Next Article in Journal
Seroprevalence and Risk Factors of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever in Cattle of Smallholder Farmers in Central Malawi
Next Article in Special Issue
The Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Trichoderma Fungi Isolated from Hungarian Grapevines, Part II, Grapevine Stimulation
Previous Article in Journal
Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Sewage Treatment Plants between January 2020 and July 2021 in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biological Control of Plant Diseases: An Evolutionary and Eco-Economic Consideration
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/pathogens10121612
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Trichoderma Fungi Isolated from Hungarian Grapevines. Part I. Isolation, Identification and In Vitro Studies

by
Csilla Kovács
1,
András Csótó
2,3,
Károly Pál
4,
Antal Nagy
2,
Erzsébet Fekete
5,
Levente Karaffa
5,6,
Christian P. Kubicek
7 and
Erzsébet Sándor
4,*
1
Research Institute Újfehértó, Agricultural Research and Educational Farm, University of Debrecen, Vadas tag 2, H-4244 Újfehértó, Hungary
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Science and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi út 138, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
3
Kálmán Kerpely Doctoral School, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi út 138, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
4
Institute of Food Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Science and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi út 138, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
5
Department of Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
6
Institute of Metagenomics, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
7
Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna A-1060, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(12), 1612; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121612
Submission received: 20 November 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 10 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Control of Plant Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This paper reports on the identification and in vitro characterization of several Trichoderma strains isolated from the Tokaj Wine Region in North-East Hungary. Ten isolates were analyzed and found to consist of six individual species—T. gamsii, T. orientale, T. simmonsii, T. afroharzianum, T. atrobrunneum and T. harzianum sensu stricto. The growth potential of the strains was assessed at a range of temperatures. We also report here on the in vitro biocontrol properties and fungicide tolerance of the most promising strains.

1. Introduction

Interest in non-chemical pesticides is increasing worldwide. Consumers’ requirements for lower pesticide residues and chemical pollutant levels, as well as the emergence of resistance among pests has resulted in a worldwide tendency towards restricting the use of chemical pesticides and searching for alternative control methods. For example, the recent Farm to Fork strategy of the European Green Deal requires a 50% reduction of the use of chemical pesticides by 2030 within the European Union. Biopesticides are amongst the most promising agents to replace chemical pesticides. However, they should not only be effective against plant pathogens, but need to fulfill economic and safety criteria as well [1].
Mycoparasitic and antagonistic properties of species of the fungal genus Trichoderma have been known for a long time [2]. While mycoparasitism on basidiomycetes is a general property of the Hypocreaceae, Trichoderma is special because its mycoparasitism also extends to ascomycetes and even other Trichoderma spp. [3]. In fact, the first report on the isolation of a species within this genus [4] roughly coincides with describing their mycoparasitic effect against Fusarium oxysporum [5] and their role in woody disease control [6]. Trichoderma (Hypocrea) species are opportunistic colonizers of various habitats, and while most species are found on the basidiocarps of basidiomycetes, they can be isolated from soil and plants, as well [7]. The arsenal Trichoderma are able to deploy to prevent infection and damage by the plant pathogens is diverse: they can prevent the germination of spores of plant pathogenic fungi by producing secondary metabolites and are able to destroy them with their secreted cell wall-degrading enzymes. Some Trichoderma strains also have been proven to increase resistance towards pathogens by inducing systemic and local defense of the plant. Furthermore, their promotion of plant growth, development, and nutrient uptake are also reported [8,9,10,11]. Trichoderma can utilize all sorts of nutrients and therefore its conidia can be produced en masse on cheap growth substrates such as agro-industrial wastes [12].
Currently, genus Trichoderma contains some 400 accepted species. Due to inter-species similarities, accurate identification based solely on morphological characteristics is not possible [13,14,15]. Therefore Trichoderma spp. described in the last 15 years have been identified by means of phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequence data [16].
Although reports on Trichoderma strains with promising biopesticide characteristics are widespread [17,18,19,20,21], and many products associated with Trichoderma are listed on databases [22,23], only a handful of strains from seven species are distributed in the single US and EU markets (Table 1). It must be noted though that in certain countries some strains are available via local distributors (e.g., Trichoderma atrobrunneum ITEM 908 in Italy by Agrifutur Inc., Alfianello, Italy). On the other hand, some previously marketed products such as Trichodex (Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd., Beer-Sheva, Israel) containing T. harzianum sensu stricto Rifai T-39 has been withdrawn from the market [24,25]. Valid taxonomical status has changed several times following the description and registration of the marketed Trichoderma strains, particularly in the case of those originally defined as Trichoderma harzianum Rifai [26]. In most cases, marker sequences or even full genome sequences (Trichoderma atrobrunneum ITEM 908 and Trichoderma afroharzianum T-22) are available today for correct identification (Table 1).
Because of their opportunistic nature, some Trichoderma species can occur in the rhizosphere, permanently colonizing the root tissues [2,27], while others are facultative endophytes of aerial plant tissues [28,29,30]. Reports on endophytic strains from grapevine are rare, and they are scarcely ever characterized or identified on the species level. Trichoderma sp. was reported to be present in debarked young grapevine in Switzerland [31]. In a comprehensive study from Spain, 44 endophytic Trichoderma strains were found among 585 endophytic fungi isolated from different grapevine cultivars [32]. Jayawardena et al. [33] described three Trichoderma species (putatively identified as “T. atroviride”, “T. cf. harzianum” and “T. lixii” by ITS sequencing), isolated from Vitis vinifera from China, but they were considered of saprophytic origin. More recently, Silva-Valderrama et al. [21] studied a grapevine endophyte Trichoderma sp. isolated earlier in Chile. Unfortunately, the Trichoderma species identification in all these studies was based solely on the ITS1 and ITS2 containing rRNA regions, and the sequences were not compared to those of the ex-type strain and therefore species identity is doubtful. Carro-Huerga [18] described an endophytic Trichoderma sp. from Spain, which—based on a multigene analysis—clustered within the T. harzianum species clade. Whether it is a member of one of the already described species in this clade or a new species could not be decided, however, because only single strains from each species were used for the construction of the phylogenetic tree.
In this paper, in vitro characterization of several Trichoderma isolates collected from the Tokaj Wine Region in Hungary is reported. This is the first report on properly identified and characterized endophytic Trichoderma strains from Europe. The strains were found during the screening of a local vineyard for grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) pathogens and were identified on the basis of ITS1 and ITS2 containing rRNA region and tef1 sequences. The growth potential of the strains was assessed at a range of temperatures. Potential human pathogens—based on temperature preferences and taxonomic characteristics—were discarded. We also report here on the in vitro biocontrol properties and fungicide tolerance of the most promising strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation

Ten Trichoderma strains were isolated (TR01-TR10) from ‘Furmint’ cultivar of grapevine (Vitis vinifera, L.) from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary (Figure 1) in 2014. The 22 years old vineyard showed very high (>34%) occurrence of the grapevine trunk diseases symptoms (GTDs) [34]. Wood chips from cordon of grapevine plants with no GTD symptom expressions were debarked and surface sterilized, and chips were placed on malt extract agar medium (MEA, Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain) in Petri dishes with a sterile scalpel, under aseptic conditions following the method described by Kovács et al. [34]. Emerging Trichoderma-like colonies were then transferred to new 2% MEA plates and isolates were purified as described in Kulling et al. [35]. Conidial suspensions were stored in 40% glycerol at −80 °C in the Laboratory of Microbiological Group, Institute of Food Science, University of Debrecen. TR04, TR05 and TR08 strains have also been deposited in the National Collection of Agricultural and Industrial Microorganism (NCAIM, Budapest, Hungary) as NCAIM (P) F001456, NCAIM (P) F001457 and NCAIM (P) F001458.

