NK cells. Representative flow cytometry plots for a CMV seronegative healthy control (a) and a CMV seropositive renal transplant recipient (RTR) (b), Case 1 (c) and Case 2 (d). Gating strategy: singlets were first defined by forward scatter area (FSC-A) and forward scatter height; lymphocytes were then gated based on the side scatter area and FSC-A, and dead cells were excluded based on uptake of Fixable Viability Stain. Lack of FcRγ expression (middle panel) and expression of NKG2C (bottom panel) were assessed in NK cells identified as CD3−CD56dim (top panel). Antibodies used were BUV395-anti-CD3 (clone UCHT1), PE.Cy7-anti-CD56 (clone MEM-188; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and APC-anti-NKG2C (clone 134591; R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and FITC-anti-FcRγ (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
Figure 1. FcRγ and NKG2C expression on NK cells. Representative flow cytometry plots for a CMV seronegative healthy control (a) and a CMV seropositive renal transplant recipient (RTR) (b), Case 1 (c) and Case 2 (d). Gating strategy: singlets were first defined by forward scatter area (FSC-A) and forward scatter height; lymphocytes were then gated based on the side scatter area and FSC-A, and dead cells were excluded based on uptake of Fixable Viability Stain. Lack of FcRγ expression (middle panel) and expression of NKG2C (bottom panel) were assessed in NK cells identified as CD3−CD56dim (top panel). Antibodies used were BUV395-anti-CD3 (clone UCHT1), PE.Cy7-anti-CD56 (clone MEM-188; Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and APC-anti-NKG2C (clone 134591; R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and FITC-anti-FcRγ (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).
Microorganisms 09 02382 g001
Table
Table 1. Primer and probe sequences used to detect HCMV DNA by qPCR or nested PCR.
Table 1. Primer and probe sequences used to detect HCMV DNA by qPCR or nested PCR.
TargetPrimerSequence (5′-3′)Product
(Base Pairs)
FWDCCCGAAAACGTGTCGCC
UL54REVAAACGTTGACGCAGATACTGTAGC105
PROBE (5 µM)6-FAM-TATCGTCAGCATCTGGTGC-BHQ-1
FWDAACTCAGCCTTCCCTAAGACCA
MIEREVGGGAGCACTGAGGCAAGTTC76
PROBE (2 µM)6-FAM-CAATGGCTGCAGTCAGGCCATGG-TAMRA-6
FWDTGAGTATGCCTGCCGTGTGA105
B2MREVACTCATACACAACTTTCAGCAGCTTAC
PROBE (5 µM)6-FAM-CCATGTGACTTTGTCACAGCCCAAGATAGTT-TAMRA-6
gB (UL55)OUTER FWDGAATRGCTGAYGGRTTGATCTTG590
OUTER REVGATCTCCTGGGATATACAGGACG
INNER FWDGAGTTCCTTGAAGACCTCTAG
INNER REVACYTTCTGGGAAGCCTCGGAACG519
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of seven HCMV seronegative individuals with evidence of HCMV infection.
Table 2. Characteristics of seven HCMV seronegative individuals with evidence of HCMV infection.
Case 1Case 2Case 3Case 4Case 5Case 6Case 7
Age (years)33576255563442
Male (M)/Female (F)FFFMMFF
EthnicityCaucasianCaucasianCaucasianCaucasianCaucasianAsianCaucasian
RTR/Healthy RTRHealthy Healthy Healthy RTRHealthy Healthy
Donor HCMV statusNegative---Positive--
T-cell responses (EliSpot assay presented as cells producing interferon-γ/200,000 PBMC) a
HCMV lysate 0010303
IE-1 pooled peptides 1010001
pp65 pooled peptides0010102
NK cells (flow cytometry)
FcRγ− (% CD3−CD56dim)8.5%27.3%2.7%3.9%8.8%4.1%13.8%
NKG2C+ (% CD3−CD56dim)2.3%7.1%4.3%1.8%2.1%2.8%2.8%
γδ T-cells (flow cytometry)
Vδ2− (% CD3+)0.19%0.5%2.2%0.1%0.4%0.7%1.2%
HCMV DNA/miRNA in saliva
HCMV DNA
(UL54 qPCR)		PosNegPosNegNegNegNeg
HCMV DNA
(UL55 nested PCR)		PosPosPosNegNegNegNeg
HCMV-encoded miRNA NegmiR-US5-2-3pNegNTNTNegNT
Plasma HCMV vIL-10 (pg/mL)
2006NANANANANA801NA
2012<60NANA1840945NANA
2014<60<60<60639<601440166
2017NA<60<609167041247786
2021NANANANANA815NA
NT: not tested; NA: no sample available. a Median (range) values for T-cell responses to CMV lysate in seropositive individuals are 245 (0-2077) EliSpots/200,000 PBMC.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Waters, S.; Lee, S.; Irish, A.; Price, P. Challenging the Conventional Interpretation of HCMV Seronegativity. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112382

AMA Style

Waters S, Lee S, Irish A, Price P. Challenging the Conventional Interpretation of HCMV Seronegativity. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(11):2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Waters, Shelley, Silvia Lee, Ashley Irish, and Patricia Price. 2021. "Challenging the Conventional Interpretation of HCMV Seronegativity" Microorganisms 9, no. 11: 2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112382

APA Style

Waters, S., Lee, S., Irish, A., & Price, P. (2021). Challenging the Conventional Interpretation of HCMV Seronegativity. Microorganisms, 9(11), 2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop