Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

arXiv:2311.11645 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Nov 2023 (v1), last revised 30 Apr 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Exploding AI Power Use: an Opportunity to Rethink Grid Planning and Management

Authors:Liuzixuan Lin, Rajini Wijayawardana, Varsha Rao, Hai Nguyen, Wedan Emmanuel Gnibga, Andrew A. Chien
View PDF
Abstract:The unprecedented rapid growth of computing demand for AI is projected to increase global annual datacenter (DC) growth from 7.2% to 11.3%. We project the 5-year AI DC demand for several power grids and assess whether they will allow desired AI growth (resource adequacy). If not, several "desperate measures" -- grid policies that enable more load growth and maintain grid reliability by sacrificing new DC reliability are considered.
We find that two DC hotspots -- EirGrid (Ireland) and Dominion (US) -- will have difficulty accommodating new DCs needed by the AI growth. In EirGrid, relaxing new DC reliability guarantees increases the power available to 1.6x--4.1x while maintaining 99.6% actual power availability for the new DCs, sufficient for the 5-year AI demand. In Dominion, relaxing reliability guarantees increases available DC capacity similarly (1.5x--4.6x) but not enough for the 5-year AI demand. New DCs only receive 89% power availability. Study of other US power grids -- SPP, CAISO, ERCOT -- shows that sufficient capacity exists for the projected AI load growth.
Our results suggest the need to rethink adequacy assessment and also grid planning and management. New research opportunities include coordinated planning, reliability models that incorporate load flexibility, and adaptive load abstractions.
Comments: Accepted by ACM e-Energy '24: the 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems
Subjects: Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as: arXiv:2311.11645 [cs.DC]
  (or arXiv:2311.11645v2 [cs.DC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.11645
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3632775.3661959

Submission history

From: Liuzixuan Lin [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:24:09 UTC (846 KB)
[v2] Tue, 30 Apr 2024 05:24:02 UTC (1,800 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess
eess.SY

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)