2.2. Identification of Endophytic Trichoderma Species

Trichoderma species were first roughly attributed to various species clades on the basis of their ITS1 and ITS2 containing rRNA sequences ([36], primers: SR6R and LR1; Table 2). Their species identity was then assessed by sequencing the large intron of the tef1 gene encoding translation elongation factor 1α ([37], primers: EF1 728F and EF1 986R). In case of 100% sequence identity with the ex-type strain of a known species, the isolate was considered to belong to this species. If the sequence of the isolate was not 100% identical to any of the known species from this clade, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the ex-type strains of the species with closest similarity, and other isolates of them whose species identity had been approved [7,26].
To this end, DNA was isolated from the monosporic Trichoderma strains with disrupting the 3 days old fungal mycelia grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain) at 25 °C in dark with MagNALyser (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). DNA isolation was carried out using NucleoSpin Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were determined by a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The isolated DNA was checked up on 0.8% agarose gel in TAE buffer.
DNA regions containing the ITS1 and ITS2 locus and the tef1 fragment were amplified with different universal primers (Table 2) in MyGenie 96 Gradient Thermal Block thermal cycler (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea) with the PCR program described in Váczy et al. [38]. The annealing temperature applied as well as the primers used for the amplification are summarized in Table 2.
NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel) was used for the purification of PCR products. DNA concentrations measurements were performed by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific) from 2 µL DNA. Sequencing of the purified amplification products was performed by Microsynth Austria GmbH (Vienna, Austria). Sequences were deposited in GenBank (OK560824-OK560833 and OK655885-OK655894).
The sequences were first compared with those deposited in the NCBI GenBank database by NBLAST analysis [39]. For phylogenetic analysis these were aligned with Clustal-X [40,41,42] and manually checked for ambiguities and adjusted, when necessary, using Genedoc [43]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed with MEGA 7.0 program [44]. The maximum likelihood method, based on the JC model was used for the ITS1 and ITS2 containing rRNA region and K2P model for the tef1 sequences. Positions containing gaps and missing data were not considered. For maximum likelihood analyses, the nearest-neighbor interchange was used as the heuristic method for tree inference. Support for internal branches was assessed by 1000 bootstrapped pseudoreplicates of data.

2.3. Mycelial Growth

The mycelial growth of the Trichoderma isolates was determined at different temperatures (5; 18.5; 20; 22.5; 25; 30 and 37 °C) in three replicates. A 10 mm diameter mycelial plug was cut from the growing edge of the fungal colonies and placed on the center of potato dextrose agar (PDA, Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain) in a 90 mm diameter Petri-dish. Two colony diameters were measured regularly for 4 days, or until the colonies reached the edge of the Petri-dish. Average data calculated from the two colony diameters were used for further statistical analyses.
The mycelial growth was evaluated separately at 5 °C, at room temperature or at typical field condition by data measured between 18.5 and 25 °C and at 37 °C. Comparison of species and strains were carried out at two times at the start of the intensive growth and before the fastest-growing strain reached the edge of the Petri-dish.
The fit of our data to the assumptions of parametric tests was tested by Levene test and Q-Q plots. Since the data did not fulfill the assumptions, the growth potential of the species and strains were compared with Kruskall-Wallis (K-W) nonparametric test. If this showed significant differences the post-hoc comparisons were made by Mann-Whitney U (M-W) test. As well, this latter test was used when two independent groups were analyzed.

2.4. Biocontrol Index of Different Trichoderma Species

The mycoparasitic ability of Trichoderma isolates was studied according to the method of [45], by BCI (biocontrol index) determination as follows:
BCI   % = d A d A + d P × 100
where dA: horizontal diameter of mycelial growth of the antagonist on PDA; dP: horizontal diameter of mycelial growth of the pathogen on PDA.
The tested pathogens were previously isolated and identified in the University of Debrecen Microbiological Laboratory of Food Science Institute (Debrecen, Hungary). Aphanomyces cochlioides and Pythium acantophoron were purchased from the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (Utrecht, The Netherlands). The plant pathogens used in the BCI tests are summarized in Table 3.
Two days old Trichoderma and three days old pathogen colonies grown on PDA medium were used for inoculation. A plant pathogen hyphal plug was first inoculated 1.5 cm away from the center of a Petri-dish, as described above for mycelial growth test. Following a 24 h long incubation, the tested Trichoderma mycelia plug was also inoculated 3 cm away from the pathogen on the same plate. Pictures were taken following 10 days incubation at 25 °C in the dark. Experiments were carried out in triplicates. Samples from the interacting zones were prepared and were screened for loops, using an AxioImager light microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

2.5. Fungicide Tolerance Test

Some of the fungicides routinely used in Hungarian vineyards were utilized to test resistance of the isolated Trichoderma strains (Table 4). We used the highest recommended concentration to be applied in vineyards, calculated from the product labels (Table 4).
Fungicides were added to the still-fluid PDA after it cooled down to 50 °C following sterilization, just before being poured into Petri-dishes, thereby avoiding heat-degradation of the chemicals. Inoculation was performed as described for the mycelial growth tests, while incubation occurred at 25 °C in the dark for 54 h. Growth inhibition was calculated from three replicates by comparing to the mycelial growth on fungicide free PDA, as follows:
Growth   inhibition   % = d c − d f d c × 100
where df: diameter of mycelial growth on PDA containing fungicide; dc: diameter of mycelial growth on PDA.

3. Results

3.1. Strain Identification

The phylogenetic analysis of the ITS sequences placed eight of the ten endophytic Trichoderma isolates (TR01-05, TR07 and TR09-10) into the Harzianum species clade of Trichoderma (Figure 2). Only two strains belonged to other groups. The TR08 clustered with the species of the Viride clade of Trichoderma and was identified through tef1 sequence as Trichoderma gamsii (Table 5). The TR06 clustered with species from the Longibrachiatum clade of Trichoderma, and the phylogenetic analysis of its tef1 sequence identified this strain as Trichoderma orientale (Figure 3, Table 5).
The isolates that fell based on ITS1 and 2 sequence analysis into the Harzianum species clade, consisted of several species: four of the eight strains were identified as Trichoderma simmonsii, two as T. harzianum sensu stricto, and one each as Trichoderma afroharzianum, and Trichoderma atrobrunneum (Table 5).
Molecular phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood method (Kimura 2-parameter model. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7.

