Revision as of 20:19, 18 June 2016 edit Hijiri88 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 37,389 edits →FYI ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:27, 6 July 2016 edit undo Hijiri88 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 37,389 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 242: ::Do you understand why this is inappropriate? If not, I will have to consider requesting that you be blocked from editing, as changing direct quotations to conform to (your interpretation of) Wikipedia's MOS, without indicating that the quote was altered, is unacceptable. ::[[User:Hijiri88\|Hijiri 88]] (<small>[[User talk:Hijiri88\|聖]][[Special:Contributions/Hijiri88\|やや]]</small>) 20:19, 18 June 2016 (UTC) == Notification of RFC for Korean MOS in regard to romanization == Hello! You contributed in some capacity to at least one of the recent discussions concerning romanization of Korean for historical topics. Should we use McCune-Reischauer or Revised for topics relating to pre-1945 Korea? If you are inclined, [[Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#RFC: Which romanization system should be used for pre-division Korean topics?\|please contribute here]]. [[User:Hijiri88\|Hijiri 88]] (<small>[[User talk:Hijiri88\|聖]][[Special:Contributions/Hijiri88\|やや]]</small>) 06:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Ryuch