3.2. Growth Characteristics at Different Temperatures

The mycelial growth of the different isolates was tested in vitro. Rapid growth was detected on PDA for all strains: they overgrew the entire Petri-dish within one week at temperatures between 18.5 and 30 °C (Figure 4). However, at 5 °C, mycelial growth was detected only in the second week (Table 6a). The majority of the strains grew fastest at 30 °C, except for TR06 (T. orientale) and TR08 (T. gamsii), whose growth maxima occurred at 37 °C and 25 °C (Figure 4).
The majority of the strains grew faster at higher temperatures. T. simmonsii (TR01-03 and TR05) showed fastest growth at 30 °C. The optimal growth temperature of T. afroharzianum (TR04) and T. harzianum (TR07 and TR10) was 30 °C as well. T. atrobrunneum (TR09) and T. gamsii (TR08) showed two different optima. The former grew faster at 18, 25 and 30 °C, while the latter grew similarly at 18, 22.5, 25 and 30 °C and did not grow at 37 °C. Only T. orientale (TR06) preferred 37 °C (i.e., the highest temperature tested) and showed significantly faster growth under that condition (Figure 4).
Growth characteristics changed during the cultivation, therefore data from the first day following the appearance of mycelia (24 h at 18.5–37 °C, and 168 h at 5 °C) were excluded from further analysis.
Although all strains of the six species have started to grow at 5 °C after one week, there were marked differences (K-W: H(5, 30) = 21.03, p = 0.0008 at 7th day, and = 21.91, p = 0.0005 at 14th day) between them (Table 6a). The fastest growth was detected for T. simmonsii, T. afroharzianum and T. atrobrunneum, while T. harzianum sensu stricto was the slowest both at the early (8th day) and the late (14th day) stages. The growth of T. gamsii (TR06) has changed over time; it was one of the slowest in the first 8 days, similarly to T. harzianum sensu stricto, but later showed accelerated growth, similar to T. orientale (TR08). Surprisingly, there was marked differences between the strains of the T. simmonsii although they were collected from the same vineyard, similarly to the two T. harzianum sensu stricto strains.
The mycelial growth of the different species and strains had significant differences (K-W: H (5, 120) = 64.86 p < 0.0001 at 24 h, and = 29.716 p < 0.0001 at 54 h) at the temperature range between 18.5 °C and 25 °C (room temperature as well as typical field conditions). At this temperature range, the growth of T. harzianum sensu stricto was the slowest, similarly to the case at 5 °C. The fastest growing isolate was T. orientale, followed by T. gamsii. The growth of T. simmonsii and T. afroharzianum fell between the fastest and the slowest ones and were quite similar to each other. T. atrobrunneum was growing as slowly as T. harzianum sensu stricto at 54 h (Table 6b).
The strains belonging to T. simmonsii (K-W: H(3, 48) = 4.48, p = 0.21 at 24 h, and = 4.65 p = 0.1993 at 54 h) and T. harzianum sensu stricto (M-W: U = 65.00, p = 0.68, at 24 h, and U = 70.00, p = 0.91 at 54 h) had similar characteristics at this temperature range (Table 6b).
The growth potential at 37 °C was tested to select potential human pathogens. T. orientale showed the highest growth rate at that temperature (Figure 4), and its initial growth rate was significantly higher than that of the other strains (Table 6c). Growth was not detected at this temperature for T. gamsii (Figure 4, Table 6c).
Although T. orientale (TR06) showed the best growth characteristics of all endophytic Trichoderma strains, it was excluded from further analysis due to its rapid growth at 37 °C. T. harzianum sensu stricto had the worse growth potential at each temperature tested except for 37 °C. Although T. gamsii did not growth at 37 °C, it was one of the slowest growing isolate at 5 °C as well. As a result of the growth tests, the two strains TR05 and TR04 were chosen for further analysis. They belong to two different species within the Harzianum clade: T. simmonsii and T. afroharzianum. They showed excellent growth both at 5 °C, and in a range that covers the most typical field conditions (18.5–25 °C), but their growth was significantly slower than that of the potential human pathogen T. orientale.

3.3. Potential for Biocontrol

Biocontrol potential in dual culture tests were studied for the TR04 and TR05 strains, against different fungi with pathogenic potential against plants. The TR04 (T. afroharzianum) showed high BCI against all the tested Ascomycota and Oomycota pathogens (Table 7), including three GTD pathogens isolated from grapevine (Diplodia seriata, Eutypa lata, Neofusicoccum parvum). This strain completely overgrew all but two pathogens and sporulated on their mycelia, killing the pathogen colonies. The TR05 strain also had high BCI (>80%), except against Botryosphaeria dothidea. Mycoparasitic activity was also detected by hyphal coiling and penetration (Figure 5).

3.4. Pesticide Tolerance

None of the tested pesticides could completely inhibit the growth of the Trichoderma TR04 and TR05 strains (Table 8). Three of the pesticides (Orvego, Sercadis, Teldor 500 SC) did not, or only slightly (7%) inhibited the mycelial growth of the TR04 (T. afroharzianum) and TR05 (T. simmonsii) strains in the concentrations used in vineyards. Only Talentum 20 EW could inhibit the growth of both strains in >50%—in this case, the concentration of the active ingredient (myclobutanil) in the growth medium was 80 mg/L. In case of Rally Q SC (45 mg/L myclobutanil concentration), inhibition fell below 50% for both strains, despite that this pesticide contains an additional active ingredient (Quinoxifen), too.

4. Discussion

Sustainable, environmental-friendly and climate neutral agricultural production is among the most important goals to be implemented all across the world. In the European Union the most recent agronomical frame for legislation, the Farm to Fork Strategy of the European Green Deal [46] has stated that “The EU needs to develop innovative ways to protect harvests from pests and diseases and to consider the potential role of new innovative techniques to improve the sustainability of the food system, while ensuring that they are safe”. The aim is to replace 50% of the chemical pesticides with biological, physical and other non-chemical methods in the integrated pest management within a decade. Therefore, appropriate pest control methods such as antagonist or hyper-parasitic (micro)organisms must be provided on the emerging fields of organic farming [47]. Their advantages include the lack of resistance developing against them, their ability to adapt to the evolving pests, lower toxicity, faster decomposition rate, and consequently the lack of remnant hazardous residues. Negative impact on environment, human or animal health is minimized, particularly if their environment of origin is similar to the one in which they are supposed to be used [1,48].
One of the fundamental requirements of any mycopesticide is proper identification and characterization [49]. Identification is also required to detect the relationship to known plant, animal or human pathogens.
Trichoderma spp. are among the most commonly marketed and employed microbial agents in agriculture, used also as biofertilizer and biostimulant in addition to being a biopesticide. Their efficiency is due to: (i) efficient competition for nutrients and space competitors, (ii) their ability to eliminate plant pathogen fungi via direct interaction (such as production of antimicrobial substances, penetration and others), and (iii) their ability to induce systemic plant resistance [50]. Although quite a few registered Trichoderma-containing products are available commercially, the majority of them are restricted to a single or a handful of countries [24]. Several of these products contain undefined strains and could potentially include pathogens of cultivated mushrooms or facultative pathogens of immunocompromised mammals including human [51]. Trichoderma are also occasionally part of a mixture of ingredients [24]. Although almost all registered and marketed Trichoderma contain isolates from the soil, there are reports about root, wood or leaf endophytes as well [21,52,53,54,55].
The ten endophytic Trichoderma strains were isolated and identified from grapevine cordon wood in an old vineyard in the Tokaj Vine Region, Hungary (Table 5). They were identified as species belonging to three large clades: Harzianum, Viride and Longibrachiatum. One strain (TR06) belonging to the Longibrachiatum clade of Trichoderma, was identified as T. orientale (Table 5, Figure 3). This species was described first as Hypocrea orientalis in 1998 [26] and has a global distribution [56]. It grows on wood and in soil [57]. T. orientale and the closely related, sympatric T. longibrachiatum are well known as opportunistic pathogens of immunocompromised human and animal [7,51,58]. Also in this study, the TR06 T. orientale strain was shown to grow the fastest at 37 °C, thus it was excluded from further studies.
The Viride clade of Trichoderma was also represented by one strain (TR08), identified as T. gamsii based on its ITS and tef1 sequences. It was described by Samuels and Druzhinina [14] as a close relative of T. viride and T. atroviride [13,59]. Trichoderma gamsii can be isolated from many different geographical locations and is also known as an endophyte of the traditional Chinese medicinal plant Panax notoginseng [60]. This species can be found in registered, commercially available biocontrol products (Table 1, [24]). The isolated T. gamsii strain displayed reduced growth at low temperature (5 °C), limiting its further application. It should be noted that low temperature growth tests are rarely performed during the characterization Trichoderma species. Since it may take longer periods of time to detect growth at low temperatures, limited cultivation time may cause false negative results [19]. Some biocontrol Trichoderma strains isolated from soil (putatively identified as “T. aureoviride, T. harzianum and T. viride”) were reported to grow well at 5 °C [51].
Eight of the isolated endophytic strains were identified within the Harzianum clade. Only two strains were identified as T. harzianum sensu stricto (TR07 and TR10), and they displayed the poorest growth potential (Table 6). The most widely available biocontrol strain, “T. harzianum T22”, which is the active ingredient in several biocontrol and plant growth-stimulating products (Table 1, [61]), is in fact not T. harzianum sensu stricto but T. afroharzianum [26]. First found in Africa, it is now believed to be ubiquitous, both in the soil and on roots [62], and grows well at 35 °C. It was represented by one strain (TR04) among our grapevine endophytic isolates with excellent growth potential even at 5 °C.
T. atrobrunneum was also represented with one strain (TR09) in our isolates, with growth characteristics being similar to T. afroharzianum, except at 30 °C where the growth of T. atrobrunneum was slower. These species are known only from temperate regions. T. simmonsii was first isolated from rotting bark in the United States in 1991 [26]. It most commonly occurs on rotting woody parts and has already been isolated in many European countries and various parts of the United States. It is marked as Trichosan® and Vitalin T-50® [26]. This species was represented by four isolates (40%, the highest percentage) in our study.
Two strains (TR04 and TR05) were chosen for further studies based on the criteria of good growth at 5 °C, as well as at ambient temperature range, but with limited growth at 37 °C. They both exhibited excellent BCI against the tested GTD pathogens isolated from grapevine (Diplodia seriata, Eutypa lata, Neofusicoccum parvum). Their BCIs were also good towards Ooomycota and Ascomycota plant pathogens isolated from other hosts.
The isolated strains with appropriate growth characteristics and good BCI were tested for potential resistance against fungicides routinely applied in vineyards. None of the tested fungicides could completely inhibit the growth of the two most promising strains (TR04, TR05). It was not surprising that the pesticide used against downy mildew (Orvego)—whose active ingredients are dimethomorph (targeting cellulose synthase) and ametoctradin (affecting respiration as a Qo site inhibitor)—did not inhibit mycelial growth of either of the two Trichoderma strains. It was more of a surprise that the strains were also insensitive towards both the fluxapyroxad- and the fenhexamid-containing pesticides. Fluxapyroxad is a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor affecting respiration, while fenhexamid is a keto reductase inhibitor within sterol biosynthesis [63]. Even a powerful pesticide (Rally Q SC) with combined myclobutanil (demethylation inhibitor in sterol biosynthesis) and quinoxyfen (with signal transduction mode of action) content showed <50% inhibition over mycelial growth. Although the primary reason to use biocontrol agents such as Trichoderma is to reduce the usage of chemical pesticides, applying fungicide-tolerant strains within a complex integrated plant protection strategy (IPM) is as well lucrative. Several studies have reported resistance towards a variety of fungicides [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] and fenhexamid tolerance of a putative T. harzianum strain (MAUL-20) has also been reported [69,73]. However, myclobutanil tolerance of our isolates was much higher than previously reported for Trichoderma [74].
Trichoderma strains isolated from healthy plants from agricultural fields may have several advantages. They have already adapted to the host, the particular agricultural practices (e.g., fungicide application) as well as to the climatic conditions (e.g., cold tolerance). Moreover, endophytic strains—whose growth is preferred in planta—may pose less harm to the soil microbiome. In summary, we can conclude that based on in vitro studies, the endophytic T. afroharzianum and T. simmonsii strains isolated from a Hungarian vineyard are promising biocontrol agents, and their potential clearly warrants further in planta and in field studies. These are described and discussed in a subsequent paper of this Pathogens Special Issue.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.; Data curation, A.N., L.K. and E.S.; Formal analysis, A.N., E.F., L.K. and C.P.K.; Funding acquisition, L.K.; Investigation, Cs.K., A.Cs. and K.P.; Methodology, Cs.K., K.P. and E.F.; Project administration, A.Cs.; Supervision, A.N., L.K. and E.S.; Writing—original draft, Cs.K., A.Cs., K.P., A.N., E.F., L.K., C.P.K. and E.S.; Writing—review & editing, L.K., C.P.K. and E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Fund (grants NN128867 to LK and K138489 to EF). The publication is supported by the EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00022 project, and co-financed by the European Union and the European Social Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Gyula Szakadát for the technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors E.S. and C.K. are the inventors of a Hungarian patent entitled „Biopeszticid gombatörzsek és készítmények”. P1800012/18, Submission Year: 2018, NSZO: C12R 1/885, A01N 63/00, A01N 63/04, C12N 1/00. The patent provides legal protection to the biocontrol-related applications of some of the Trichoderma strains described in this manuscript in Hungary. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests.

References

  1. Zaki, O.; Weekersb, F.; Thonarta, P.; Teschc, E.; Kuenemannc, P.; Jacquesa, P. Limiting factors of mycopesticide development. Biol. Control 2020, 144, 104220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Druzhinina, I.S.; Seidl-Seiboth, V.; Herrera-Estrella, A.; Horwitz, B.A.; Kenerley, C.M.; Monte, E.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Zeilinger, S.; Grigoriev, I.V.; Kubicek, C.P. Trichoderma: The genomics of opportunistic success. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Druzhinina, I.S.; Chenthamara, K.; Zhang, J.; Atanasova, L.; Yang, D.; Miao, Y.; Rahimi, M.J.; Grujic, M.; Cai, F.; Pourmehdi, S.; et al. Massive lateral transfer of genes encoding plant cell wall-degrading enzymes to the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma from its plant-associated hosts. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thakur, A.K.; Norris, R.V. A Biochemical study of some soil fungi with special reference to ammonia production. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 1928, 11, 141. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tjamos, E.C.; Papavizas, G.C.; Cook, R.J. Biological Control of Plant Diseases: Progress and Challenges for the Future; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1922; p. 222. [Google Scholar]
  6. Weindling, R. Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopathology 1932, 22, 837–845. [Google Scholar]
  7. Druzhinina, I.S.; Komon-Zelazowska, M.; Kredics, L.; Hatvani, L.; Antal, Z.; Belayneh, T.; Kubicek, C.P. Alternative reproductive strategies of Hypocrea orientalis and genetically close but clonal Trichoderma longibrachiatum, both capable of causing invasive mycoses of humans. Microbiology 2008, 154, 3447–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Harman, G.; Howell, C.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species—Opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Wees, S.C.; Van der Ent, S.; Pieterse, C.M. Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Harman, G.E. Overview of Mechanisms and Uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pieterse, C.M.J.; Zamioudis, C.; Berendsen, R.L.; Weller, D.M.; Van Wees, S.C.M.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. Induced Systemic Resistance by Beneficial Microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2014, 52, 347–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Mulatu, A.; Alemu, T.; Megersa, N.; Vetukuri, R.R. Optimization of Culture Conditions and Production of Bio-Fungicides from Trichoderma Species under Solid-State Fermentation Using Mathematical Modeling. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Druzhinina, I.; Kubicek, C.P. Species Concepts and Biodiversity in Trichoderma and Hypocrea: From Aggregate Species to Species Clusters? J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2005, 6, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Samuels, G.J. Trichoderma: Systematics, the sexual state, and ecology. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Waghunde, R.R.; Shelake, R.M.; Sabalpara, A.N. Trichoderma: A significant fungus for agriculture and environment. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 11, 1952–1965. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cai, F.; Druzhinina, I.S. In honor of John Bissett: Authoritative guidelines on molecular identification of Trichoderma. Fungal Divers. 2021, 107, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Verma, M.; Brara, S.K.; Tyagia, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Valéroa, J.R. Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp.: Panoply of biological control. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 37, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carro-Huerga, G.; Compant, S.; Gorfer, M.; Cardoza, R.E.; Schmoll, M.; Gutiérrez, S.; Casquero, P.A. Colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by the Endophyte Trichoderma sp. Strain T154: Biocontrol Activity Against Phaeoacremonium minimum. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Úrbez-Torres, J.R.; Tomaselli, E.; Pollard-Flamand, J.; Boulé, J.; Gerin, D.; Pollastro, S. Characterization of Trichoderma isolates from southern Italy, and their potential biocontrol activity against grapevine trunk disease fungi. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2020, 59, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nuangmek, W.; Aiduang, W.; Kumla, J.; Lumyong, S.; Suwannarach, N. Evaluation of a Newly Identified Endophytic Fungus, Trichoderma phayaoense for Plant Growth Promotion and Biological Control of Gummy Stem Blight and Wilt of Muskmelon. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 634772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva-Valderrama, I.; Toapanta, D.; Miccono, M.A.; Lolas, M.; Díaz, G.A.; Cantu, D.; Castro, A. Biocontrol potential of grapevine endophytic and rhizospheric fungi against trunk pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 614620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pesticide Info Database. Available online: https://www.pesticideinfo.org/ (accessed on 7 February 2021).
  23. BPDB: Bio-Pesticides DataBase. Available online: https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/bpdb (accessed on 7 February 2021).
  24. Woo, S.L.; Ruocco, M.; Vinale, F.; Nigro, M.; Marra, R.; Lombardi, N.; Pascale, A.; Lanzuise, S.; Manganiello, G.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. Open Mycol. J. 2014, 8, 71–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. NÉBIH (2009): 2009-ben Kiadott Növényvédő Szer Forgalomba Hozatali és Felhasználási Engedélyek. Available online: https://portal.nebih.gov.hu/-/novenyvedo-szer-okiratok-tara-2009 (accessed on 7 February 2021).
  26. Chaverri, P.; Branco-Rocha, F.; Jaklitsch, W.; Gazis, R.; Degenkolb, T.; Samuels, G.J. Systematics of the Trichoderma harzianum species complex and the re-identification of commercial biocontrol strains. Mycologia 2015, 107, 558–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Vargas, W.A.; Mandawe, J.C.; Kenerley, C.M. Plant-derived sucrose is a key element in the symbiotic association between Trichoderma virens and maize plants. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 792–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Lin, F.; Kubicek, C.P.; Druzhinina, I.S. Trichoderma taxi sp. nov., an endophytic fungus from Chinese yew Taxus mairei. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 270, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hanada, R.E.; de Jorge Souza, T.; Pomella, A.W.V.; Hebbar, K.P.; Pereira, J.O.; Ismaiel, A.; Samuels, G.J. Trichoderma martiale sp. nov., a new endophyte from sapwood of Theobroma cacao with a potential for biological control. Mycol. Res. 2008, 112, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mulaw, T.G.; Kubicek, C.P.; Druzhinina, I.S. The rhizosphere of Coffea arabica in its native highland forests of Ethiopia provides a niche for a distinguished diversity of Trichoderma. Diversity 2010, 2, 527–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Casieri, L.; Hofstetter, V.; Viret, O.; Gindro, K. Fungal communities living in the wood of different cultivars of young Vitis vinifera plants. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2009, 48, 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  32. González, V.; Tello, M.L. The endophytic mycota associated with Vitis vinifera in central Spain. Fungal Divers. 2011, 47, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jayawardena, R.S.; Purahong, W.; Zhang, W.; Wubet, T.; Li, X.H.; Liu, M.; Zhao, W.; Hyde, K.D.; Liu, J.; Yan, J. Biodiversity of fungi on Vitis vinifera L. revealed by traditional and high-resolution culture-independent approaches. Fungal Divers. 2018, 90, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kovács, C.S.; Balling, P.; Bihari, Z.; Nagy, A.; Sándor, E. Incidence of grapevine trunk diseases is influenced by soil, topology and vineyard age, but not by Diplodia seriata infection rate in the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary. Phytoparasitica 2017, 45, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kulling, C.; Szakacs, G.; Kubicek, C.P. Molecular identification of Trichoderma species from Russia, Siberia and the Himalaya. Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  37. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Váczy, K.Z.; Sándor, E.; Karaffa, L.; Fekete, E.; Fekete, É.; Árnyasi, M.; Czeglédi, L.; Kövics Gy, J.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Kubicek, C.P. Sexual Recombination in the Botrytis cinerea populations in Hungarian vineyards. Phytopathology 2008, 98, 1312–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Higgins, D.G.; Sharp, P.M. CLUSTAL: A package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 1988, 73, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. ClustalW and ClustalX version 2. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Nicholas, K.B.; Nicholas, H.B.; Deerfield, D.W. GeneDoc: Analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBnet News 1997, 4, 14. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Szekeres, A.; Leitgeb, B.; Kredics, L.; Manczinger, L.; Vágvölgyi, C. A novel, image analysis-based method for the evaluation of in vitro antagonism. J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 65, 619–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal; COM(2019) 640 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52019DC0640&print=true (accessed on 7 February 2021).
  47. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Farm to Fork Strategy; COM(2020) 381 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0381&print=true (accessed on 7 February 2021).
  48. Leahy, J.; Mendelsohn, M.; Kough, J.; Jones, R.; Berckes, N. Biopesticide Oversight and Registration at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. OECD. Annex to the Working Document on the Risk Assessment of Secondary Metabolites of Microbial Biocontrol Agents; ENV/JM/MONO(2018)33/ANN1; Series on Pesticides No. 98; OECD: Paris, France, 2018; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2018)33/ann1&doclanguage=en (accessed on 7 February 2021).
  50. Viterbo, A.; Inbar, J.; Hadar, Y.; Chet, I. Plant Disease Biocontrol and Induced Resistance via Fungal Mycoparasites. In A Comprehensive Treatise on Fungi as Experimental Systems for Basic and Applied Research, 2nd ed.; The Mycota; Kubicek, C.P., Druzhinina, I.S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 127–146. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kredics, L.; Antal, Z.; Dóczi, I.; Manczinger, L.; Kevei, F.; Nagy, E. Clinical importance of the genus Trichoderma. A review. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2003, 50, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Longa, C.M.O.; Pertot, I.; Tosi, S. Ecophysiological requirements and survival of a Trichoderma atroviride isolate with biocontrol potential. J. Basic Microbiol. 1998, 48, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ruano-Rosa, D.; Prieto, P.; Rincón, A.; Gómez Rodríguez, M.V.; Valderrama, R.; Barroso, J.B.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Fate of Trichoderma harzianum in the olive rhizosphere: Time course of the root colonization process and interaction with the fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae. BioControl 2016, 61, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bailey, B.A.; Melnick, R.L. The Endophytic Trichoderma. In Trichoderma: Biology and Applications; Mukherjee, P.K., Horwitz, B.K., Singh, U.S., Mukherjee, M., Schmoll, M., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2013; pp. 152–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tseng, Y.-H.; Rouina, H.; Groten, K.; Rajani, P.; Furch, A.C.U.; Reichelt, M.; Baldwin, I.T.; Nataraja, K.N.; Uma Shaanker, R.; Oelmüller, R. An endophytic Trichoderma strain promotes growth of its hosts and defends against pathogen attack. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 573670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kubicek, C.P.; Komon-Zelazowska, M.; Druzhinina, I.S. Fungal genus Hypocrea/Trichoderma: From barcodes to biodiversity. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2008, 9, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Samuels, G.J.; Chaverri, P.; Farr, D.F.; McCray, E.B. Trichoderma Online, Systematic Mycology 10 and Microbiology Laboratory; ARS, USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases (accessed on 7 February 2021).
  58. Kuhls, K.; Lieckfeldt, E.; Börner, T.; Guého, E. Molecular re-identification of human pathogenic Trichoderma isolates as Trichoderma longibrachiatum and Trichoderma citrinoviride. Med. Mycol. 1999, 37, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jaklitsch, W.; Samuels, G.; Dodd, S.; Lu, B.; Druzhinina, I.S. Hypocrea rufa/Trichoderma viride: A reassessment, and description of five closely related species with and without warted conidia. Stud. Mycol. 2006, 56, 135–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Marik, T.; Tyagi, C.; Racić, G.; Rakk, D.; Szekeres, A.; Vágvölgyi, C.S.; Kredics, L. New 19-residue Peptaibols from Trichoderma Clade Viride. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Samuels, G.J.; Hebbar, P.K. Trichoderma: Identification and Agricultural Properties; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2015; p. 204. [Google Scholar]
  62. Chaverri, P.; Samuels, G.J. Evolution of habitat preference and nutrition mode in a cosmopolitan fungal genus with evidence of inter kingdom host jumps and major shifts in ecology. Evolution 2013, 67, 2823–2837. [Google Scholar]
  63. Fungicide Resistance Action Committee. FRAC Code List 2021, Fungal Control Agents Sorted by Cross Resistance Pattern and Mode of Action. FRAC: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; Available online: https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/publications/frac-code-list/frac-code-list-2021--final.pdf?sfvrsn=f7ec499a_2 (accessed on 7 December 2021).
  64. McLean, K.L.; Hunt, J.; Stewart, A. Compatibility of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum C52 with selected fungicides. N. Z. Plant Prot. 2001, 54, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Bhai, S.R.; Thomas, J. Compatibility of Trichoderma harzianum (Rifai.) with fungicides, insecticides and fertilizers. Indian Phytopathol. 2010, 63, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  66. Madhavi, G.B.; Bhattiprolu, S.L.; Reddy, V.B. Compatibility of biocontrol agent Trichoderma viride with various pesticides. J. Hortl. Sci. 2011, 6, 71–73. [Google Scholar]
  67. Vasundara, P.; Rangaswamy, V.; Johnson, M. Compatibility studies with fungicides, insecticides and their combinations on Trichoderma viridae in invitro conditions International. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2015, 6, 310–316. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wedajo, B. Compatibility Studies of Fungicides with Combination of Trichoderma species under in vitro conditions. Virol. Mycol. 2015, 4, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Khirallah, W.; Mouden, N.; Selmaoui, K.; Achbani, E.; Benkirane, R.; Touhami, A.O.; Douira, A. Compatibility of Trichoderma spp. with some fungicides under in vitro conditions. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2016, 7, 9060–9067. [Google Scholar]
  70. Silva, M.A.F.; Moura, K.E.; Moura, K.E.; Salomão, D.; Patricio, F.R.A. Compatibility of Trichoderma isolates with pesticides used in lettuce crop. Summa Phytopathol. 2018, 44, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Tomer, A.; Singh, R.; Prasad, D. Compatibility Trichoderma harzianum with systemic and two non systemic fungicides of in vitro. Asian J. Crop Sci. 2018, 10, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Maurya, S.; Rai, D.; Dubey, S.; Pal, R.K. Compatibility of Trichoderma harzianum with different fungicides under in vitro. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2020, 8, 2946–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Caron, J.; Thibodeau, P.O.; Bélanger, R.R. Sélection d’isolats de Trichoderma comme agent de lute biologique contre la moisissure grise (Botrytis cinerea) dans la production de la tomate de serre. In Rapport de Recherche, Club D’encadrement Technique Pro-Serre; SPSQ: Québec, QC, Canada, 1994; p. 48. [Google Scholar]
  74. Figueras-Roca, M.; Cristani, C.; Vannacci, G. Sensitivity of Trichoderma isolates and selected resistant mutants to DMI fungicides. Crop Prot. 1996, 15, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 10 01612 g001 550
Figure 1. The origin of the Trichoderma strains. Tarcal, Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary.
Figure 1. The origin of the Trichoderma strains. Tarcal, Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary.
Pathogens 10 01612 g001
Pathogens 10 01612 g002 550
Figure 2. Greatest log likelihood ITS Maximum Parsimony phylogenetic tree generated from TR01-TR10 (Table 5) and deponated sequences with Accession Number before species name. The length of branches is proportional to the number of nucleotide differences in the sequences, the scale is under the dendrogram. The numbers above branches show the results of the bootstrap analysis values from 1000 replicates.
Figure 2. Greatest log likelihood ITS Maximum Parsimony phylogenetic tree generated from TR01-TR10 (Table 5) and deponated sequences with Accession Number before species name. The length of branches is proportional to the number of nucleotide differences in the sequences, the scale is under the dendrogram. The numbers above branches show the results of the bootstrap analysis values from 1000 replicates.
Pathogens 10 01612 g002
Pathogens 10 01612 g003 550
Figure 3. Maximum Parsimony phylogenetic tree generated from tef1 of Trichoderma isolates TR01–TR10 (Table 5) and deponated sequences with Accession Number before species name. The length of branches is proportional to the number of nucleotide differences in the sequences, the scale is under the dendrogram. The numbers above branches show the results of the bootstrap analysis values higher than 50, from 1000 replicates.
Figure 3. Maximum Parsimony phylogenetic tree generated from tef1 of Trichoderma isolates TR01–TR10 (Table 5) and deponated sequences with Accession Number before species name. The length of branches is proportional to the number of nucleotide differences in the sequences, the scale is under the dendrogram. The numbers above branches show the results of the bootstrap analysis values higher than 50, from 1000 replicates.
Pathogens 10 01612 g003
Pathogens 10 01612 g004 550
Figure 4. Average mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma species isolated in the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary. Colony diameter was measured at 30 h following inoculation. Different letters show significant differences based on pairwise comparison with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Average mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma species isolated in the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary. Colony diameter was measured at 30 h following inoculation. Different letters show significant differences based on pairwise comparison with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).
Pathogens 10 01612 g004
Pathogens 10 01612 g005 550
Figure 5. Hyphal coiling of Trichoderma afroharzianum (TR04 strain) against Diplodia seriata hypha. Sample was stained with lactophenol cotton blue. Images were prepared with Zeiss AxioImager phase-contrast microscope, equipped with AxioCam MRc5 camera.
Figure 5. Hyphal coiling of Trichoderma afroharzianum (TR04 strain) against Diplodia seriata hypha. Sample was stained with lactophenol cotton blue. Images were prepared with Zeiss AxioImager phase-contrast microscope, equipped with AxioCam MRc5 camera.
Pathogens 10 01612 g005
Table
Table 1. Trichoderma species in marketed biocontrol products.
Table 1. Trichoderma species in marketed biocontrol products.
Trichoderma SpeciesStrainDeponated Sequences/GenomeProductProducer/DistributorReference/Database Information
Harzianum clade of Trichoderma
T. afroharzianum
(formerly: T. harzianum Rifai)		T-22
(KRL-AG2, ATCC20847)		https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/portal/pages/projectStatus.jsf?db=TriharT22_1 (accessed on 7 December 2021)T-22 WP
BW240 G a (PlantShield® HC Biological Fungicide; T-22® HC Biological Fungicide; RootShield® Home and Garden Biological Fungicide; Root Guardian; RootShield® Seed Treatment; RootShield® Seed Treatment Biological Fungicide; RootShield® AG; RootShield® AG Biological Fungicide)		Bio Works Inc., Victor, NY, USAhttp://www.pesticideinfo.org (accessed on 7 February 2021)
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/068539-00010-20190430.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2021)
https://mycocosm.jgi.doe.gov/TriharT22_1/TriharT22_1.info.html (accessed on 7 February 2021)
T-22™ HChttp://www.pesticideinfo.org (accessed on 7 February 2021)
Trianum G Biological Fungicide (Trianum Granules Biological Fungicide; Trianum G)Koppert Biological Systems, Inc., Howell, MI, USAhttp://www.pesticideinfo.org (accessed on 7 February 2021)
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/089635-00003-20151005.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2021)
Trianum WG
Biological Fungicide (Trianum P Biological Fungicide; Trianum P; Trianum Granules
Biological Fungicide; T-22 WG Water Dispersible Granules-Biological Fungicide)		http://www.pesticideinfo.org (accessed on 7 February 2021)
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/089635-00002-20150930.pdf (accessed on 7 February 2021)
T. atrobrunneum (formerly: T. harzianum Rifai)ITEM 908PNRQ10000000Trianum PKoppert Biological Systems, Inc., Howell, MI, USAhttps://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/bpdb/Reports/2034.htm (accessed on 7 February 2021)
Virens clade of Trichoderma
T. virensG-41ATCC 20609BW240 G a (RootShield® Plus Granules, RootShield® Plus Granules Biological Fungicide,
TurfShield® PLUS G, TurfShield® PLUS G Biological Fungicide, TurfShield® PLUS Granules,
TurfShield® PL US Granules Biological Fungicide)		Bio Works Inc., Victor, NY, USAhttp://www.pesticideinfo.org (accessed on 7 February 2021)
https://www.atcc.org/products/20906 (accessed on 7 February 2021)
Viride clade of Trichoderma
T. asperellumT34EU077228
EU077227		T34 Biocontrol
(Asperello T34 BIOCONTROL)		Biobest
Biocontrol Technologies, Barcelona, Spain		https://www.pesticideinfo.org/
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/087301-00001-20200403.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021)
Trifender ProKwizda Agro Hungary Kft., Budapest, Hungaryhttps://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/bpdb/Reports/2043.htm (accessed on 07 December 2021)
https://kwizda.hu/AGRO_HU/products/t/Trifender%20Pro/Product%20Management/Registration%20Report/Trifender%20Pro%20Okirat.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021)
ICC012GQ351595
GQ351596		Bioten ™ WP b (Tenet™ WP and Remedier WP and Tenet™ T&O)Isagro USA, Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/bpdb/Reports/2043.htm (accessed on 7 December 2021)
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/080289-00009-20110217.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021)
T. atrovirideI-1237 Esquive WPAgrauxine, Marcq en Baroeul, Francehttps://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/bpdb/Reports/2046.htm (accessed on 7 December 2021)
https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2706 (accessed on 7 December 2021)
Tri-SoilAgrauxine, Marcq en Baroeul, Francehttps://ephy.anses.fr/ppp/tri-soil (accessed on 7 December 2021) https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/bpdb (accessed on 7 December 2021)
SC1HV500891-500896VINTEC®Bi-PA nv, Londerzeel, Belgiumhttps://www.pesticideinfo.org/
https://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/bpdb/Reports/2799.htm (accessed on 7 December 2021)
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/092083-00002-20200805.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021)
T. gamsii
(formerly: T. viride)		ICC080GQ351598Bioten ™ WP b (Tenet™ WP and Remedier WP and Tenet™ T&O)Isagro USA, Inc., Morrisville, NC, USAhttp://www.pesticideinfo.org (accessed on 7 December 2021)
https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides (accessed on 7 December 2021)
a Contains both Trichoderma afroharzianum Rifai strain T-22 and Trichoderma virens strain G-41; b Contains both Trichoderma asperellum ICC 012 and Trichoderma gamsii ICC 080.
Table
Table 2. Molecular markers and annealing temperature used for the PCR amplification of Trichoderma sp.
Table 2. Molecular markers and annealing temperature used for the PCR amplification of Trichoderma sp.
Amplified RegionPrimerReferenceAnnealing Temperature (°C)
ITS1/ITS2SR6RWhite et al. [36]50
LR1
tef1EF1 728FCarbone and Kohn [37]59
EF1 986R
Table
Table 3. Plant pathogenic fungi used in the determination of the biocontrol activity of the Trichoderma strains.
Table 3. Plant pathogenic fungi used in the determination of the biocontrol activity of the Trichoderma strains.
Reference Number *Fungal PathogenHostAccession Number **
CBS 477.71Aphanomyces cochlioidesBeta vulgaris L.HQ665241
JT2015Botryosphaeria dothideaJuglans regia L.MN706192
J2034Diaporthe eresJuglans regia L.MT111103
HUT01Diplodia seriataVitis vinifera L.KU377167
R.3Eutypa lataVitis vinifera L.OK178559
B.CS.5.4.20.1.BNeofusicoccum parvumVitis vinifera L.OK178560
CBS 337.29Pythium acantophoronAnanas sativus (L.) Merr.HQ665212
* Reference number in the CBS, or in the strain collection of the Microbiological Laboratory of Food Science Institute, University of Debrecen, Hungary. ** Accession number of the ribosomal DNA region.
Table
Table 4. Systemic fungicides used for the determination Trichoderma strains tolerance. Tested concentration means their final concentration in the potato dextrose agar medium.
Table 4. Systemic fungicides used for the determination Trichoderma strains tolerance. Tested concentration means their final concentration in the potato dextrose agar medium.
TargetPesticideActive IngredientTested Concentration of the Pesticide
(mg/L or mL/L)
Downy mildewOrvegoAmetoctradin399
Dimethomorph299.25
Powdery mildewRally Q SCMyclobutanil,45
Quinoxifen45
SercadisFluxapyroxad225
Talentum 20 EWMyclobutanil80
Grey moldChorus 50 WGCyprodinil469
Teldor 500 SCFenhexamid835
Table
Table 5. Trichoderma strains from endophytic woody tissues of ‘Furmint’ grapevine from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary in 2014.
Table 5. Trichoderma strains from endophytic woody tissues of ‘Furmint’ grapevine from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary in 2014.
Trichoderma SpeciesStrain No.NCBI GenBank Accession No.
ITS atef1b
Harzianum clade
T. afroharzianumTR04OK560827OK655888
T. atrobrunneumTR09OK560832OK655893
T. harzianumTR07OK560830OK655891
TR10OK560833OK655894
T. simmonsiiTR01OK560824OK655885
TR02OK560825OK655886
TR03OK560826OK655887
TR05OK560828OK655889
Longibrachiatum Clade
T. orientaleTR06OK560829OK655890
Viride Clade
T. gamsiiTR08OK560831OK655892
a ITS: Internal Transcribed Spacer. b tef1: Translation elongation factor 1-α.
Table
Table 6. (a) Mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma strains from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary at 5 °C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 192 h and 336 h. Standard error (SE) is in separate column. Different letters show significant differences between species and strains based on pairwise analysis with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05); (b) Mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma strains from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary at room temperature (18.5–25 °C) on PDA at 24 h and 54 h. Standard error (SE) is in separate column. Different letters show significant differences between species and strains based on pairwise analysis with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05); (c) Mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma strains from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary at 37 °C on PDA at 24 h and 30 h. Standard error (SE) is in separate column. Different letters show significant differences between species and strains based on pairwise analysis with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).
Table 6. (a) Mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma strains from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary at 5 °C on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 192 h and 336 h. Standard error (SE) is in separate column. Different letters show significant differences between species and strains based on pairwise analysis with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05); (b) Mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma strains from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary at room temperature (18.5–25 °C) on PDA at 24 h and 54 h. Standard error (SE) is in separate column. Different letters show significant differences between species and strains based on pairwise analysis with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05); (c) Mycelial growth of endophytic Trichoderma strains from the Tokaj Wine Region, Hungary at 37 °C on PDA at 24 h and 30 h. Standard error (SE) is in separate column. Different letters show significant differences between species and strains based on pairwise analysis with Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).
(a)
192 h 336 h
StrainsSpeciesMeanSE MeanSE
Harzianum Clade
T. afroharzianum16.172.20ab34.006.00ab
T. atrobrunneum17.001.44a27.501.61a
T. harzianum7.830.88c17.581.35d
T. simmonsii14.920.64ab28.790.85a
Longibrachiatum Clade
T. orientale12.670.17b22.670.44b
Viride Clade
T. gamsii8.001.15c22.170.60bc
TR01T. simmonsii15.330.44a30.330.93a
TR02T. simmonsii17.831.09b31.170.60a
TR03T. simmonsii13.830.33a29.170.60a
TR05T. simmonsii12.670.17c24.501.04b
TR07T. harzianum9.500.76a19.670.83a
TR10T. harzianum6.170.73b15.502.02a
(b)
24 h 54 h
StrainsSpeciesMeanSE MeanSE
Harzianum Clade
T. afroharzianum17.060.87b56.423.81ab
T. atrobrunneum18.290.41b51.252.42a
T. harzianum13.850.49a47.552.31a
T. simmonsii18.720.39bc60.132.04bc
Longibrachiatum Clade
T. orientale26.000.80d72.173.65d
Viride Clade
T. gamsii20.500.83c66.043.41c
TR01T. simmonsii17.921.58 0.0056.25
TR02T. simmonsii18.581.59 0.0057.54
TR03T. simmonsii20.423.29 0.0059.46
TR05T. simmonsii17.963.34 0.0067.25
TR07T. harzianum14.132.11 0.0047.79
TR10T. harzianum13.582.76 0.0047.31
(c)
24 h 30 h
StrainsSpeciesMeanSE MeanSE
Harzianum Clade
T. afroharzianum21.500.29c32.170.67c
T. atrobrunneum13.170.17b16.170.17b
T. harzianum14.170.53b18.330.44b
T. simmonsii20.630.43c28.830.55c
Longibrachiatum Clade
T. orientale39.830.33d58.670.17d
Viride Clade
T. gamsii0.000.00a0.000.00a
TR01T. simmonsii19.000.76 28.670.73
TR02T. simmonsii21.830.67 30.000.29
TR03T. simmonsii21.170.88 27.502.00
TR05T. simmonsii20.500.29 29.170.67
TR07T. harzianum14.001.00 18.500.87
TR10T. harzianum14.330.60 18.170.44
Table
Table 7. Biocontrol activity expressed in biocontrol index (BCI) of the Trichoderma strains toward plant pathogen fungi. Standard deviation (SD) is in brackets.
Table 7. Biocontrol activity expressed in biocontrol index (BCI) of the Trichoderma strains toward plant pathogen fungi. Standard deviation (SD) is in brackets.
BCI (%)
Fungal PathogenTR04TR05
Oomycota
Aphanomyces cochlioides90.37 (0.64)84.81 (0.64)
Pythium acantophoron100.00 (0.00)100.00 (0.00)
Ascomycota
Botryosphaeria dothidea100.00 (0.00)25.19 (0.64)
Diaporthe eres100.00 (0.00)100.00 (0.00)
Diplodia seriata100.00 (0.00)100.00 (0.00)
Eutypa lata100.00 (0.00)100.00 (0.00)
Neofusicoccum parvum95.19 (1.28)90.00 (1.11)
Table
Table 8. Mycelial growth inhibition of TR04 and TR05 Trichoderma strains by different systemic fungicides. Standard deviation (SD) is in brackets.
Table 8. Mycelial growth inhibition of TR04 and TR05 Trichoderma strains by different systemic fungicides. Standard deviation (SD) is in brackets.
Mycelial Growth Inhibition (%)
PesticideTR04TR05
Orvego0.00 (0.00)0.00 (0.00)
Rally Q SC28.82 (1.78)41.18 (2.10)
Sercadis0.00 (0.00)0.00 (0.00)
Talentum 20 EW57.6 (2.44)58.43 (0.61)
Chorus 50 WG43.33 (0.48)51.96 (0.98)
Teldor 500 SC0.00 (0.00)7.25 (1.88)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kovács, C.; Csótó, A.; Pál, K.; Nagy, A.; Fekete, E.; Karaffa, L.; Kubicek, C.P.; Sándor, E. The Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Trichoderma Fungi Isolated from Hungarian Grapevines. Part I. Isolation, Identification and In Vitro Studies. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121612

AMA Style

Kovács C, Csótó A, Pál K, Nagy A, Fekete E, Karaffa L, Kubicek CP, Sándor E. The Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Trichoderma Fungi Isolated from Hungarian Grapevines. Part I. Isolation, Identification and In Vitro Studies. Pathogens. 2021; 10(12):1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121612

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kovács, Csilla, András Csótó, Károly Pál, Antal Nagy, Erzsébet Fekete, Levente Karaffa, Christian P. Kubicek, and Erzsébet Sándor. 2021. "The Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Trichoderma Fungi Isolated from Hungarian Grapevines. Part I. Isolation, Identification and In Vitro Studies" Pathogens 10, no. 12: 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121612

APA Style

Kovács, C., Csótó, A., Pál, K., Nagy, A., Fekete, E., Karaffa, L., Kubicek, C. P., & Sándor, E. (2021). The Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Trichoderma Fungi Isolated from Hungarian Grapevines. Part I. Isolation, Identification and In Vitro Studies. Pathogens, 10(12), 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121612

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop